Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Energy development
View on WikipediaThis article needs to be updated. The reason given is: IEA world energy outlook 2024 https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024/executive-summary. (October 2024) |


Energy development is the field of activities focused on obtaining sources of energy from natural resources.[citation needed] These activities include the production of renewable, nuclear, and fossil fuel derived sources of energy, and for the recovery and reuse of energy that would otherwise be wasted. Energy conservation and efficiency measures reduce the demand for energy development, and can have benefits to society with improvements to environmental issues.
Societies use energy for transportation, manufacturing, illumination, heating and air conditioning, and communication, for industrial, commercial, agricultural and domestic purposes. Energy resources may be classified as primary resources, where the resource can be used in substantially its original form, or as secondary resources, where the energy source must be converted into a more conveniently usable form. Non-renewable resources are significantly depleted by human use, whereas renewable resources are produced by ongoing processes that can sustain indefinite human exploitation.
Thousands of people are employed in the energy industry. The conventional industry comprises the petroleum industry, the natural gas industry, the electrical power industry, and the nuclear industry. New energy industries include the renewable energy industry, comprising alternative and sustainable manufacture, distribution, and sale of alternative fuels.
Classification of resources
[edit]
Energy resources may be classified as primary resources, suitable for end use without conversion to another form, or secondary resources, where the usable form of energy required substantial conversion from a primary source. Examples of primary energy resources are wind power, solar power, wood fuel, fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas, and uranium. Secondary resources are those such as electricity, hydrogen, or other synthetic fuels.
Another important classification is based on the time required to regenerate an energy resource. "Renewable resources" are those that recover their capacity in a time significant by human needs. Examples are hydroelectric power or wind power, when the natural phenomena that are the primary source of energy are ongoing and not depleted by human demands. Non-renewable resources are those that are significantly depleted by human usage and that will not recover their potential significantly during human lifetimes. An example of a non-renewable energy source is coal, which does not form naturally at a rate that would support human use.
Fossil fuels
[edit]
Fossil fuel (primary non-renewable fossil) sources burn coal or hydrocarbon fuels, which are the remains of the decomposition of plants and animals. There are three main types of fossil fuels: coal, petroleum, and natural gas. Another fossil fuel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), is principally derived from the production of natural gas. Heat from burning fossil fuel is used either directly for space heating and process heating, or converted to mechanical energy for vehicles, industrial processes, or electrical power generation. These fossil fuels are part of the carbon cycle and allow solar energy stored in the fuel to be released.
The use of fossil fuels in the 18th and 19th century set the stage for the Industrial Revolution.
Fossil fuels make up the bulk of the world's current primary energy sources. In 2024, 86% of the world's energy needs was met from fossil fuels,[3] up from 81% in 2005.[4] The technology and infrastructure for the use of fossil fuels already exist. Liquid fuels derived from petroleum deliver much usable energy per unit of weight or volume, which is advantageous when compared with lower energy density sources such as batteries. Fossil fuels are currently economical for decentralized energy use.

Energy dependence on imported fossil fuels creates energy security risks for dependent countries.[5][6][7][8][9] Oil dependence in particular has led to war,[10] funding of radicals,[11] monopolization,[12] and socio-political instability.[13]
Fossil fuels are non-renewable resources, which will eventually decline in production [14] and become exhausted. While the processes that created fossil fuels are ongoing, fuels are consumed far more quickly than the natural rate of replenishment. Extracting fuels becomes increasingly costly as society consumes the most accessible fuel deposits.[15] Extraction of fossil fuels results in environmental degradation, such as the strip mining and mountaintop removal for coal.
Fuel efficiency is a form of thermal efficiency, meaning the efficiency of a process that converts chemical potential energy contained in a carrier fuel into kinetic energy or work. The fuel economy is the energy efficiency of a particular vehicle, is given as a ratio of distance travelled per unit of fuel consumed. Weight-specific efficiency (efficiency per unit weight) may be stated for freight, and passenger-specific efficiency (vehicle efficiency) per passenger. The inefficient atmospheric combustion (burning) of fossil fuels in vehicles, buildings, and power plants contributes to urban heat islands.[16]
Conventional production of oil peaked, conservatively, between 2007 and 2010. In 2010, it was estimated that an investment of $8 trillion in non-renewable resources would be required to maintain current levels of production for 25 years.[17] In 2010, governments subsidized fossil fuels by an estimated $500 billion a year.[18] Fossil fuels are also a source of greenhouse gas emissions, leading to concerns about global warming if consumption is not reduced.
The combustion of fossil fuels leads to the release of pollution into the atmosphere. The fossil fuels are mainly carbon compounds. During combustion, carbon dioxide is released, and also nitrogen oxides, soot and other fine particulates. The carbon dioxide is the main contributor to recent climate change.[19] Other emissions from fossil fuel power station include sulphur dioxide, carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds (VOC), mercury, arsenic, lead, cadmium, and other heavy metals including traces of uranium.[20][21]
A typical coal plant generates billions of kilowatt hours of electrical power per year.[22]
Nuclear
[edit]Fission
[edit]Nuclear power is the use of nuclear fission to generate useful heat and electricity. Fission of uranium produces nearly all economically significant nuclear power. Radioisotope thermoelectric generators form a very small component of energy generation, mostly in specialized applications such as deep space vehicles.
Nuclear power plants, excluding naval reactors, provided about 5.7% of the world's energy and 13% of the world's electricity in 2012.[23]
In 2013, the IAEA report that there are 437 operational nuclear power reactors,[24] in 31 countries,[25] although not every reactor is producing electricity.[26] In addition, there are approximately 140 naval vessels using nuclear propulsion in operation, powered by some 180 reactors.[27][28][29] As of 2013, attaining a net energy gain from sustained nuclear fusion reactions, excluding natural fusion power sources such as the Sun, remains an ongoing area of international physics and engineering research. More than 60 years after the first attempts, commercial fusion power production remains unlikely before 2050.[30]
There is an ongoing debate about nuclear power.[31][32][33] Proponents, such as the World Nuclear Association, the IAEA and Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy contend that nuclear power is a safe, sustainable energy source that reduces carbon emissions.[34] Opponents contend that nuclear power poses many threats to people and the environment.[35][36]
Nuclear power plant accidents include the Chernobyl disaster (1986), Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (2011), and the Three Mile Island accident (1979).[37] There have also been some nuclear submarine accidents.[37][38][39] In terms of lives lost per unit of energy generated, analysis has determined that nuclear power has caused less fatalities per unit of energy generated than the other major sources of energy generation. Energy production from coal, petroleum, natural gas and hydropower has caused a greater number of fatalities per unit of energy generated due to air pollution and energy accident effects.[40][41][42][43][44] However, the economic costs of nuclear power accidents is high, and meltdowns can take decades to clean up. The human costs of evacuations of affected populations and lost livelihoods is also significant.[45][46]
Comparing Nuclear's latent cancer deaths, such as cancer with other energy sources immediate deaths per unit of energy generated(GWeyr). This study does not include fossil fuel related cancer and other indirect deaths created by the use of fossil fuel consumption in its "severe accident" classification, which would be an accident with more than 5 fatalities.
As of 2012, according to the IAEA, worldwide there were 68 civil nuclear power reactors under construction in 15 countries,[24] approximately 28 of which in the People's Republic of China (PRC), with the most recent nuclear power reactor, as of May 2013, to be connected to the electrical grid, occurring on February 17, 2013, in Hongyanhe Nuclear Power Plant in the PRC.[47] In the United States, two new Generation III reactors are under construction at Vogtle. U.S. nuclear industry officials expect five new reactors to enter service by 2020, all at existing plants.[48] In 2013, four aging, uncompetitive, reactors were permanently closed.[49][50]
Recent experiments in extraction of uranium use polymer ropes that are coated with a substance that selectively absorbs uranium from seawater. This process could make the considerable volume of uranium dissolved in seawater exploitable for energy production. Since ongoing geologic processes carry uranium to the sea in amounts comparable to the amount that would be extracted by this process, in a sense the sea-borne uranium becomes a sustainable resource.[51][52][relevant?]
Nuclear power is a low carbon power generation method of producing electricity, with an analysis of the literature on its total life cycle emission intensity finding that it is similar to renewable sources in a comparison of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per unit of energy generated.[53][54] Since the 1970s, nuclear fuel has displaced about 64 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (GtCO2-eq) greenhouse gases, that would have otherwise resulted from the burning of oil, coal or natural gas in fossil-fuel power stations.[55]
Nuclear power phase-out and pull-backs
[edit]Japan's 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident, which occurred in a reactor design from the 1960s, prompted a rethink of nuclear safety and nuclear energy policy in many countries.[56] Germany decided to close all its reactors by 2022, and Italy has banned nuclear power.[56] Following Fukushima, in 2011 the International Energy Agency halved its estimate of additional nuclear generating capacity to be built by 2035.[57][58]
Fukushima
[edit]Following the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster – the second worst nuclear incident, that displaced 50,000 households after radioactive material leaked into the air, soil and sea,[59] and with subsequent radiation checks leading to bans on some shipments of vegetables and fish[60] – a global public support survey by Ipsos (2011) for energy sources was published and nuclear fission was found to be the least popular[61]
Fission economics
[edit]
The economics of new nuclear power plants is a controversial subject, since there are diverging views on this topic, and multibillion-dollar investments ride on the choice of an energy source. Nuclear power plants typically have high capital costs for building the plant, but low direct fuel costs. In recent years there has been a slowdown of electricity demand growth and financing has become more difficult, which affects large projects such as nuclear reactors, with very large upfront costs and long project cycles which carry a large variety of risks.[62] In Eastern Europe, a number of long-established projects are struggling to find finance, notably Belene in Bulgaria and the additional reactors at Cernavoda in Romania, and some potential backers have pulled out.[62] Where cheap gas is available and its future supply relatively secure, this also poses a major problem for nuclear projects.[62]
Analysis of the economics of nuclear power must take into account who bears the risks of future uncertainties. To date all operating nuclear power plants were developed by state-owned or regulated utility monopolies[63][64] where many of the risks associated with construction costs, operating performance, fuel price, and other factors were borne by consumers rather than suppliers. Many countries have now liberalized the electricity market where these risks, and the risk of cheaper competitors emerging before capital costs are recovered, are borne by plant suppliers and operators rather than consumers, which leads to a significantly different evaluation of the economics of new nuclear power plants.[65]
Costs
[edit]Costs are likely to go up for currently operating and new nuclear power plants, due to increased requirements for on-site spent fuel management and elevated design basis threats.[66] While first of their kind designs, such as the EPRs under construction are behind schedule and over-budget, of the seven South Korean APR-1400s presently under construction worldwide, two are in S.Korea at the Hanul Nuclear Power Plant and four are at the largest nuclear station construction project in the world as of 2016, in the United Arab Emirates at the planned Barakah nuclear power plant. The first reactor, Barakah-1 is 85% completed and on schedule for grid-connection during 2017.[67][68] Two of the four EPRs under construction (in Finland and France) are significantly behind schedule and substantially over cost.[69]
Renewable sources
[edit]
Renewable energy is generally defined as energy that comes from resources which are naturally replenished on a human timescale such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides, waves and geothermal heat. Renewable energy replaces conventional fuels in four distinct areas: electricity generation, hot water/space heating, motor fuels, and rural (off-grid) energy services.
Including traditional biomass usage, about 19% of global energy consumption is accounted for by renewable resources.[72] Wind powered energy production is being turned to as a prominent renewable energy source, increasing global wind power capacity by 12% in 2021.[73] While not the case for all countries, 58% of sample countries linked renewable energy consumption to have a positive impact on economic growth.[74] At the national level, at least 30 nations around the world already have renewable energy contributing more than 20% of energy supply. National renewable energy markets are projected to continue to grow strongly in the coming decade and beyond.[76]
Unlike other energy sources, renewable energy sources are not as restricted by geography. Additionally deployment of renewable energy is resulting in economic benefits as well as combating climate change. Rural electrification[75] has been researched on multiple sites and positive effects on commercial spending, appliance use, and general activities requiring electricity as energy.[76] Renewable energy growth in at least 38 countries has been driven by the high electricity usage rates.[77] International support for promoting renewable sources like solar and wind have continued grow.
While many renewable energy projects are large-scale, renewable technologies are also suited to rural and remote areas and developing countries, where energy is often crucial in human development. To ensure human development continues sustainably, governments around the world are beginning to research potential ways to implement renewable sources into their countries and economies. For example, the UK Government's Department for Energy and Climate Change 2050 Pathways created a mapping technique to educate the public on land competition between energy supply technologies.[78] This tool provides users the ability to understand what the limitations and potential their surrounding land and country has in terms of energy production.
Hydroelectricity
[edit]
Hydroelectricity is electric power generated by hydropower; the force of falling or flowing water. In 2015 hydropower generated 16.6% of the world's total electricity and 70% of all renewable electricity [79][page needed] and was expected to increase about 3.1% each year for the following 25 years.
Hydropower is produced in 150 countries, with the Asia-Pacific region generating 32 percent of global hydropower in 2010. China is the largest hydroelectricity producer, with 721 terawatt-hours of production in 2010, representing around 17 percent of domestic electricity use. There are now three hydroelectricity plants larger than 10 GW: the Three Gorges Dam in China, Itaipu Dam across the Brazil/Paraguay border, and Guri Dam in Venezuela.[80]
The cost of hydroelectricity is relatively low, making it a competitive source of renewable electricity. The average cost of electricity from a hydro plant larger than 10 megawatts is 3 to 5 U.S. cents per kilowatt-hour.[80] Hydro is also a flexible source of electricity since plants can be ramped up and down very quickly to adapt to changing energy demands. However, damming interrupts the flow of rivers and can harm local ecosystems, and building large dams and reservoirs often involves displacing people and wildlife.[80] Once a hydroelectric complex is constructed, the project produces no direct waste, and has a considerably lower output level of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide than fossil fuel powered energy plants.[81]
Wind
[edit]Wind power harnesses the power of the wind to propel the blades of wind turbines. These turbines cause the rotation of magnets, which creates electricity. Wind towers are usually built together on wind farms. There are offshore and onshore wind farms. Global wind power capacity has expanded rapidly to 336 GW in June 2014, and wind energy production was around 4% of total worldwide electricity usage, and growing rapidly.[82]
Wind power is widely used in Europe, Asia, and the United States.[83] Several countries have achieved relatively high levels of wind power penetration, such as 21% of stationary electricity production in Denmark,[84] 18% in Portugal,[84] 16% in Spain,[84] 14% in Ireland,[85] and 9% in Germany in 2010.[84][86]: 11 By 2011, at times over 50% of electricity in Germany and Spain came from wind and solar power.[87][88] As of 2011, 83 countries around the world are using wind power on a commercial basis.[86]: 11
Many of the world's largest onshore wind farms are located in the United States, China, and India. Most of the world's largest offshore wind farms are located in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. The two largest offshore wind farm are currently the 630 MW London Array and Gwynt y Môr.
| Wind farm | Current capacity (MW) |
Country | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alta (Oak Creek-Mojave) | 1,320 | [89] | |
| Jaisalmer Wind Park | 1,064 | [90] | |
| Roscoe Wind Farm | 781 | [91] | |
| Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center | 735 | [92][93] | |
| Capricorn Ridge Wind Farm | 662 | [92][93] | |
| Fântânele-Cogealac Wind Farm | 600 | [94] | |
| Fowler Ridge Wind Farm | 599 | [95] |
Solar
[edit]Solar energy is the radiant energy from the Sun's light and heat, which can be harnessed using a range of technologies such as solar electricity, solar thermal energy (including solar water heating) and solar architecture.[96][97][98] It is an essential source of renewable energy, and its technologies are broadly characterized as either passive solar or active solar depending on how they capture and distribute solar energy or convert it into solar power. Active solar techniques include the use of photovoltaic systems, concentrated solar power, and solar water heating to harness the energy. Passive solar techniques include designing a building for better daylighting, selecting materials with favorable thermal mass or light-dispersing properties, and organizing spaces that naturally circulate air.
In 2011, the International Energy Agency said that "the development of affordable, inexhaustible and clean solar energy technologies will have huge longer-term benefits. It will increase countries' energy security through reliance on an indigenous, inexhaustible, and mostly import-independent resource, enhance sustainability, reduce pollution, lower the costs of mitigating global warming .... these advantages are global".[96][99]Biofuels
[edit]A biofuel is a fuel that contains energy from geologically recent carbon fixation. These fuels are produced from living organisms. Examples of this carbon fixation occur in plants and microalgae. These fuels are made by a biomass conversion (biomass refers to recently living organisms, most often referring to plants or plant-derived materials). This biomass can be converted to convenient energy containing substances in three different ways: thermal conversion, chemical conversion, and biochemical conversion. This biomass conversion can result in fuel in solid, liquid, or gas form. This new biomass can be used for biofuels. Biofuels have increased in popularity because of rising oil prices and the need for energy security.
Bioethanol is an alcohol made by fermentation, mostly from carbohydrates produced in sugar or starch crops such as corn or sugarcane. Cellulosic biomass, derived from non-food sources, such as trees and grasses, is also being developed as a feedstock for ethanol production. Ethanol can be used as a fuel for vehicles in its pure form, but it is usually used as a gasoline additive to increase octane and improve vehicle emissions. Bioethanol is widely used in the USA and in Brazil. Current plant design does not provide for converting the lignin portion of plant raw materials to fuel components by fermentation.
Biodiesel is made from vegetable oils and animal fats. Biodiesel can be used as a fuel for vehicles in its pure form, but it is usually used as a diesel additive to reduce levels of particulates, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbons from diesel-powered vehicles. Biodiesel is produced from oils or fats using transesterification and is the most common biofuel in Europe. However, research is underway on producing renewable fuels from decarboxylation[100]
In 2010, worldwide biofuel production reached 105 billion liters (28 billion gallons US), up 17% from 2009,[101] and biofuels provided 2.7% of the world's fuels for road transport, a contribution largely made up of ethanol and biodiesel.[citation needed] Global ethanol fuel production reached 86 billion liters (23 billion gallons US) in 2010, with the United States and Brazil as the world's top producers, accounting together for 90% of global production. The world's largest biodiesel producer is the European Union, accounting for 53% of all biodiesel production in 2010.[101] As of 2011, mandates for blending biofuels exist in 31 countries at the national level and in 29 states or provinces.[86]: 13–14 The International Energy Agency has a goal for biofuels to meet more than a quarter of world demand for transportation fuels by 2050 to reduce dependence on petroleum and coal.[102]
Geothermal
[edit]
Geothermal energy is thermal energy generated and stored in the Earth. Thermal energy is the energy that determines the temperature of matter. The geothermal energy of the Earth's crust originates from the original formation of the planet (20%) and from radioactive decay of minerals (80%).[103] The geothermal gradient, which is the difference in temperature between the core of the planet and its surface, drives a continuous conduction of thermal energy in the form of heat from the core to the surface. The adjective geothermal originates from the Greek roots γη (ge), meaning earth, and θερμος (thermos), meaning hot.
