Hubbry Logo
SlaverySlaveryMain
Open search
Slavery
Community hub
Slavery
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Slavery
Slavery
from Wikipedia

Peter, a slave from Louisiana, in 1863. The scars are the result of a whipping by his overseer.

Slavery describes a set of practices involving some or all of the following elements: [1]

  • Unfree labor, where an enslaved person is forced to work against their will.
  • Ownership of humans or their labor as personal property (see § Chattel slavery).
  • A high degree of control over the enslaved person's autonomy.

It is an economic phenomenon and its history resides in economic history.[2] Slavery typically involves compulsory work, with the slave's location of work and residence dictated by the party that holds them in bondage. Enslavement is the placement of a person into slavery, and the person is called a slave or an enslaved person (see § Terminology).

Many historical cases of enslavement occurred as a result of breaking the law, becoming indebted, suffering a military defeat, or exploitation for cheaper labor; other forms of slavery were instituted along demographic lines such as race or sex. Slaves would be kept in bondage for life, or for a fixed period of time after which they would be granted freedom.[3] Although slavery is usually involuntary and involves coercion, there are also cases where people voluntarily enter into slavery to pay a debt or earn money due to poverty. In the course of human history, slavery was a typical feature of civilization,[4] and existed in most societies throughout history,[5][6] but it is now outlawed in most countries of the world, except as a punishment for a crime.[7][8] In general there were two types of slavery throughout human history: domestic and productive.[4]

In chattel slavery, the slave is legally rendered the personal property (chattel) of the slave owner. In economics, the term de facto slavery describes the conditions of unfree labour and forced labour that most slaves endure.[9] In 2019, approximately 40 million people, of whom 26% were children, were still enslaved throughout the world despite slavery being illegal. In the modern world, more than 50% of slaves provide forced labour, usually in the factories and sweatshops of the private sector of a country's economy.[10] In industrialised countries, human trafficking is a modern variety of slavery; in non-industrialised countries, people in debt bondage are common,[9] others include captive domestic servants, people in forced marriages, and child soldiers.[11]

Etymology

[edit]

The word slave was borrowed into Middle English through the Old French esclave which ultimately derives from Byzantine Greek σκλάβος (sklábos) or εσκλαβήνος (ésklabḗnos).

According to the widespread view, which has been known since the 18th century, the Byzantine Σκλάβινοι (Sklábinoi), Έσκλαβηνοί (Ésklabēnoí), borrowed from a Slavic tribe self-name *Slověne, turned into σκλάβος, εσκλαβήνος (Late Latin sclāvus) in the meaning 'prisoner of war slave', 'slave' in the 8th/9th century, because they often became captured and enslaved.[12][13][14][15] However this version has been disputed since the 19th century.[16][17]

An alternative contemporary hypothesis suggests that Medieval Latin sclāvus via *scylāvus derives from Byzantine σκυλάω (skūláō, skyláō) or σκυλεύω (skūleúō, skyleúō) with the meaning "to strip the enemy (killed in a battle)" or "to make booty / extract spoils of war".[18][19][20][21] This version has been criticized as well.[22]

Terminology

[edit]

There is no consensus among historians about whether terms such as "unfree labourer" or "enslaved person", rather than "slave", should be used when describing the victims of slavery.[4] According to those proposing a change in terminology, slave perpetuates the crime of slavery in language by reducing its victims to a nonhuman noun instead of "carry[ing] them forward as people, not the property that they were" (see also People-first language). Other historians prefer slave because the term is familiar and shorter, or because it accurately reflects the inhumanity of slavery, with person implying a degree of autonomy that slavery does not allow.[23]

Chattel slavery

[edit]
A poster for a slave auction in Georgia, U.S., 1860
13th-century slave market in Yemen[24]
Portrait of an older woman in New Orleans with her enslaved servant girl in the mid-19th century

As a social institution, chattel slavery classes slaves as chattels (personal property) owned by the enslaver; like livestock, they can be bought and sold at will.[25] Chattel slavery was historically the normal form of slavery worldwide and was practiced in places such as classical Greece and the Roman Empire, where it was considered a keystone of society.[26][27][28] Other places where it was extensively practiced include the Muslim world such as Medieval Egypt,[29] Subsaharan Africa,[30] Brazil, the Antebellum United States, and parts of the Caribbean such as Cuba and Haiti.[31][32] The Iroquois enslaved others in ways that "looked very like chattel slavery."[33]

Beginning in the 18th century, a series of abolitionist movements in Europe and the Americas saw slavery as a violation of the slaves' rights as people ("all men are created equal"), and sought to abolish it. Abolitionism encountered extreme resistance but was eventually successful. Several of the states of the United States began abolishing slavery during the American Revolutionary War. After the French Revolution, the government of France abolished slavery in 1794, but Napoleon reintroduced it in 1802 and permanent abolition did not occur until 1848. In much of the British Empire, slavery was subject to abolition in 1833, throughout the United States it was abolished in 1865 as a result of the Civil War, which was fought after the attempted secession of the South in order to protect its "Peculiar Institution" (I.e. slavery). In Cuba slavery was abolished in 1886. The last country in the Americas to abolish slavery was Brazil, in 1888.[34]

Chattel slavery survived longest in the Middle East. After the trans-Atlantic slave trade had been suppressed, the ancient trans-Saharan slave trade, the Indian Ocean slave trade and the Red Sea slave trade continued to traffic slaves from the African continent to the Middle East.

