Hubbry Logo
FundamentalismFundamentalismMain
Open search
Fundamentalism
Community hub
Fundamentalism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fundamentalism
Fundamentalism
Fundamentalism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Part of a series on the
Philosophy of religion
Religious concepts
God
Conceptions
Existence
Arguments for
Arguments against
By religion
Theories of religion
Philosophers of religion
Ancient and medieval
Early modern
19th-century
Contemporary
Related topics
Part of a series on
History of religions
Founding figures
Religious studies
Timeline
Prehistoric
Axial Age
Middle Ages
Early modern era
Modern era
Religions

Fundamentalism is a tendency among certain groups and individuals that is characterized by the application of a strict literal interpretation to scriptures, dogmas, or ideologies, along with a strong belief in the importance of distinguishing one's ingroup and outgroup,[1][2][3][4] which leads to an emphasis on some conception of "purity", and a desire to return to a previous ideal from which advocates believe members have strayed. The term is usually used in the context of religion to indicate an unwavering attachment to a set of irreducible beliefs (the "fundamentals").[5]

The term "fundamentalism" is generally regarded by scholars of religion as referring to a largely modern religious phenomenon which, while itself a reinterpretation of religion as defined by the parameters of modernism, reifies religion in reaction against modernist, secularist, liberal and ecumenical tendencies developing in religion and society in general that it perceives to be foreign to a particular religious tradition.[6] Depending upon the context, the label "fundamentalism" can be a pejorative rather than a neutral characterization, similar to the ways that calling political perspectives "right-wing" or "left-wing" can have negative connotations.[7][8]

Religious fundamentalism

[edit]

Buddhism

[edit]
See also: Buddhism and violence

Buddhist fundamentalism has targeted other religious and ethnic groups, as in Myanmar. A Buddhist-dominated country, Myanmar has seen tensions between Muslim minorities and the Buddhist majority, especially during the 2013 Burma anti-Muslim riots (possibly instigated by hardline groups such as the 969 Movement).[9] as well as during actions which are associated with the Rohingya genocide (2016 onwards).

Buddhist fundamentalism also features in Sri Lanka. Buddhist-dominated Sri Lanka has seen recent tensions between Muslim minorities and the Buddhist majority, especially during the 2014 anti-Muslim riots in Sri Lanka[10] and in the course of the 2018 anti-Muslim riots in Sri Lanka,[11] allegedly instigated by hardline groups such as the Bodu Bala Sena.[12]

Historic and contemporary examples of Buddhist fundamentalism occur in each of the three main branches of Buddhism: Theravada, Mahayana, and Vajrayana. In addition to the above examples of fundamentalism in Theravada-dominated societies, the reification of a protector deity, Dorje Shugden, by 19th-century Tibetan lama Pabongkhapa could be seen as an example of fundamentalism in the Vajrayana tradition. Dorje Shugden was a key tool in Pabongkhapa's persecution of the flourishing Rimé movement, an ecumenical movement which fused the teachings of the Sakya, Kagyu and Nyingma,[13] in response to the dominance of the Gelug school. While Pabongkhapa had an initially inclusive view early in his life, he received a number of signs that he had displeased Dorje Shugden by receiving teachings from non-Gelug schools, and thus initiated a revival movement that opposed the mixing of non-Gelug practices by Gelug practitioners.[14] The main function of the deity was presented as "the protection of the Ge-luk tradition through violent means, even including the killing of its enemies." Crucially, however, these "‘enemies’ of the Gelug refers less to the members of rival schools than to members of the Gelug tradition ‘who mix Dzong-ka-ba’s tradition with elements coming from other traditions, particularly the Nying-ma Dzok-chen’."[14]

In Japan, a prominent example has been the practice among some members of the Mahayana Nichiren sect of shakubuku – a method of proselytizing which involves the strident condemnation of other sects as deficient or evil.

Christianity

[edit]
Main articles: Christian fundamentalism, Christian nationalism, Christian terrorism, and Sectarian violence among Christians

George Marsden has defined Christian fundamentalism as the demand for strict adherence to certain theological doctrines, in opposition to Modernist theology.[15] Its supporters originally coined the term in order to describe what they claimed were five specific classic theological beliefs of Christianity, and the coinage of the term led to the development of a Christian fundamentalist movement within the Protestant community of the United States in the early part of the 20th century.[16] Fundamentalism as a movement arose in the United States, starting among conservative Presbyterian theologians at Princeton Theological Seminary in the late 19th century. It soon spread to conservatives among the Baptists and other denominations around 1910 to 1920. The movement's purpose was to reaffirm key theological tenets and defend them against the challenges of liberal theology and higher criticism.[17][18]

The concept of "fundamentalism" has roots in the Niagara Bible Conferences which were held annually between 1878 and 1897. During those conferences, the tenets widely considered to be fundamental Christian belief were identified.

"Fundamentalism" was prefigured by The Fundamentals: A Testimony To The Truth, a collection of twelve pamphlets published between 1910 and 1915 by brothers Milton and Lyman Stewart. It is widely considered to be the foundation of modern Christian fundamentalism.

In 1910, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church identified what became known as the five fundamentals:[19]

In 1920, the word "fundamentalist" was first used in print by Curtis Lee Laws, editor of The Watchman Examiner, a Baptist newspaper.[20] Laws proposed that those Christians who were fighting for the fundamentals of the faith should be called "fundamentalists".[21]

Theological conservatives who rallied around the five fundamentals came to be known as "fundamentalists". They rejected the existence of commonalities with theologically related religious traditions, such as the grouping of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism into one Abrahamic family of religions.[2] By contrast, while Evangelical groups (such as the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association) typically agree with the "fundamentals" as they are expressed in The Fundamentals, they are often willing to participate in events with religious groups that do not hold to the "essential" doctrines.[22]

Ethnic tribal religions

[edit]
See also: Indigenism and Ethnic religion

A few scholars label some indigenist revitalization movements within ethnic and indigenous religions who reject the changes brought by the modern states and major religions in favor of a return to traditional ways as fundamentalists in contrast with syncretic reform movements. Thus, numerous new generally fundamentalist Native American religious movements include the Pueblo Revolt (1680s), the Shawnee Prophet Movement (1805–1811), the Cherokee Prophet Movement (1811–1813), the Red Stick War (1813–1814), White Path's Rebellion (1826), the Winnebago Prophet Movement (1830–1832), the first Ghost Dance (1869–1870) and the second Ghost Dance (1889–1890), and the Snake movements among the Cherokee, Choctaw, and Muscogee Creek peoples during the 1890s.[23]

Hinduism

[edit]
See also: Hindutva, Hindu nationalism, and Hindu terrorism

The existence of fundamentalism in Hinduism is a complex and contradictory phenomenon. While some would argue that certain aspects of Gaudiya Vaishnavism manifest fundamentalist tendencies, these tendencies are more clearly displayed in Hindutva, the predominant form of Hindu nationalism in India today, and an increasingly powerful and influential voice within the religion. Hinduism includes a diversity of ideas on spirituality and traditions, but has no ecclesiastical order, no unquestionable religious authorities, no governing body, no prophet(s) nor any binding holy book; Hindus can choose to be polytheistic, pantheistic, panentheistic, pandeistic, henotheistic, monotheistic, monistic, agnostic, atheistic or humanist.[24][25][26] According to Doniger, "ideas about all the major issues of faith and lifestyle – vegetarianism, nonviolence, belief in rebirth, even caste – are subjects of debate, not dogma."[27]

Some would argue that, because of the wide range of traditions and ideas covered by the term Hinduism, a lack of theological 'fundamentals' means that a dogmatic 'religious fundamentalism' per se is hard to find.[28] Others point to the recent rise of Hindu nationalism in India as evidence to the contrary. The religion "defies our desire to define and categorize it." In India, the term "dharma" is preferred, which is broader than the Western term "religion."[29]

Hence, certain scholars argue that Hinduism lacks dogma and thus a specific notion of "fundamentalism," while other scholars identify several politically active Hindu movements as part of a "Hindu fundamentalist family."[30][31]

Islam

[edit]
Main articles: Islamic fundamentalism, Islamism, Islamofascism, Jihadism, Islamic terrorism, and Sectarian violence among Muslims

Fundamentalism within Islam goes back to the early history of Islam in the 7th century, to the time of the Kharijites.[32] From their essentially political position, they developed extreme doctrines that set them apart from both mainstream Shia and Sunni Muslims. The Kharijites were particularly noted for adopting a radical approach to takfir, whereby they declared other Muslims to be unbelievers and therefore deemed them worthy of death.[32][33][34][35]

The Shia and Sunni religious conflicts since the 7th century created an opening for radical ideologues, such as Ali Shariati (1933–77), to merge social revolution with Islamic fundamentalism, as exemplified by the Iranian Revolution in 1979.[36] Islamic fundamentalism has appeared in many countries;[37] the Salafi-Wahhabi version is promoted worldwide and financed by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Pakistan.[38][39][40][41][42][43]

The Iran hostage crisis of 1979–80 marked a major turning point in the use of the term "fundamentalism". The media, in an attempt to explain the ideology of Ayatollah Khomeini and the Iranian Revolution to a Western audience described it as a "fundamentalist version of Islam" by way of analogy to the Christian fundamentalist movement in the U.S. Thus was born the term Islamic fundamentalist, which became a common use of the term in following years.[44]

Judaism

[edit]
Main articles: Jewish fundamentalism and Jewish extremist terrorism

Jewish fundamentalism has been used to characterize militant religious Zionism, and both Ashkenazi and Sephardic versions of Haredi Judaism.[45] Ian S. Lustik has characterized "Jewish fundamentalism" as "an ultranationalist, eschatologically based, irredentist ideology".[46]

New Atheism

[edit]
Main article: New Atheism

The term New Atheism describes the positions of some atheist academics, writers, scientists, and philosophers of the 20th and 21st centuries.[47][48] Critics have described New Atheism as "secular fundamentalism".[49][50][51][52]

Politics

[edit]

In modern politics, fundamentalism has been associated with right-wing conservative ideology, especially social conservatism. Social conservatives often support policies in line with religious fundamentalism, such as support for school prayer and opposition to LGBT rights and abortion.[53] Conversely, secularism has been associated with left-wing or liberal ideology, as it takes the opposite stance to said policies,[6] however, various left-wing policies have likewise been deemed forms of fundamentalism,[54] notably stronger forms of wokeness.[55]

Political usage of the term "fundamentalism" has been criticized. It has been used by political groups to berate opponents, using the term flexibly depending on their political interests. According to Judith Nagata, a professor of Asia Research Institute in the National University of Singapore, "The Afghan mujahiddin, locked in combat with the Soviet enemy in the 1980s, could be praised as 'freedom fighters' by their American backers at the time, while the present Taliban, viewed, among other things, as protectors of American enemy Osama bin Laden, are unequivocally 'fundamentalist'."[56]