Earth's internal heat is thermal energy generated from radioactive decay and continual heat loss from Earth's formation. Temperatures at the core-mantle boundary may reach over 4000 °C (7,200 °F).[104] The high temperature and pressure in Earth's interior cause some rock to melt and solid mantle to behave plastically, resulting in portions of mantle convecting upward since it is lighter than the surrounding rock. Rock and water is heated in the crust, sometimes up to 370 °C (700 °F).[105]
From hot springs, geothermal energy has been used for bathing since Paleolithic times and for space heating since ancient Roman times, but it is now better known for electricity generation. Worldwide, 11,400 megawatts (MW) of geothermal power is online in 24 countries in 2012.[106] An additional 28 gigawatts of direct geothermal heating capacity is installed for district heating, space heating, spas, industrial processes, desalination and agricultural applications in 2010.[107]
Geothermal power is cost effective, reliable, sustainable, and environmentally friendly,[108] but has historically been limited to areas near tectonic plate boundaries. Recent technological advances have dramatically expanded the range and size of viable resources, especially for applications such as home heating, opening a potential for widespread exploitation. Geothermal wells release greenhouse gases trapped deep within the earth, but these emissions are much lower per energy unit than those of fossil fuels. As a result, geothermal power has the potential to help mitigate global warming if widely deployed in place of fossil fuels.
The Earth's geothermal resources are theoretically more than adequate to supply humanity's energy needs, but only a very small fraction may be profitably exploited. Drilling and exploration for deep resources is very expensive. Forecasts for the future of geothermal power depend on assumptions about technology, energy prices, subsidies, and interest rates. Pilot programs like EWEB's customer opt in Green Power Program [109] show that customers would be willing to pay a little more for a renewable energy source like geothermal. But as a result of government assisted research and industry experience, the cost of generating geothermal power has decreased by 25% over the past two decades.[110] In 2001, geothermal energy cost between two and ten US cents per kWh.[111]
Oceanic
[edit]Marine Renewable Energy (MRE) or marine power (also sometimes referred to as ocean energy, ocean power, or marine and hydrokinetic energy) refers to the energy carried by the mechanical energy of ocean waves, currents, and tides, shifts in salinity gradients, and ocean temperature differences. MRE has the potential to become a reliable and renewable energy source because of the cyclical nature of the oceans.[112] The movement of water in the world's oceans creates a vast store of kinetic energy or energy in motion. This energy can be harnessed to generate electricity to power homes, transport, and industries.
The term marine energy encompasses both wave power, i.e. power from surface waves, and tidal power, i.e. obtained from the kinetic energy of large bodies of moving water. Offshore wind power is not a form of marine energy, as wind power is derived from the wind, even if the wind turbines are placed over water. The oceans have a tremendous amount of energy and are close to many if not most concentrated populations. Ocean energy has the potential to provide a substantial amount of new renewable energy around the world.[113]
Marine energy technology is in its first stage of development. To be developed, MRE needs efficient methods of storing, transporting, and capturing ocean power, so it can be used where needed.[114] Over the past year, countries around the world have started implementing market strategies for MRE to commercialize. Canada and China introduced incentives, such as feed-in tariffs (FiTs), which are above-market prices for MRE that allow investors and project developers a stable income. Other financial strategies consist of subsidies, grants, and funding from public-private partnerships (PPPs). China alone approved 100 ocean projects in 2019.[115] Portugal and Spain recognize the potential of MRE in accelerating decarbonization, which is fundamental to meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement. Both countries are focusing on solar and offshore wind auctions to attract private investment, ensure cost-effectiveness, and accelerate MRE growth.[116] Ireland sees MRE as a key component to reduce its carbon footprint. The Offshore Renewable Energy Development Plan (OREDP) supports the exploration and development of the country's significant offshore energy potential.[117] Additionally, Ireland has implemented the Renewable Electricity Support Scheme (RESS) which includes auctions designed to provide financial support for communities, increase technology diversity, and guarantee energy security.[118]
However, while research is increasing, there have been concerns associated with threats to marine mammals, habitats, and potential changes to ocean currents. MRE can be a renewable energy source for coastal communities helping their transition from fossil fuel, but researchers are calling for a better understanding of its environmental impacts.[119] Because ocean-energy areas are often isolated from both fishing and sea traffic, these zones may provide shelter from humans and predators for some marine species. MRE devices can be an ideal home for many fish, crayfish, mollusks, and barnacles; and may also indirectly affect seabirds, and marine mammals because they feed on those species. Similarly, such areas may create an "artificial reef effect" by boosting biodiversity nearby. Noise pollution generated from the technology is limited, also causing fish and mammals living in the area of the installation to return.[120] In the most recent State of Science Report about MRE, the authors claim that there is no evidence for fish, mammals, or seabirds to be injured by either collision, noise pollution, or the electromagnetic field. The uncertainty of its environmental impact comes from the low quantity of MRE devices in the ocean today where data is collected.[121]
100% renewable energy
[edit]The incentive to use 100% renewable energy, for electricity, transport, or even total primary energy supply globally, has been motivated by global warming and other ecological as well as economic concerns. Renewable energy use has grown much faster than anyone anticipated.[122] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has said that there are few fundamental technological limits to integrating a portfolio of renewable energy technologies to meet most of total global energy demand.[123] At the national level, at least 30 nations around the world already have renewable energy contributing more than 20% of energy supply. Also, Stephen W. Pacala and Robert H. Socolow have developed a series of "stabilization wedges" that can allow us to maintain our quality of life while avoiding catastrophic climate change, and "renewable energy sources," in aggregate, constitute the largest number of their "wedges."[124]
Mark Z. Jacobson says producing all new energy with wind power, solar power, and hydropower by 2030 is feasible and existing energy supply arrangements could be replaced by 2050. Barriers to implementing the renewable energy plan are seen to be "primarily social and political, not technological or economic". Jacobson says that energy costs with a wind, solar, water system should be similar to today's energy costs.[125]
Similarly, in the United States, the independent National Research Council has noted that "sufficient domestic renewable resources exist to allow renewable electricity to play a significant role in future electricity generation and thus help confront issues related to climate change, energy security, and the escalation of energy costs ... Renewable energy is an attractive option because renewable resources available in the United States, taken collectively, can supply significantly larger amounts of electricity than the total current or projected domestic demand." .[126]
Critics of the "100% renewable energy" approach include Vaclav Smil and James E. Hansen. Smil and Hansen are concerned about the variable output of solar and wind power, but Amory Lovins argues that the electricity grid can cope, just as it routinely backs up nonworking coal-fired and nuclear plants with working ones.[127]
Google spent $30 million on their "Renewable Energy Cheaper than Coal" project to develop renewable energy and stave off catastrophic climate change. The project was cancelled after concluding that a best-case scenario for rapid advances in renewable energy could only result in emissions 55 percent below the fossil fuel projections for 2050.[128]
Increased energy efficiency
[edit]
Although increasing the efficiency of energy use is not energy development per se, it may be considered under the topic of energy development since it makes existing energy sources available to do work.[130]: 22
Efficient energy use reduces the amount of energy required to provide products and services. For example, insulating a home allows a building to use less heating and cooling energy to maintain a comfortable temperature. Installing fluorescent lamps or natural skylights reduces the amount of energy required for illumination compared to incandescent light bulbs. Compact fluorescent lights use two-thirds less energy and may last 6 to 10 times longer than incandescent lights. Improvements in energy efficiency are most often achieved by adopting an efficient technology or production process.[131]
Reducing energy use may save consumers money, if the energy savings offsets the cost of an energy efficient technology. Reducing energy use reduces emissions. According to the International Energy Agency, improved energy efficiency in buildings, industrial processes and transportation could reduce the global energy demand in 2050 to around 8% smaller than today, but serving an economy more than twice as big and a population of about 2 billion more people.[132]
Energy efficiency and renewable energy are said to be the twin pillars of sustainable energy policy.[133] In many countries energy efficiency is also seen to have a national security benefit because it can be used to reduce the level of energy imports from foreign countries and may slow down the rate at which domestic energy resources are depleted.
It's been discovered "that for OECD countries, wind, geothermal, hydro and nuclear have the lowest hazard rates among energy sources in production".[134]
Transmission
[edit]
While new sources of energy are only rarely discovered or made possible by new technology, distribution technology continually evolves.[135] The use of fuel cells in cars, for example, is an anticipated delivery technology.[136] This section presents the various delivery technologies that have been important to historic energy development. They all rely in way on the energy sources listed in the previous section.
Shipping and pipelines
[edit]Coal, petroleum and their derivatives are delivered by boat, rail, or road. Petroleum and natural gas may also be delivered by pipeline, and coal via a Slurry pipeline. Fuels such as gasoline and LPG may also be delivered via aircraft. Natural gas pipelines must maintain a certain minimum pressure to function correctly. The higher costs of ethanol transportation and storage are often prohibitive.[137]
Wired energy transfer
[edit]
Electricity grids are the networks used to transmit and distribute power from production source to end user, when the two may be hundreds of kilometres away. Sources include electrical generation plants such as a nuclear reactor, coal burning power plant, etc. A combination of sub-stations and transmission lines are used to maintain a constant flow of electricity. Grids may suffer from transient blackouts and brownouts, often due to weather damage. During certain extreme space weather events solar wind can interfere with transmissions. Grids also have a predefined carrying capacity or load that cannot safely be exceeded. When power requirements exceed what's available, failures are inevitable. To prevent problems, power is then rationed.
Industrialised countries such as Canada, the US, and Australia are among the highest per capita consumers of electricity in the world, which is possible thanks to a widespread electrical distribution network. The US grid is one of the most advanced,[citation needed] although infrastructure maintenance is becoming a problem. CurrentEnergy provides a realtime overview of the electricity supply and demand for California, Texas, and the Northeast of the US. African countries with small scale electrical grids have a correspondingly low annual per capita usage of electricity. One of the most powerful power grids in the world supplies power to the state of Queensland, Australia.
Wireless energy transfer
[edit]Wireless power transfer is a process whereby electrical energy is transmitted from a power source to an electrical load that does not have a built-in power source, without the use of interconnecting wires. Currently available technology is limited to short distances and relatively low power level.
Orbiting solar power collectors would require wireless transmission of power to Earth. The proposed method involves creating a large beam of microwave-frequency radio waves, which would be aimed at a collector antenna site on the Earth. Formidable technical challenges exist to ensure the safety and profitability of such a scheme.
Storage
[edit]
Energy storage is accomplished by devices or physical media that store energy to perform useful operation at a later time. A device that stores energy is sometimes called an accumulator.
All forms of energy are either potential energy (e.g. Chemical, gravitational, electrical energy, temperature differential, latent heat, etc.) or kinetic energy (e.g. momentum). Some technologies provide only short-term energy storage, and others can be very long-term such as power to gas using hydrogen or methane and the storage of heat or cold between opposing seasons in deep aquifers or bedrock. A wind-up clock stores potential energy (in this case mechanical, in the spring tension), a battery stores readily convertible chemical energy to operate a mobile phone, and a hydroelectric dam stores energy in a reservoir as gravitational potential energy. Ice storage tanks store ice (thermal energy in the form of latent heat) at night to meet peak demand for cooling. Fossil fuels such as coal and gasoline store ancient energy derived from sunlight by organisms that later died, became buried and over time were then converted into these fuels. Even food (which is made by the same process as fossil fuels) is a form of energy stored in chemical form.
History
[edit]Since prehistory, when humanity discovered fire to warm up and roast food, through the Middle Ages in which populations built windmills to grind the wheat, until the modern era in which nations can get electricity splitting the atom. Man has sought endlessly for energy sources.
Except nuclear, geothermal and tidal, all other energy sources are from current solar isolation or from fossil remains of plant and animal life that relied upon sunlight. Ultimately, solar energy itself is the result of the Sun's nuclear fusion. Geothermal power from hot, hardened rock above the magma of the Earth's core is the result of the decay of radioactive materials present beneath the Earth's crust, and nuclear fission relies on man-made fission of heavy radioactive elements in the Earth's crust; in both cases these elements were produced in supernova explosions before the formation of the Solar System.
Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the question of the future of energy supplies has been of interest. In 1865, William Stanley Jevons published The Coal Question in which he saw that the reserves of coal were being depleted and that oil was an ineffective replacement. In 1914, U.S. Bureau of Mines stated that the total production was 5.7 billion barrels (910,000,000 m3). In 1956, Geophysicist M. King Hubbert deduces that U.S. oil production would peak between 1965 and 1970 and that oil production will peak "within half a century" on the basis of 1956 data. In 1989, predicted peak by Colin Campbell[138] In 2004, OPEC estimated, with substantial investments, it would nearly double oil output by 2025[139]
Sustainability
[edit]
The environmental movement has emphasized sustainability of energy use and development.[140] Renewable energy is sustainable in its production; the available supply will not be diminished for the foreseeable future - millions or billions of years. "Sustainability" also refers to the ability of the environment to cope with waste products, especially air pollution. Sources which have no direct waste products (such as wind, solar, and hydropower) are brought up on this point. With global demand for energy growing, the need to adopt various energy sources is growing. Energy conservation is an alternative or complementary process to energy development. It reduces the demand for energy by using it efficiently.
Resilience
[edit]Some observers contend that idea of "energy independence" is an unrealistic and opaque concept.[141] The alternative offer of "energy resilience" is a goal aligned with economic, security, and energy realities. The notion of resilience in energy was detailed in the 1982 book Brittle Power: Energy Strategy for National Security.[142] The authors argued that simply switching to domestic energy would not be secure inherently because the true weakness is the often interdependent and vulnerable energy infrastructure of a country. Key aspects such as gas lines and the electrical power grid are often centralized and easily susceptible to disruption. They conclude that a "resilient energy supply" is necessary for both national security and the environment. They recommend a focus on energy efficiency and renewable energy that is decentralized.[143]
In 2008, former Intel Corporation Chairman and CEO Andrew Grove looked to energy resilience, arguing that complete independence is unfeasible given the global market for energy.[144] He describes energy resilience as the ability to adjust to interruptions in the supply of energy. To that end, he suggests the U.S. make greater use of electricity.[145] Electricity can be produced from a variety of sources. A diverse energy supply will be less affected by the disruption in supply of any one source. He reasons that another feature of electrification is that electricity is "sticky" – meaning the electricity produced in the U.S. is to stay there because it cannot be transported overseas. According to Grove, a key aspect of advancing electrification and energy resilience will be converting the U.S. automotive fleet from gasoline-powered to electric-powered. This, in turn, will require the modernization and expansion of the electrical power grid. As organizations such as The Reform Institute have pointed out, advancements associated with the developing smart grid would facilitate the ability of the grid to absorb vehicles en masse connecting to it to charge their batteries.[146]
Present and future
[edit]
Liquid fuels incl. Biofuels Coal Natural Gas
Renewable fuels Nuclear fuels

Industrialized nations
Developing nations
EE/Former Soviet Union
Extrapolations from current knowledge to the future offer a choice of energy futures.[149] Predictions parallel the Malthusian catastrophe hypothesis. Numerous are complex models based scenarios as pioneered by Limits to Growth. Modeling approaches offer ways to analyze diverse strategies, and hopefully find a road to rapid and sustainable development of humanity. Short term energy crises are also a concern of energy development. Extrapolations lack plausibility, particularly when they predict a continual increase in oil consumption.[citation needed]
Energy production usually requires an energy investment. Drilling for oil or building a wind power plant requires energy. The fossil fuel resources that are left are often increasingly difficult to extract and convert. They may thus require increasingly higher energy investments. If investment is greater than the value of the energy produced by the resource, it is no longer an effective energy source. These resources are no longer an energy source but may be exploited for value as raw materials. New technology may lower the energy investment required to extract and convert the resources, although ultimately basic physics sets limits that cannot be exceeded.
Between 1950 and 1984, as the Green Revolution transformed agriculture around the globe, world grain production increased by 250%. The energy for the Green Revolution was provided by fossil fuels in the form of fertilizers (natural gas), pesticides (oil), and hydrocarbon fueled irrigation.[150] The peaking of world hydrocarbon production (peak oil) may lead to significant changes, and require sustainable methods of production.[151] One vision of a sustainable energy future involves all human structures on the earth's surface (i.e., buildings, vehicles and roads) doing artificial photosynthesis (using sunlight to split water as a source of hydrogen and absorbing carbon dioxide to make fertilizer) efficiently than plants.[152]
With contemporary space industry's economic activity[153][154] and the related private spaceflight, with the manufacturing industries, that go into Earth's orbit or beyond, delivering them to those regions will require further energy development.[155][156] Researchers have contemplated space-based solar power for collecting solar power for use on Earth. Space-based solar power has been in research since the early 1970s. Space-based solar power would require construction of collector structures in space. The advantage over ground-based solar power is higher intensity of light, and no weather to interrupt power collection.
Energy technology
[edit]Energy technology is an interdisciplinary engineering science having to do with the efficient, safe, environmentally friendly, and economical extraction, conversion, transportation, storage, and use of energy, targeted towards yielding high efficiency whilst skirting side effects on humans, nature, and the environment.
For people, energy is an overwhelming need, and as a scarce resource, it has been an underlying cause of political conflicts and wars. The gathering and use of energy resources can be harmful to local ecosystems and may have global outcomes.
Energy is also the capacity to do work. We can get energy from food. Energy can be of different forms such as kinetic, potential, mechanical, heat, light etc. Energy is required for individuals and the whole society for lighting, heating, cooking, running, industries, operating transportation and so forth. Basically there are two types of energy depending on the source s they are; 1.Renewable Energy Sources 2.Non-Renewable Energy Sources
Interdisciplinary fields
[edit]As an interdisciplinary science Energy technology is linked with many interdisciplinary fields in sundry, overlapping ways.
- Physics, for thermodynamics and nuclear physics
- Chemistry for fuel, combustion, air pollution, flue gas, battery technology and fuel cells.
- Electrical engineering
- Engineering, often for fluid energy machines such as combustion engines, turbines, pumps and compressors.
- Geography, for geothermal energy and exploration for resources.
- Mining, for petrochemical and fossil fuels.
- Agriculture and forestry, for sources of renewable energy.
- Meteorology for wind and solar energy.
- Water and Waterways, for hydropower.
- Waste management, for environmental impact.
- Transportation, for energy-saving transportation systems.
- Environmental studies, for studying the effect of energy use and production on the environment, nature and climate change.
- (Lighting Technology), for Interior and Exterior Natural as well as Artificial Lighting Design, Installations, and Energy Savings
- (Energy Cost/Benefit Analysis), for Simple Payback and Life Cycle Costing of Energy Efficiency/Conservation Measures Recommended
Electrical engineering
[edit]
Electric power engineering deals with the production and use of electrical energy, which can entail the study of machines such as generators, electric motors and transformers. Infrastructure involves substations and transformer stations, power lines and electrical cable. Load management and power management over networks have meaningful sway on overall energy efficiency. Electric heating is also widely used and researched.
Thermodynamics
[edit]Thermodynamics deals with the fundamental laws of energy conversion and is drawn from theoretical Physics.