During the 20th century, the issue of chattel slavery was addressed and investigated globally by international bodies created by the League of Nations and the United Nations (UN), such as the Temporary Slavery Commission in 1924–1926, the Committee of Experts on Slavery in 1932, and the Advisory Committee of Experts on Slavery in 1934–1939.[35] By the time of the UN Ad Hoc Committee on Slavery in 1950–1951, legal chattel slavery still existed only in the Arabian Peninsula: in Oman, in Qatar, in Saudi Arabia, in the Trucial States and in Yemen.[35] Legal chattel slavery was finally abolished in the Arabian Peninsula in the 1960s: Saudi Arabia and Yemen in 1962, in Dubai in 1963, and Oman as the last in 1970.[35]

The last country to abolish slavery, Mauritania, did so in 1981. While slavery had technically been banned by colonial France in French West Africa (including Mauritania) already in 1905,[36] this had been a purely nominal ban. The 1981 ban on slavery was not enforced in practice, as legal mechanisms to prosecute those who used slaves were not implemented until 2007.[37][38]

Bonded labour

[edit]

Indenture, also known as bonded labour or debt bondage, is a form of unfree labour in which a person works to pay off a debt by pledging themself as collateral. The services required to repay the debt, and their duration, may be undefined. Debt bondage can be passed on from generation to generation, with children required to pay off their progenitors' debt.[39] Debt bondage is most prevalent in South Asia,[39] and is the most widespread form of slavery today.[40]

Money marriage refers to a marriage where a child, usually a girl, is married off to settle debts owed by their parents.[41] The Chukri system is a debt bondage system found in parts of Bengal where a woman or girl can be coerced into prostitution in order to pay off debts.[42]

Dependents

[edit]

The word slavery has also been used to refer to a legal state of dependency to somebody else.[43][44] For example, in Persia, the situations and lives of such slaves could be better than those of common citizens.[45]

Forced labour

[edit]

Forced labour, or unfree labour, is sometimes used to describe an individual who is forced to work against their own will, under threat of violence or other punishment. This may also include institutions not commonly classified as slavery, such as serfdom, conscription and penal labour. As slavery has been legally outlawed in all countries, forced labour in the present day (frequently referred to as "modern slavery") revolves around illegal control.

Human trafficking primarily involves women and children forced into prostitution and is the fastest growing form of forced labour, with Thailand, Cambodia, India, Brazil and Mexico having been identified as leading hotspots of commercial sexual exploitation of children.[46][47]

Child soldiers and child labour

[edit]

In 2007, Human Rights Watch estimated that 200,000 to 300,000 children served as soldiers in then-current conflicts.[48][49] More girls under 16 work as domestic workers than any other category of child labour, often sent to cities by parents living in rural poverty as with the Haitian restaveks.[50]

Forced marriage

[edit]

Forced marriages or early marriages are often considered types of slavery. Forced marriage continues to be practiced in parts of the world including some parts of Asia and Africa and in immigrant communities in the West.[51][52][53][54] Marriage by abduction occurs in many places in the world today, with a 2003 study finding a national average of 69% of marriages in Ethiopia being through abduction.[55]

Other uses of the term

[edit]

The word slavery is often used as a pejorative to describe any activity in which one is coerced into performing. Some argue that military drafts and other forms of coerced government labour constitute "state-operated slavery."[56][57] Some libertarians and anarcho-capitalists view government taxation as a form of slavery.[58]

"Slavery" has been used by some anti-psychiatry proponents to define involuntary psychiatric patients, claiming there are no unbiased physical tests for mental illness and yet the psychiatric patient must follow the orders of the psychiatrist. They assert that instead of chains to control the slave, the psychiatrist uses drugs to control the mind.[59] Drapetomania was a pseudoscientific psychiatric diagnosis for a slave who desired freedom; "symptoms" included laziness and the tendency to flee captivity.[60][61]

Some proponents of animal rights have applied the term slavery to the condition of some or all human-owned animals, arguing that their status is comparable to that of human slaves.[62]

The labour market, as institutionalized under contemporary capitalist systems, has been criticized by mainstream socialists and by anarcho-syndicalists, who utilise the term wage slavery as a pejorative or dysphemism for wage labour.[63][64][65] Socialists draw parallels between the trade of labour as a commodity and slavery. Cicero is also known to have suggested such parallels.[66]

Characteristics

[edit]

Economics

[edit]

Economists have modeled the circumstances under which slavery (and variants such as serfdom) appear and disappear. One theoretical model is that slavery becomes more desirable for landowners where land is abundant, but labour is scarce, such that rent is depressed and paid workers can demand high wages. If the opposite holds true, then it is more costly for landowners to guard the slaves than to employ paid workers who can demand only low wages because of the degree of competition.[67] Thus, first slavery and then serfdom gradually decreased in Europe as the population grew. They were reintroduced in the Americas and in Russia as large areas of land with few inhabitants became available.[68]

Slavery is more common when the tasks are relatively simple and thus easy to supervise, such as large-scale monocrops such as sugarcane and cotton, in which output depended on economies of scale. This enables systems of labour, such as the gang system in the United States, to become prominent on large plantations where field hands toiled with factory-like precision. Then, each work gang was based on an internal division of labour that assigned every member of the gang to a task and made each worker's performance dependent on the actions of the others. The slaves chopped out the weeds that surrounded the cotton plants as well as excess sprouts. Plow gangs followed behind, stirring the soil near the plants and tossing it back around the plants. Thus, the gang system worked like an assembly line.[69]

Since the 18th century, critics have argued that slavery hinders technological advancement because the focus is on increasing the number of slaves doing simple tasks rather than upgrading their efficiency. For example, it is sometimes argued that, because of this narrow focus, technology in Greece – and later in Rome – was not applied to ease physical labour or improve manufacturing.[70][71]

The work of the Mercedarians was in ransoming Christian slaves held in North Africa (1637).