"Fundamentalist" has been used pejoratively to refer to philosophies perceived as literal-minded or carrying a pretense of being the sole source of objective truth, regardless of whether it is usually called a religion. For instance, the Archbishop of Wales has criticized "atheistic fundamentalism" broadly[57][58][59] and said "Any kind of fundamentalism, be it Biblical, atheistic or Islamic, is dangerous".[60] He also said, "the new fundamentalism of our age ... leads to the language of expulsion and exclusivity, of extremism and polarisation, and the claim that, because God is on our side, he is not on yours."[61] He claimed it led to situations such as councils calling Christmas "Winterval", schools refusing to put on nativity plays and crosses being removed from chapels. Others have countered that some of these attacks on Christmas are urban legends, not all schools do nativity plays because they choose to perform other traditional plays like A Christmas Carol or "The Snow Queen" and, because of rising tensions between various religions, opening up public spaces to alternate displays rather than the Nativity scene is an attempt to keep government religion-neutral.[62]

In The New Inquisition, Robert Anton Wilson lampoons the members of skeptical organizations such as the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal as fundamentalist materialists, alleging that they dogmatically dismiss any evidence that conflicts with materialism as hallucination or fraud.[63]

In France, during a protestation march against the imposition of restrictions on the wearing of headscarves in state-run schools, a banner labeled the ban as "secular fundamentalism".[64][65] In the United States, private or cultural intolerance of women wearing the hijab (Islamic headcovering) and political activism by Muslims also has been labeled "secular fundamentalism".[66]

The term "fundamentalism" is sometimes applied to signify a counter-cultural fidelity to a principle or set of principles, as in the pejorative term "market fundamentalism", used to imply exaggerated religious-like faith in the ability of unfettered laissez-faire or free-market capitalist economic views or policies to solve economic and social problems. According to economist John Quiggin, the standard features of "economic fundamentalist rhetoric" are "dogmatic" assertions and the claim that anyone who holds contrary views is not a real economist. Retired professor in religious studies Roderick Hindery lists positive qualities attributed to political, economic, or other forms of cultural fundamentalism, including "vitality, enthusiasm, willingness to back up words with actions, and the avoidance of facile compromise" as well as negative aspects such as psychological attitudes,[which?] occasionally elitist and pessimistic perspectives, and in some cases literalism.[67]

Criticism

[edit]

A criticism by Elliot N. Dorff:

In order to carry out the fundamentalist program in practice, one would need a perfect understanding of the ancient language of the original text, if indeed the true text can be discerned from among variants. Furthermore, human beings are the ones who transmit this understanding between generations. Even if one wanted to follow the literal word of God, the need for people first to understand that word necessitates human interpretation. Through that process human fallibility is inextricably mixed into the very meaning of the divine word. As a result, it is impossible to follow the indisputable word of God; one can only achieve a human understanding of God's will.[68]

Howard Thurman was interviewed in the late 1970s for a BBC feature on religion. He told the interviewer:

I say that creeds, dogmas, and theologies are inventions of the mind. It is the nature of the mind to make sense out of experience, to reduce the conglomerates of experience to units of comprehension which we call principles, or ideologies, or concepts. Religious experience is dynamic, fluid, effervescent, yeasty. But the mind can't handle these so it has to imprison religious experience in some way, get it bottled up. Then, when the experience quiets down, the mind draws a bead on it and extracts concepts, notions, dogmas, so that religious experience can make sense to the mind. Meanwhile, religious experience goes on experiencing, so that by the time I get my dogma stated so that I can think about it, the religious experience becomes an object of thought.[69]

Influential criticisms of fundamentalism include James Barr's books on Christian fundamentalism and Bassam Tibi's analysis of Islamic fundamentalism.[citation needed][70]

A study at the University of Edinburgh found that of its six measured dimensions of religiosity, "lower intelligence is most associated with higher levels of fundamentalism."[71]

Use as a label

[edit]

The Associated Press' AP Stylebook recommends that the term fundamentalist not be used for any group that does not apply the term to itself. Many scholars have adopted a similar position.[72] Other scholars, however, use the term in the broader descriptive sense to refer to various groups in various religious traditions including those groups that would object to being classified as fundamentalists, such as in the Fundamentalism Project.[73]

Tex Sample asserts that it is a mistake to refer to a Muslim, Jewish, or Christian fundamentalist. Rather, a fundamentalist's fundamentalism is their primary concern, over and above other denominational or faith considerations.[74]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Fundamentalism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Fundamentalism is a religious movement originating in early twentieth-century American Protestantism, defined by its insistence on the literal interpretation of sacred scriptures and unwavering adherence to core doctrinal tenets perceived as foundational and unchanging, in direct opposition to modernist theological dilutions and secular influences. The term derives specifically from , a collection of essays published between and and funded by oil magnate Lyman Stewart, which systematically defended orthodox beliefs such as , the , his , bodily , and miracles against emerging higher criticism and evolutionary theory. This movement emerged as a defensive response to perceived encroachments of within denominations, higher education, and culture, emphasizing not only doctrinal purity but also practical separation from compromising institutions and ecumenical compromises with unbelief. Key characteristics include a militant posture against —often manifested in public controversies like the 1925 —and a prioritization of scriptural authority over human reason or where they conflict, fostering communities organized around conferences, independent churches, and missions agencies. While initially confined to evangelical Protestant circles, the concept of fundamentalism has been analogously applied to analogous orthodox revivalist trends in other faiths, such as Jewish Haredi communities or Islamist groups seeking return to pristine interpretations, though these extensions risk diluting the term's original precision and have invited pejorative overuse to any strict religious as irrational or dangerous. Controversies surrounding fundamentalism often stem from its unyielding resistance to accommodation with progressive norms, leading to schisms within broader religious bodies and cultural clashes, yet its enduring appeal lies in providing epistemological certainty amid rapid societal shifts, as evidenced by persistent fundamentalist influence in American and global religious revitalizations.

Definition and Core Characteristics

Etymology and Conceptual Foundations

The term "fundamentalism" emerged in American English during the 1920s, formed by adding the suffix "-ism" to "fundamental," which traces to Latin fundamentum (foundation) via Old French and Middle English, denoting a return to core or essential principles. It was first popularized by Baptist pastor and editor Curtis Lee Laws in July 1920 at a Baptist conference in Buffalo, New York, where he urged supporters to "fight a good fight" for the "fundamentals" of Christianity against liberal theological shifts. Conceptually, the term's foundations lie in late-19th-century Protestant , particularly the Niagara Bible Conferences held annually from 1878 to 1897, which articulated seven "fundamentals" including the inerrancy of , the premillennial of Christ, and as non-negotiable truths derived directly from biblical texts. These ideas crystallized in (1909–1915), a 12-volume series funded by oil magnate Lyman Stewart and edited by scholars like A.C. Dixon and , which defended , the virgin birth, Christ's deity and miracles, vicarious atonement, and bodily against higher criticism and Darwinian . At its core, fundamentalism posits that foundational doctrines or texts possess absolute authority, unalterable by empirical challenges, historical contextualization, or cultural adaptation, often framing —such as scientific or theological —as corrosive threats requiring militant restoration of pristine origins. This entails a selective literalism prioritizing scriptural or doctrinal primacy over interpretive flexibility, rooted in causal realism that views deviation as leading to doctrinal erosion and societal decay, as evidenced by early fundamentalists' opposition to German imported to American seminaries post-1870s. While initially a badge of doctrinal purity in , the concept's expansion to other domains reflects analogous commitments to unchanging axioms amid perceived , though critics from academic quarters have sometimes conflated it with , overlooking its emphasis on verifiable scriptural consistency. Fundamentalism differs from religious in its proactive militancy and selective retrieval of doctrinal "fundamentals" as a reaction against , often resulting in or institutional challenges, whereas emphasizes gradual preservation of traditions within established frameworks without such radical confrontation. This distinction is evident in early 20th-century Protestant contexts, where fundamentalists rejected liberal theological influences aggressively, contrasting with conservatives who accommodated certain modern adaptations while upholding core tenets. Orthodoxy, by contrast, denotes adherence to historically codified doctrines accepted by a religious community's authoritative bodies, lacking the fundamentalist drive to combat perceived internal dilutions or external secular threats through novel reinterpretations of scripture. Fundamentalists may even critique orthodox institutions as compromised, prioritizing a purified essence over institutional continuity, as seen in movements that demand literal scriptural inerrancy beyond orthodox consensus. Traditionalism shares orthodoxy's emphasis on continuity but remains more passive, focusing on ritual and cultural preservation rather than the activist doctrinal purification central to fundamentalism. Extremism and fanaticism overlap with fundamentalism in potential for uncompromising zeal but diverge in scope and motivation: extremism encompasses non-religious ideologies and violent fringes without necessary ties to sacred "fundamentals," while fanaticism implies irrational emotional devotion untethered from systematic doctrinal claims. Fundamentalism, however, grounds its positions in a reasoned—albeit rigid—return to perceived originary principles, distinguishing it from mere ideological rigidity or unprincipled fervor, though critics argue the line blurs when fundamentalism endorses militancy.

Universal Principles Across Contexts

Fundamentalism manifests across religious and ideological domains through shared commitments to absolutist truth claims that prioritize foundational principles or texts as infallible guides for individual and societal conduct. These claims derive authority from perceived non-negotiable sources—such as scriptures, revelations, or ideological axioms—elevated above rational , historical contingency, or pluralistic , often legitimizing exclusionary or coercive to preserve doctrinal purity. A defining is the reactionary posture toward , encompassing secular governance, scientific empiricism, and , which fundamentalists interpret as existential threats undermining sacred order or ideological integrity. This opposition frames contemporary developments—such as , technological acceleration, or democratic pluralism—as deviations from an idealized primordial state, prompting calls for restoration through literal adherence to core tenets. Despite this antimodern , fundamentalist groups routinely adopt modern instruments, including , global networks, and organizational tactics, to amplify their reach and mobilize adherents. Universal to these movements is a grand historical structuring around themes of pristine origins, subsequent or fall, and eschatological redemption achievable only via unwavering fidelity to . This schema fosters a dualistic , categorizing forces as either aligned with the absolute truth or emblematic of moral decay, thereby rationalizing militancy—ranging from cultural to political confrontation—against perceived adversaries. Such narratives transcend religious boundaries, appearing in secular variants where ideological texts, like Marxist dialectics or environmental manifestos, serve as analogous inerrant blueprints demanding total allegiance. Selectivity in doctrinal retrieval further unites fundamentalist expressions: adherents emphasize a curated subset of principles as eternally binding while dismissing interpretive evolutions or contextual adaptations as dilutions. This approach rejects pluralism, positing the selected fundamentals as exhaustive and exclusive, incompatible with or coexistence with rival systems. In practice, it cultivates authoritarian tendencies, subordinating personal and institutional flexibility to the imperatives of purity, often evident in demands for legal or social reconfiguration to align with the foundational vision.