Thermal and chemical energy
[edit]
Thermal and chemical energy are intertwined with chemistry and environmental studies. Combustion has to do with burners and chemical engines of all kinds, grates and incinerators along with their energy efficiency, pollution and operational safety.
Exhaust gas purification technology aims to lessen air pollution through sundry mechanical, thermal and chemical cleaning methods. Emission control technology is a field of process and chemical engineering. Boiler technology deals with the design, construction and operation of steam boilers and turbines (also used in nuclear power generation, see below), drawn from applied mechanics and materials engineering.
Energy conversion has to do with internal combustion engines, turbines, pumps, fans and so on, which are used for transportation, mechanical energy and power generation. High thermal and mechanical loads bring about operational safety worries which are dealt with through many branches of applied engineering science.
Nuclear energy
[edit]
Nuclear technology deals with nuclear power production from nuclear reactors, along with the processing of nuclear fuel and disposal of radioactive waste, drawing from applied nuclear physics, nuclear chemistry and radiation science.
Nuclear power generation has been politically controversial in many countries for several decades but the electrical energy produced through nuclear fission is of worldwide importance.[157] There are high hopes that fusion technologies will one day replace most fission reactors but this is still a research area of nuclear physics.
Renewable energy
[edit]
Renewable energy has many branches.
Wind power
[edit]
Wind turbines convert wind energy into electricity by connecting a spinning rotor to a generator. Wind turbines draw energy from atmospheric currents and are designed using aerodynamics along with knowledge taken from mechanical and electrical engineering. The wind passes across the aerodynamic rotor blades, creating an area of higher pressure and an area of lower pressure on either side of the blade. The forces of lift and drag are formed due to the difference in air pressure. The lift force is stronger than the drag force; therefore the rotor, which is connected to a generator, spins. The energy is then created due to the change from the aerodynamic force to the rotation of the generator.[158]
Being recognized as one of the most efficient renewable energy sources, wind power is becoming more and more relevant and used in the world.[159] Wind power does not use any water in the production of energy making it a good source of energy for areas without much water. Wind energy could also be produced even if the climate changes in line with current predictions, as it relies solely on wind.[160]
Geothermal
[edit]Deep within the Earth, is an extreme heat producing layer of molten rock called magma.[161] The very high temperatures from the magma heats nearby groundwater. There are various technologies that have been developed in order to benefit from such heat, such as using different types of power plants (dry, flash or binary), heat pumps, or wells.[162] These processes of harnessing the heat incorporate an infrastructure which has in one form or another a turbine which is spun by either the hot water or the steam produced by it.[163] The spinning turbine, being connected to a generator, produces energy. A more recent innovation involves the use of shallow closed-loop systems that pump heat to and from structures by taking advantage of the constant temperature of soil around 10 feet deep.[164]
Hydropower
[edit]
Hydropower draws mechanical energy from rivers, ocean waves and tides. Civil engineering is used to study and build dams, tunnels, waterways and manage coastal resources through hydrology and geology. A low speed water turbine spun by flowing water can power an electrical generator to produce electricity.
Bioenergy
[edit]Bioenergy deals with the gathering, processing and use of biomasses grown in biological manufacturing, agriculture and forestry from which power plants can draw burning fuel. Ethanol, methanol (both controversial) or hydrogen for fuel cells can be had from these technologies and used to generate electricity.
Enabling technologies
[edit]Heat pumps and Thermal energy storage are classes of technologies that can enable the utilization of renewable energy sources that would otherwise be inaccessible due to a temperature that is too low for utilization or a time lag between when the energy is available and when it is needed. While enhancing the temperature of available renewable thermal energy, heat pumps have the additional property of leveraging electrical power (or in some cases mechanical or thermal power) by using it to extract additional energy from a low quality source (such as seawater, lake water, the ground, the air, or waste heat from a process).
Thermal storage technologies allow heat or cold to be stored for periods of time ranging from hours or overnight to interseasonal, and can involve storage of sensible energy (i.e. by changing the temperature of a medium) or latent energy (i.e. through phase changes of a medium, such between water and slush or ice). Short-term thermal storages can be used for peak-shaving in district heating or electrical distribution systems. Kinds of renewable or alternative energy sources that can be enabled include natural energy (e.g. collected via solar-thermal collectors, or dry cooling towers used to collect winter's cold), waste energy (e.g. from HVAC equipment, industrial processes or power plants), or surplus energy (e.g. as seasonally from hydropower projects or intermittently from wind farms). The Drake Landing Solar Community (Alberta, Canada) is illustrative. borehole thermal energy storage allows the community to get 97% of its year-round heat from solar collectors on the garage roofs, which most of the heat collected in summer.[165][166] Types of storages for sensible energy include insulated tanks, borehole clusters in substrates ranging from gravel to bedrock, deep aquifers, or shallow lined pits that are insulated on top. Some types of storage are capable of storing heat or cold between opposing seasons (particularly if very large), and some storage applications require inclusion of a heat pump. Latent heat is typically stored in ice tanks or what are called phase-change materials (PCMs).
See also
[edit]- Policy
- Energy policy, Energy policy of the United States, Energy policy of China, Energy policy of India, Energy policy of the European Union, Energy policy of the United Kingdom, Energy policy of Russia, Energy policy of Brazil, Energy policy of Canada, Energy policy of the Soviet Union, Energy Industry Liberalization and Privatization (Thailand)
- General
- Seasonal thermal energy storage (Interseasonal thermal energy storage), Geomagnetically induced current, Energy harvesting, Timeline of sustainable energy research 2020–present
- Feedstock
- Raw material, Biomaterial, Energy consumption, Materials science, Recycling, Upcycling, Downcycling
References
[edit]- ^ "2023 Statistical Review of World Energy". energyinst.org. 23 Jul 2023. Retrieved 23 Jan 2024.
- ^ "International". EIA. Retrieved 24 Jan 2024.
- ^ Institute, Energy. "Home". Statistical review of world energy. Retrieved 2025-09-23.
- ^ International Energy Agency: Key World Energy Statistics 2007. S. 6
- ^ Energy Security and Climate Policy: Assessing Interactions. p125
- ^ Energy Security: Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications. Edited by Carlos Pascual, Jonathan Elkind. p210
- ^ Geothermal Energy Resources for Developing Countries. By D. Chandrasekharam, J. Bundschuh. p91
- ^ Congressional Record, V. 153, PT. 2, January 18, 2007 to February 1, 2007 edited by U S Congress, Congress (U.S.). p 1618
- ^ India s Energy Security. Edited by Ligia Noronha, Anant Sudarshan.
- ^ National security, safety, technology, and employment implications of increasing CAFE standards : hearing before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, second session, January 24, 2002. DIANE Publishing. p10
- ^ Ending our-Dependence on Oil Archived 2013-03-19 at the Wayback Machine - American Security Project. americansecurityproject.org
- ^ Energy Dependency, Politics and Corruption in the Former Soviet Union. By Margarita M. Balmaceda. Psychology Press, December 6, 2007.
- ^ Oil-Led Development Archived May 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine: Social, Political, and Economic Consequences. Terry Lynn Karl. Stanford University. Stanford, California, United States.
- ^ Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation, and Risk Management. Was at: www.pppl.gov/polImage.cfm?doc_Id=44&size_code=Doc
- ^ "Big Rig Building Boom". Rigzone.com. 2006-04-13. Archived from the original on 2007-10-21. Retrieved 2008-01-18.
- ^ "Heat Island Group Home Page". Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 2000-08-30. Archived from the original on January 9, 2008. Retrieved 2008-01-19.
- ^ "Has the World Already Passed "Peak Oil"?". nationalgeographic.com. 2010-11-11. Archived from the original on 2014-08-12.
- ^ ScienceDaily.com (April 22, 2010) "Fossil-Fuel Subsidies Hurting Global Environment, Security, Study Finds" Archived 2016-04-10 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007): IPCC Fourth Assessment Report - Working Group I Report on "The Physical Science Basis".
- ^ "Environmental impacts of coal power: air pollution". Union of Concerned Scientists. 18 August 2005. Archived from the original on 15 January 2008. Retrieved 18 January 2008.
- ^ NRDC: There Is No Such Thing as "Clean Coal" Archived July 30, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ How much electricity does a typical nuclear power plant generate Archived 2013-07-29 at the Wayback Machine? - FAQ - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
- ^ "Key World Energy Statistics 2012" (PDF). International Energy Agency. 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-11-18. Retrieved 2012-12-17.
- ^ a b "PRIS - Home". Iaea.org. Archived from the original on 2013-06-02. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
- ^ "World Nuclear Power Reactors 2007-08 and Uranium Requirements". World Nuclear Association. 2008-06-09. Archived from the original on March 3, 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-21.
- ^ "Japan approves two reactor restarts". Taipei Times. 2013-06-07. Archived from the original on 2013-09-27. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
- ^ "What is Nuclear Power Plant - How Nuclear Power Plants work | What is Nuclear Power Reactor - Types of Nuclear Power Reactors". EngineersGarage. Archived from the original on 2013-10-04. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
- ^ "Nuclear-Powered Ships | Nuclear Submarines". World-nuclear.org. Archived from the original on 2013-06-12. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
- ^ "RPI at Work | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-02-26. Retrieved 2015-06-04. Naval Nuclear Propulsion, Magdi Ragheb. As of 2001, about 235 naval reactors had been built
- ^ "Beyond ITER". The ITER Project. Information Services, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. Archived from the original on 7 November 2006. Retrieved 5 February 2011. - Projected fusion power timeline
- ^ Union-Tribune Editorial Board (March 27, 2011). "The nuclear controversy". Union-Tribune. Archived from the original on November 19, 2011.
- ^ James J. MacKenzie. Review of The Nuclear Power Controversy by Arthur W. Murphy The Quarterly Review of Biology, Vol. 52, No. 4 (Dec., 1977), pp. 467-468.
- ^ In February 2010 the nuclear power debate played out on the pages of The New York Times, see A Reasonable Bet on Nuclear Power Archived 2017-02-01 at the Wayback Machine and Revisiting Nuclear Power: A Debate Archived 2017-04-09 at the Wayback Machine and A Comeback for Nuclear Power? Archived 2010-02-26 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ U.S. Energy Legislation May Be 'Renaissance' for Nuclear Power Archived 2009-06-26 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Spencer R. Weart (2012). The Rise of Nuclear Fear. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-06506-2.
- ^ Sturgis, Sue. "Investigation: Revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety". The Institute for Southern Studies. Institute for Southern Studies. Archived from the original on 2010-04-18. Retrieved 2010-08-24.
- ^ Strengthening the Safety of Radiation Sources Archived 2009-03-26 at the Wayback Machine p. 14.
- ^ Johnston, Robert (September 23, 2007). "Deadliest radiation accidents and other events causing radiation casualties". Database of Radiological Incidents and Related Events. Archived from the original on October 23, 2007.
- ^ Markandya, A.; Wilkinson, P. (2007). "Electricity generation and health". Lancet. 370 (9591): 979–990. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61253-7. PMID 17876910. S2CID 25504602.
- ^ "Dr. MacKay Sustainable Energy without the hot air". Data from studies by the Paul Scherrer Institute including non EU data. p. 168. Archived from the original on 2 September 2012. Retrieved 15 September 2012.
- ^ "How Deadly is Your Kilowatt? We Rank the Killer Energy Sources". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2012-06-10. Retrieved 2017-05-13. with Chernobyl's total predicted linear no-threshold cancer deaths included, nuclear power is safer when compared to many alternative energy sources' immediate, death rate.
- ^ Brendan Nicholson (2006-06-05). "Nuclear power 'cheaper, safer' than coal and gas". The Age. Archived from the original on 2008-02-08. Retrieved 2008-01-18.
- ^ Burgherr Peter (2008). "A Comparative Analysis of Accident Risks in Fossil, Hydro, and Nuclear Energy Chains" (PDF). Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. 14 (5): 947–973, 962–5. Bibcode:2008HERA...14..947B. doi:10.1080/10807030802387556. S2CID 110522982. Comparing Nuclear's latent cancer deaths, such as cancer with other energy sources immediate deaths per unit of energy generated(GWeyr). This study does not include fossil fuel related cancer and other indirect deaths created by the use of fossil fuel consumption in its "severe accident", an accident with more than 5 fatalities, classification.
- ^ Richard Schiffman (12 March 2013). "Two years on, America hasn't learned lessons of Fukushima nuclear disaster". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017.
- ^ Martin Fackler (June 1, 2011). "Report Finds Japan Underestimated Tsunami Danger". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 5, 2017.
- ^ "Worldwide First Reactor to Start Up in 2013, in China - World Nuclear Industry Status Report". Worldnuclearreport.org. 18 February 2013. Archived from the original on 2013-06-02. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
- ^ Ayesha Rascoe (February 9, 2012). "U.S. approves first new nuclear plant in a generation". Reuters. Archived from the original on July 1, 2017.
- ^ Mark Cooper (18 June 2013). "Nuclear aging: Not so graceful". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Archived from the original on 5 July 2013.
- ^ Matthew Wald (June 14, 2013). "Nuclear Plants, Old and Uncompetitive, Are Closing Earlier Than Expected". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 26, 2017.
- ^ Conca, James. "Uranium Seawater Extraction Makes Nuclear Power Completely Renewable". forbes.com. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
- ^ April 20, 2016 Volume 55, Issue 15 Pages 4101-4362 In this issue:Uranium in Seawater Page 962 to 965
- ^ "Collectively, life cycle assessment literature shows that nuclear power is similar to other renewable and much lower than fossil fuel in total life cycle GHG emissions". Nrel.gov. 2013-01-24. Archived from the original on 2013-07-02. Retrieved 2013-06-22.
- ^ Wagner, Friedrich (2021). "CO2 emissions of nuclear power and renewable energies: a statistical analysis of European and global data". The European Physical Journal Plus. 136 (5) 562. Bibcode:2021EPJP..136..562W. doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01508-7. ISSN 2190-5444.
- ^ Kharecha Pushker A (2013). "Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power - global nuclear power has prevented an average of 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths and 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent (GtCO2-eq) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that would have resulted from fossil fuel burning". Environmental Science. 47 (9): 4889–4895. Bibcode:2013EnST...47.4889K. doi:10.1021/es3051197. hdl:2060/20140017100. PMID 23495839.
- ^ a b Sylvia Westall; Fredrik Dahl (June 24, 2011). "IAEA Head Sees Wide Support for Stricter Nuclear Plant Safety". Scientific American. Archived from the original on June 25, 2011.
- ^ "Gauging the pressure". The Economist. 28 April 2011. Archived from the original on 31 August 2012.
- ^ European Environment Agency (January 23, 2013). "Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation: Full Report". p. 476. Archived from the original on May 17, 2013.
- ^ Tomoko Yamazaki; Shunichi Ozasa (27 June 2011). "Fukushima Retiree Leads Anti-Nuclear Shareholders at Tepco Annual Meeting". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 30 June 2011.
- ^ Mari Saito (7 May 2011). "Japan anti-nuclear protesters rally after PM call to close plant". Reuters. Archived from the original on 7 May 2011.
- ^ a b Ipsos (23 June 2011), Global Citizen Reaction to the Fukushima Nuclear Plant Disaster (theme: environment / climate) Ipsos Global @dvisor (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 24 December 2014. Survey website: Ipsos MORI: Poll: Strong global opposition towards nuclear power Archived 2016-04-03 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ a b c Kidd, Steve (January 21, 2011). "New reactors—more or less?". Nuclear Engineering International. Archived from the original on 2011-12-12.
- ^ Ed Crooks (12 September 2010). "Nuclear: New dawn now seems limited to the east". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2022-12-10. Retrieved 12 September 2010.
- ^ Edward Kee (16 March 2012). "Future of Nuclear Energy" (PDF). NERA Economic Consulting. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 October 2013. Retrieved 2 October 2013.
- ^ The Future of Nuclear Power. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2003. ISBN 978-0-615-12420-9. Archived from the original on 2017-05-18. Retrieved 2006-11-10.
- ^ Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2011). "The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle" (PDF). p. xv. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-06-01.
- ^ "UAE's fourth power reactor under construction". www.world-nuclear-news.org. Archived from the original on 16 September 2017. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
- ^ "The Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation ( ENEC ) provided a project update on the status of the UAE peaceful nuclear energy program". www.fananews.com. Archived from the original on 6 October 2016. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
- ^ Patel, Tara; Francois de Beaupuy (24 November 2010). "China Builds Nuclear Reactor for 40% Less Than Cost in France, Areva Says". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 28 November 2010. Retrieved 2011-03-08.
- ^ Source for data beginning in 2017: "Renewable Energy Market Update Outlook for 2023 and 2024" (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency (IEA). June 2023. p. 19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 July 2023.
IEA. CC BY 4.0.
● Source for data through 2016: "Renewable Energy Market Update / Outlook for 2021 and 2022" (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency. May 2021. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2023.IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0
- ^ Data: BP Statistical Review of World Energy, and Ember Climate (3 November 2021). "Electricity consumption from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, 2020". OurWorldInData.org. Our World in Data consolidated data from BP and Ember. Archived from the original on 3 November 2021.
- ^ "Modern renewables – SDG7: Data and Projections – Analysis". IEA. Retrieved 2024-02-04.
- ^ Østergaard, Poul Alberg; Duic, Neven; Noorollahi, Younes; Kalogirou, Soteris (2022-11-01). "Renewable energy for sustainable development". Renewable Energy. 199: 1145–1152. Bibcode:2022REne..199.1145O. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.065. ISSN 0960-1481.
- ^ Shahbaz, Muhammad; Raghutla, Chandrashekar; Chittedi, Krishna Reddy; Jiao, Zhilun; Vo, Xuan Vinh (2020-09-15). "The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from the renewable energy country attractive index". Energy. 207 118162. Bibcode:2020Ene...20718162S. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118162. ISSN 0360-5442.
- ^ Akbas, Beste; Kocaman, Ayse Selin; Nock, Destenie; Trotter, Philipp A. (2022-03-01). "Rural electrification: An overview of optimization methods". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 156 111935. Bibcode:2022RSERv.15611935A. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111935. ISSN 1364-0321.
- ^ Østergaard, Poul Alberg; Duic, Neven; Noorollahi, Younes; Kalogirou, Soteris (2020-12-01). "Latest progress in Sustainable Development using renewable energy technology". Renewable Energy. 162: 1554–1562. Bibcode:2020REne..162.1554O. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.124. hdl:20.500.14279/19253. ISSN 0960-1481.
- ^ Lu, Zhou; Gozgor, Giray; Mahalik, Mantu Kumar; Padhan, Hemachandra; Yan, Cheng (2022-08-01). "Welfare gains from international trade and renewable energy demand: Evidence from the OECD countries". Energy Economics. 112 106153. Bibcode:2022EneEc.11206153L. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106153. hdl:10454/19625. ISSN 0140-9883.
- ^ Bridge, Gavin; Bouzarovski, Stefan; Bradshaw, Michael; Eyre, Nick (2013-02-01). "Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy". Energy Policy. 53: 331–340. Bibcode:2013EnPol..53..331B. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066. ISSN 0301-4215.