Scottish economist Adam Smith stated that free labour was economically better than slave labour, and that it was nearly impossible to end slavery in a free, democratic, or republican form of government since many of its legislators or political figures were slave owners and would not punish themselves. He further stated that slaves would be better able to gain their freedom under centralized government, or a central authority like a king or church.[72][73] Similar arguments appeared later in the works of Auguste Comte, especially given Smith's belief in the separation of powers, or what Comte called the "separation of the spiritual and the temporal" during the Middle Ages and the end of slavery, and Smith's criticism of masters, past and present. As Smith stated in the Lectures on Jurisprudence, "The great power of the clergy thus concurring with that of the king set the slaves at liberty. But it was absolutely necessary both that the authority of the king and of the clergy should be great. Where ever any one of these was wanting, slavery still continues..."[74]

Sale and inspection of slaves

Even after slavery became a criminal offense, slave owners could get high returns. According to researcher Siddharth Kara, the profits generated worldwide by all forms of slavery in 2007 were $91.2 billion. That was second only to drug trafficking, in terms of global criminal enterprises. At the time the weighted average global sales price of a slave was estimated to be approximately $340, with a high of $1,895 for the average trafficked sex slave, and a low of $40 to $50 for debt bondage slaves in part of Asia and Africa. The weighted average annual profits generated by a slave in 2007 was $3,175, with a low of an average $950 for bonded labour and $29,210 for a trafficked sex slave. Approximately 40% of slave profits each year were generated by trafficked sex slaves, representing slightly more than 4% of the world's 29 million slaves.[75]

Identification

[edit]
Barefooted slaves depicted in David Roberts' Egypt and Nubia, issued between 1845 and 1849
Slave branding, c. 1853

Slaves are often identified or marked via mutilation or tattooing. A widespread practice was branding, either to explicitly mark slaves as property or as punishment. Some slaves are forced to wear shackles that cannot be removed such as cuffs, legcuffs, collars, chains, or anklets.

[edit]

Private versus state-owned slaves

[edit]

Slaves have been owned privately by individuals but have also been under state ownership. For example, the kisaeng were women from low castes in pre modern Korea, who were owned by the state under government officials known as hojang and were required to provide entertainment to the aristocracy. In the 2020s, in North Korea, Kippumjo ("Pleasure Brigades") are made up of women selected from the general population to serve as entertainers and as concubines to the rulers of North Korea.[76][77] "Tribute labor" is compulsory labor for the state and has been used in various iterations such as corvée, mit'a and repartimiento. The internment camps of totalitarian regimes such as the Nazis and the Soviet Union placed increasing importance on the labor provided in those camps, leading to a growing tendency among historians to designate such systems as slavery.[78]

A combination of these include the encomienda where the Spanish Crown granted private individuals the right to the free labour of a specified number of natives in a given area.[79] In the "Red Rubber System" of both the Congo Free State and French ruled Ubangi-Shari,[80] labour was demanded as taxation; private companies were conceded areas within which they were allowed to use any measures to increase rubber production.[81] Convict leasing was common in the Southern United States where the state would lease prisoners for their free labour to companies.

[edit]

Depending upon the era and the country, slaves sometimes had a limited set of legal rights. For example, in the Province of New York, people who deliberately killed slaves were punishable under a 1686 statute.[82] And, as already mentioned, certain legal rights attached to the nobi in Korea, to slaves in various African societies, and to black female slaves in the French colony of Louisiana. Giving slaves legal rights has sometimes been a matter of morality, but also sometimes a matter of self-interest. For example, in ancient Athens, protecting slaves from mistreatment simultaneously protected people who might be mistaken for slaves, and giving slaves limited property rights incentivized slaves to work harder to get more property.[83] In the southern United States prior to the extirpation of slavery in 1865, a proslavery legal treatise reported that slaves accused of crimes typically had a legal right to counsel, freedom from double jeopardy, a right to trial by jury in graver cases, and the right to grand jury indictment, but they lacked many other rights such as white adults' ability to control their own lives.[84]

History

[edit]
Corinthian black-figure terra-cotta votive tablet of slaves working in a mine, dated to the late seventh century BC

Slavery predates written records and has existed in many cultures.[85] Slavery is rare among hunter-gatherer populations because it requires economic surpluses and a substantial population density. Thus, although it has existed among unusually resource-rich hunter gatherers, such as the American Indian peoples of the salmon-rich rivers of the Pacific Northwest coast, slavery became widespread only with the invention of agriculture during the Neolithic Revolution about 11,000 years ago.[4] Slavery was practiced in almost every ancient civilization.[85] Such institutions included debt bondage, punishment for crime, the enslavement of prisoners of war, child abandonment, and the enslavement of slaves' offspring.[86]

Africa

[edit]

Slavery was widespread in Africa, which pursued both internal and external slave trade.[87] In the Senegambia region, between 1300 and 1900, close to one-third of the population was enslaved. In early Islamic states of the western Sahel, including Ghana, Mali, Segou, and Songhai, about a third of the population were enslaved.[88]