Historical Development

Origins in Protestant Christianity

The origins of fundamentalism trace to late 19th-century American , where conservative evangelicals responded to challenges from theological , biblical higher criticism, and Darwinian by reaffirming the 's inerrancy and supernatural elements of . Precursors included the Niagara Bible Conference (1878–1897), which emphasized premillennial and listed five core doctrines—inerrancy of Scripture, the virgin birth of Christ, his , bodily , and literal —as essential to orthodox faith. These gatherings, attended by figures like James H. Brookes and Gordon, fostered a militant defense against perceived doctrinal erosion in denominations like Presbyterians and . The term "fundamentalism" emerged from The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth, a 12-volume series of 90 essays published between 1910 and 1915, funded anonymously by oil magnate Lyman Stewart at a cost of approximately $300,000 (equivalent to over $9 million in 2023 dollars) and distributed free to over 3 million clergy, educators, and missionaries worldwide. Edited initially by Amzi C. Dixon and later by Reuben A. Torrey of the Bible Institute of Los Angeles, the essays—authored by theologians such as , James Orr, and Arno C. Gaebelein—defended against , critiqued , and upheld doctrines like the miracles of Christ and the unity of the Bible. While not explicitly listing "five fundamentals," the series crystallized opposition to accommodation with secular science and liberal theology, influencing Princeton Theological Seminary's Old Princeton orthodoxy until its reorganization in 1929. By the 1920s, the movement gained visibility through denominational battles, such as the 1920 Baptist usage of "fundamentalist" by Curtis Lee Laws to describe those fighting modernism in the Northern Baptist Convention, and the 1925 , which publicized fundamentalist resistance to teaching evolution in public schools. This era marked fundamentalism's shift from defensive apologetics to organized separatism, as leaders like formed independent institutions, including in 1929, to preserve confessional standards amid mainstream Protestant accommodation to cultural changes. Unlike broader , early fundamentalism prioritized militancy and , viewing compromise as , though it drew from transatlantic influences like British Keswick holiness teachings.

Expansion to Global Religious Movements

The concept of fundamentalism, initially developed in the context of early 20th-century American , was extended by scholars to analogous movements in non-Christian religions during the mid-to-late , as researchers identified recurring patterns of scriptural inerrancy, rejection of secular , and demands for societal reconfiguration according to ancient religious norms across diverse traditions. This conceptual broadening reflected causal responses to shared pressures, including Western colonial legacies, rapid , and the erosion of structures in post-colonial states, prompting revivalist efforts to reclaim doctrinal purity amid perceived cultural threats. By the 1970s, the term encompassed movements in , , , and beyond, though critics noted that such extensions sometimes overlooked religion-specific historical contingencies, with Islamic variants predating Protestant models by centuries. In , fundamentalist impulses manifested early through 18th-century Wahhabi reformism, initiated by , which condemned syncretic practices and forged a 1744 pact with the Al Saud clan to enforce strict , laying foundations for Saudi Arabia's 1932 establishment as a Wahhabi-dominated kingdom. The modern phase accelerated in the late with figures like and , who critiqued Ottoman and colonial influences, evolving into organized activism via the Muslim Brotherhood's 1928 founding in by , which sought total Islamic governance and inspired global offshoots. This trajectory culminated in high-profile expansions, such as the 1979 under , which overthrew the Pahlavi monarchy and instituted velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist), exporting Shia fundamentalism through networks supporting groups like , formed in 1982. Sunni counterparts, including the Afghan mujahideen's 1980s resistance to Soviet invasion—bolstered by Saudi and Pakistani funding totaling over $3 billion in U.S.-backed aid—further globalized the model, birthing transnational entities like in 1988. Jewish fundamentalism emerged distinctly in Israel following the 1967 Six-Day War, when conquests of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem were interpreted by religious Zionists as messianic fulfillment of biblical promises, galvanizing opposition to territorial compromise. The Gush Emunim ("Bloc of the Faithful") movement, established in 1974, spearheaded unauthorized settlements, growing from dozens in the 1970s to over 100 outposts by the 1980s, framing land retention as a divine imperative against secular state policies. This strain intertwined with ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) groups, whose population surged from 80,000 in 1948 to over 1 million by 2020, resisting assimilation through insular communities and political leverage via parties like Shas, founded in 1984. Hindu fundamentalism crystallized through ideology, coined by in his 1923 treatise Hindutva: Who is a Hindu?, which redefined as a militant ethno-cultural nationalism excluding Muslims and Christians as foreign. The (RSS), formed in 1925 amid Hindu-Muslim riots, built a paramilitary network emphasizing physical discipline and anti-colonial Hindu revival, influencing affiliates like the (BJP), which transitioned from marginal status—winning 2 seats in 1984—to governance in 1998 and 2014, with membership exceeding 100 million by 2020. Events like the 1992 mosque demolition by kar sevaks mobilized masses, reflecting causal backlash to partition's 1947 legacy and secular Nehruvian policies. Parallel developments occurred in other traditions, such as Sikh fundamentalism via the , which escalated post-1984 —resulting in over 3,000 deaths—and the , fostering militancy until the . Buddhist variants in Sri Lanka's Jathika Helu Urumaya party, launched in , and Myanmar's , active since 2012, similarly fused monastic authority with ethnic exclusionism against Muslim minorities. These global proliferations underscored fundamentalism's adaptability to local grievances, often amplifying through migration, media, and state sponsorship, with over 100 active groups identified across religions by the early 2000s.

Evolution into Secular and Political Forms

In the interwar period, as religious fundamentalism faced setbacks in Western contexts following events like the 1925 Scopes Trial, political philosophers identified analogous structures in secular totalitarian ideologies. Eric Voegelin's 1938 analysis in Die politischen Religionen described Bolshevism and National Socialism as "political religions," characterized by dogmatic creeds, eschatological visions of societal transformation, and demands for unconditional loyalty akin to religious fundamentalism's insistence on scriptural inerrancy. These movements substituted immanent political salvation for transcendent divine order, enforcing ideological purity through state mechanisms and suppressing dissent with messianic fervor, resulting in regimes that claimed over 100 million lives in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany by 1945. This framework extended the fundamentalist paradigm to secular politics by emphasizing causal mechanisms such as the replacement of empirical pluralism with absolutist narratives, where deviation was equated with heresy. Voegelin argued that such ideologies filled the vacuum left by declining traditional religion, drawing on gnostic impulses to "immanentize the eschaton"—accelerating utopian ends through human agency alone—evident in Stalin's purges (1936–1938, claiming 700,000 executions) and Hitler's racial doctrines codified in the 1935 Nuremberg Laws. Unlike religious variants grounded in historical texts, these political forms leveraged modern technology and mass propaganda for total control, as seen in the Soviet cult of personality around Lenin post-1924 and Nazi rallies at Nuremberg from 1933 onward. By the mid-20th century, the concept influenced broader critiques of ideological , with scholars applying fundamentalist traits—such as binary moral frameworks and rejection of —to non-religious dogmas. Post-1945 analyses, including Aron's observations on fascism's quasi-religious foundations, underscored how secular movements replicated fundamentalism's causal realism in pursuing monolithic truths, often leading to authoritarian consolidation. This evolution reflected not mere analogy but empirical patterns: totalitarian states enforced orthodoxy via purges and indoctrination, mirroring religious fundamentalists' defenses against , though secular versions prioritized or racial over . The term "secular fundamentalism" later emerged in academic discourse to denote rigid or anti-theistic militancy, as in 20th-century atheistic regimes' suppression of , but retained pejorative connotations without the term's original precision.

Religious Fundamentalism

Christian Fundamentalism

Christian fundamentalism arose within American Protestantism in the late 19th century as a defensive response to theological modernism, higher biblical criticism, and Darwinian evolution, emphasizing adherence to essential orthodox doctrines derived directly from Scripture. Participants in early Bible conferences, such as the Niagara Bible Conference convened annually from 1876 to 1897 at Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, articulated a 14-point creed in 1878 that affirmed the Bible's divine inspiration, verbal inerrancy, and the necessity of personal regeneration through Christ's atoning blood, while rejecting postmillennial optimism in favor of premillennial eschatology. These gatherings fostered a network of conservative evangelicals committed to resisting liberal theological shifts in seminaries and denominations, prioritizing scriptural authority over human reason or scientific consensus where they conflicted. The movement crystallized with the publication of : A Testimony to the Truth, a 12-volume series of 90 essays issued between 1910 and 1915, funded by oil magnate Lyman Stewart and distributed free to over 3 million clergy and educators by the Testimony Book Company. Authored by conservative scholars like and James Orr, the essays systematically opposed modernist views on , , and theology, defending "fundamentals" such as the inerrancy and of Scripture in its original autographs, the Christ, his full deity and sinless humanity, substitutionary atonement for sin, bodily resurrection, and the reality of miracles including future physical return of Christ. This literature provided a doctrinal bulwark, influencing the formation of the World's Christian Fundamentals Association in 1919, which mobilized against perceived in mainline denominations. The 1920s fundamentalist-modernist controversy intensified denominational conflicts, particularly in the Presbyterian Church and Northern Baptist Convention, over issues like ordination standards and seminary curricula. A pivotal event was the in July 1925 in , where high school teacher was prosecuted for violating a state law by teaching , pitting prosecutor , a fundamentalist advocate, against defense attorney . Though Scopes was convicted (later overturned on technicality), the trial, sensationalized by media figures like , caricatured fundamentalists as anti-intellectual, prompting many to retreat from public engagement toward "separatism"—a commitment to ecclesiastical separation from compromising institutions and individuals. Fundamentalism differs from broader in its militant opposition to not only externally but within the church, enforcing stricter boundaries through secondary separation (avoiding cooperation with those who tolerate error) and cultural disengagement, whereas evangelicals, post-1940s via figures like and the , pursued cultural influence and doctrinal minimalism. Fundamentalists maintain literal interpretation of Genesis creation accounts, reject uniformitarian geology, and prioritize confessional fidelity over , sustaining influence in independent churches, Baptist seminaries like (founded 1927), and missions emphasizing personal holiness. By the mid-20th century, while evangelicals grew through media and alliances, fundamentalism preserved a purist strand, critiquing neo-evangelical compromises as diluting .