- ^ "Renewables 2016: Global Status Report" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-05-25. Retrieved 2017-05-24.
- ^ a b c Worldwatch Institute (January 2012). "Use and Capacity of Global Hydropower Increases". Archived from the original on 2014-09-24. Retrieved 2014-01-11.
- ^ Renewables 2011 Global Status Report, page 25, Hydropower Archived April 9, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, REN21, published 2011, accessed 2011-11-7.
- ^ The World Wind Energy Association (2014). 2014 Half-year Report. WWEA. pp. 1–8.
- ^ Global wind energy markets continue to boom – 2006 another record year Archived 2011-04-07 at the Wayback Machine (PDF).
- ^ a b c d "World Wind Energy Report 2010" (PDF). Report. World Wind Energy Association. February 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 September 2011. Retrieved 8 August 2011.
- ^ "Renewables". eirgrid.com. Archived from the original on 15 August 2011. Retrieved 22 November 2010.
- ^ a b c REN21 (2011). "Renewables 2011: Global Status Report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-05.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "This page has been removed - News - The Guardian". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2017-02-26.
- ^ Spain Renewable Energy and High Penetration Archived June 9, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Terra-Gen Press Release Archived 2012-05-10 at the Wayback Machine, 17 April 2012
- ^ BS Reporter (11 May 2012). "Suzlon creates country's largest wind park". business-standard.com. Archived from the original on 1 October 2012.
- ^ "Top News". www.renewableenergyworld.com. Archived from the original on 5 January 2016. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
- ^ a b "Drilling Down: What Projects Made 2008 Such a Banner Year for Wind Power?". renewableenergyworld.com. Archived from the original on 2011-07-15.
- ^ a b AWEA: U.S. Wind Energy Projects – Texas Archived December 29, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ FG Forrest; a. s.; fg {zavináč } fg {tečka} cz - Content Management System - Edee CMS; SYMBIO Digital, s. r. o. - Webdesign. "CEZ Group - The Largest Wind Farm in Europe Goes Into Trial Operation". cez.cz. Archived from the original on 2015-07-01.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ AWEA: U.S. Wind Energy Projects – Indiana Archived 2010-09-18 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b "Solar Energy Perspectives: Executive Summary" (PDF). International Energy Agency. 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 January 2012.
- ^ "Energy". Royal Society of Chemistry. 2 April 2014.
- ^ Maka, Ali O M; Alabid, Jamal M (1 June 2022). "Solar energy technology and its roles in sustainable development". Clean Energy. 6 (3): 476–483. doi:10.1093/ce/zkac023. ISSN 2515-396X.
- ^ Marques Lameirinhas, Ricardo A.; N Torres, João Paulo; de Melo Cunha, João P. (2022). "A photovoltaic technology review: History, fundamentals and applications". Energies. 15 (5): 1823. doi:10.3390/en15051823.
- ^ Santillan-Jimenez Eduardo (2015). "Continuous catalytic deoxygenation of model and algal lipids to fuel-like hydrocarbons over Ni–Al layered double hydroxide". Catalysis Today. 258: 284–293. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2014.12.004.
- ^ a b "Biofuels Make a Comeback Despite Tough Economy". Worldwatch Institute. 2011-08-31. Archived from the original on 2012-05-30. Retrieved 2011-08-31.
- ^ "Technology Roadmap, Biofuels for Transport" (PDF). 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-07-22.
- ^ How Geothermal energy works Archived 2014-09-25 at the Wayback Machine. Ucsusa.org. Retrieved on 2013-04-24.
- ^ Lay T., Hernlund J., Buffett B. A. (2008). "Core–mantle boundary heat flow". Nature Geoscience. 1 (1): 25–32. Bibcode:2008NatGe...1...25L. doi:10.1038/ngeo.2007.44.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Nemzer, J. "Geothermal heating and cooling". Archived from the original on 1998-01-11.
- ^ "Geothermal capacity | About BP | BP Global". Bp.com. Archived from the original on 2013-10-06. Retrieved 2013-10-05.
- ^ Fridleifsson, Ingvar B.; Bertani, Ruggero; Huenges, Ernst; Lund, John W.; Ragnarsson, Arni; Rybach, Ladislaus (2008-02-11), O. Hohmeyer and T. Trittin, ed., The possible role and contribution of geothermal energy to the mitigation of climate change (pdf), IPCC Scoping Meeting on Renewable Energy Sources, Luebeck, Germany, pp. 59–80, retrieved 2009-04-06
- ^ Glassley, William E. (2010). Geothermal Energy: Renewable Energy and the Environment, CRC Press, ISBN 9781420075700.
- ^ Green Power Archived 2014-10-15 at the Wayback Machine. eweb.org
- ^ Cothran, Helen (2002), Energy Alternatives, Greenhaven Press, ISBN 978-0-7377-0904-9
- ^ Fridleifsson, Ingvar (2001). "Geothermal energy for the benefit of the people". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 5 (3): 299–312. Bibcode:2001RSERv...5..299F. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.459.1779. doi:10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00002-8.
- ^ Caballero, Mariah D.; Gunda, Thushara; McDonald, Yolanda J. (2023-09-01). "Energy justice & coastal communities: The case for Meaningful Marine Renewable Energy Development". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 184 113491. Bibcode:2023RSERv.18413491C. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113491. ISSN 1364-0321.
- ^ Ocean Energy. 2009. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77932-2. ISBN 978-3-540-77931-5.
- ^ Thorson, J (2022). Unlocking the potential of marine energy using hydrogen generation technologies. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
- ^ Ni, Na (2023-04-01). "The current state on China's marine energy industry policy". IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1171 (1) 012025. Bibcode:2023E&ES.1171a2025N. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1171/1/012025. ISSN 1755-1307.
- ^ Vieira, Mário; Macedo, Ana; Alvarenga, António; Lafoz, Marcos; Villalba, Isabel; Blanco, Marcos; Rojas, Rodrigo; Romero-Filgueira, Alejandro; García-Mendoza, Adriana; Santos-Herran, Miguel; Alves, Marco (January 2024). "What future for marine renewable energy in Portugal and Spain up to 2030? Forecasting plausible scenarios using general morphological analysis and clustering techniques". Energy Policy. 184 113859. Bibcode:2024EnPol.18413859V. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113859. hdl:10362/159623. ISSN 0301-4215.
- ^ "About". Ocean Energy Ireland. Retrieved 2024-03-12.
- ^ "Renewable Electricity Support Scheme (RESS)". www.gov.ie. 2019-12-20. Retrieved 2024-03-12.
- ^ Newman, Sarah F.; Bhatnagar, Dhruv; O'Neil, Rebecca S.; Reiman, Andy P.; Preziuso, Danielle C.; Robertson, Bryson (2022-09-30). "Evaluating the resilience benefits of marine energy in microgrids". International Marine Energy Journal. 5 (2): 143–150. doi:10.36688/imej.5.143-150. ISSN 2631-5548.
- ^ "Ocean energy: An important ally in the fight against climate change". impact.economist.com. Retrieved 2024-02-27.
- ^ "Environmental Effects of Marine Renewable Energy: the 2020 State of the Science Report | Tethys". tethys.pnnl.gov. Retrieved 2024-02-27.
- ^ Paul Gipe (4 April 2013). "100 Percent Renewable Vision Building". Renewable Energy World. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014.
- ^ IPCC (2011). "Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation" (PDF). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. p. 17. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-01-11.
- ^ S. Pacala; R. Socolow (2004). "Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies" (PDF). Science. 305 (5686). Science Vol. 305: 968–972. Bibcode:2004Sci...305..968P. doi:10.1126/science.1100103. PMID 15310891. S2CID 2203046. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-08-12.
- ^ Mark A. Delucchi; Mark Z. Jacobson (2011). "Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies" (PDF). Energy Policy. Elsevier Ltd. pp. 1170–1190. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2012-06-16.
- ^ National Research Council (2010). Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments. National Academies of Science. p. 4. doi:10.17226/12619. ISBN 978-0-309-13708-9. Archived from the original on 2014-03-27.
- ^ Amory Lovins (March–April 2012). "A Farewell to Fossil Fuels". Foreign Affairs. 329 (5997): 1292–1294. Bibcode:2010Sci...329.1292H. doi:10.1126/science.1195449. PMID 20829473. S2CID 206529026. Archived from the original on 2012-07-07.
- ^ "What It Would Really Take to Reverse Climate Change". IEEE. 2014-11-18. Archived from the original on 24 November 2016. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
- ^ "Philips Tornado Asian Compact Fluorescent". Philips. Archived from the original on 2012-08-04. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
- ^ Richard L. Kauffman Obstacles to Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency. in: From Silos to Systems: Issues in Clean Energy and Climate Change. A report on the work of the REIL Network, 2008-2010. Edited by Parker L et al. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies 2010
- ^ Diesendorf, Mark (2007). Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy, UNSW Press, p. 86.
- ^ IEA (2021), Net Zero by 2050, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050, License: CC BY 4.0
- ^ "The Twin Pillars of Sustainable Energy: Synergies between Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Technology and Policy". Aceee.org. Archived from the original on 2009-04-29. Retrieved 2010-07-16.
- ^ Ross, Cullen (26 August 2016). "Evaluating renewable energy policies" (PDF). The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 61 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12175. hdl:10.1111/1467-8489.12175. S2CID 157313814.
- ^ "News". Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Archived from the original on 2010-09-22.
- ^ Fuel Cell Materials Technology in Vehicular Propulsion: Report. National Academies, 1983.
- ^ "Oak Ridge National Laboratory — Biomass, Solving the science is only part of the challenge". Archived from the original on 2013-07-02. Retrieved 2008-01-06.
- ^ "Oil Price Leap in the Early Nineties," Noroil, December 1989, pages 35–38.
- ^ Opec Oil Outlook to 2025 Table 4, Page 12
- ^ Sustainable Development and Innovation in the Energy Sector. Ulrich Steger, Wouter Achterberg, Kornelis Blok, Henning Bode, Walter Frenz, Corinna Gather, Gerd Hanekamp, Dieter Imboden, Matthias Jahnke, Michael Kost, Rudi Kurz, Hans G. Nutzinger, Thomas Ziesemer. Springer, December 5, 2005.
- ^ "Energy independence and security: A reality check" (PDF). deloitte.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 5, 2013.
- ^ Brittle Power: Energy Plan for National Security Archived 2009-07-02 at the Wayback Machine. Amory B. Lovins and L. Hunter Lovins (1982).
- ^ "The Fragility of Domestic Energy." Archived 2009-01-06 at the Wayback Machine Amory B. Lovins and L. Hunter Lovins. Atlantic Monthly. November 1983.
- ^ "Our Electric Future." Archived 2014-08-25 at the Wayback Machine Andrew Grove. The American. July/August 2008.
- ^ Andrew Grove and Robert Burgelman (December 2008). "An Electric Plan for Energy Resilience". McKinsey Quarterly. Archived from the original on 2014-08-25. Retrieved 2010-07-20.
- ^ Resilience in Energy: Building Infrastructure Today for Tomorrow's Automotive Fuel. Reform Institute. March 2009.[permanent dead link]
- ^ World energy consumption outlook from the International Energy Outlook, published by the U.S. DOE Energy Information Administration
- ^ Source: Energy Information Administration – International Energy Outlook 2004 Archived 2017-07-27 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Mandil, C. (2008) "Our energy for the future". S.A.P.I.EN.S. 1 (1) Archived 2009-04-28 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Eating Fossil Fuels". Resilience. Archived from the original on 2007-06-11.
- ^ Peak Oil: the threat to our food security Archived July 14, 2009, at the Wayback Machine retrieved 28 May 2009
- ^ Faunce TA, Lubitz W, Rutherford AW, MacFarlane D, Moore, GF, Yang P, Nocera DG, Moore TA, Gregory DH, Fukuzumi S, Yoon KB, Armstrong FA, Wasielewski MR, Styring S. 'Energy and Environment Case for a Global Project on Artificial Photosynthesis.' Energy and Environmental Science 2013, 6 (3), 695 - 698 doi:10.1039/C3EE00063J Styring, Stenbjorn; Wasielewski, Michael R.; Armstrong, Fraser A.; Yoon, Kyung Byung; Fukuzumi, Shunichi; Gregory, Duncan H.; Moore, Tom A.; Nocera, Daniel G.; Yang, Peidong; Moore, Gary F.; MacFarlane, Douglas; Rutherford, A. W. (Bill); Lubitz, Wolfgang; Faunce, Thomas A. (2013-02-20). "Energy and environment policy case for a global project on artificial photosynthesis". Energy & Environmental Science. 6 (3): 695–698. Bibcode:2013EnEnS...6..695F. doi:10.1039/C3EE00063J. (accessed 13 March 2013)
- ^ Joan Lisa Bromberg (October 2000). NASA and the Space Industry. JHU Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-8018-6532-9. Retrieved 10 June 2011.
- ^ Kai-Uwe Schrogl (2 August 2010). Yearbook on Space Policy 2008/2009: Setting New Trends. Springer. p. 49. ISBN 978-3-7091-0317-3. Retrieved 10 June 2011.
- ^ Propulsion Techniques: Action and Reaction edited by Peter J. Turchi. p341
- ^ Climate Change: The Science, Impacts and Solutions. Edited by A. Pittock
- ^ "The West's Nuclear Mistake". www.msn.com. Retrieved 2021-12-08.
- ^ "How Do Wind Turbines Work?". Energy.gov. Retrieved 2020-12-10.
- ^ "BiblioBoard". openresearchlibrary.org. Retrieved 2020-12-10.
- ^ Ledec, George C.; Rapp, Kennan W.; Aiello, Roberto G. (2011-12-01). Greening the Wind: Environmental and Social Considerations for Wind Power Development. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-8926-3. hdl:10986/2388. ISBN 978-0-8213-8926-3.
- ^ "How Geothermal Energy Works | Union of Concerned Scientists". www.ucsusa.org. Retrieved 2020-12-14.
- ^ "Geothermal Energy". National Geographic Society. 2012-11-20. Retrieved 2020-12-14.
- ^ US EPA, OAR. "Geothermal Energy". archive.epa.gov. Retrieved 2020-12-14.
- ^ "Where is Geothermal Energy Used?". GreenFire Energy Inc. Retrieved 2020-12-14.
- ^ Wong, Bill (June 28, 2011), "Drake Landing Solar Community" Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine, IDEA/CDEA District Energy/CHP 2011 Conference, Toronto, pp. 1–30, retrieved 21 April 2013
- ^ Wong B., Thornton J. (2013). Integrating Solar & Heat Pumps. Archived 2013-10-15 at the Wayback Machine Renewable Heat Workshop.
Sources
[edit]- Armstrong, Robert C., Catherine Wolfram, Robert Gross, Nathan S. Lewis, and M.V. Ramana et al. The Frontiers of Energy, Nature Energy, Vol 1, 11 January 2016.
- Serra, J. "Alternative Fuel Resource Development", Clean and Green Fuels Fund, (2006).
- Bilgen, S. and K. Kaygusuz, Renewable Energy for a Clean and Sustainable Future, Energy Sources 26, 1119 (2004).
- Energy analysis of Power Systems, UIC Nuclear Issues Briefing Paper 57 (2004).
- Silvestre B. S., Dalcol P. R. T. (2009). "Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration — Brazil". Technovation. 29 (8): 546–561. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.003.
Journals
[edit]External links
[edit]- Bureau of Land Management 2012 Renewable Energy Priority Projects
- Energypedia - a wiki about renewable energies in the context of development cooperation
- Hidden Health and Environmental Costs Of Energy Production and Consumption In U.S.
- IEA-ECES - International Energy Agency - Energy Conservation through Energy Conservation programme.
- IEA HPT TCP - International Energy Agency - Technology Collaboration Programme on Heatpumping Technologies.
- IEA-SHC - International Energy Agency - Solar Heating and Cooling programme.