In European courtly society, and European aristocracy, black African slaves and their children became visible in the late 1300s and 1400s. Starting with Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor, black Africans were included in the retinue. In 1402 an Ethiopian embassy reached Venice. In the 1470s black Africans were painted as court attendants in wall paintings that were displayed in Mantua and Ferrara. In the 1490s black Africans were included on the emblem of the Duke of Milan.[89]

During the trans-Saharan slave trade, slaves from West Africa were transported across the Sahara desert to North Africa to be sold to Mediterranean and Middle eastern civilizations. During the Red Sea slave trade, slaves were transported from Africa across the Red Sea to the Arabian Peninsula. The Indian Ocean slave trade, sometimes known as the east African slave trade, was multi-directional. Africans were sent as slaves to the Arabian Peninsula, to Indian Ocean islands (including Madagascar), to the Indian subcontinent, and later to the Americas. These traders captured Bantu peoples (Zanj) from the interior in present-day Kenya, Mozambique and Tanzania and brought them to the coast.[90][91] There, the slaves gradually assimilated in rural areas, particularly on Unguja and Pemba islands.[92]

Some historians assert that as many as 17 million people were sold into slavery on the coast of the Indian Ocean, the Middle East, and North Africa, and approximately 5 million African slaves were bought by Muslim slave traders and taken from Africa across the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, and Sahara Desert between 1500 and 1900.[93] The captives were sold throughout the Middle East. This trade accelerated as superior ships led to more trade and greater demand for labour on plantations in the region. Eventually, tens of thousands of captives were being taken every year.[92][94][95] The Indian Ocean slave trade was multi-directional and changed over time. To meet the demand for menial labour, Bantu slaves bought by east African slave traders from southeastern Africa were sold in cumulatively large numbers over the centuries to customers in Egypt, Arabia, the Persian Gulf, India, European colonies in the Far East, the Indian Ocean islands, Ethiopia , Sudan and Somalia.[96]

According to the Encyclopedia of African History, "It is estimated that by the 1890s the largest slave population of the world, about 2 million people, was concentrated in the territories of the Sokoto Caliphate. The use of slave labour was extensive, especially in agriculture."[97][98] The Anti-Slavery Society estimated there were 2 million slaves in Ethiopia in the early 1930s out of an estimated population of 8 to 16 million.[99]

Slave labour in East Africa was drawn from the Zanj, Bantu peoples that lived along the East African coast.[91][100] The Zanj were for centuries shipped as slaves by Arab traders to all the countries bordering the Indian Ocean during the Indian Ocean slave trade. The Umayyad and Abbasid caliphs recruited many Zanj slaves as soldiers and, as early as 696, there were slave revolts of the Zanj against their Arab enslavers during their slavery in the Umayyad Caliphate in Iraq. The Zanj Rebellion, a series of uprisings that took place between 869 and 883 near Basra (also known as Basara), against the slavery in the Abbasid Caliphate situated in present-day Iraq, is believed to have involved enslaved Zanj that had originally been captured from the African Great Lakes region and areas further south in East Africa.[101] It grew to involve over 500,000 slaves and free men who were imported from across the Muslim empire and claimed over "tens of thousands of lives in lower Iraq".[102]

The Zanj who were taken as slaves to the Middle East were often used in strenuous agricultural work.[103] As the plantation economy boomed and the Arabs became richer, agriculture and other manual labour work was thought to be demeaning. The resulting labour shortage led to an increased slave market.

Slave market in Algiers, 1684

In Algiers, the capital of Algeria, captured Christians and Europeans were forced into slavery. In about 1650, there were as many as 35,000 Christian slaves in Algiers.[104] By one estimate, raids by Barbary slave traders on coastal villages and ships extending from Italy to Iceland, enslaved an estimated 1 to 1.25 million Europeans between the 16th and 19th centuries.[105][106][107] However, this estimate is the result of an extrapolation which assumes that the number of European slaves captured by Barbary pirates was constant for a 250-year period:

There are no records of how many men, women and children were enslaved, but it is possible to calculate roughly the number of fresh captives that would have been needed to keep populations steady and replace those slaves who died, escaped, were ransomed, or converted to Islam. On this basis it is thought that around 8,500 new slaves were needed annually to replenish numbers – about 850,000 captives over the century from 1580 to 1680. By extension, for the 250 years between 1530 and 1780, the figure could easily have been as high as 1,250,000.[108]

Davis' numbers have been refuted by other historians, such as David Earle, who cautions that true picture of Europeans slaves is clouded by the fact the corsairs also seized non-Christian whites from eastern Europe.[108] In addition, the number of slaves traded was hyperactive,[clarification needed] with exaggerated estimates relying on peak years to calculate averages for entire centuries, or millennia. Hence, there were wide fluctuations year-to-year, particularly in the 18th and 19th centuries, given slave imports, and also given the fact that, prior to the 1840s, there are no consistent records. Middle East expert, John Wright, cautions that modern estimates are based on back-calculations from human observation.[109] Such observations, across the late 16th and early 17th century observers, account for around 35,000 European Christian slaves held throughout this period on the Barbary Coast, across Tripoli, Tunis, but mostly in Algiers. The majority were sailors (particularly those who were English), taken with their ships, but others were fishermen and coastal villagers. However, most of these captives were people from lands close to Africa, particularly Spain and Italy.[110] This eventually led to the bombardment of Algiers by an Anglo-Dutch fleet in 1816.[111][110]

Arab-Swahili slave traders and their captives on the Ruvuma River in East Africa, 19th century