Islamic Fundamentalism

Islamic fundamentalism refers to revivalist movements within Sunni Islam that seek to restore society to the purity of the seventh-century practices of Muhammad and his companions, as derived strictly from the Quran and authentic hadith, while condemning later theological innovations (bid'ah), Sufi practices, and secular governance as deviations warranting rejection or confrontation. These movements emphasize tawhid (monotheism) in its strictest form, often interpreting political authority as illegitimate unless based on divine sovereignty (hakimiyyah), and view modern Muslim states as jahiliyyah (pre-Islamic ignorance) due to their adoption of Western legal and democratic systems. Unlike Islamic modernism, which reconciles scripture with rationalism and contemporary science to adapt sharia flexibly, fundamentalism prioritizes literalist adherence, rejecting interpretive evolution (ijtihad) beyond the salaf (pious predecessors). The ideological foundations trace to medieval scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah (1263–1328), whose fatwas justified (declaring Muslims apostates) against rulers compromising Islamic law and endorsed defensive against internal threats, influencing later calls for overthrowing "un-Islamic" regimes. In the , Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (1703–1792) formalized these into , a puritanical denouncing shrine veneration and saint intercession as shirk (polytheism); in 1744, he allied with Muhammad ibn Saud, establishing the first Saudi state on a platform of enforced orthodoxy through conquest and da'wah (). This pact laid the groundwork for Saudi Arabia's 20th-century consolidation, where became state ideology, blending religious zeal with political expansionism. Twentieth-century organizations amplified these ideas politically. The , founded in in by , promoted gradual Islamization through , social services, and eventual sharia implementation, viewing Western colonialism and secular nationalism as existential threats; al-Banna's slogan "Islam is the solution" framed comprehensive governance under divine law, influencing branches across the Arab world and beyond. (1906–1966), a Brotherhood ideologue executed by Egypt's government, radicalized the discourse in his 1964 manifesto Milestones, applying to entire Muslim societies for submitting to man-made laws and advocating a (tali'a) to wage revolutionary against jahili rulers, concepts that diverged from traditional quietist Salafism by prioritizing offensive violence for systemic overthrow. (1903–1979), founder of Pakistan's in 1941, paralleled this by theorizing Islam as a totalitarian system opposing and , further embedding fundamentalist thought in South Asian politics. Jihadist offshoots exemplify the violent manifestations. , formed by in 1988 amid the Afghan-Soviet war, operationalized Qutbist ideas through global attacks, including the , 2001, assaults on the U.S., which killed 2,996 people and aimed to expel Western influence from Muslim lands. The , emerging in 1994 from Deobandi madrassas influenced by Wahhabi funding, seized in 1996 and imposed a harsh Hanafi interpretation of , banning women from education, work, and public unaccompanied travel, enforcing mandates and public floggings for moral infractions. The (ISIS), declaring a in 2014, escalated to mass excommunication of Shia, , and dissenting Sunnis, conducting beheadings, , and territorial conquests that resulted in tens of thousands of deaths across and before territorial defeat in 2019; its Salafi-jihadist blend drew from Wahhabi purity and Qutbist . Saudi Arabia's oil wealth facilitated global dissemination, with estimates of over €76 billion invested since the in mosques, madrassas, and scholars promoting Wahhabi-Salafi doctrines, countering Nasserist and Iranian Shiism while securing domestic clerical loyalty post-1979 . This export, often via charities and aid, correlated with rising extremism in recipient regions like and , though local adaptations varied; critics note that while not all funded entities turned violent, the emphasis on scriptural literalism eroded tolerant traditions, fostering environments conducive to radical . Empirical data from conflict zones show fundamentalist governance prioritizing ideological purity over welfare, with under rule (1996–2001 and post-2021) witnessing plummeting female literacy and increased honor-based violence, underscoring causal links between doctrinal rigidity and suppressed individual agency.

Jewish Fundamentalism

Jewish fundamentalism encompasses ultra-conservative strands within that prioritize literal adherence to the and (Jewish law), viewing these texts as divinely immutable and rejecting accommodations to secular or Enlightenment . Unlike more adaptive forms of , it posits an unbroken chain of tradition as the sole arbiter of truth, often manifesting in communal insularity and resistance to state institutions perceived as eroding religious authority. In contemporary , where demographic and political dynamics amplify its visibility, divides into Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) and the activist of , each driven by causal responses to Zionism's secular origins and post-Holocaust existential pressures. Haredi Judaism, the insular ultra-Orthodox sector, exemplifies fundamentalist withdrawal from modern society, emphasizing perpetual Torah study for men, rigid gender segregation, and high fertility as fulfillments of divine commandments. Emerging from near-extinction after the Holocaust—which decimated European yeshivas—Haredi communities rebuilt through institutional replication of pre-war structures, prioritizing spiritual preservation over temporal engagement. By 2024, Israel's Haredi population reached approximately 1.39 million, comprising 13.9% of the total populace, fueled by average fertility rates exceeding six children per woman, far outpacing secular Jewish demographics. Politically, Haredi parties like United Torah Judaism and Shas leverage coalition bargaining for subsidies supporting yeshivas and exemptions from military service, affecting over 13% of draft-age males as of recent data, a policy rooted in the view that Torah scholarship supersedes national defense obligations. This stance reflects a causal realism wherein religious purity demands separation from irreligious influences, including Zionism initially deemed heretical, though pragmatic alliances have since formed. Religious Zionism, conversely, fuses fundamentalist theology with nationalist activism, interpreting Israel's 1948 establishment as the onset of messianic redemption and biblical land promises as mandates for territorial expansion. Influenced by Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook (1865–1935), who reframed secular Zionism as divine providence, and his son Zvi Yehuda Kook (1891–1982), this strand birthed Gush Emunim in 1974, which spearheaded West Bank settlements post-1967 Six-Day War, viewing Judea and Samaria as inalienable Eretz Yisrael. By 2023, over 500,000 Jewish settlers resided in these territories, with fundamentalist subgroups like Hilltop Youth employing vigilante tactics to prevent withdrawals, as seen in escalated violence following the 2005 Gaza disengagement. Politically empowered, the Religious Zionism alliance secured 14 Knesset seats in the 2022 elections, enabling ministerial roles that prioritize settlement legalization over peace concessions, grounded in a literalist reading where Jewish sovereignty fulfills prophetic imperatives. This militancy stems from a first-principles assertion of scriptural priority over international norms, contrasting Haredi passivity yet sharing anti-assimilationist cores. These movements' growth—Haredi via demographics, Religious Zionist via —challenges Israel's secular foundations, with empirical projections indicating Haredim could reach 31% of the by 2065 absent policy shifts, amplifying tensions over and cultural norms. Scholarly analyses, often from Western academia, critique these as threats to pluralism, yet overlook how fundamentalist resilience empirically counters assimilation rates exceeding 50% among non-Orthodox globally, preserving amid historical attrition. Causal drivers include reactions to perceived existential threats, from trauma to Arab-Israeli conflicts, fostering absolutist commitments verifiable in voting patterns and settlement persistence despite evacuations.

Hindu and Other Non-Abrahamic Fundamentalisms

Hindu fundamentalism, frequently associated with the ideology of , emphasizes the revival of Hindu cultural primacy in through opposition to perceived foreign religious encroachments, particularly from and , while promoting a unified Hindu identity rooted in ancient Vedic traditions. Unlike Abrahamic fundamentalisms, which typically center on literal interpretations of singular scriptures, Hindu variants lack a comparable doctrinal core due to Hinduism's diverse, non-creedal structure, rendering "fundamentalism" here more akin to ethno-nationalist revivalism than strict scripturalism. The term , meaning "Hinduness," was coined by in his 1923 pamphlet , which posits that true Indians must regard the nation as both homeland and sacred territory, excluding those with loyalties to extraterritorial holy sites. Key organizations driving this movement include the (RSS), founded on September 27, 1925, by Keshav Baliram Hedgewar in as a cultural volunteer group to foster Hindu discipline and unity amid perceived threats from Muslim separatism and colonial rule. The RSS, with an estimated 5-6 million active members by 2023, operates through shakhas (daily gatherings) emphasizing physical training, ideological via texts like Savarkar's works, and social service, while inspiring affiliates like the (BJP), which secured national majorities in the 2014 and 2019 elections under , advancing policies such as the 2019 revocation of and Kashmir's autonomy and the 2020 Citizenship Amendment Act favoring non-Muslim refugees. Critics, including reports, attribute incidents like the 1992 in —claimed by as Lord Ram's birthplace—and subsequent communal riots killing over 2,000, primarily , to RSS-linked mobilization, though proponents frame these as corrections to historical injustices under Mughal rule. Empirical data from India's 2011 census shows at 79.8% of the population, with at 14.2%, fueling narratives of demographic shifts via higher minority rates (2.6 vs. 2.1 for per 2019-21 ) and alleged forced conversions, prompting anti-conversion laws in 10 states by 2023. In practice, Hindu fundamentalist activities include ghar wapsi (homecoming) reconversion campaigns by groups like the , targeting Christians and to restore purported ancestral Hindu affiliations, with over 1,000 reconversions reported annually in some states since 2014. Cow protection vigilantism, rooted in Hindu reverence for the animal as sacred, has led to over 50 deaths in lynchings between 2015 and 2020, per data, often targeting and Dalits suspected of beef consumption or trade, though official statistics indicate declining overall rates post-2014 compared to prior decades. Scholarly analyses note that while Western-influenced Hindu reformers like those in the (founded 1875 by ) advocated scriptural return to against idolatry, modern blends this with political nationalism, prioritizing territorial integrity over theological purity. Among other non-Abrahamic traditions, Buddhist fundamentalism emerges in ethno-religious conflicts, as in Myanmar's led by monk Ashin Wirathu since 2001, which portrays as a demographic and cultural threat to , contributing to the 2017 Rohingya crisis displacing over 700,000 via violence that the UN labeled genocidal, though Burmese officials deny systematic intent. In , the (BBS, founded 2012) advocates Sinhalese Buddhist supremacy, inciting anti-Muslim riots in 2014 and 2018 that damaged over 100 mosques, amid a 74% Buddhist majority per 2012 census, framing such actions as defense against "extremist" minorities despite 's doctrinal emphasis on non-violence. Sikh fundamentalism, less doctrinal due to the faith's reformist origins under in the 15th century, manifested politically in the Khalistan separatist insurgency (1980s-1990s), seeking an independent Sikh state in , marked by the 1984 assault on the —killing up to 3,000—and subsequent anti-Sikh riots claiming 3,000 lives, driven by demands for scriptural adherence to the and opposition to perceived Hindu assimilation. These cases illustrate how non-Abrahamic fundamentalisms adapt selective traditionalism to modern nationalist grievances, often prioritizing communal survival over universalist tenets.