- SDH - Solar District Heating Platform. (European Union)
Energy development
View on GrokipediaFundamentals and Classification
Definition and Principles
Energy development refers to the systematic processes of identifying, extracting, converting, and distributing energy from natural resources to generate usable forms that power human activities, infrastructure, and economies. These processes begin with primary energy sources—raw materials such as coal, crude oil, uranium, flowing water, wind, or solar radiation—that are transformed into secondary energy forms like electricity, refined fuels, or heat. In 2023, global primary energy supply reached approximately 620 exajoules, predominantly from fossil fuels, underscoring the scale of these operations.[10][1] At its core, energy development adheres to the inviolable laws of thermodynamics, which dictate the feasibility and efficiency of energy transformations. The first law of thermodynamics, or the law of energy conservation, asserts that energy in a closed system remains constant; it can only change forms, such as from chemical potential in hydrocarbons to kinetic energy in turbines, without net creation or destruction. This principle underpins all extraction and conversion technologies, from drilling rigs liberating subterranean natural gas to photovoltaic cells capturing photons and generating electron flow.[11][12] The second law of thermodynamics introduces directional constraints and inherent inefficiencies, stating that energy disperses or degrades into less useful forms, increasing entropy, and prohibiting processes like perpetual motion machines. Consequently, no energy conversion achieves 100% efficiency; real-world systems, such as steam turbines in coal-fired plants, typically operate at 33-45% thermal efficiency due to heat losses, while combined-cycle gas turbines can reach up to 60%. These limits necessitate engineering innovations to minimize waste, such as advanced materials for higher [Carnot cycle](/page/Carnot cycle) performance, while recognizing that all energy development incurs thermodynamic penalties that favor concentrated, high-density sources for practical scalability.[13][14]Energy Density Metrics
Energy density metrics quantify the amount of usable energy available from a given quantity of an energy source, typically expressed as gravimetric energy density (megajoules per kilogram, MJ/kg) or volumetric energy density (MJ per liter or cubic meter). Gravimetric measures energy per unit mass, relevant for transportation and handling costs, while volumetric assesses energy per unit volume, critical for storage and infrastructure requirements. These metrics underpin the feasibility of energy development, as higher densities enable more efficient extraction, conversion, and distribution with lower material and land demands; for instance, sources with densities exceeding 30 MJ/kg or 25 MJ/L support scalable industrial applications, whereas lower values necessitate compensatory infrastructure like vast collection areas or frequent replenishment.[15][16] Fossil fuels exhibit moderate to high densities compared to biomass or renewables. Anthracite coal averages 24-32 MJ/kg gravimetrically, with volumetric densities around 15-25 MJ/L depending on bulk density (0.6-1.0 g/cm³). Crude oil ranges from 42-46 MJ/kg, yielding 35-42 MJ/L at typical densities of 0.8-0.95 g/cm³, making it ideal for mobile applications. Natural gas, primarily methane, reaches 50-55 MJ/kg but has low volumetric density as a gas (0.04 MJ/L at standard conditions); liquefaction boosts it to about 22 MJ/L for LNG. These values derive from lower heating values accounting for combustion efficiency, with oil's liquid state providing a practical balance for global transport networks.[16][17] Nuclear fuels demonstrate exceptionally high densities due to fission releasing nuclear binding energy, far surpassing chemical bonds in fossil fuels. Enriched uranium oxide (UO₂) fuel, with 3-5% U-235, yields effective gravimetric densities of approximately 3-8 × 10⁶ MJ/kg over a reactor cycle, as 1 kg of fuel can produce energy equivalent to 2-3 million kg of coal (at coal's 24 MJ/kg baseline). Volumetric densities exceed 10⁹ MJ/m³ for fuel assemblies, enabling compact reactors that generate gigawatts from kilograms of material annually. This stems from each fission event liberating about 200 MeV (3.2 × 10⁻¹¹ J), with practical burnup rates amplifying output per unit mass.[18][19] Renewable sources generally feature lower densities, reflecting their diffuse nature. Dry biomass like wood chips provides 15-20 MJ/kg, comparable to low-grade coal but requiring 2-3 times the mass for equivalent output, with volumetric challenges from irregular packing. Solar energy's effective density is minimal when normalized to collection area or material; average terrestrial insolation delivers ~0.2-1 kWh/m²/day (0.7-3.6 MJ/m²/day), translating to power densities of 5-15 W/m² for photovoltaic systems after efficiency losses, orders below nuclear's ~10⁶ W/m³. Wind energy fares similarly, with average power densities of 1-3 W/m² across turbine footprints, necessitating expansive installations for terawatt-scale output. These metrics highlight renewables' reliance on scale rather than concentration, increasing land and material footprints.[18][19]| Energy Source | Gravimetric Density (MJ/kg) | Volumetric Density (MJ/L or equiv.) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coal (anthracite) | 24-32 | 15-25 | Bulk density varies; chemical combustion.[19][17] |
| Crude Oil | 42-46 | 35-42 | Liquid form optimizes transport.[16] |
| Natural Gas (LNG) | 50-55 | ~22 (LNG) | Gaseous form lower without liquefaction.[16] |
| Nuclear Fuel (UO₂) | ~10⁶ | ~10⁹ /m³ | Fission-based; effective over cycle.[18] |
| Biomass (dry wood) | 15-20 | 8-12 | Moisture reduces effective yield.[19] |
| Solar (PV effective) | N/A (flux-based) | ~10^{-6} /m³ (atmospheric) | Power density 5-15 W/m² avg.[18] |
Reliability and Capacity Factors
The capacity factor of an energy generation facility quantifies its operational efficiency, defined as the ratio of actual electrical energy output over a given period to the maximum possible output at continuous full-rated capacity during that time, expressed as a percentage.[20] It reflects both technical reliability and utilization patterns, with higher values indicating sustained operation closer to design limits. In energy development, capacity factors inform infrastructure scaling, grid stability, and economic viability, as low factors necessitate oversized installations to achieve equivalent energy yields, increasing material demands and land use.[21] Reliability encompasses the predictability and controllability of power supply, distinguishing dispatchable sources—capable of ramping output on demand—from intermittent ones dependent on environmental conditions. Dispatchable technologies like nuclear, fossil fuels, and certain hydro facilities maintain high capacity factors through continuous baseload operation or flexible response to demand, minimizing blackout risks without extensive backups.[22] In contrast, wind and solar exhibit variability due to meteorological dependence, yielding lower factors and requiring compensatory measures such as overbuild, storage, or fossil peakers, which elevate system costs and complexity.[23] United States data from the Energy Information Administration illustrate these disparities for 2023, based on utility-scale generation:| Energy Source | Capacity Factor (%) |
|---|---|
| Nuclear | 93.0 |
| Geothermal | 69.4 |
| Natural Gas (other fossil gas) | 53.8 |
| Hydroelectric (conventional) | 35.0 |
| Wind | 33.2 |
| Solar Photovoltaic | 23.2 |
| Solar Thermal | 22.1 |
Resource Categorization
Energy resources are classified into nonrenewable and renewable categories according to their replenishment on human timescales. Nonrenewable resources deplete with use and include fossil fuels and nuclear fuels. Fossil fuels—coal, petroleum, and natural gas—originate from ancient biomass deposits compressed over geological epochs, accounting for approximately 80% of global primary energy consumption as of 2022.[10][31] Nuclear fuels, chiefly uranium isotopes like U-235, are mined from finite deposits and enable energy release via atomic fission, representing about 4-5% of world primary energy supply.[32][31] Renewable resources regenerate through natural processes and encompass hydropower, wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, and tidal energy. Hydropower harnesses gravitational potential from water reservoirs, while wind and solar derive from atmospheric and solar radiation fluxes, respectively; these intermittent sources supplied around 14% of global primary energy in recent assessments.[33][31] Geothermal taps subsurface heat conduction, biomass utilizes recent organic growth, and tidal leverages gravitational interactions—categories collectively emphasizing flux-based availability over stock depletion.[33] This binary framework, while foundational, overlooks nuances such as nuclear fuel cycle extensions via breeder reactors or biomass sustainability limits from land competition; nonetheless, it structures policy and development priorities by distinguishing stock (nonrenewable) from flow (renewable) dynamics.[10] Empirical data from agencies like the U.S. Energy Information Administration underscore fossil dominance in scale, with renewables scaling variably by geography and technology maturity.[31]Historical Development
Pre-Industrial Energy Sources
Prior to the Industrial Revolution, human societies derived energy predominantly from renewable biological and mechanical sources, with global primary energy consumption estimated at less than 10 exajoules annually around 1800, almost entirely from biomass such as wood and agricultural residues.[34] These sources powered essential activities including heating, cooking, agriculture, and rudimentary manufacturing, constrained by low energy density and intermittency compared to later fossil fuels.[35] Muscle power from humans and domesticated animals provided the bulk of mechanical work, supplemented by hydraulic and aeolian forces harnessed through simple machines like water wheels and windmills.[36] Biomass, chiefly firewood and charcoal, served as the cornerstone for thermal energy needs. In pre-industrial Europe, wood supplied over 90% of energy for heating and cooking until the late 18th century, with charcoal—produced by pyrolyzing wood in low-oxygen pits—enabling higher-temperature applications such as iron smelting in bloomeries dating back to the Iron Age.[34] Charcoal production consumed vast forests; for instance, pre-1800 American iron furnaces required 200-400 bushels of charcoal per ton of pig iron, contributing to regional deforestation and prompting early shifts toward coal in Britain by the 16th century.[37] In agrarian societies, crop wastes and animal dung supplemented wood, but overuse led to woodland depletion, as evidenced by England's reliance on imported timber by the Tudor era.[38] Human and animal muscle constituted the primary motive power for labor-intensive tasks. Domestication of draft animals like oxen and horses, beginning around 4000 BCE in Eurasia, amplified agricultural output; a single horse could perform the work equivalent of 1-5 humans in plowing, depending on terrain.[39] Human labor, often coerced through slavery in ancient civilizations such as Rome—where estimates suggest slaves provided up to 20% of caloric energy input via diet—underpinned mining, construction, and transport until mechanization.[40] Overall, muscle sources accounted for nearly all non-thermal energy pre-1700, limited by biological efficiency of around 20-25% in converting food to work.[41] Water and wind offered intermittent mechanical energy for milling and pumping, emerging as scalable alternatives from antiquity. Water wheels, documented in Greece by 300 BCE and proliferating in medieval Europe, powered grain mills and forges; by 1086, England's Domesday Book recorded over 5,000 mills, each generating 1-5 horsepower.[42] Efficiency hovered at 20-30% for undershot and breastshot designs, rising modestly with overshot variants by the 18th century.[43] Windmills, adapted from Persian designs by the 7th century and refined into post mills in 12th-century England, similarly drove grinding and drainage, with Dutch polders employing thousands by 1700 to reclaim land via wind-powered Archimedes screws.[44] These animate prime movers foreshadowed factory systems but remained site-bound and weather-dependent, yielding far less reliable output than post-industrial steam.[45]Industrial Era: Fossil Fuel Expansion
The Industrial Revolution, beginning in Britain circa 1760, marked the pivotal expansion of fossil fuel utilization, with coal emerging as the dominant energy source that powered mechanization and economic transformation. Coal output in Britain escalated dramatically from approximately 5.2 million tons per year in 1750 to 62.5 million tons by 1850, driven by innovations such as James Watt's improved steam engine in 1769, which harnessed coal's combustion for efficient rotary motion in factories, textile mills, and early railways.[46] [47] This surge facilitated the shift from water- and animal-powered artisanal production to coal-fueled industrial-scale operations, particularly in iron smelting via Abraham Darby III's coke process in 1760, which reduced reliance on scarce charcoal and enabled mass production of iron for machinery and infrastructure.[48] Coal's expansion extended globally, underpinning industrialization in Europe and North America by providing a high-energy-density fuel superior to biomass for sustained operations. In the United States, anthracite and bituminous coal mining boomed from the early 1800s, with Pennsylvania output fueling steel production and steamships; by 1850, U.S. coal production reached 8.4 million tons annually, contributing to a foundation for 19th-century economic growth through cheap, abundant energy that lowered production costs and expanded markets.[49] [50] Globally, coal's share of primary energy consumption rose above 10% by 1800 and surpassed 50% by the 1870s, as its portability and scalability outpaced traditional sources, enabling urban factories and transportation networks that multiplied productivity and population densities.[51] Parallel to coal's dominance, petroleum extraction initiated a secondary fossil fuel wave in the mid-19th century, transitioning energy applications from stationary power to mobile and illuminative uses. Edwin Drake's drilling of the first commercial oil well in Titusville, Pennsylvania, on August 27, 1859, at 69.5 feet depth, yielded 25 barrels per day initially, spurring U.S. production from negligible volumes to over 2,000 barrels daily by 1860 and displacing whale oil in kerosene lamps, which consumed vast marine resources prior.[52] This breakthrough, refined through distillation processes, laid groundwork for oil's role in lubrication and early engines, with global output climbing to support industrial logistics; by the 1870s, refineries in regions like Baku and Pennsylvania processed crude into versatile products, amplifying fossil fuels' causal contribution to sustained GDP growth via reliable, scalable energy exceeding pre-industrial limits.[53] [54]20th Century: Nuclear Innovation and Electrification
The expansion of electrification in the 20th century transformed energy access, driven primarily by coal-fired and hydroelectric plants in the early decades, with global electricity generation rising from approximately 66 TWh in 1900 to thousands of TWh by mid-century.[55] In the United States, urban and nonfarm rural electrification reached nearly 90% by 1930, but only about 10% of farms had access, highlighting disparities that private utilities largely ignored due to low density and high costs.[56] The Rural Electrification Act of May 20, 1936, established federal loans through the Rural Electrification Administration to fund cooperatives, enabling rapid deployment of distribution systems and increasing U.S. rural access to over 90% by the 1950s.[57] Globally, post-World War II economic recovery accelerated demand, with electricity consumption growing at about 6% annually in the 1950s and 1960s, outpacing fossil fuel expansion and supporting industrialization in Europe and Japan.[58] Nuclear innovation emerged from wartime research, culminating in the first controlled chain reaction on December 2, 1942, with Chicago Pile-1 at the University of Chicago, which demonstrated fission's potential without producing weapons-grade material.[59] The U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1954 shifted nuclear technology toward civilian use, authorizing private development of power reactors and marking a pivot from military monopoly.[60] Experimental Breeder Reactor-I (EBR-I) in Idaho achieved the first electricity from nuclear fission on December 20, 1951, powering four 200-watt light bulbs, proving the feasibility of heat-to-electricity conversion via atomic processes.[61] The Soviet Union's Obninsk plant became the world's first grid-connected nuclear facility on June 27, 1954, generating 5 MW for public supply using a graphite-moderated reactor.[62] Commercial deployment accelerated in the late 1950s, with the UK's Calder Hall reactor connecting to the grid on August 27, 1956, as the first station designed for both plutonium production and 200 MW electricity output, emphasizing dual-use innovation.[63] In the U.S., Shippingport Atomic Power Station in Pennsylvania began commercial operation on December 2, 1957, producing 60 MW from a pressurized water reactor, the first full-scale plant for utility-scale electricity.[62] These milestones enabled nuclear to contribute to electrification by providing high-capacity, low-fuel-cost baseload power; by 1970, over 100 reactors operated worldwide, with installed capacity exceeding 20 GW, reducing reliance on fossil fuels in nations like France and supporting grid stability amid rising demand.[64] Innovations in reactor designs, such as light-water and gas-cooled types, addressed safety and efficiency, though early plants prioritized proof-of-concept over optimization, with capacity factors improving from under 50% in the 1960s to higher levels by century's end.[65]Post-2000: Renewables Acceleration and Demand Surge
Global primary energy demand expanded substantially after 2000, rising from around 400 exajoules in 2000 to approximately 620 exajoules by 2023, with an average annual growth rate of about 2%.[66] This surge was primarily propelled by industrialization, urbanization, and population growth in emerging economies, particularly China and India, where non-OECD countries accounted for the majority of the increase.[67] Electricity demand contributed significantly, driven by factors such as air conditioning proliferation, electrification of transport via electric vehicles, and data center expansion, with global electricity consumption growing by nearly 1,100 terawatt-hours in 2024 alone.[68] Concurrent with rising demand, renewable energy deployment accelerated markedly, especially for wind and solar photovoltaic technologies, whose combined share in global electricity generation climbed from 0.2% in 2000 to 13.4% in 2023.[69] Global renewable capacity expanded by over 415% since 2000, with solar PV leading due to plummeting costs—from over $5 per watt in 2000 to under $0.30 per watt by 2023—and supportive policies including feed-in tariffs and production tax credits.[70] [71] In the United States, federal subsidies directed nearly half of energy support (46%) toward renewables between 2016 and 2022, facilitating rapid installations, though such incentives also distorted markets by favoring intermittent sources over dispatchable alternatives.[72] Despite this growth, renewables' penetration in total primary energy remained limited, comprising about 15% in 2023 (largely from traditional biomass and hydropower), as fossil fuels continued to supply over 80% of global energy needs and met most of the incremental demand surge.[73] The intermittency of wind and solar necessitated backup from fossil or nuclear capacity, highlighting reliability challenges; for instance, capacity factors for solar averaged 10-25% and wind 20-40%, far below fossil fuels' 50-90%.[71] Policy frameworks like the Kyoto Protocol (1997, effective post-2000) and Paris Agreement (2015) amplified renewable investments, but empirical data indicate that demand growth in developing regions prioritized affordable, dense energy sources, sustaining fossil fuel dominance.[74]Baseload Energy Sources
Fossil Fuels Overview
Fossil fuels—coal, crude oil, and natural gas—originate from the compressed remains of ancient organic matter and constitute the primary source of global energy, accounting for 81.5% of primary energy consumption in 2023 despite a marginal decline in share amid record total demand growth of 2%.[75] In electricity generation, they provide essential baseload capacity, defined as the continuous minimum power output to meet steady demand, due to their dispatchability: plants can start, ramp, and sustain operations on demand, achieving capacity factors typically between 50% and 85% depending on fuel type and plant efficiency, far exceeding intermittent sources like solar (around 25%) or wind (35%).[76][77] This reliability stems from the fuels' high energy density—coal at about 24 MJ/kg, oil at 42 MJ/kg, and natural gas at 50 MJ/kg—enabling compact storage and rapid mobilization without dependence on weather or geography.[78] As baseload providers, fossil fuels underpin grid stability worldwide, with coal dominating in developing economies for its abundance and low cost (often under $0.05/kWh at the plant level), while natural gas offers cleaner combustion and flexibility in combined-cycle plants yielding up to 60% efficiency.[79] Oil, though less common for stationary power due to higher costs, supports peaking and backup roles in diesel generators. Their established infrastructure—pipelines, refineries, and power stations—facilitates scalability, having powered industrialization and lifted billions from poverty through affordable, on-demand energy since the 19th century.[80] In 2023, global fossil fuel consumption hit new highs, with oil at 100.2 million barrels per day and coal comprising a quarter of total energy use, underscoring their role amid surging demand from electrification and industry.[81] Projections from the International Energy Agency indicate fossil fuel demand may peak before 2030 under current policies, driven by efficiency gains and clean energy expansion, yet they are expected to remain over 70% of primary energy through mid-century due to unmatched reliability and infrastructure inertia.[82] Combustion of these fuels releases carbon dioxide and other pollutants, contributing to climate impacts, but technological advances like carbon capture and utilization (CCU) aim to mitigate emissions while preserving baseload utility; for instance, CCU-equipped gas plants can achieve near-zero net CO2 output at scales up to 90% capture rates.[82] Their finite reserves—estimated at 50 years for oil and gas, longer for coal—necessitate strategic development, but enhanced recovery techniques have extended viable supplies, emphasizing fossil fuels' enduring centrality to energy security.[83]Coal Production and Utilization