Under Omani Arabs, Zanzibar became East Africa's main slave port, with as many as 50,000 African slaves passing through every year during the 19th century.[112][113] Some historians estimate that between 11 and 18 million African slaves crossed the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, and Sahara Desert from 650 to 1900 AD.[85][failed verification][114] Eduard Rüppell described the losses of Nuba slaves from Southern sudan being transported on foot to Egypt: "after the Daftardar bey's 1822 campaign in the southern Nuba mountains, nearly 40,000 slaves were captured. However, through bad treatment, disease and desert travel barely 5,000 made it to Egypt."[115] W.A. Veenhoven wrote: "The German doctor, Gustav Nachtigal, an eye-witness, believed that for every slave who arrived at a market three or four died on the way ... Keltie (The Partition of Africa, London, 1920) believes that for every slave the Arabs brought to the coast at least six died on the way or during the slavers' raid. Livingstone puts the figure as high as ten to one."[116]

Systems of servitude and slavery were common in parts of Africa, as they were in much of the ancient world. In many African societies where slavery was prevalent, the slaves were not treated as chattel slaves and were given certain rights in a system similar to indentured servitude elsewhere in the world. The forms of slavery in Africa were closely related to kinship structures. In many African communities, where land could not be owned, enslavement of individuals was used as a means to increase the influence a person had and expand connections.[117] This made slaves a permanent part of a master's lineage and the children of slaves could become closely connected with the larger family ties.[118] Children of slaves born into families could be integrated into the master's kinship group and rise to prominent positions within society, even to the level of chief in some instances. However, stigma often remained attached and there could be strict separations between slave members of a kinship group and those related to the master.[117] Slavery was practiced in many different forms: debt slavery, enslavement of war captives, military slavery, and criminal slavery were all practiced in various parts of Africa.[119] Slavery for domestic and court purposes was widespread throughout Africa.

A model showing a cross-section of a typical 1700s European slave ship on the Middle Passage, National Museum of American History

When the Atlantic slave trade began, many of the local slave systems began supplying captives for chattel slave markets outside Africa. Although the Atlantic slave trade was not the only slave trade from Africa, it was the largest in volume and intensity. As Elikia M'bokolo wrote in Le Monde diplomatique:

The African continent was bled of its human resources via all possible routes. Across the Sahara, through the Red Sea, from the Indian Ocean ports and across the Atlantic. At least ten centuries of slavery for the benefit of the Muslim countries (from the ninth to the nineteenth).... Four million enslaved people exported via the Red Sea, another four million through the Swahili ports of the Indian Ocean, perhaps as many as nine million along the trans-Saharan caravan route, and eleven to twenty million (depending on the author) across the Atlantic Ocean.[120]

The trans-Atlantic slave trade peaked in the late 18th century, when the largest number of slaves were captured on raiding expeditions into the interior of West Africa. These expeditions were typically carried out by African kingdoms, such as the Oyo Empire (Yoruba), the Ashanti Empire,[121] the kingdom of Dahomey,[122] and the Aro Confederacy.[123] It is estimated that about 15 percent of slaves died during the voyage, with mortality rates considerably higher in Africa itself in the process of capturing and transporting indigenous peoples to the ships.[124][125]

Mauritania was the last country in the world to officially ban slavery, in 1981,[37] with legal prosecution of slaveholders established in 2007.[126]

Middle East

[edit]
19th-century engraving depicting an Arab slave-trading caravan transporting black African slaves across the Sahara Desert

In the earliest known records, slavery is treated as an established institution. The Code of Hammurabi (c. 1760 BC), for example, prescribed death for anyone who helped a slave escape or who sheltered a fugitive.[127] The Bible mentions slavery as an established institution.[85] Slavery existed in Pharaonic Egypt, but studying it is complicated by terminology used by the Egyptians to refer to different classes of servitude over the course of history. Interpretation of the textual evidence of classes of slaves in ancient Egypt has been difficult to differentiate by word usage alone.[128][129] The three apparent types of enslavement in ancient Egypt were chattel slavery, bonded labour, and forced labour.[130][131][132]

Following the Islamic conquests of the 7th and 8th century, slavery was regulated by the Islamic law, in parallell to the Middle East being more or less united by a succession of Islamic empires. The history of slavery in the Muslim Middle East was therefore reflected in the slavery of the Islamic empires that succeeded each other between the 7th and the 20th century. Slavery was hence reflected in the institution of slavery in the Rashidun Caliphate (632–661), slavery in the Umayyad Caliphate (661–750), slavery in the Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258), slavery in the Mamluk Sultanate (1258–1517) and slavery in the Ottoman Empire (1517–1922), before slavery was finally abolished in one Muslim country after another during the 20th century.

Historically, slaves in the Arab World came from many different regions, including Sub-Saharan Africa (mainly Zanj),[133] the Caucasus (mainly Circassians),[134] Central Asia (mainly Tartars), and Central and Eastern Europe (mainly Slavs Saqaliba).[135] These slaves were trafficked to the Arab world from Africa via the Trans-Saharan slave trade, the Baqt treaty, the Red Sea slave trade and the Indian Ocean slave trade; from Asia via the Bukhara slave trade; and from Europe via the Prague slave trade, the Venetian slave trade and the Barbary slave trade, respectively.

Ottoman wars saw Europeans dragged to that empire.

Between 1517 and 1917, most of the Middle East consisted of the Ottoman Empire. In the Ottoman capital of Constantinople, about one-fifth of the population consisted of slaves.[4] The city was a major centre of the slave trade in the 15th and later centuries.