Secular and Ideological Fundamentalisms

Economic and Market Fundamentalism

Economic and market fundamentalism denotes a doctrinal commitment to laissez-faire principles, asserting that free markets, driven by individual self-interest and price signals, inherently produce efficient outcomes superior to state-directed alternatives, with government roles confined to enforcing contracts, protecting property rights, and preventing coercion. This perspective views deviations such as subsidies, tariffs, or extensive regulations as distortions that erode prosperity, drawing from classical liberal foundations like Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations (1776), which emphasized the "invisible hand" of market coordination. Adherents, including economists from the Austrian and Chicago schools, contend that empirical regularities—such as innovation spurred by competition and resource allocation via decentralized knowledge—validate this framework over interventionist models prone to knowledge problems and rent-seeking. The intellectual lineage traces to 20th-century revivals amid perceived failures of Keynesian policies, with Friedrich Hayek's The Road to Serfdom (1944) arguing that economic planning leads inexorably to totalitarianism by undermining voluntary cooperation, and Milton Friedman's Capitalism and Freedom (1962) advocating deregulation, school choice, and monetary rules to curb inflation. Implementation occurred notably under Margaret Thatcher's privatization of state industries (1979–1990), reducing UK government spending from 45.1% of GDP in 1979 to 39.5% by 1990, and Ronald Reagan's tax cuts (top rate from 70% to 28% via 1981 and 1986 acts), correlating with GDP growth averaging 3.5% annually in the 1980s. These policies aligned with neoliberal reforms in developing nations, as in Chile's post-1973 liberalization under the "Chicago Boys," where GDP per capita rose from $2,500 in 1980 to over $10,000 by 2010 after tariff reductions and pension privatization. Empirical assessments, such as the Heritage Foundation's , reveal a positive correlation: countries scoring above 70 (deemed "mostly free") averaged 3.5% annual GDP per capita growth from 1995–2023, versus 1.2% for those below 50 ("repressed"), controlling for factors like initial income levels. Similarly, the Fraser Institute's data show nations in the top quartile of —measured by sound money, freedom, and regulatory efficiency—exhibit 2.5 times higher rates and lower incidence than the bottom quartile. Critics, often from interventionist paradigms prevalent in academia, allege market fundamentalism exacerbates inequality (e.g., U.S. rising from 0.37 in 1980 to 0.41 in 2020) or ignores externalities like , yet causal analyses indicate absolute reductions—global extreme fell from 42% in 1980 to 8.5% in 2023—stem from market-oriented growth rather than redistribution alone. Such critiques warrant scrutiny given institutional incentives favoring expansive government roles, as evidenced by overrepresentation of statist views in departments. While labeled "fundamentalist" pejoratively by opponents to imply irrational dogma akin to religious zealotry, proponents ground their stance in falsifiable propositions testable against historical episodes like the Soviet collapse (GDP per capita stagnating at ~$6,000 versus Western averages exceeding $20,000 by 1990) or East Asia's export-led booms post-liberalization. This rigidity against interventions preserves systemic incentives for productivity, though excesses like in bailouts (e.g., 2008 interventions totaling $700 billion in TARP) highlight needs for consistent rule application over selective rescues. Overall, the paradigm's resilience derives from its alignment with observed patterns of wealth creation across diverse contexts, from Hong Kong's 7% average growth (1950–1997) under minimal intervention to Estonia's post-1992 reforms yielding 5% annual GDP expansion.

Political and Nationalist Variants

Political fundamentalism refers to the rigid, absolutist adherence to a political or , where core principles are treated as unassailable truths requiring literal interpretation and total obedience, often rejecting pluralism, compromise, or empirical revision. Unlike religious variants, it substitutes sacred scriptures with ideological texts, manifestos, or leaders' pronouncements, fostering a quasi-sacral view of that prioritizes purity over . Key characteristics include dualistic worldviews pitting ideologues against corrupting "others," organized efforts to impose doctrinal conformity through state mechanisms, and emotional mobilization via narratives of and redemption. This mindset has historically fueled totalitarian systems, where deviation invites suppression, as ideological "fundamentals" demand societal reconfiguration to align with the doctrine's vision. Historical manifestations include and , ideologies that operationalized political fundamentalism through centralized authority and mass indoctrination. In Benito Mussolini's , doctrinally elevated the state as the supreme ethical entity, demanding subordination of individuals and classes to national unity, as outlined in the 1932 "," which denounced liberalism's and advocated anti-materialist . This led to institutional enforcement, such as the creation of the in 1927 to eliminate dissent, embodying a fundamentalist rejection of ideological rivals. Similarly, Soviet under and treated Marxist texts as infallible guides, purging "revisionists" to preserve doctrinal orthodoxy; Stalin's regime, viewing class enemies as irredeemable, executed or imprisoned millions in labor camps from the 1920s onward, with the 1930s collectivization campaigns alone causing an estimated 5-10 million deaths from and repression. Nationalist variants of political fundamentalism sacralize the nation-state or ethnic group as the paramount entity, insisting on its historical or cultural purity against modernist dilutions like or internationalism. This often involves mythologizing a foundational past and enforcing homogeneity, with opponents framed as traitors undermining national essence. exemplified this through irredentist policies reclaiming "lost" territories, such as the 1935 invasion of to assert imperial destiny, while suppressing regional autonomies. In ethnonationalist forms, it promotes causal realism in attributing societal ills to external or internal "pollutants," justifying coercive measures; for instance, interwar European movements drew on this to advocate exclusionary citizenship laws, prioritizing blood-and-soil ties over civic inclusivity. Such variants thrive amid perceived existential threats, mirroring religious fundamentalism's defensive posture but grounding legitimacy in secular narratives of collective destiny.

Atheist and Scientific Fundamentalisms

Atheist fundamentalism denotes a form of dogmatic characterized by rigid intolerance toward religious belief, mirroring aspects of religious fundamentalism through uncompromising assertions and dismissal of opposing views as irrational or harmful. This label has been applied particularly to the movement emerging in the mid-2000s, led by figures such as , , and , who advocated militant critique of religion via books like Dawkins' (2006), which equates faith with intellectual delusion and calls for its societal marginalization. Critics, including philosopher , contend that lacks the doctrinal structure for true fundamentalism, as it constitutes mere absence of belief rather than prescriptive , rendering the term a to equate non-belief with . Nonetheless, empirical observations of New Atheist reveal patterns of absolutism, such as Harris's 2004 claim in The End of Faith that religious moderates enable fundamentalism by perpetuating doctrine, justifying broad condemnation without granular analysis of varied beliefs. Proponents of the fundamentalist critique argue that exhibits intolerance by prioritizing empirical disproof of theism while ignoring 's role in foundational questions like meaning and , leading to a quasi-evangelical push for secular dominance. For instance, Dawkins's 2006 assertion that teaching children constitutes parallels fundamentalist , fostering cultural antagonism rather than neutral . This stance contributed to the movement's peak influence around 2007–2010, with bestsellers selling millions, but waned by the amid internal schisms and external pushback, including accusations of enabling reactionary religious resurgence by framing all faith as equally irrational. Academic analyses, often from journals, highlight how such risks epistemic closure by rejecting non-falsifiable critiques, though coverage—frequently left-leaning—tends to underemphasize these dogmatisms in favor of portraying as inherently rational. Scientific fundamentalism, closely aligned with , manifests as an unwavering belief that empirical alone yields valid , extending its domain to realms like and metaphysics where methodological limits apply. Defined as the assertion of 's "universal competence," this view, exemplified by chemist Peter Atkins's 1995 claim that natural encompasses all explanatory needs, dismisses non-empirical disciplines as superfluous or illusory. In practice, it appears in policy debates, such as insistence on data-driven ethics in , ignoring causal complexities like human values derived from evolutionary history yet irreducible to lab metrics; for example, attempts to quantify moral progress solely via scientific metrics overlook historical regressions, as seen in programs justified under early 20th-century scientistic banners. Critiques portray scientific fundamentalism as dogmatic for enforcing a materialist that precludes alternative epistemologies, such as philosophical first principles underpinning scientific axioms themselves—e.g., the uniformity of , unprovable by induction alone. Peer-reviewed examinations note its risks in stifling innovation, as when consensus on "settled " delayed paradigm shifts like until 1960s evidence compelled acceptance, revealing how institutional adherence can mimic orthodoxy. Within atheist circles, this fuses with fundamentalism by weaponizing against , claiming empirical incompatibility (e.g., Harris's neuroscientific reduction of to states, rejecting dualist counterarguments a priori), yet empirical shows 's self-correcting —falsifying 20–30% of published findings in fields like via replication crises since —undermines absolutist pretensions. Such overreach, while advancing domains like physics (e.g., confirmation in 2012), fosters hubris, as evidenced by Atkins's unyielding denial of 's boundaries despite proving formal systems' limits since 1931.