Coal is extracted primarily through two methods: surface mining and underground mining. Surface mining, suitable for shallower deposits, involves stripping away overburden and extracting coal via draglines, bucket-wheel excavators, or truck-and-shovel operations, comprising about two-thirds of U.S. production due to lower costs compared to underground methods.[84] Underground mining, used for deeper seams, employs techniques such as room-and-pillar, where pillars of coal support the roof, or longwall mining, which uses shearers to extract entire panels of coal in a continuous operation, allowing for higher recovery rates but requiring advanced roof control and ventilation systems.[85] Post-extraction, coal undergoes processing including crushing, screening, and washing to remove impurities and improve quality for specific uses.[86] Global coal production reached approximately 8.9 billion tonnes in 2024, marking a 1.4% increase from the previous year, driven largely by demand in Asia.[87] China dominated with over 51% of worldwide output, producing around 4.6 billion tonnes, followed by India at 11.7% and Indonesia at 9%, reflecting the Asia-Pacific region's 80% share of total production.[88] Other significant producers included the United States (about 500 million short tons), Australia, and Russia, though output in OECD countries like the U.S. and EU declined due to policy shifts and competition from natural gas.[89] Production trends from 2020 to 2025 show resilience in developing economies, with global totals rising despite Western reductions; for instance, China's output grew steadily to meet industrial and power needs, while U.S. production fell from 548 million short tons in 2020 to around 500 million in 2024.[90] [91] Utilization of coal centers on electricity generation and industrial applications, with thermal coal powering steam turbines in pulverized coal-fired plants that achieve efficiencies up to 40-45% in supercritical designs.[90] In 2024, global coal demand hit a record 8.77 billion tonnes, up 1% year-over-year, primarily for power sector use amid heatwaves and hydropower shortfalls in Asia, where coal supplied about 60% of China's electricity.[90] [92] Coking coal, a metallurgical variant, is essential for steel production via blast furnaces, accounting for roughly 8% of global coal use and supporting industries in India and Indonesia.[93] Despite growth in renewables, coal's role in providing dispatchable baseload power persisted, with consumption rising 2.3% in 2024, concentrated in ASEAN nations (+9%) while falling 4% in OECD countries.[93] Projections for 2025 indicate stable demand near 2024 levels, underscoring coal's continued economic viability in high-growth regions despite emission reduction pressures.[94]Oil Extraction and Refining
![Barnett Shale drilling rig in operation][float-right] Oil extraction involves drilling into subterranean reservoirs to access crude oil, a fossil fuel formed from ancient organic matter under heat and pressure over millions of years. Conventional extraction targets porous rock formations where oil flows freely to the wellbore under natural reservoir pressure, often enhanced by secondary recovery methods like water or gas injection.[95] Unconventional methods, dominant in recent decades, include hydraulic fracturing combined with horizontal drilling to liberate oil trapped in low-permeability shale and tight sandstone formations.[95] [96] Hydraulic fracturing entails injecting high-pressure fluid—primarily water mixed with sand and chemicals—into the formation to create fractures, allowing oil to flow to the well. This technique, first commercially applied in the U.S. in the 1940s but revolutionized in the 2000s for shale plays like the Permian Basin, has enabled the United States to become the world's largest producer, outputting approximately 13.6 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil in 2023.[97] [98] Globally, crude oil production reached about 100 million bpd in 2023, with the top producers being the United States (13.6 million bpd), Saudi Arabia (9.97 million bpd), and Russia (9.78 million bpd), accounting for roughly 33% of the total.[99] [98] Offshore drilling, utilizing platforms or subsea systems, contributes significantly, particularly in regions like the North Sea and Gulf of Mexico, where advanced directional drilling accesses reserves under seabeds.[95] Extracted crude oil, varying in density and sulfur content (e.g., light sweet vs. heavy sour), is transported via pipelines, tankers, or rail to refineries for processing into usable products. Refining begins with separation through atmospheric and vacuum distillation, heating crude to 350–400°C to vaporize components, which are then condensed into fractions like naphtha, kerosene, and residuum based on boiling points.[100] Subsequent conversion processes, such as catalytic cracking and hydrocracking, break heavy hydrocarbons into lighter ones like gasoline and diesel, while reforming upgrades low-octane naphtha.[100] [101] Final treatment removes impurities like sulfur via hydrotreating, yielding products that constitute over 90% of U.S. transportation fuels.[100] Refineries process diverse crudes to optimize yields, with global capacity exceeding 100 million bpd as of 2023, though utilization varies with market demand.[102]Natural Gas Developments
Natural gas, primarily composed of methane, emerged as a major energy source in the 19th century following early commercial uses for lighting in Britain during the 1780s.[103] Ancient civilizations in China utilized bamboo pipelines for transport over 2,500 years ago, but systematic development accelerated post-World War II with advancements in welding, metallurgy, and pipeline infrastructure in the United States, enabling widespread distribution.[104] [105] Technological breakthroughs in the early 21st century, particularly horizontal drilling combined with hydraulic fracturing (fracking), unlocked vast shale gas reserves, transforming the U.S. into the world's largest producer.[106] U.S. production surged from around 18 trillion cubic feet in 2005 to over 1,029 billion cubic meters annually by 2024, reducing reliance on imports, lowering energy prices, and contributing to a 7.5% drop in per capita greenhouse gas emissions through substitution for coal.[107] [108] This shale revolution accounted for approximately one-tenth of U.S. GDP growth between 2008 and 2018 and reshaped global markets by enabling net exports.[109] [110] Liquefied natural gas (LNG) technology, which cools gas to -162°C to reduce volume by 600 times for maritime transport, facilitated international trade expansion since the first commercial shipments in 1964.[111] Recent innovations include floating LNG (FLNG) facilities for offshore production and small-scale plants for localized distribution, alongside cryogenic improvements and carbon capture integration to enhance efficiency and reduce emissions.[112] Global production reached 4.12 trillion cubic meters in 2024, up 1.2% from prior years, led by the U.S., Russia, Iran, and China, with demand projected to rise 60% by 2040 driven by Asian economic growth.[113] [114] Proven reserves exceed 50 years of current consumption, but sustained investment is required to avert potential supply shortfalls of 22% if demand growth persists without new capacity.[115] While methane leakage poses environmental risks, empirical data indicate net decarbonization benefits in power generation compared to coal, supporting natural gas's role in baseload energy amid transitioning grids.[116]Nuclear Fission Processes
Nuclear fission is the process by which the nucleus of a heavy atom, such as uranium-235, splits into two or more lighter nuclei, known as fission products, releasing substantial energy primarily in the form of kinetic energy of the fragments, neutrons, and gamma radiation.[117][32] This reaction is induced when a slow-moving thermal neutron is absorbed by the fissile uranium-235 nucleus, forming the excited uranium-236 compound nucleus, which becomes unstable and divides asymmetrically into fragments with masses typically between 95 and 135 atomic mass units.[118][119] Each fission event liberates approximately 200 million electron volts (MeV) of energy, vastly exceeding chemical reactions, with about 85% of this energy initially appearing as kinetic energy of the rapidly recoiling fission products.[120] The released energy from fission fragments is thermalized through collisions with surrounding coolant and moderator materials, converting to heat that sustains the reactor's operation.[121] Concurrently, each fission typically emits 2 to 3 prompt neutrons, enabling a self-sustaining chain reaction when the effective neutron multiplication factor (k-effective) equals or exceeds 1, meaning at least one of the emitted neutrons induces another fission.[122][123] In controlled environments like power reactors, control rods made of neutron-absorbing materials such as boron or cadmium modulate neutron flux to maintain criticality, preventing exponential growth while ensuring steady heat output.[124] Fission processes in commercial reactors predominantly utilize enriched uranium fuel, where uranium-235 concentration is raised to 3-5% to achieve the necessary neutron economy for sustained reactions in thermal spectra, as natural uranium contains only 0.7% U-235.[32] Alternative fissile materials like plutonium-239, bred from uranium-238 via neutron capture, support similar fission chains in mixed-oxide fuel cycles.[124] Fission products, including isotopes like cesium-137 and strontium-90, accumulate as reactor poisons, gradually absorbing neutrons and necessitating fuel shuffling or replacement every 12-24 months to sustain efficiency.[125] Delayed neutrons from fission product decay provide crucial seconds-to-minutes timescales for reactor control, allowing operators to respond to transients without immediate shutdown.[120]Nuclear Safety and Waste Handling
Nuclear power exhibits one of the lowest mortality rates among energy sources, with estimates ranging from 0.03 to 0.07 deaths per terawatt-hour (TWh) of electricity generated, primarily attributable to historical accidents rather than routine operations.[126][127] This compares favorably to coal (24.6 deaths/TWh), oil (18.4 deaths/TWh), and natural gas (2.8 deaths/TWh), and is comparable to or lower than wind (0.04 deaths/TWh) and solar (0.02-0.44 deaths/TWh, including occupational hazards).[126][128] The low routine risk stems from multiple engineered barriers, including robust containment structures and redundant cooling systems, which prevent significant radionuclide releases under normal conditions.[129] Major accidents have shaped safety protocols but represent rare failures often linked to design flaws or external events. The 1979 Three Mile Island incident in Pennsylvania involved a partial core meltdown due to equipment malfunction and operator error, releasing minimal radioactive gases equivalent to less than a chest X-ray for nearby residents, with no detectable health effects or fatalities from radiation.[130][131] Chernobyl in 1986, caused by a flawed reactor design (RBMK) and procedural violations during a test, resulted in 28-30 immediate deaths from acute radiation syndrome among workers and firefighters, plus approximately 15 fatalities from thyroid cancers in exposed children; broader projections of thousands of cancer deaths remain contested, with United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) attributing no significant increase in other cancers.[132][133] The 2011 Fukushima Daiichi meltdowns, triggered by a tsunami overwhelming seawalls, produced no direct radiation deaths but approximately 2,300 fatalities from evacuation stress, primarily among the elderly; radiation exposures remained below levels causing acute effects.[134] These events prompted global enhancements, including better operator training, probabilistic risk assessments, and seismic standards.[130] Advanced reactor designs in Generation III and IV incorporate passive safety features, such as natural convection cooling and gravity-driven systems that function without external power or human intervention, reducing core damage probabilities to below 1 in 10 million reactor-years.[135][136] Examples include the AP1000's canned rotor pumps and the EPR's four-train safety systems, which enhance resistance to loss-of-coolant accidents and station blackouts observed in past incidents.[129] Regulatory bodies like the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission require these designs to demonstrate superior performance through validated simulations and testing.[135] Nuclear waste handling focuses on high-level waste (spent fuel), which constitutes a small volume—approximately 2 metric tons per TWh generated—compared to coal ash (hundreds of thousands of tons per TWh) or end-of-life solar panels (thousands of tons per TWh equivalent).[137][138] Low- and intermediate-level wastes are vitrified or solidified for interim storage, while spent fuel undergoes initial wet storage in pools for cooling before transfer to dry cask systems, which have operated without significant incidents for decades.[139] Long-term disposal relies on deep geological repositories (DGRs), engineered with multiple barriers (e.g., copper canisters in bentonite clay within crystalline rock) to isolate waste for millennia; Finland's Onkalo facility is under construction for operation by 2025, and the U.S. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant has safely disposed of transuranic waste since 1999.[139][140] Progress varies by country due to political and siting challenges, but reprocessing recovers over 95% of usable material in programs like France's, minimizing waste volume.[139]Dispatchable Renewables
Hydroelectric Systems
Hydroelectric systems generate electricity by directing water from reservoirs or rivers through turbines connected to generators, converting gravitational potential energy into mechanical and then electrical energy.[141] The primary types include impoundment facilities, which use dams to create reservoirs for controlled water release; run-of-river systems, which harness natural river flow with minimal storage; and pumped storage, which functions as a large-scale energy battery by pumping water uphill during low-demand periods for later generation.[142] Impoundment dominates global capacity due to its dispatchability, enabling output adjustment to grid needs, unlike intermittent renewables.[143] Development accelerated in the late 19th century, with the first commercial hydroelectric plant operational in 1882 at Appleton, Wisconsin, producing 12.5 kW.[144] By the early 20th century, large-scale projects like Hoover Dam (1936, 2,080 MW initial capacity) supported electrification and flood control in the United States.[145] Post-World War II expansion focused on storage hydropower for baseload power, with milestones including Itaipu Dam (1984, 14 GW) on the Brazil-Paraguay border.[146] The Three Gorges Dam in China, completed in 2006 with 22,500 MW capacity, exemplifies modern mega-projects, generating approximately 100 TWh annually while managing Yangtze River flooding.[147] As of 2024, global installed hydroelectric capacity reached 1,443 GW, accounting for about 15% of worldwide electricity production and 47% of renewable generation.[148] [149] In 2022, output totaled 4,354 TWh, led by China (1,300 TWh), Brazil, and Canada.[150] Capacity additions averaged 26 GW annually through 2030 projections, though growth has slowed due to site limitations and environmental regulations.[151] Hydroelectric plants exhibit high energy density, with capacities up to 22,500 MW at single sites, and operational lifespans exceeding 50-100 years, yielding low levelized costs of 3-5 cents per kWh after construction.[149] Advantages include near-zero operational emissions (lifecycle CO2 intensity 4-24 g/kWh, lower than solar's 39-81 g/kWh in some assessments), reliability for peaking and storage via reservoirs, and multifunctionality for irrigation and navigation.[149] Pumped storage constitutes 90% of global energy storage capacity, enhancing grid stability.[142] However, disadvantages encompass high capital costs (often $1-3 million per MW), geographic constraints requiring suitable topography and water resources, and vulnerability to droughts, as evidenced by 2021-2022 reductions in Brazilian output.[152] Environmental impacts arise primarily from dam construction, which floods habitats, fragments rivers, and blocks fish migration, reducing upstream-downstream connectivity for species like salmon.[152] Reservoirs alter water temperature, chemistry, and sediment transport, promoting eutrophication and delta erosion; empirical studies document biodiversity loss and methane emissions from organic decay in tropical reservoirs, equivalent to 1% of global anthropogenic GHGs in some cases.[153] [154] Large projects have displaced millions, as with Three Gorges affecting 1.3 million people.[147] Mitigation includes fish ladders and minimum flow releases, but effectiveness varies; run-of-river systems minimize flooding but offer less storage.[152] Despite these, hydroelectric remains a dispatchable low-carbon option, with lifecycle impacts often lower than fossil alternatives when sited appropriately.[155]Geothermal Extraction
Geothermal extraction utilizes heat from the Earth's interior, primarily from radioactive decay and residual formation heat, to produce electricity or direct thermal energy. Wells are drilled into subsurface reservoirs containing hot water or steam, which is brought to the surface to drive turbines connected to generators.[156] Fluid is typically reinjected to sustain reservoir pressure and minimize environmental impact.[157] Three principal types of geothermal power plants exist: dry steam plants, which pipe high-temperature steam directly to turbines; flash steam plants, which extract high-pressure hot water that "flashes" into steam upon pressure reduction; and binary cycle plants, which transfer heat from lower-temperature geothermal fluids to a secondary working fluid with a lower boiling point for vaporization.[157] Dry steam plants, like those in The Geysers field in California, represent the simplest but least common configuration due to the rarity of pure steam reservoirs.[157] The first experimental geothermal power generation occurred on July 4, 1904, in Larderello, Italy, where Prince Piero Ginori Conti powered four light bulbs using steam from a geothermal well.[158] Commercial production began there in 1913 with a 250 kW plant, marking the onset of utility-scale geothermal electricity.[159] As of 2024, global installed geothermal power capacity reached approximately 15.1 GW, with at least 400 MW added that year, reflecting steady but modest growth.[160] The United States leads with 3,937 MW, primarily in California and Nevada, followed by Indonesia (2,653 MW), the Philippines, Turkey, and New Zealand.[161] Geothermal plants achieve high capacity factors exceeding 75% on average, enabling dispatchable baseload operation with minimal intermittency compared to solar or wind.[162] Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) expand viability beyond conventional hydrothermal reservoirs by fracturing hot dry rock formations to create artificial permeability, allowing fluid circulation for heat extraction.[163] U.S. Department of Energy projections indicate EGS could contribute 90 GW of capacity by 2050, potentially powering tens of millions of homes.[164] Recent demonstrations, such as those by Fervo Energy, report rapid cost reductions through improved drilling and stimulation techniques.[165] Key advantages include near-zero greenhouse gas emissions during operation, resource longevity spanning decades without fuel needs, and small land footprints relative to output.[166] However, deployment remains geographically constrained to tectonically active regions, with high upfront drilling costs—often exceeding $5-10 million per well—and risks of induced seismicity from reinjection or fracturing.[162] Resource depletion in mature fields, like The Geysers, necessitates ongoing management, though reinjection has mitigated declines in many cases.[157] The International Energy Agency estimates untapped technical potential at 42 TW for electricity over 20 years using EGS at depths under 5 km, underscoring scalability if technological and policy barriers are addressed.[167]Biomass and Biofuel Conversion
Biomass conversion involves transforming organic materials, such as wood residues, agricultural waste, and energy crops, into usable energy forms through thermochemical or biochemical processes. These methods enable the production of heat, electricity, or biofuels, positioning biomass as a dispatchable renewable source capable of on-demand generation unlike intermittent renewables. In 2023, modern bioenergy—excluding traditional biomass uses—accounted for approximately 21 exajoules (EJ), or 4.5% of global total final energy consumption.[168] Thermochemical conversion dominates biomass utilization, with direct combustion being the most common for electricity and heat generation, achieving overall plant efficiencies of 20-40% depending on technology and feedstock. Gasification converts biomass into syngas (a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide) at high temperatures (700-1000°C) with limited oxygen, yielding efficiencies up to 70-80% in integrated systems when combined with gas turbines. Pyrolysis, conducted in the absence of oxygen at 400-600°C, produces bio-oil, biochar, and gases, with fast pyrolysis converting 70-90% of biomass to vapors and gases for subsequent upgrading into fuels. Biochemical processes, such as anaerobic digestion of wet biomass, generate biogas (primarily methane) with yields of 0.2-0.4 cubic meters per kilogram of volatile solids, suitable for electricity or upgraded to biomethane.[169][170][171] Biofuel conversion focuses on liquid and gaseous fuels from biomass feedstocks. First-generation biofuels, derived from food crops like corn for ethanol via fermentation (yielding 350-400 liters per tonne of corn) or soybeans for biodiesel through transesterification, dominated production in 2023, with global liquid biofuel output reaching levels that increased 8% year-on-year into 2024, led by the United States (37% share) and Brazil (22% share). Second-generation processes target non-food lignocellulosic biomass via enzymatic hydrolysis or gasification followed by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, though commercial scale remains limited due to higher costs. These biofuels blend with conventional fuels, supporting dispatchable applications in transportation and power when co-fired in engines or turbines.[172][173]| Conversion Process | Primary Products | Typical Efficiency | Key Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combustion | Heat, Electricity | 20-40% | Power plants, district heating[169] |
| Gasification | Syngas | 70-80% (integrated) | Fuel synthesis, turbines[174] |
| Pyrolysis | Bio-oil, Biochar | 70-90% (vapors) | Liquid fuels, chemicals[169] |
| Anaerobic Digestion | Biogas | 30-50% | Electricity, vehicle fuel[175] |
Intermittent Renewables
Solar Technologies
Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems generate electricity through the photovoltaic effect, where photons from sunlight excite electrons in semiconductor materials, typically silicon-based cells, producing direct current that is inverted to alternating current for grid use. Monocrystalline and polycrystalline silicon dominate commercial modules, with efficiencies ranging from 18-22% for standard panels, while thin-film alternatives like cadmium telluride offer lower efficiencies around 15-18% but potentially reduced material use. Laboratory records for multi-junction or tandem cells, such as perovskite-silicon combinations, have reached 31.68% conversion efficiency as of late 2023, though commercial scalability remains limited by stability and cost.[179][180] Global PV capacity expanded rapidly, surpassing 2.2 TW cumulative by late 2024, with annual additions exceeding 597 GW that year, primarily in China, the US, and Europe, fueled by module price drops to under $0.20/W. Despite this growth, real-world performance is constrained by capacity factors averaging 23% in the US as of 2024, varying by location from under 15% in northern latitudes to over 30% in sunny deserts, due to inherent intermittency tied to solar irradiance fluctuations, cloud cover, and day-night cycles. This variability necessitates overbuilding capacity or complementary dispatchable sources to maintain grid reliability, as output can drop 70-100% intra-hour during weather events.[181][182][183] Concentrated solar power (CSP) technologies, including parabolic troughs, power towers, and dish systems, concentrate sunlight via mirrors to heat a fluid—often molten salt—for steam-driven turbines, enabling dispatchability through thermal storage for several hours post-sunset. Global CSP capacity stood at approximately 8.1 GW as of 2023, concentrated in Spain, the US, and the Middle East, with projects like Noor Energy 1 in the UAE adding 400 MW via tower systems with integrated storage. CSP achieves higher capacity factors (25-40%) than PV in optimal sites but requires vast land (up to 10 acres/MW) and water for cooling, limiting deployment amid costs 2-3 times PV's levelized expenses without storage.[184] Material demands pose further constraints: PV production relies on energy-intensive polysilicon refining (emitting 50-100 kg CO2/kW capacity) and scarce inputs like silver (20 mg/W) and indium, with mining and refining contributing to habitat disruption and water pollution. Lifecycle assessments indicate manufacturing accounts for 61-86% of emissions, often 40-50 g CO2/kWh equivalent, comparable to some gas plants before offsets, compounded by end-of-life challenges where panels' encapsulation hinders recycling rates below 10% globally, generating hazardous waste including lead and cadmium. These factors underscore solar's reliance on supply chain vulnerabilities, particularly from China-dominant production (80%+ market share), and underscore the need for empirical evaluation beyond capacity metrics for systemic energy contributions.[185][186][187]Wind Turbine Deployments
Wind turbine deployments involve the installation of turbines to harness kinetic energy from wind for electricity generation, with onshore systems comprising the majority due to lower costs and established infrastructure. By the end of 2024, global cumulative wind power capacity reached approximately 1,136 gigawatts (GW), following the addition of 117 GW in that year alone, marking a record despite supply chain constraints and policy uncertainties in some regions.[188] This growth reflects sustained investments driven by government incentives, though actual generation is limited by capacity factors typically ranging from 25-45% for onshore and higher for offshore, necessitating backup or storage for reliability.[189] Historically, large-scale deployments began in the 1980s in California and Denmark, with cumulative capacity under 10 GW by 1990; exponential expansion occurred post-2000, fueled by feed-in tariffs and renewable portfolio standards, reaching over 1,000 GW by 2023.[190] In 2024, new installations totaled 109 GW onshore and 8 GW offshore, with onshore dominating due to faster permitting and deployment timelines, though offshore offers higher wind speeds and yields in coastal areas.[188] China accounted for the bulk of additions at nearly 80 GW, underscoring state-directed scaling, while Europe's deployments slowed amid grid integration challenges from intermittency.[191] Leading nations by cumulative capacity as of 2024 include:| Country | Installed Capacity (GW) |
|---|---|
| China | 522 |
| United States | ~150 |
| Germany | ~70 |
| India | ~50 |
| Brazil | ~30 |
Marine and Tidal Methods
Marine energy encompasses technologies that harness kinetic and potential energy from ocean waves, tides, and currents to generate electricity. Tidal methods primarily exploit the predictable rise and fall of tides driven by gravitational forces from the Moon and Sun, while wave methods capture the irregular motion of surface waves generated by wind. Unlike solar or wind resources, tidal flows are highly predictable on diurnal and semi-diurnal cycles, offering greater dispatchability, though output remains periodic and site-specific. Global installed capacity for ocean energy, predominantly tidal, stood at 494 MW as of the end of 2024, representing a negligible fraction of total renewable capacity.[196] Tidal barrages function like hydroelectric dams across estuaries or bays with significant tidal ranges, typically exceeding 5 meters. Water is impounded during high tide and released through turbines during ebb tide to drive generators. The world's first commercial-scale facility, the La Rance barrage in France, has operated since 1966 with a capacity of 240 MW, producing over 11 TWh annually at a capacity factor around 25-30%. The larger Sihwa Lake Tidal Power Station in South Korea, commissioned in 2011, generates 254 MW and supplies baseload power equivalent to 10% of Incheon's electricity needs, demonstrating viability in high-amplitude sites but highlighting environmental trade-offs such as altered sediment flows and marine habitats. Tidal stream generators, akin to underwater wind turbines, avoid impoundment by placing rotors in fast-flowing tidal currents; the MeyGen project in Scotland's Pentland Firth has deployed arrays up to 6 MW operational as of 2023, with potential scaling to 398 MW, though biofouling and mechanical failures limit reliability.[197][198] Wave energy converters include oscillating water columns, point absorbers, and attenuators that transform linear or rotational wave motion into mechanical energy for turbines. Devices like the Pelamis attenuator and Oyster hinge have undergone sea trials, but commercial deployments remain limited to prototypes, such as the 0.75 MW Aguçadoura plant in Portugal (operational 2008-2010 before storm damage). Installed wave capacity globally is under 10 MW, constrained by device survivability in extreme conditions—waves can exceed 20 meters in storms—and efficiency losses from irregular inputs. U.S. Department of Energy initiatives in 2024 allocated $112.5 million for wave technology advancement, targeting pilot-scale testing amid challenges like high levelized costs estimated at $0.20-0.50/kWh, far exceeding mature renewables.[199][200] Deployment faces geophysical limitations: viable tidal barrage sites number fewer than 50 worldwide with ranges over 5 meters, while wave resources concentrate in temperate latitudes like the North Atlantic. Capital costs for barrages exceed $5,000/kW due to civil engineering demands, and stream turbines require corrosion-resistant materials costing 2-3 times onshore equivalents. Environmental assessments reveal mixed impacts—tidal streams pose lower ecosystem disruption than barrages, which can trap fish and modify salinity—but permitting delays persist, as seen in canceled U.K. projects. Despite theoretical potentials of 1-3 TW for tides and 2-3 TW for waves, economic viability hinges on subsidies and technological maturation; global generation was approximately 1 TWh in 2023, underscoring marine methods' marginal role in energy transitions. Prospects include hybrid systems integrating with offshore wind, but scaling requires resolving durability in saline, high-velocity environments without relying on intermittent backups.[201][202]Infrastructure and Efficiency
Energy Storage Solutions
Energy storage solutions enable the temporal decoupling of energy generation and consumption, addressing intermittency in variable renewable sources like solar and wind while enhancing grid reliability and efficiency. These technologies convert electrical energy into storable forms—such as potential, kinetic, chemical, or thermal—and release it on demand, with global installed capacity exceeding 200 GW as of 2024, dominated by mature systems but rapidly expanding through electrochemical innovations.[203][204] Pumped storage hydropower (PSH) constitutes the predominant form, accounting for over 90% of worldwide energy storage capacity, with approximately 189 GW installed globally by 2024, up from 179 GW in 2023. PSH operates by pumping water to an elevated reservoir during surplus generation periods and releasing it through turbines to generate electricity during peaks, offering round-trip efficiencies of 70-85% and lifespans exceeding 50 years. Despite high upfront capital costs—typically $1,500-3,000 per kW for new installations—PSH provides cost-effective long-duration storage (hours to days) with minimal degradation, though deployment is constrained by suitable topography and environmental permitting.[205][206][207] Electrochemical batteries, particularly lithium-ion (Li-ion), have surged in adoption for short- to medium-duration applications (1-10 hours), with utility-scale deployments projected to double globally between 2024 and 2025, driven by falling costs from $300-400 per kWh in 2023 to under $150 per kWh by 2025 in favorable markets. Li-ion systems excel in rapid response times (milliseconds) and modularity, enabling grid services like frequency regulation, but face limitations including thermal runaway risks, reliance on scarce materials like cobalt and lithium, and cycle life degradation after 3,000-5,000 charges. In contrast to PSH's bulk storage advantages, Li-ion capital costs escalate for durations beyond 4 hours, rendering it less economical for seasonal needs.[208][209][210] Emerging alternatives address specific gaps: compressed air energy storage (CAES) compresses air in underground caverns for efficiencies up to 70%, suitable for multi-hour discharge but limited by geology and requiring natural gas hybridization in current plants; flow batteries, such as vanadium redox variants, decouple power and energy capacity for scalable, long-duration (10+ hours) use with efficiencies of 75-85% and negligible degradation over decades, though at higher costs ($300-500 per kWh). Hydrogen storage, via electrolysis to produce H2 during excess generation and reconversion in fuel cells or turbines, offers potential for seasonal balancing with energy densities far exceeding batteries, but round-trip efficiencies hover at 30-50% due to conversion losses, compounded by infrastructure needs.[211][212][213] Challenges across technologies include scaling to terawatt-hour levels required for high-renewable grids, supply chain vulnerabilities for batteries, and integration with aging infrastructure. PSH remains the benchmark for economic viability in bulk applications, with lifecycle costs 20-50% lower than Li-ion for equivalent long-term service, while batteries dominate flexible, distributed roles amid policy incentives.[214][215][216]Transmission Grids and Pipelines
Transmission grids consist of high-voltage lines and substations that deliver electricity from generation sources to distribution networks and end-users, enabling efficient bulk power transfer over long distances. These networks operate at voltages typically exceeding 100 kV to minimize resistive losses, with alternating current (AC) systems predominant in most regions and direct current (DC) lines used for interconnections or undersea cables. Globally, electricity transmission and distribution losses average approximately 8.1% of generated output, though figures vary by country; in the United States, losses stand at about 5%, equivalent to enough power to supply several Central American nations.[217][218][219] Upgrading transmission infrastructure is critical for accommodating rising demand and integrating variable renewable sources like wind and solar, which are often located remotely from load centers. In 2023, global investment in power grid infrastructure reached an estimated USD 310 billion, with significant portions directed toward expansion in the United States and Europe to support electrification and data center growth. The U.S. Energy Information Administration reports that spending on electricity transmission systems nearly tripled from 2003 to 2023, reaching $27.7 billion annually, driven by needs for resilience and capacity additions. However, challenges persist, including permitting delays, supply chain constraints for components like transformers, and the need for advanced technologies such as high-voltage direct current (HVDC) to reduce losses over ultra-long distances.[220][221][222] Intermittent renewables exacerbate grid integration issues due to their weather-dependent output, necessitating enhanced forecasting, flexibility, and interconnections to balance supply fluctuations. Bulk-power grid connection queues in regions like the United States have ballooned, creating bottlenecks that delay renewable projects by years and require overbuilds to ensure reliability. In a scenario without accelerated grid development, substantial low-cost renewable generation could be curtailed, underscoring the causal link between transmission capacity and effective energy transition.[223][224] Pipelines serve as the primary infrastructure for transporting liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons, offering lower energy losses per unit distance compared to rail or truck alternatives—typically under 1% for natural gas over thousands of kilometers. In the United States, natural gas pipeline projects completed in 2024 added approximately 6.5 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of takeaway capacity, supporting production from shale regions and exports. Recent expansions are fueled by demand from liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities, data centers, and power generation, with proposals exceeding 3,300 million cubic feet per day in the Southeast alone. For instance, Energy Transfer's 2025 announcement of a 1.5 Bcf/d pipeline extension highlights ongoing investments to link Permian Basin supplies to Gulf Coast markets.[225][226][227]Efficiency Enhancements in End-Use
Efficiency enhancements in end-use sectors focus on technological advancements that reduce the energy required to provide essential services such as illumination, space conditioning, cooking, and mobility, without diminishing output quality. These improvements span residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation applications, driven by engineering innovations, regulatory standards, and material science progress. Historical data indicate substantial reductions in energy intensity across these domains, contributing to lower overall consumption despite rising demand for services.[228] In residential and commercial buildings, appliance and lighting efficiencies have seen dramatic gains. Modern LED bulbs consume up to 90% less electricity than traditional incandescent bulbs for equivalent light output, while lasting 25 times longer, enabling widespread adoption since their commercialization in the early 2010s.[229] Refrigerator energy use has similarly declined, with contemporary ENERGY STAR models averaging under 500 kWh annually compared to over 1,700 kWh for pre-1990s units, reflecting compressor and insulation optimizations mandated by federal standards.[230] HVAC systems have improved via higher Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) ratings, rising from typical values of 8-9 in the 1990s to minimum standards of 13 by 2006 and 14 in certain regions by 2023, yielding 20-30% savings per upgrade through variable-speed compressors and advanced refrigerants.[231] Building envelope enhancements, including advanced insulation and low-emissivity windows, further cut heating and cooling loads by 10-15% via reduced thermal bridging and air leakage.[232] Transportation end-use efficiency has advanced through engine refinements, aerodynamics, and lightweight materials. U.S. light-duty vehicle fleet average fuel economy increased from 13.1 miles per gallon (mpg) in model year 1975 to 27.1 mpg in 2023, propelled by Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards that doubled efficiency targets by the mid-1980s and continued refinements thereafter.[233] In industry, variable frequency drives for motors and process heat recovery systems have lowered energy per unit output by 20-50% in sectors like manufacturing, as documented in sectoral intensity metrics.[234] These enhancements collectively demonstrate causal links between targeted innovations and verifiable reductions in end-use energy demand, though real-world impacts vary with behavioral factors and grid decarbonization.[235]Economics and Markets
Levelized Cost Analyses
The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) measures the average revenue per unit of electricity generated that would be required to recover the costs of building and operating an electric generating plant over its assumed lifetime, encompassing capital expenditures, fixed and variable operations and maintenance, fuel, and financing costs, discounted to present value and divided by lifetime energy output.[236] This metric facilitates comparisons across technologies but assumes constant capacity factors and excludes externalities like grid integration or intermittency management.[237] Recent analyses indicate renewables exhibit the lowest unsubsidized LCOE ranges among new-build options, though dispatchable fossil and nuclear plants offer higher reliability. Lazard's 2025 report estimates unsubsidized LCOE for utility-scale solar photovoltaic at $38–$78 per MWh (20–30% capacity factor, 35-year lifetime) and onshore wind at $37–$86 per MWh (30–55% capacity factor, 30-year lifetime), compared to gas combined cycle at $48–$109 per MWh (30–90% capacity factor), coal at $71–$173 per MWh (65–85% capacity factor), and nuclear at $141–$220 per MWh (89–92% capacity factor, 70-year lifetime), using a 7.7% weighted average cost of capital (WACC).[236] The U.S. Energy Information Administration's Annual Energy Outlook 2025 projects lower figures for 2030 online plants at a 6.65% WACC over 30 years, with onshore wind at $26–$32 per MWh (simple and capacity-weighted averages), utility-scale solar PV at $19–$30 per MWh, natural gas combined cycle at $38 per MWh, advanced nuclear at $67–$81 per MWh, and coal with carbon capture at $49–$54 per MWh.[237]| Technology | LCOE Range ($/MWh, Unsubsidized) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Onshore Wind | 37–86 | Lazard 2025 |
| Utility-Scale Solar PV | 38–78 | Lazard 2025 |
| Gas Combined Cycle | 48–109 | Lazard 2025 |
| Coal | 71–173 | Lazard 2025 |
| Nuclear | 141–220 | Lazard 2025 |
Subsidy Impacts and Policy Interventions
Global energy subsidies totaled approximately $7 trillion in 2022, equivalent to 7.1% of world GDP, with the vast majority attributed to fossil fuels through implicit mechanisms such as unpriced externalities from air pollution and climate impacts rather than direct budgetary transfers.[240] Explicit consumer subsidies for fossil fuel consumption, primarily in developing economies via price controls, reached over $1 trillion that year, surpassing prior records due to post-pandemic energy price volatility.[241] In contrast, direct subsidies for renewable power generation amounted to about $128 billion annually as of recent estimates, representing roughly 20% of total energy sector support and focusing on technologies like solar and wind through production tax credits or feed-in tariffs.[242] These disparities highlight how fossil subsidies often suppress consumption prices, encouraging overuse and delaying efficiency investments, while renewable subsidies accelerate deployment but at the expense of market distortions by favoring intermittent sources over dispatchable alternatives like nuclear or natural gas. Empirical analyses indicate that fossil fuel subsidies inflate energy demand and emissions, with their phased removal projected to yield modest economic adjustments but significant environmental gains; for instance, full reform could cut global CO2 emissions by 1-7% by 2030 relative to baseline scenarios, with limited GDP impacts if revenues are recycled into targeted relief for low-income households.[243] In Ireland, eliminating most fossil subsidies except household allowances reduced emissions by 20% by 2030 with only marginal effects on GDP and incomes, underscoring that such interventions primarily reallocate resources without broad contractionary effects.[244] Renewable subsidies, however, have mixed price impacts: they depress wholesale electricity prices via the merit-order effect—where low-marginal-cost renewables displace higher-cost generators—but elevate system-wide costs through requirements for backup capacity and grid upgrades, often passed to consumers via higher retail rates or taxes.[245] In the U.S., the Production Tax Credit for wind has spurred capacity additions since 1992, yet studies critique its role in sustaining uneconomic projects, with total renewable incentives under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) forecasted to exceed $4.7 trillion cumulatively by 2050, potentially crowding out unsubsidized low-carbon options like advanced nuclear.[246] [247] Policy interventions beyond direct subsidies, such as carbon pricing mechanisms, offer a more efficient alternative by internalizing externalities without selecting specific technologies, allowing markets to optimize abatement across sources.[248] Carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems reduce distortions compared to output-based subsidies, which can inadvertently prolong reliance on subsidized fossils or intermittents; for example, empirical modeling shows carbon pricing curbs emissions more cost-effectively than equivalent subsidy levels, with revenue neutrality mitigating regressive effects on lower-income groups.[249] In contrast, hybrid approaches like the IRA's technology-specific credits have accelerated clean energy investments—projecting 43-48% emissions cuts from 2005 levels by 2035—but at high fiscal costs, with each ton abated potentially requiring $36-87 in public funds, raising questions about long-term fiscal sustainability and innovation incentives.[250] [251] Reforms prioritizing subsidy phase-outs paired with border carbon adjustments could enhance competitiveness, though political resistance in subsidy-dependent economies often delays implementation, perpetuating inefficiencies.[252]Global Trade and Energy Access
Global energy trade remains dominated by fossil fuels, with crude oil comprising approximately 40% of internationally traded energy commodities by value in recent years, followed by natural gas and coal. In 2024, total global energy supply increased by 2%, driven largely by non-OECD countries, where rising demand for imported fuels supported industrial and residential needs.[67] Liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade expanded significantly, with the United States exporting 88.4 million tonnes, surpassing Qatar and Australia to become the top exporter, supplying Europe and Asia amid geopolitical shifts.[253] Coal exports, primarily from Australia, Indonesia, and Russia, continued to fuel power generation in import-dependent economies like China and India, where affordable supplies enabled rapid electrification.[254] Energy trade flows exhibit stark regional imbalances, with OPEC+ nations such as Saudi Arabia and Russia leading oil exports, while the European Union and developing Asian economies rank among top importers. The U.S. Energy Information Administration reported that nearly one-third of U.S. energy production was exported in 2024, predominantly fossil fuels, highlighting the role of shale gas and oil in global markets.[255] These dynamics underscore vulnerabilities: Russia's invasion of Ukraine disrupted pipeline gas to Europe, spurring LNG imports but elevating costs that strained budgets in energy-importing developing countries.[256] Trade in renewables components, such as solar panels from China, has grown but constitutes a minor share compared to hydrocarbon volumes, limited by intermittency and infrastructure needs.[257] Access to modern energy remains uneven, with 730 million people—primarily in sub-Saharan Africa—lacking electricity in 2024, a stagnation reflecting only an 11 million decline from 2023 despite global population growth.[258] In least developed countries (LDCs), reliance on imported fossil fuels for grid expansion is critical, yet high prices and supply risks exacerbate energy poverty, defined as insufficient access to clean cooking and reliable power, affecting over 2 billion for cooking fuels. Trade dependence amplifies these challenges; for instance, volatile LNG and oil import costs post-2022 hindered progress in regions like South Asia and Africa, where domestic resources are underdeveloped and subsidies strain fiscal resources.[259] Conversely, sustained coal and gas imports have underpinned access gains in Asia, where China and India added hundreds of millions to grids via imported baseload fuels, demonstrating trade's causal role in scaling reliable supply over intermittent alternatives.[260] Geopolitical tensions and biased policy emphases on renewables—often from Western institutions overlooking affordability—further impede equitable access, as empirical data show fossil trade volumes correlating with poverty reduction metrics in import-reliant economies.[261]Impacts and Externalities