Eastern European slaves were provided for slavery in the Ottoman Empire via the Crimean slave trade by Tatar raids on Slavic villages[136] but also by conquest and the suppression of rebellions, in the aftermath of which entire populations were sometimes enslaved and sold across the Empire, reducing the risk of future rebellion. The Ottomans also purchased slaves from traders who brought slaves into the Empire from Europe and Africa. It has been estimated that some 200,000 slaves – mainly Circassians – were imported into the Ottoman Empire between 1800 and 1909.[137] In 1908, women slaves were still sold in the Ottoman Empire.[138] German orientalist, Gustaf Dalman, reported seeing slaves in Muslim houses in Aleppo, belonging to Ottoman Syria, in 1899, and that boys could be bought as slaves in Damascus and Cairo in as late as 1909.[139]

Persian slave in the Khanate of Khiva, 19th century

A major center of slave trade to the Middle east was central Asia, where the Bukhara slave trade had supplied slaves to the Middle East for thousands of years from antiquity until the 1870s. A slave market for captured Russian and Persian slaves was the Khivan slave trade centred in the Central Asian khanate of Khiva.[140] In the early 1840s, the population of the Uzbek states of Bukhara and Khiva included about 900,000 slaves.[137]

By 1870, chattel slavery had been at least formally banned in most areas of the world, with the exception of Muslim lands in Caucasus, Africa, and the Persian Gulf.[141] While slavery was by the 1870s viewed as morally unacceptable in the West, slavery was not considered to be immoral in the Muslim world since it was an institution recognized (halal) in the Quran and morally justified under the guise of warfare against non-Muslims (kafir of Dar al-Harb), and non-Muslims were kidnapped and enslaved by Muslims around the Muslim world: in the Balkans, the Caucasus, the Baluchistan, India, South West Asia and the Philippines.[141] Slaves where marched in shackles to the coasts of Sudan, Ethiopia and Somali, placed upon dhows and trafficked across the Indian Ocean to the Gulf of Aden, or across the Red Sea to Arabia and Aden, with weak slaves being thrown in the sea; or across the Sahara desert via the Trans-Saharan slave trade to the Nile, while dying from exposure and swollen feet.[141]

Ottoman anti slavery laws where not enforced in the late 19th-century, particularly not in Hejaz; the first attempt to ban the Red Sea slave trade in 1857, the firman of 1857, resulted in a rebellion in the Hejaz Province, the Hejaz rebellion, which resulted in Hejaz being exempted from the ban.[142] The Anglo-Ottoman Convention of 1880 formally banned the Red Sea slave trade, but it was not enforced in the Ottoman Provinces in the Arabian Peninsula.[142] In the late 19th century, the Sultan of Morocco stated to Western diplomats that it was impossible for him to ban slavery because such a ban would not be enforceable, but the British asked him to ensure that the slave trade in Morocco would at least be handled discreet and away from the eyes of foreign witnesses.[142]

Chattel slavery lasted in most of the Middle East until the 20th century. The Red Sea slave trade still provided enslaved people from Africa to the Arabian Peninsula after World War II. As recently as the 1960s, Saudi Arabia's slave population was estimated at 300,000.[143] Along with Yemen, the Saudis abolished slavery in 1962.[144]

Americas

[edit]

Enslavement in the Americas existed before European arrival and was used for numerous reasons.[145] Slavery in Mexico can be traced back to the Aztecs.[146] Other Amerindians, such as the Inca of the Andes, the Tupinambá of Brazil, the Creek of Georgia, and the Comanche of Texas, also practiced slavery.[85]

Slavery in Canada was practiced by First Nations and by European settlers.[147] Slave-owning people of what became Canada were, for example, the fishing societies, such as the Yurok, that lived along the Pacific coast from Alaska to California,[148] on what is sometimes described as the Pacific or Northern Northwest Coast. Some of the indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast, such as the Haida and Tlingit, were traditionally known as fierce warriors and slave-traders, raiding as far as California. Slavery was hereditary, the slaves being prisoners of war and their descendants were slaves.[149] Some nations in British Columbia continued to segregate and ostracize the descendants of slaves as late as the 1970s.[150]

Diagrams of a slave ship and the alignment of captive slaves during the Atlantic slave trade

Slavery in America remains a contentious issue and played a major role in the history and evolution of some countries, triggering a revolution, a civil war, and numerous rebellions.

The countries that controlled most of the transatlantic slave market in terms of number of slaves shipped were the UK, Portugal and France.

Slaves embarked to America from 1450 until 1800 by country

In order to establish itself as an American empire, Spain had to fight against the relatively powerful civilizations of the New World. The Spanish conquest of the indigenous peoples in the Americas included using the Natives as forced labour. The Spanish colonies were the first Europeans to use African slaves in the New World on islands such as Cuba and Hispaniola.[151] It was argued by some contemporary writers to be intrinsically immoral.[152][153][154] Bartolomé de las Casas, a 16th-century Dominican friar and Spanish historian, participated in campaigns in Cuba (at Bayamo and Camagüey) and was present at the massacre of Hatuey; his observation of that massacre led him to fight for a social movement away from the use of natives as slaves. Also, the alarming decline in the native population had spurred the first royal laws protecting the native population. The first African slaves arrived in Hispaniola in 1501.[155] This era saw a growth in race-based slavery.[156] England played a prominent role in the Atlantic slave trade. The "slave triangle" was pioneered by Francis Drake and his associates, though English slave-trading would not take off until the mid-17th century.