Sociological and Psychological Aspects

Causes and Drivers of Fundamentalist Movements

Fundamentalist movements often emerge as a reactive response to the disruptions of , including rapid industrialization, , and , which erode traditional social structures and authority. Scholars such as and R. Scott Appleby, in their multi-volume Fundamentalism Project conducted in the 1990s, characterized fundamentalism not as mere but as a modern phenomenon: militants selectively adopt contemporary organizational tactics—like media and —to combat perceived existential threats from liberal individualism and . This framework posits that fundamentalists perceive modernity's pluralism and relativism as undermining divinely ordained truths, prompting a quest for absolutist frameworks to restore communal identity and moral order. Empirical patterns support this, with surges in fundamentalist activity correlating to periods of intense ; for instance, post-World War II economic booms in the West and upheavals in the Global South from the 1950s onward accelerated secular policies that alienated religious constituencies. Socioeconomic dislocations further drive recruitment, particularly in contexts of inequality and state failure. Research indicates that lower , rural-urban migration, and economic marginalization heighten vulnerability to fundamentalist appeals, as these offer alternative networks for welfare and status denied by failing secular institutions. In developing regions, fundamentalist groups have capitalized on structural adjustments imposed by in the 1980s and 1990s, which widened income gaps—evidenced by Gini coefficients rising in many Middle Eastern and African states during that era—positioning themselves as providers of amid corruption and privatization fallout. Political exclusion compounds this: where democratic channels falter or authoritarian regimes suppress , fundamentalists frame their as a totalizing solution to voids, as seen in the 1979 , where economic grievances intertwined with to propel Khomeini's movement. Psychological factors predispose individuals to fundamentalist ideologies amid uncertainty, favoring rigid belief systems that reduce . Studies link religious fundamentalism to lower trait openness and , traits measurable via personality inventories like the Big Five, which correlate with preference for binary moral frameworks over ambiguity. Neuroimaging research reveals heightened activity in the brain's threat-detection networks—such as the and —among high fundamentalists, akin to patterns in obsessive-compulsive disorder, suggesting an innate defensive posture against worldview challenges. This aligns with causal mechanisms where existential anxieties, amplified by globalization's since the late , drive adherents toward ideologies promising certainty and in-group solidarity, though such traits do not universally predict and may confer adaptive benefits like resilience in unstable environments. Globalization and perceived act as catalysts by intensifying identity threats, prompting retrenchment into primordial loyalties. Sociologist argues that the diffusion of cosmopolitan values via media and migration since the erodes local traditions, eliciting fundamentalist backlash in religions with strong scriptural foundations, unlike more adaptable folk practices. Data from Pew Research surveys in the 2010s show fundamentalist self-identification rising in regions exposed to high migration inflows, such as and , where narratives of civilizational clash—framed around demographic shifts and value erosion—mobilize support. These drivers interact dynamically: for example, in secular variants like market fundamentalism, deregulation zeal post-1980s neoliberal reforms mirrors religious patterns by absolutizing economic doctrines amid inequality spikes, illustrating fundamentalism's adaptability across domains. Religious fundamentalist populations have exhibited higher fertility rates compared to their moderate or secular counterparts, contributing to demographic expansion in various global regions. For instance, orthodox Jewish communities, evangelical Christians in and , and Salafi Muslims in parts of the and maintain average birth rates exceeding 2.5 children per woman, often double those of liberal religious or non-religious groups. This pattern stems from doctrinal emphases on traditional family structures and pro-natalist teachings, which correlate with lower rates of contraception use and delayed . In the United States, while overall Christian affiliation has declined to 63% of adults by from 75% in 2011, the proportion of strictly religious adherents within has increased, with evangelicals rising from 56% to 64% of Protestants between 2016 and 2020. Globally, benefits from rapid growth in the Global South, where sub-Saharan Africa's Christian population is projected to rise from 517 million in 2010 to 1.1 billion by 2050, characterized by higher levels. follows similar trajectories, with Muslim-majority countries showing rates averaging 2.9 children per woman as of 2015-2020, fueling projections that will nearly equal 's global share by mid-century, amid rising conservative adherence in youth cohorts. Secular and ideological fundamentalisms, such as militant atheism or dogmatic , show stagnant or declining demographic vitality due to (below 1.5 children per woman in many Western secular cohorts) and aging populations. Projections indicate that by 2050, the combined populations of Jewish, Muslim, and Christian fundamentalists will surpass secularists numerically, driven by differential birth rates and from high-fertility religious regions comprising 97% of global . This shift underscores a broader reversal of , with fundamentalist groups poised to constitute a larger societal amid and economic pressures that often reinforce doctrinal insularity.

Comparisons with Modernist and Relativist Ideologies

Fundamentalism stands in stark opposition to modernist ideologies, which prioritize to scientific advancements, , and progressive reinterpretation of doctrines. In the early 20th-century Fundamentalist-Modernist controversy within American Protestantism, fundamentalists defended the inerrancy of scripture and literal interpretations against modernists' willingness to accommodate and evolutionary theory, viewing the latter as eroding foundational truths. This conflict, peaking in events like the 1925 , highlighted fundamentalism's rejection of modernism's emphasis on religious thought as subject to ongoing revision and alignment with secular . Relativist ideologies, which posit that truth and morality are contingent on cultural, historical, or individual contexts rather than absolute, further diverge from fundamentalism's commitment to unchanging creeds and divine . Fundamentalists assert objective moral standards derived from sacred texts, contrasting with relativism's denial of universal norms, which they see as fostering moral decay and societal fragmentation. Sociologist Peter Berger has described both fundamentalism and relativism as extreme responses to modernity's disruptions, yet fundamentalism seeks to restore pre-modern certainties against relativism's embrace of pluralism and toward absolutes. Empirical studies link religious fundamentalism to rule-based moral and low tolerance for , underscoring its incompatibility with relativist frameworks that prioritize subjective experience over doctrinal rigor. While some analyses portray fundamentalism as a paradoxical form of —employing modern organizational tactics to resist cultural shifts—its core causal dynamic remains a defensive reclamation of against modernist and relativist erosion of hierarchies. This opposition manifests in fundamentalists' active engagement with modern media and to counter perceived threats, as seen in global movements reacting to globalization's homogenizing effects since the late . In essence, fundamentalism privileges empirical fidelity to originating principles over the flux of modernist innovation or relativist contingency, often leading to heightened social tensions in pluralistic societies.

Impacts and Consequences

Positive Outcomes and Achievements

Fundamentalist commitments to unchanging principles have been associated with improved outcomes, including greater , purpose in life, and effective mechanisms. Empirical research shows that religious fundamentalism correlates positively with solidified beliefs that foster psychological , such as reduced vulnerability to negative emotions and enhanced through structured worldviews. For instance, fundamentalist individuals often utilize positive religious strategies—like seeking spiritual support and collaborative problem-solving with a —which inversely relate to maladaptive responses and promote resilience during adversity. In insular fundamentalist communities, adherence to doctrinal norms yields measurable social and . The , exemplifying Protestant fundamentalism, maintain business failure rates below 10% in the first five years—contrasting sharply with the 65% national average—and achieve approximately 90% retention of members, curbing out-migration through communal solidarity and . Similarly, ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities exhibit fertility rates driving annual of 4.2%, sustaining demographic expansion amid broader societal declines in birth rates. These patterns reflect causal links between strict adherence to family-centric tenets and outcomes like lower prevalence and coherent social structures, countering narratives that overlook such data in favor of bias toward secular . Ideological variants, such as market fundamentalism, have driven prosperity by prioritizing empirical incentives over interventionist policies; historical in the under Reagan, rooted in principled free-market advocacy, correlated with GDP growth averaging 3.5% annually and falling from 10.8% in 1982 to 5.3% by 1989. However, these gains stem from verifiable causal mechanisms like spurred by reduced barriers, though attribution requires distinguishing from factors like technological advances. Overall, fundamentalism's emphasis on non-negotiable truths enables resistance to , yielding cohesive groups with superior metrics in family formation and enterprise longevity where mainstream sources underemphasize due to institutional preferences for ideologies.

Criticisms and Negative Associations

Fundamentalism, across religious and ideological variants, has been criticized for fostering intolerance and toward out-groups, with empirical studies showing positive correlations between religious fundamentalism and against homosexuals, women, and adherents of other faiths. For instance, a 2013 dissertation analyzing survey data found religious fundamentalism significantly predicted , particularly toward sexual minorities, independent of other variables like political . Critics argue this stems from rigid adherence to doctrinal absolutes, which prioritizes conformity over empirical pluralism and causal nuance in . A key negative association is with , including and intimate partner , where fundamentalist beliefs legitimize aggression against perceived threats to . Research links religious fundamentalism to support for religiously motivated , as seen in social psychological analyses of terrorist ideologies. Quantitative data from U.S. surveys indicate higher fundamentalist identification correlates with approval of and partner , with one study of Christian respondents showing fundamentalist levels predicting both endorsement and perpetration of such acts. Ideological fundamentalisms, such as unchecked market absolutism, face similar critiques for enabling through policies exacerbating inequality, though empirical ties are less direct than in religious cases. Psychologically, fundamentalism is associated with reduced and , traits that hinder adaptation to contradicting core tenets. Neuroscientific and behavioral studies suggest fundamentalist cognition favors binary moral frameworks over probabilistic reasoning, potentially amplifying denial of on topics like or . This manifests socially as resistance to modernization, with critics noting fundamentalism's role in polarizing communities and eroding trust in institutions perceived as relativistic. Environmentally, higher fundamentalism predicts negative attitudes toward conservation, opposing spiritual or calls for amid verifiable ecological . Detractors, including scholars wary of academic overgeneralization, contend these traits arise not inherently from "fundamentals" but from absolutist interpretations that suppress , leading to authoritarian control and empirical stagnation. While some data show mitigating , fundamentalist strains amplify risks by framing opposition as existential threats, as evidenced in global patterns of out-group . Such associations underscore fundamentalism's potential to undermine causal realism, favoring unyielding over data-driven progress.

Case Studies of Societal Influence

The 1979 Iranian Revolution exemplifies the societal transformation wrought by Shia , as Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's movement overthrew the Pahlavi monarchy and established the , embedding strict interpretations of into governance and daily life. Within months, the mandated hijab enforcement for women, restricted mixed-gender interactions, and revised family laws to prioritize patriarchal authority, such as lowering the marriage age for girls to 9 in some interpretations of Islamic . Education curricula were overhauled to emphasize Islamic over secular subjects, with universities purged of perceived Western influences by 1980, leading to a brain drain of over 1 million professionals by the mid-1980s. This fundamentalist framework influenced demographics, as birth rates surged initially due to pronatalist policies aligned with religious ideals, peaking at 6.5 children per woman in 1988 before declining. Economically, the revolution fostered self-reliance rhetoric but resulted in sanctions and isolation, with GDP per capita stagnating at around $2,000 (in 1980 dollars) through the 1980s amid war and ideological purges. In Afghanistan, the Taliban's Deobandi-influenced Sunni fundamentalism, consolidated after their 1996 capture of Kabul and renewed in 2021, imposed a rigid moral code that reshaped social structures, particularly curtailing women's public roles. Under the 1996-2001 regime, female secondary education was banned, affecting 1.5 million girls and contributing to a literacy gender gap widening to 30 percentage points by 2000. Post-2021, the Taliban decreed women barred from most employment and universities, enforcing mahram accompaniment for travel over 72 kilometers, which Amnesty International documented as systematically violating rights and exacerbating poverty, with female labor participation dropping below 20% by 2023. Cultural enforcement included destruction of pre-Islamic artifacts, such as the 2001 Bamiyan Buddha demolitions, signaling rejection of pluralism, while public executions for moral infractions reinforced communal conformity. These policies, justified via literalist Hanafi jurisprudence, stabilized rural Pashtun areas through anti-corruption courts but isolated Afghanistan internationally, with humanitarian aid comprising 80% of GDP inflows by 2022 due to aid dependency. Christian fundamentalism in the United States, particularly through the New Christian Right since the , exerted influence on and by mobilizing evangelical voters, who numbered over 25% of the electorate by 1980, to prioritize in policy. This movement shaped abortion laws, with organizations like lobbying for restrictions; by 2022, their advocacy contributed to the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson decision overturning , enabling 14 states to enact near-total bans affecting 1.2 million abortions annually pre-Dobbs. In education, fundamentalist pushes for led to the 1981 Arkansas Balanced Treatment Act, later struck down, but influenced curricula in over 20 states via school board elections, with 15% of public schools incorporating elements by the per surveys. Politically, alliances with the Republican Party amplified this, as seen in Reagan's 1980 endorsement, which correlated with evangelical turnout driving his 59% popular vote win and subsequent faith-based initiatives expanding to $2 billion in funding by 2001. Such influence preserved traditional family structures in regions but drew criticism for eroding church-state separation. Hindu nationalism, or Hindutva, under the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) since 2014, has mainstreamed fundamentalist interpretations of Hindu identity, altering India's multicultural fabric through legal and cultural shifts. The Citizenship Amendment Act of 2019 fast-tracked naturalization for non-Muslim refugees, excluding Muslims and prompting protests in 150 cities, while the 2020 revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's autonomy integrated it under Hindu-majority governance, displacing 4,000 Kashmiri Pandits' claims but escalating militancy. Societally, cow protection laws in BJP-ruled states led to over 50 lynching incidents targeting Muslims by 2017, fostering vigilantism and dietary conformity aligned with sacred cow reverence. Education saw revisions glorifying Hindu epics, with the 2023 National Education Policy emphasizing "Indian knowledge systems" over Mughal history, affecting 250 million students and correlating with a 15% rise in RSS-affiliated shakhas (branches) to 57,000 by 2022. This ideology boosted national cohesion metrics, with BJP support reaching 37% in 2019 elections, but strained minority relations, as anti-conversion laws in 10 states by 2021 curtailed interfaith marriages.