Emissions Profiles by Source
Lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions profiles for energy sources encompass emissions from fuel extraction, construction, operation, and decommissioning, expressed as grams of CO2 equivalent per kilowatt-hour (g CO2eq/kWh) of electricity generated. Fossil fuel-based sources, particularly coal and natural gas, exhibit the highest emissions primarily due to combustion processes releasing CO2, methane, and other GHGs, with coal averaging around 840 g CO2eq/kWh and natural gas around 389 g CO2eq/kWh in harmonized lifecycle assessments. These figures dwarf those of low-carbon alternatives, where nuclear power emits a median of 12 g CO2eq/kWh, onshore and offshore wind around 10 g CO2eq/kWh each, utility-scale photovoltaic solar 57 g CO2eq/kWh, and hydropower 6.2 g CO2eq/kWh, reflecting emissions mainly from material production and site preparation rather than fuel use. [262] Variations exist due to technology specifics, fuel quality, and regional factors; for instance, combined-cycle natural gas plants emit less than simple-cycle counterparts, while biomass combustion yields a median of 486 g CO2eq/kWh owing to upstream land-use changes and harvesting emissions, often comparable to or exceeding unabated gas. Geothermal systems average 20 g CO2eq/kWh, and concentrating solar power (CSP) 28 g CO2eq/kWh, both low but higher than wind or hydro due to thermal fluid and mirror manufacturing. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) can reduce fossil emissions by 80-90% in theory, but deployment remains limited, with lifecycle estimates for coal with CCS still exceeding 100 g CO2eq/kWh in many studies.[263]| Energy Source | Median Lifecycle GHG Emissions (g CO2eq/kWh) |
|---|---|
| Coal | 840 |
| Natural Gas | 389 |
| Biomass | 486 |
| Utility PV Solar | 57 |
| CSP | 28 |
| Geothermal | 20 |
| Nuclear | 12 |
| Onshore Wind | 10 |
| Offshore Wind | 10 |
| Hydropower | 6.2 |
Land and Material Footprints
Nuclear power exhibits the lowest land-use intensity among major electricity sources, requiring approximately 7.1 hectares per terawatt-hour per year (ha/TWh/y) when accounting for full lifecycle impacts including mining, plant footprint, and waste storage.[266] This efficiency stems from nuclear fuel's high energy density, where a single 1,000-megawatt (MW) facility occupies about 1.3 square miles, delivering continuous baseload power without expansive spacing needs.[267] In comparison, fossil fuel power plants like coal or natural gas are similarly compact at the generation stage (around 0.3-1 ha/MW), but their upstream extraction processes—such as open-pit coal mining or hydraulic fracturing pads—disturb far larger areas, often exceeding 100 ha/TWh/y when including supply chain land degradation.[268][269] Renewable sources generally demand substantially more land due to lower power densities and spatial requirements. Utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems require 20-75 times the land area of nuclear for equivalent annual energy output, with empirical data from over 90% of U.S. installations showing power densities of 5-40 acres per MW, factoring in panel arrays, roads, and setbacks.[268][270] Onshore wind farms necessitate even greater footprints—up to 360 times that of nuclear—primarily because turbines must be spaced 5-10 rotor diameters apart to mitigate turbulence losses, resulting in land-use intensities of 50-100 ha/TWh/y despite only 1-5% direct occupation by infrastructure.[267][268] Hydropower reservoirs impose variable but often high impacts, with large dams like China's Three Gorges submerging over 600 square kilometers, yielding intensities around 10-50 ha/TWh/y depending on site topography and sedimentation.[268] Geothermal and concentrated solar power (CSP) align closer to fossil baselines at 10-20 ha/TWh/y, while biomass cultivation can reach extremes of 58,000 ha/TWh/y for dedicated energy crops, rivaling food production pressures.[266]| Energy Source | Lifecycle Land-Use Intensity (ha/TWh/y) | Key Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclear | 7.1 | Compact plants; minimal fuel volume despite mining.[266] |
| Natural Gas | ~10-20 | Plant efficiency high; fracking pads add indirect use.[268] |
| Coal | ~20-50 | Mining dominates over plant footprint.[269] |
| Solar PV | ~40-100 | Array spacing and balance-of-system needs.[268][270] |
| Onshore Wind | ~50-200 | Turbine wake avoidance spacing.[268] |
| Hydropower | 10-50 | Reservoir inundation varies by yield.[268] |
| Biomass | Up to 58,000 | Crop monocultures for fuel.[266] |
Health and Mortality Statistics
Fossil fuel combustion for energy production is a leading cause of premature mortality worldwide, primarily through ambient air pollution such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5), nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide, which contribute to respiratory diseases, cardiovascular conditions, and lung cancer. A 2023 analysis estimated that fossil fuel-related ambient PM2.5 pollution alone causes 5.13 million excess deaths annually (95% confidence interval: 3.63–6.32 million), accounting for over one-fifth of global deaths from these pollutants.[275] In the United States, oil and gas operations were linked to approximately 90,000–91,000 premature deaths per year as of recent estimates, alongside hundreds of thousands of asthma attacks and preterm births, with disproportionate impacts on communities near extraction sites.[276][277] Comparative mortality rates across energy sources, measured in deaths per terawatt-hour (TWh) of electricity generated over the full lifecycle (including extraction, construction, operation, and air pollution effects), reveal stark differences. Coal-fired power exhibits the highest rates, driven by mining accidents and chronic air pollution, followed by oil; nuclear, wind, and solar rank among the lowest, with rates below 0.5 deaths per TWh. These figures incorporate historical data, such as major disasters (e.g., Chernobyl for nuclear, Banqiao Dam failure for hydro), but emphasize empirical lifetime averages rather than isolated events.[126][278]| Energy Source | Deaths per TWh (lifetime average) |
|---|---|
| Coal | 24.6 |
| Oil | 18.4 |
| Natural Gas | 2.8 |
| Hydro | 1.3 |
| Biomass | 4.6 (primarily from indoor combustion in developing regions) |
| Wind | 0.15 (mainly turbine installation falls) |
| Solar (rooftop/utility) | 0.44 (installation accidents, e.g., falls) |
| Nuclear | 0.04 (includes major accidents like Chernobyl and Fukushima) |
Controversies and Challenges
Intermittency and Grid Stability Issues
Variable renewable energy sources such as solar photovoltaic and wind power exhibit inherent intermittency due to their dependence on weather conditions and diurnal cycles, resulting in output fluctuations that challenge grid frequency regulation and voltage stability.[183] Unlike dispatchable sources like nuclear or natural gas plants, which maintain steady output with capacity factors exceeding 90% and 50% respectively in the United States as of 2023, solar and wind achieve average capacity factors of approximately 25% and 35%, necessitating overbuilding of installed capacity to meet demand reliably.[24] This variability reduces system inertia—provided by rotating masses in conventional generators—leading to faster frequency drops during imbalances, as inverter-based renewables contribute minimal inherent inertia.[281] High renewable penetration exacerbates the "duck curve" phenomenon, observed in California where midday solar surges create excess supply, forcing curtailment of up to 10% of renewable output on peak days in 2023, followed by rapid evening ramps that strain flexible gas plants and risk shortages without sufficient backups.[282] In Texas during the February 2021 winter storm, wind generation fell below 10% of nameplate capacity due to icing, contributing to widespread outages alongside failures in thermal plants, underscoring how intermittency compounds vulnerabilities in extreme weather without diversified, resilient baseload.[283] Empirical analyses indicate that achieving over 30-40% variable renewable energy share often requires additional reserves equivalent to 10-20% of peak load for balancing, increasing operational costs and reliance on fossil fuel peakers.[284] Mitigating these issues demands substantial investments in grid-scale storage, advanced forecasting, and transmission infrastructure, yet peer-reviewed assessments highlight that current battery deployments cover only short-duration imbalances, with levelized costs for firming intermittent supply remaining 2-3 times higher than dispatchable alternatives at scales beyond 20% penetration.[285] Low-inertia systems with high inverter penetration have demonstrated empirical instability, such as frequency nadir drops of 0.5-1 Hz in test grids, necessitating synthetic inertia controls whose efficacy diminishes under prolonged low-output periods.[286] Without concurrent expansion of reliable dispatchable capacity or breakthroughs in long-duration storage, pursuing aggressive renewable targets risks elevated blackout probabilities, as evidenced by modeling showing unserved energy rising exponentially above 50% non-firm generation shares.[287]Nuclear Regulatory Hurdles
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing process for new reactors involves sequential stages, including design certification, combined construction and operating license applications, and environmental reviews, often spanning 3-5 years or more per phase, contributing to overall project timelines exceeding a decade.[288] These requirements, intensified after the 1979 Three Mile Island accident and further after Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima in 2011, mandate extensive safety analyses, probabilistic risk assessments, and public hearings that impose significant administrative burdens and costs estimated at $8.6 million annually per plant in direct regulatory expenses, plus $22 million in NRC fees.[289][290] In Europe, analogous frameworks under the Euratom Treaty and national bodies like France's ASN or the UK's ONR enforce similar rigorous standards, resulting in construction delays and financing costs that have escalated overnight capital expenses for reactors by factors of 2-5 compared to pre-1980s builds.[291][292] Specific projects illustrate these hurdles: the Vogtle Units 3 and 4 AP1000 reactors in Georgia, USA, faced initial licensing approval in 2012 but encountered mid-construction regulatory revisions and inspections that exacerbated delays from original in-service dates of 2016-2017 to actual commercial operation in 2023-2024, with total costs rising from $14 billion to over $35 billion.[293][294] While construction mismanagement played a role, regulatory demands for iterative design changes and compliance—stemming from first-of-a-kind U.S. deployment—amplified overruns, as utilities must incorporate evolving NRC guidance during builds, unlike standardized processes in Asia where timelines average 5-7 years.[295][296] Similarly, the UK's Hinkley Point C project has seen costs balloon to £35 billion (about $45 billion) by 2024, with regulatory scrutiny under ONR delaying pours and requiring bespoke safety cases that deter investor confidence.[297] Critics, including reports from the Idaho National Laboratory, argue that the NRC's framework remains overly prescriptive and litigation-prone, prioritizing hypothetical worst-case scenarios over empirical safety records—nuclear power's core-melt risk is orders of magnitude below fossil fuel operational hazards—leading to redundant reviews that stifle innovation without commensurate risk reduction.[298][299] This has resulted in a U.S. "nuclear winter" since the 1970s, with no new large-scale plants ordered until the 2000s, as developers face uncertain timelines that inflate interest during construction (IDC) to 30-50% of total costs.[300][301] For advanced designs like small modular reactors (SMRs), persistent hurdles include the need for novel risk-informed licensing, though 2024 proposals for NRC Part 53 aim to introduce performance-based alternatives to traditional deterministic rules, potentially shortening reviews to 2-3 years if implemented.[302] Despite such reforms, systemic caution—fueled by public and legal challenges—continues to elevate nuclear's levelized costs above unsubsidized renewables in regulated markets, hindering scalability despite its dispatchable, low-emission attributes.[303]Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Debates
The debate over phasing out fossil fuels centers on balancing climate mitigation imperatives against energy reliability, economic viability, and development needs, with fossil fuels accounting for 81.5% of global primary energy consumption in 2023.[75] Proponents argue that rapid phase-out is essential to limit warming to 1.5°C under the Paris Agreement, citing projections for 80-85% reductions in coal use, 55-70% in gas, and 75-95% in oil by 2050 to align with net-zero pathways.[304] The 2023 COP28 agreement marked a milestone by calling for a "transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems" in a just, orderly manner, though it stopped short of a full phase-out due to opposition from oil-producing nations.[305] However, empirical data from the IEA's World Energy Outlook 2024 indicates that under current policies, demand for coal, oil, and gas will peak before 2030 but remain substantial, with global energy demand rising 2.2% in 2024 across all fuels amid clean energy growth.[82][306] Critics of aggressive phase-out highlight the risks of energy shortages and economic disruption, particularly in developing economies where fossil fuels enable industrialization and poverty reduction.[307] Nations like China and India, major emitters reliant on coal for over 50% and 70% of electricity respectively, have resisted binding commitments, emphasizing equitable burden-sharing and the need for affordable baseload power absent scalable alternatives.[308] Fossil-dependent exporters face fiscal revenue losses from declining demand, potentially exacerbating growth challenges without viable diversification.[309] Studies warn that premature phase-out could impose trillions in transition costs, including stranded assets and job displacements in sectors employing millions, while intermittency in renewables necessitates fossil backups for grid stability.[310] Further contention arises over the feasibility of "abated" fossil fuels via carbon capture, with skeptics arguing it distracts from true decarbonization and risks locking in emissions-intensive infrastructure.[311] Developing countries at COP28 and beyond have opposed phase-out timelines that ignore their right to development, demanding finance and technology transfers from historical emitters before curtailing access to reliable energy sources.[312] As of 2025, actions like Brazil's pre-COP30 oil approvals underscore persistent investment in fossils despite pledges, reflecting doubts about renewables' capacity to meet rising demand projected to grow through the decade.[313] These debates reveal tensions between aspirational climate goals and the causal realities of energy systems, where fossil fuels' density and dispatchability continue to underpin global supply despite incremental clean energy advances.[256]Renewables Scalability Critiques
Critics of renewable energy scalability, particularly for solar photovoltaic (PV) and wind, contend that their intermittent nature imposes system-wide constraints that limit replacement of dispatchable sources like fossil fuels and nuclear at the global scale required for net-zero transitions. Empirical analyses indicate that achieving high penetration levels necessitates overbuilding capacity by factors of 2-3 times average demand to account for variability, alongside extensive grid reinforcements and storage, which escalate total costs beyond levelized estimates for standalone generation. For instance, integrating renewables into European grids is projected to require at least €1.3 trillion in power network investments by 2030, driven by the need to manage intermittency-induced congestion and balancing.[314] Similarly, Germany's grid expansion for renewables is estimated at €650 billion by 2045, highlighting the causal link between variable generation and infrastructure overhauls that traditional baseload systems avoid.[315] Energy return on investment (EROI) metrics further underscore scalability challenges, as renewables typically yield lower net energy outputs compared to conventional fossil fuels when accounting for full lifecycle inputs, including backup and transmission. Peer-reviewed assessments place the useful-stage EROI for fossil fuels at approximately 3.5:1, rising to 8.5:1 at the final delivery stage, whereas solar PV and wind often fall below these thresholds, especially when storage is factored in to mitigate intermittency, potentially dropping effective EROI to levels that strain societal energy surpluses.[316] Analyses of global trends confirm that most renewable alternatives exhibit substantially lower EROI than conventional oil and coal, with declining values as deployment scales due to diminishing returns from resource quality and system integration.[317] This disparity implies that widespread adoption could reduce the net energy available for non-energy economic activities, a causal reality often downplayed in optimistic projections from institutions with incentives to promote transitions.[318] Material intensity poses another bottleneck, with scaling solar and wind to supplant global fossil-based energy demanding volumes of critical minerals far exceeding current production capacities and timelines for mine development. Transition scenarios project cumulative needs of 27-81 million tonnes of copper for associated electrical grids alone, alongside substantial steel and aluminum, with clean energy technologies collectively requiring sixfold increases in minerals like lithium and cobalt by 2040 under stated policy pledges.[319] [320] Offshore wind and utility-scale solar grids amplify copper demands further, while quantitative reviews of low-carbon tech reveal per-unit material footprints 10 times higher in tonnage for common inputs compared to incumbent systems, complicating supply chains amid geopolitical concentrations in extraction.[321] [322] Land requirements exacerbate these issues, as high-density renewables necessitate vast exclusions from agriculture and ecosystems, with methodological inconsistencies in pro-renewable studies often underreporting effective footprints by excluding spacing and backup infrastructure. Estimates for a U.S. 100% renewables electricity system suggest direct occupation approaching 1% of national land by 2035 under optimistic builds, but critics note this ignores indirect impacts like transmission corridors and the infeasibility of replicating at global scales without compromising food security or biodiversity.[323] [324] Empirical deployment data reinforces the critique: despite trillions in subsidies, renewables supplied under 13% of global primary energy in 2023, with fossils retaining over 80% dominance, as capacity growth fails to translate to proportional energy displacement due to these intertwined physical limits.[317] Such patterns align with first-principles assessments that variability and low energy density inherently cap scalability absent breakthroughs in storage or fusion alternatives.Recent Trends and Outlook
2024-2025 Global Demand Patterns
Global primary energy demand increased by 2.2% in 2024, exceeding the average annual growth rate of the previous decade and reflecting robust economic expansion in non-OECD countries.[306] [325] This uptick drove higher consumption across all major fuels, with fossil fuels maintaining their dominance despite policy pushes toward low-carbon alternatives; oil's share of total energy fell below 30% for the first time, though absolute demand for coal and natural gas also rose amid industrial and power sector needs.[326] Projections for 2025 indicate continued moderation in growth to around 2%, tempered by efficiency gains and slower oil demand expansion, but sustained by rising needs in developing economies.[256] [327] Electricity demand exhibited sharper acceleration, rising 4.3% year-over-year in 2024 compared to 2.5% in 2023, with forecasts for 3.9% average annual growth through 2027.[328] [329] Key drivers included electrification of transport and heating, alongside explosive expansion in data centers fueled by artificial intelligence workloads; global data center electricity use stood at approximately 415 terawatt-hours (TWh) in 2024, projected to double to 945 TWh by 2030 at a 15% annual clip—over four times the pace of overall electricity demand growth.[330] [331] Electric vehicle adoption contributed further, with installed data center capacity surging 20% or 15 gigawatts globally, concentrated in the United States and China.[326] Regionally, Asia dominated demand increments, with China accounting for over half of the 2024 global rise at 4% domestic growth, representing 27% of worldwide consumption driven by manufacturing resurgence and urban electrification.[325] India and other emerging markets followed suit, propelled by population growth, industrialization, and infrastructure buildout, while OECD nations saw subdued or flat trends amid energy efficiency and deindustrialization.[67] [332] Non-OECD countries thus claimed the bulk of incremental demand, underscoring a divergence where fossil fuel reliance persists in high-growth areas despite renewable capacity additions outpacing overall needs in some quarters.[333] For 2025, similar patterns are anticipated, with electricity demand in emerging Asia projected to grow over 5% amid data center and EV proliferation, contrasting with OECD stabilization around 1-2%.[334]| Region/Source | 2024 Demand Growth (%) | Key 2024-2025 Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| Global Primary Energy | 2.2 | Economic recovery, industrialization[306] |
| Global Electricity | 4.3 | AI data centers, EVs[329] |
| China (Total) | 4.0 | Manufacturing, power sector coal use[325] |
| OECD Electricity | ~1.5 | Efficiency, slower GDP gains[328] |
| Data Centers (Global) | ~15 (electricity) | AI compute expansion[330] |