Many whites who arrived in North America during the 17th and 18th centuries came under contract as indentured servants.[157] The transformation from indentured servitude to slavery was a gradual process in Virginia. The earliest legal documentation of such a shift was in 1640 where a black man, John Punch, was sentenced to lifetime slavery, forcing him to serve his master, Hugh Gwyn, for the remainder of his life, for attempting to run away. This case was significant because it established the disparity between his sentence as a black man and that of the two white indentured servants who escaped with him (one described as Dutch and one as a Scotchman). It is the first documented case of a black man sentenced to lifetime servitude and is considered one of the first legal cases to make a racial distinction between black and white indentured servants.[158][159]

After 1640, planters started to ignore the expiration of indentured contracts and keep their servants as slaves for life. This was demonstrated by the 1655 case Johnson v. Parker, where the court ruled that a black man, Anthony Johnson of Virginia, was granted ownership of another black man, John Casor, as the result of a civil case.[160] This was the first instance of a judicial determination in the Thirteen Colonies holding that a person who had committed no crime could be held in servitude for life.[161][162]

Spanish colonial America

[edit]

In Jamaica and elsewhere in the Caribbean area, the Spanish enslaved many of the Taino natives. Some of them escaped, and some hurled themselves and their children off of cliffs to avoid enslavement, but most died from European diseases and overwork.[163] The practice began under Christopher Columbus, who was looking for gold to finance his future expeditions, and was continued by the other conquistadors who followed in his wake.

In 1519, Hernán Cortés brought the first modern slave to Mexico.[164] In the mid-16th century, the Spanish New Laws, prohibited slavery of the indigenous people, including the Aztecs. A labour shortage resulted. This led to the African slaves being imported, as they were not susceptible to smallpox. In exchange, many Africans were afforded the opportunity to buy their freedom, while eventually others were granted their freedom by their masters.[164]

Spain practically did not trade in slaves until 1810 after the rebellions and independence of its American territories or viceroyalties. After the Napoleonic invasions, Spain had lost its industry and its American territories, except in Cuba and Puerto Rico, where the African slave trade to Cuba began on a massive scale from 1810 onwards. It was started by French planters exiled from the French lost colony Saint Domingue (Haiti) who settled in the eastern part of Cuba.

In 1789, the Spanish Crown led an effort to reform slavery, as the demand for slave labour in Cuba was growing. The Crown issued a decree, Código Negro Español (Spanish Black Code), that specified food and clothing provisions, put limits on the number of work hours, limited punishments, required religious instruction, and protected marriages, forbidding the sale of young children away from their mothers. The British made other changes to the institution of slavery in Cuba. However, planters often flouted the laws and protested against them, considering them a threat to their authority and an intrusion into their personal lives.[165]

English and Dutch Caribbean

[edit]
Planting the sugar cane, British West Indies, 1823
Statue of Bussa, who led the largest slave rebellion in Barbadian history

In the early 17th century, the majority of the labour in Barbados was provided by European indentured servants, mainly English, Irish and Scottish, with African and native American slaves providing little of the workforce. The introduction of sugar cane in 1640 completely transformed society and the economy. Barbados eventually had one of the world's largest sugar industries.[166] The workable sugar plantation required a large investment and a great deal of heavy labour. At first, Dutch traders supplied the equipment, financing, and African slaves, in addition to transporting most of the sugar to Europe. In 1644, the population of Barbados was estimated at 30,000, of which about 800 were of African descent, with the remainder mainly of English descent. By 1700, there were 15,000 free whites and 50,000 enslaved Africans. In Jamaica, although the African slave population in the 1670s and 1680s never exceeded 10,000, by 1800 it had increased to over 300,000. The increased implementation of slave codes or black codes, which created differential treatment between Africans and the white workers and ruling planter class. In response to these codes, several slave rebellions were attempted or planned during this time, but none succeeded.

Funeral at slave plantation, Dutch Suriname. 1840–1850.

The planters of the Dutch colony of Suriname relied heavily on African slaves to cultivate, harvest and process the commodity crops of coffee, cocoa, sugar cane and cotton plantations.[167] The Netherlands abolished slavery in Suriname in 1863.

Many slaves escaped the plantations. With the help of the native South Americans living in the adjoining rain forests, these runaway slaves established a new and unique culture in the interior that was highly successful in its own right. They were known collectively in English as Maroons, in French as Nèg'Marrons (literally meaning "brown negroes", that is "pale-skinned negroes"), and in Dutch as Marrons. The Maroons gradually developed several independent tribes through a process of ethnogenesis, as they were made up of slaves from different African ethnicities. These tribes include the Saramaka, Paramaka, Ndyuka or Aukan, Kwinti, Aluku or Boni, and Matawai. The Maroons often raided plantations to recruit new members from the slaves and capture women, as well as to acquire weapons, food and supplies. They sometimes killed planters and their families in the raids.[168] The colonists also mounted armed campaigns against the Maroons, who generally escaped through the rain forest, which they knew much better than did the colonists. To end hostilities, in the 18th century the European colonial authorities signed several peace treaties with different tribes. They granted the Maroons sovereign status and trade rights in their inland territories, giving them autonomy.

Brazil

[edit]
Public flogging of a slave in 19th-century Brazil, by Johann Moritz Rugendas
Slave punishment by Jacques Étienne Arago, 1839

Slavery in Brazil began long before the first Portuguese settlement was established in 1532, as members of one tribe would enslave captured members of another.[169]

Later, Portuguese colonists were heavily dependent on indigenous labour during the initial phases of settlement to maintain the subsistence economy, and natives were often captured by expeditions called bandeiras. The importation of African slaves began midway through the 16th century, but the enslavement of indigenous peoples continued well into the 17th and 18th centuries.