Contemporary Debates and Labeling

Recent Developments (2020-2025)

In the United States, emerged as a prominent force in political discourse following the 2020 presidential election, with surveys indicating that approximately 10% of identified as adherents and 20% as sympathizers by 2024. This trend correlated with increased visibility in Republican politics, including endorsements from figures like Senator , and was linked to policy initiatives such as , a blueprint released in 2024 advocating for governance aligned with conservative Christian principles, including restrictions on and LGBTQ+ rights. Critics from progressive organizations, such as PRRI, characterized it as a threat to democratic pluralism, while supporters framed it as a defense of traditional values against ; however, empirical data from Pew Research showed varying levels of globally, with the U.S. exhibiting moderate support compared to higher rates in countries like and . The from 2020 onward amplified fundamentalist responses across Abrahamic traditions, with some groups interpreting the crisis as or an opportunity for radical mobilization, leading to heightened and resistance to measures deemed incompatible with doctrinal purity. In Islamic contexts, persisted in regions like the , where jihadist groups exploited governance vacuums post-2020, resulting in thousands of deaths and displacements annually through 2025, as tracked by conflict databases. Demographic projections from the Belfer Center indicated that by mid-century, fundamentalist populations in , , and could surpass liberal and secular counterparts due to higher rates and lower defection, a trend evident in data from 2020-2025 showing slowed in the Global South. Atheist and scientific fundamentalism saw limited institutional growth but featured in cultural debates, with rising unaffiliated populations in the West—reaching 29% of U.S. adults by —often exhibiting dogmatic rejection of religious influence in , as seen in critiques of "new atheists" aligning against perceived Islamic threats. Ongoing evolution-intelligent design disputes persisted in educational forums, with fundamentalist scientific accused of mirroring religious absolutism by dismissing non-empirical worldviews without nuance. These developments underscored fundamentalism's adaptability to contemporary crises, fueling in and while demographic shifts suggested resilience against modernist ideologies.

Use as a Pejorative Term and Counterarguments

The term "fundamentalism," originally a self-affirmative descriptor coined by Baptist editor Curtis Lee Laws in 1920 to denote Protestant Christians committed to defending essential biblical doctrines against modernist dilutions, has evolved into a predominantly label in public and scholarly discourse. This shift accelerated following the 1925 , where media portrayals framed defenders of as anti-intellectual obstacles to scientific progress, embedding connotations of rigidity, intolerance, and backwardness. By the late , the label extended beyond to stigmatize any strict adherence to foundational principles—religious, political, or economic—as irrational fanaticism, often exemplified by phrases like "market fundamentalism" to critique without analogous scrutiny of state-interventionist zeal. In contemporary usage, particularly within and academia, "fundamentalism" functions as a rhetorical tool to delegitimize opponents of progressive norms, disproportionately targeting traditionalist or conservative positions while sparing equivalent dogmatisms in secular ideologies. For instance, orthodox religious objections to practices like or are branded fundamentalist to imply , whereas uncompromising advocacy for expansive government redistribution or identity-based policies evades the term despite similar absolutism. This selective application aligns with documented left-leaning biases in these institutions, where surveys indicate over 80% of journalists and professors identify as liberal or progressive, fostering a tendency to pathologize non-conformist views as threats to pluralism rather than evaluating them on evidentiary grounds. Counterarguments against this pejorative deployment emphasize that the term's degradation obscures the rational basis for principled fidelity to verifiable truths, such as scriptural or empirical moral absolutes, which provide societal anchors amid relativist erosion. Defenders, including historical fundamentalists, contend that reclaiming the label honors a legacy of intellectual resistance to theological compromise, as seen in the 1910–1915 publication of , a 12-volume series articulating defensible core tenets like the virgin birth and against higher criticism's unsubstantiated . Critics of the slur argue it reflects the labeler's own ideological entrenchment, projecting intolerance onto others to avoid first-principles scrutiny of foundational claims; for example, unwavering commitment to evolutionary or utilitarian exhibits parallel "fundamentalist" traits but escapes censure due to . Empirical support for non-pejorative fundamentalism includes data from stable religious communities, where adherence to unchanging doctrines correlates with lower rates of social pathologies like family breakdown, as opposed to secular relativism's associations with rising in metrics such as U.S. rates doubling since 2000 amid declining traditional affiliations. Proponents further assert that dismissing fundamentalism wholesale ignores causal mechanisms where lax adherence to absolutes yields predictable declines in civilizational cohesion, as evidenced by historical precedents like the Republic's moral fragmentation preceding extremism. Rather than a vice, measured fundamentalism—grounded in falsifiable evidence like archaeological corroboration of biblical events—serves as a bulwark against epistemic chaos, countering the narrative's implicit endorsement of , which lacks comparable rigor and has failed to deliver promised societal advancements in areas like reduction or ethical consistency.

Future Trajectories and Challenges

Fundamentalist movements are projected to experience demographic expansion relative to secular populations, driven primarily by higher fertility rates among adherent communities. According to analyses from the Belfer Center at , Jewish, Muslim, and Christian fundamentalists are expected to surpass liberal religious and secular counterparts in numerical growth by mid-century, as conservative groups maintain birth rates exceeding replacement levels while secular cohorts trend toward . This trajectory holds particularly in high-growth regions such as and , where fundamentalist interpretations correlate with larger family sizes and resistance to secular initiatives. Adaptation to technological and societal shifts represents a core challenge, as rapid innovations in , , and test commitments to scriptural literalism. For instance, advancements in genetic editing and reproductive technologies provoke debates within fundamentalist circles over compatibility with doctrines on creation and human dignity, potentially fracturing unity or prompting selective endorsements of progress. Online platforms exacerbate this by enabling both —through echo chambers amplifying core tenets—and exposure to counter-narratives, which can erode insularity but also foster hybrid ideologies blending fundamentalism with populist politics. Politically, fundamentalist groups face escalating scrutiny and restrictions in pluralistic societies, including legal curbs on expressions deemed intolerant, as evidenced by international reports highlighting threats to assembly from fundamentalist . In Western contexts, associations with —such as policy proposals emphasizing traditional values—invite backlash from secular institutions, potentially marginalizing movements amid rising perceptions of cultural . Globally, fundamentalist responses to crises like or pandemics may yield alliances with governance on moral grounds but risk alienation if perceived as obstructing empirical solutions, underscoring tensions between absolutist frameworks and pragmatic adaptation. Secularization's uneven advance poses dual challenges: in declining religious adherence areas like and , fundamentalists contend with shrinking recruitment pools, yet paradoxically, modernization's dislocations—economic inequality, identity erosion—fuel resurgence as a bulwark against . Empirical data indicate that while overall wanes in affluent societies, strict adherents remain stable or grow proportionally, suggesting resilience through cohesion rather than conversion. Sustaining doctrinal purity amid intergenerational shifts, particularly as youth encounter diverse worldviews via and migration, will determine long-term viability, with failures risking dilution or .

References

  1. https://teachinghistory.org/history-content/ask-a-historian/24092
  2. https://shepherds.edu/a-brief-history-of-fundamentalism/
  3. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/evangelical-history/the-four-phases-of-protestant-fundamentalism-in-america/
  4. https://www.sv.uio.no/c-rex/english/resources/key-consepts-and-questions/what-is-fundamentalism.html
  5. https://jamesbishopblog.com/2020/08/05/the-characteristics-of-religious-fundamentalism/
  6. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/on-defining-fundamentalism/5AAF2188C7E7414347D9C2CDA2B4335C
  7. https://arcjournal.library.mcgill.ca/article/download/343/364
  8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13569317.2022.2138294
  9. https://www.etymonline.com/word/fundamentalist
  10. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/06/the-origins-of-fundamentalism/397238/
  11. https://sharperiron.org/article/meaning-of-fundamentalism
  12. https://dwightlongenecker.com/what-is-fundamentalism-2/
  13. https://www.cathedralatl.org/sermons/what-is-fundamentalism-and-where-did-it-come-from/
  14. https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/twenty/tkeyinfo/fundam.htm
  15. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/660/BAR22-16-Dunn.pdf
  16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25024206
  17. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC100875
  18. https://academic.oup.com/book/26314/chapter/194594083
  19. https://philpapers.org/archive/MARRFA-4.pdf
  20. https://theology.worldea.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Fundamentalism-_wea_gis_14_-_thomas_schirrmacher_-_fundamentalism.pdf
  21. https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-791
  22. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1146&context=hst_fac_pub
  23. https://www.biola.edu/blogs/biola-magazine/2014/the-untold-story-of-the-fundamentals
  24. https://libguides.bju.edu/fundamentalism
  25. https://www.thearda.com/us-religion/history/timelines/entry?etype=3&eid=55
  26. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/230/
  27. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/martinkramer/files/coming_to_terms_fundamentalists_or_islamists_middle_east_quarterly.pdf
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350189555_The_Rise_of_Islamic_Fundamentalism
  29. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA175025.pdf
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9734595/
  31. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/10/216
  32. https://www.banglajol.info/index.php/PP/article/view/60190/42540
  33. https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontosociology3rdedition/chapter/15-4-contemporary-fundamentalist-movements/
  34. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/fa/fa_julaug03o.html
  35. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14690760601121614
  36. https://voegelinview.com/modern-political-religion/
  37. https://faculty.lsu.edu/voegelin/voegelins-works/books.php
  38. https://referenceworks.brill.com/abstract/entries/EJHC/COM-0640.xml
  39. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/interpreting-religion/totalitarianism-as-religion/2E26FB894DBDC27D6D50708272886A5E
  40. https://polsci.institute/political-theory/secular-vs-religious-fundamentalism-traits-differences
  41. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Niagara-Bible-Conference
  42. https://www.hamptonchurch.com/post/the-niagara-bible-conference-creed-1878
  43. https://blog.ibnet.org/2020/09/29/the-beginning-of-fundamentalism-the-niagara-bible-conference/
  44. https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Fundamentals
  45. https://theopedia.com/the-fundamentals
  46. https://pluralism.org/fundamentalism-evangelicalism-and-pentecostalism
  47. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/monkeytrial-fundamentalism-and-social-gospel/
  48. https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/twenty/tkeyinfo/tscopes.htm
  49. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/insignificance-scopes-trial/
  50. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/evangelical-history/who-is-a-fundamentalist/
  51. https://credohouse.org/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-and-evangelical-and-a-fundamentalist
  52. https://centralseminary.edu/on-fundamentalism-and-evangelicalism/
  53. https://sharperiron.org/article/brief-history-of-fundamentalism
  54. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP88T00096R000400460001-8.pdf
  55. https://mail.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/download/2703/1771/4225
  56. https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/jcs/2003-v23-n2-jcs23_2/jcs23_2art06.pdf
  57. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Muhammad-ibn-Abd-al-Wahhab
  58. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/saud/cron/
  59. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/egypts-muslim-brotherhood
  60. https://iep.utm.edu/qutb/
  61. https://www.counterextremism.com/extremists/hassan-al-banna
  62. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI%282023%29747084
  63. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/sayyid-qutb-father-of-salafi-jihadism-forerunner-of-the-islamic-/10096380
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358128185_Was_the_%27Milestones%27_of_Sayyid_Qutb_a_Milestone_for_Terrorism
  65. https://www.dw.com/en/saudi-arabia-exports-extremism-to-many-countries-including-germany-study-says/a-39618920
  66. https://georgetownsecuritystudiesreview.org/2014/12/20/the-radicalization-of-south-asian-islam-saudi-money-and-the-spread-of-wahhabism/
  67. https://www.usip.org/tracking-talibans-mistreatment-women
  68. https://jcpa.org/article/jews-and-fundamentalism/
  69. https://en.idi.org.il/articles/58484
  70. https://www.sourcesjournal.org/articles/a-natural-act-of-vengeance-settler-violence-and-two-types-of-jewish-fundamentalism
  71. https://www.resetdoc.org/story/growing-weight-religious-zionism-israel-war-gaza/
  72. https://johnmenadue.com/post/2024/10/the-haredisation-of-israel-and-its-demographic-future-is-there-a-case-for-ringing-alarm-bells/
  73. https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/on-the-difference-between-hinduism-and-hindutva/
  74. https://sorapscourse.unive.it/files/2019/05/Eng-proof-IO2Unit5_Hindu-Fundamentalism-reading.pdf
  75. https://lausanne.org/global-analysis/the-rise-of-hindu-fundamentalism
  76. https://ijrcs.org/wp-content/uploads/IJRCS202411005-min.pdf
  77. https://didache.nazarene.org/index.php/volume-2-1/280-v2n1-shadakshari
  78. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/519909
  79. https://academic.oup.com/book/26469/chapter/194907525
  80. https://smallwarsjournal.com/2021/07/06/enemy-within-and-without-historical-examples-islamic-and-buddhist-fundamentalism/
  81. https://www.heritage.org/index/pages/report
  82. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-religion/article/mapping-the-concept-of-fundamentalism-a-scoping-review/C8C310B91C68F6908C9C8A999A1867EC
  83. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13569317.2022.2138294
  84. https://sjsu.edu/faculty/wooda/2B-HUM/Readings/The-Doctrine-of-Fascism.pdf
  85. https://aucklandunitarian.org.nz/what-is-the-appeal-of-fascism/
  86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369033966_Under_the_stigma_of_fundamentalism_some_reflections_on_a_controversial_concept
  87. https://revolutionarycommunist.org/middle-east/palestine/communism-fundamentalism-and-the-question-of-palestine-first-published-in-frfi-111-febmar-1993/
  88. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15570274.2023.2235809
  89. https://academic.oup.com/book/687/chapter/135368804
  90. https://www.learnreligions.com/definition-of-fundamentalist-atheist-247860
  91. https://anthropoetics.ucla.edu/ap1502/1502watson/
  92. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/may/03/cananatheistbeafundamenta
  93. https://researcherslinks.com/current-issues/The-New-Atheism-and-Religious-Fundamentalism-Are-They-a-Mirror-Image-of-Each-Other/9/5/334/html
  94. https://rpmministries.org/2011/11/the-fundamentalist-atheists/
  95. https://vridar.org/2016/03/16/atheism-and-fundamentalism-why-atheists-dont-understand-religion-and-why-believers-dont-like-atheist-criticisms/
  96. https://portalcioranbr.wordpress.com/2025/06/28/new-atheism-religion-chris-hedges/
  97. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03080188.2022.2152246
  98. https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/scientism-and-the-integrity-of-the-humanities
  99. https://www.hoover.org/research/dangerous-rise-scientism
  100. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/03080188.2022.2152246
  101. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-024-04527-w
  102. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366487728_Scientism_and_scientific_fundamentalism_what_science_can_learn_from_mainstream_religion
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1369219/
  104. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/series/FP.html
  105. https://www.amacad.org/project/fundamentalism-project
  106. https://files.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/3585/files/2018/01/fundamental1.pdf
  107. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-internationale-des-etudes-du-developpement-2017-1-page-33?lang=fr
  108. https://mswmanagementj.com/index.php/home/article/view/166
  109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3510753
  110. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5500821/
  111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301051118308573
  112. https://www.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.574
  113. https://revisesociology.com/2018/11/23/the-causes-of-fundamentalism/
  114. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0037768611432120
  115. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/demographic-projections-predict-fundamentalist-populations-surpassing-secular
  116. https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2011/06/shall-the-religious-inherit-the-earth/
  117. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2021/12/14/about-three-in-ten-u-s-adults-are-now-religiously-unaffiliated/
  118. https://divineatheist.quora.com/Why-does-Christian-Fundamentalism-seem-to-be-rising-in-the-United-States
  119. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/
  120. https://ifstudies.org/blog/why-is-secularization-likely-to-stall-in-america-by-2050-a-response-to-laurie-derose
  121. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/fundamentalist-modernist-conflict
  122. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23902527
  123. https://biologos.org/series/should-christians-take-the-vaccine/articles/fundamentalists-modernists-and-evolution
  124. https://www.the-american-interest.com/2006/09/01/between-relativism-and-fundamentalism/
  125. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2008/03/04/between-relativism-and-fundamentalism-is-there-a-middle-ground/
  126. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263916011_Thou_shalt_not_kill_Religious_fundamentalism_conservatism_and_rule-based_moral_processing
  127. https://meaningness.com/fundamentalism-countercultural-modernism
  128. https://irl.umsl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1308&context=dissertation
  129. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1118&context=ijgls
  130. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1086&context=honors-theses
  131. https://scholars.indianastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2438&context=etds
  132. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276927455_A_re-examination_of_religious_fundamentalism_positive_implications_for_coping
  133. https://lancasteronline.com/business/local_business/the-amish-effect-unique-cultural-strengths-help-plain-sect-businesses-thrive/article_ba60c8e4-e6dc-11e5-9cc7-73775e680585.html
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0007681323001246
  135. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01416200.2025.2471105?src=exp-la
  136. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41682-023-00159-y
  137. https://chs.vcu.edu/media/chs/documents/WhitewashedTombs_Coercion%2CAbuse%2CtheHiddenSinsoftheFundamentalistChurch.pdf
  138. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1822158
  139. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-in-the-machine/201810/how-religious-fundamentalism-hijacks-the-brain
  140. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494422000172
  141. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004438187/BP000006.xml?language=en
  142. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-18111-001
  143. https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2014/vi14-101.pdf
  144. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348284246_A_social_revolution_in_the_name_of_a_religion_The_Islamic_Revolution_of_197879_in_Iran
  145. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2626789
  146. https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/99805/10504892.pdf
  147. https://www.mei.edu/sites/default/files/mei_library/pdf/5930.pdf
  148. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1135&context=wmjowl
  149. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/afghanistan/report-afghanistan/
  150. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/taliban-afghanistan
  151. https://www.gmfus.org/news/how-religious-diplomacy-and-pan-islamic-organizations-can-help-stabilize-afghanistan
  152. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/55206/chapter/426554702
  153. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/05/10/abortion-history-right-white-evangelical-1970s-00031480
  154. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1325&context=honors201019
  155. https://ipr.blogs.ie.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/574/2025/01/FINAL-Blessing-Caroline-IPR.pdf
  156. https://www.oah.org/tah/november-5/evangelicalism-and-politics/
  157. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2019/04/the-bjp-in-power-indian-democracy-and-religious-nationalism?lang=en
  158. https://apnews.com/article/india-election-narendra-modi-hindu-nationalism-rss-79c30c8ae750a9c037d86b9e2c1b640c
  159. https://eastasiaforum.org/2025/05/08/hindu-nationalism-threatens-indias-secular-foundations/
  160. https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/the-rise-of-hindu-nationalism-and-its-regional-and-global-ramifications/
  161. https://prri.org/research/christian-nationalism-across-all-50-states-insights-from-prris-2024-american-values-atlas/
  162. https://www.hds.harvard.edu/news/2025/03/05/video-yang-scholars-2025-christian-nationalism-global-perspective
  163. https://kettering.org/project-2025-the-blueprint-for-christian-nationalist-regime-change/
  164. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/01/28/comparing-levels-of-religious-nationalism-around-the-world/
  165. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S236531402100019X
  166. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/violent-extremism-sahel
  167. https://chronikler.com/2024/06/17/new-atheists-and-old-prejudices/
  168. https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateEvolution/comments/1jcem0d/lets_debate_the_debate/
  169. https://actalliance.org/act-news/faith-power-and-politics-how-religious-fundamentalism-is-fueling-political-extremism/
  170. https://daily.jstor.org/what-is-fundamentalism/
  171. https://www.proclaimanddefend.org/2024/02/02/historical-fundamentalism-a-personal-word/
  172. https://almoutran.com/2011/03/525/
  173. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/12/21/key-findings-from-the-global-religious-futures-project/
  174. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.2711591
  175. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096880809690302X
  176. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2016/06/fundamentalist-intolerance-degrading-assembly-and-association-rights
  177. https://www.pbs.org/video/how-project-2025-impacts-the-separation-of-church-and-state-c6rhks/
  178. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/3/104
  179. https://baptistnews.com/article/americans-growing-less-religious-and-more-strictly-religious-at-the-same-time/
  180. https://www.omiworld.org/2024/10/07/religious-fundamentalism-a-challenge-to-global-peace/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.