During the Atlantic slave trade era, Brazil imported more African slaves than any other country. Nearly 5 million slaves were brought from Africa to Brazil during the period from 1501 to 1866.[170] Until the early 1850s, most African slaves who arrived on Brazilian shores were forced to embark at West Central African ports, especially in Luanda (in present-day Angola). Today, with the exception of Nigeria, the country with the largest population of people of African descent is Brazil.[171]

Slave labour was the driving force behind the growth of the sugar economy in Brazil, and sugar was the primary export of the colony from 1600 to 1650. Gold and diamond deposits were discovered in Brazil in 1690, which sparked an increase in the importation of African slaves to power this newly profitable market. Transportation systems were developed for the mining infrastructure, and population boomed from immigrants seeking to take part in gold and diamond mining. Demand for African slaves did not wane after the decline of the mining industry in the second half of the 18th century. Cattle ranching and foodstuff production proliferated after the population growth, both of which relied heavily on slave labour. 1.7 million slaves were imported to Brazil from Africa from 1700 to 1800, and the rise of coffee in the 1830s further enticed expansion of the slave trade.

Brazil was the last country in the Western world to abolish slavery. Forty percent of the total number of slaves brought to the Americas were sent to Brazil.[citation needed]

Haiti

[edit]

Slavery in Haiti began at an unknown time with slavery being already practiced by the native populations when Christopher Columbus on the island in 1492.[172] European colonists would go and institutionalize slavery on the island and turn it into a major business which was devastating to the native population.[173] Following the indigenous Taíno's near decimation from forced labour, disease and war, the Spanish, under advisement of the Catholic priest Bartolomé de las Casas, and with the blessing of the Catholic church, who also wished to protect the indigenous people, began engaging in earnest in the use of African slaves.[clarification needed] During the French colonial period beginning in 1625, the economy of Haiti (then known as Saint-Domingue) was based on slavery, and the practice there was regarded as the most brutal in the world.

Saint-Domingue slave revolt in 1791

Following the Treaty of Ryswick of 1697, Hispaniola was divided between France and Spain. France received the western third and subsequently named it Saint-Domingue. To develop it into sugarcane plantations, the French imported thousands of slaves from Africa. Sugar was a lucrative commodity crop throughout the 18th century. By 1789, approximately 40,000 white colonists lived in Saint-Domingue. The whites were vastly outnumbered by the tens of thousands of African slaves they had imported to work on their plantations, which were primarily devoted to the production of sugarcane. In the north of the island, slaves were able to retain many ties to African cultures, religion and language; these ties were continually being renewed by newly imported Africans. Blacks outnumbered whites by about ten to one.

The French-enacted Code Noir ("Black Code"), prepared by Jean-Baptiste Colbert and ratified by Louis XIV, had established rules on slave treatment and permissible freedoms. Saint-Domingue has been described as one of the most brutally efficient slave colonies; one-third of newly imported Africans died within a few years.[174] Many slaves died from diseases such as smallpox and typhoid fever.[175] They had birth rates around 3 percent, and there is evidence that some women aborted fetuses, or committed infanticide, rather than allow their children to live within the bonds of slavery.[176][177]

As in its Louisiana colony, the French colonial government allowed some rights to free people of color: the mixed-race descendants of white male colonists and black female slaves (and later, mixed-race women). Over time, many were released from slavery. They established a separate social class. White French Creole fathers frequently sent their mixed-race sons to France for their education. Some men of color were admitted into the military. More of the free people of color lived in the south of the island, near Port-au-Prince, and many intermarried within their community. They frequently worked as artisans and tradesmen, and began to own some property. Some became slave holders. The free people of color petitioned the colonial government to expand their rights.

Slaves that made it to Haiti from the trans-Atlantic journey and slaves born in Haiti were first documented in Haiti's archives and transferred to France's Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. As of 2015, these records are in The National Archives of France. According to the 1788 Census, Haiti's population consisted of nearly 40,000 whites, 30,000 free coloureds and 450,000 slaves.[178]

The Haitian Revolution of 1804, the only successful slave revolt in human history, precipitated the end of slavery in all French colonies, which came in 1848.

United States

[edit]
A coffle of slaves being driven on foot from Staunton, Virginia, to Tennessee in 1850

Slavery in the United States was the legal institution of human chattel enslavement, primarily of Africans and African Americans, that existed in the United States of America in the 18th and 19th centuries, after it gained independence from the British and before the end of the American Civil War. Slavery had been practiced in British America from early colonial days and was legal in all Thirteen Colonies, at the time of the Declaration of Independence in 1776. By the time of the American Revolution, the status of slave had been institutionalized as a racial caste associated with African ancestry.[179] The United States became polarized over the issue of slavery, represented by the slave and free states divided by the Mason–Dixon line, which separated free Pennsylvania from slave Maryland and Delaware.

Congress, during the Jefferson administration, prohibited the importation of slaves, effective 1808, although smuggling (illegal importing) was not unusual.[180] Domestic slave trading, however, continued at a rapid pace, driven by labour demands from the development of cotton plantations in the Deep South. Those states attempted to extend slavery into the new western territories to keep their share of political power in the nation. Such laws proposed to Congress to continue the spread of slavery into newly ratified states include the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

A black family works a cotton plantation. A young boy stands in front of the camera. The photo is in black and white.
A Black family works a cotton plantation in Mississippi. The subtitle says "We'se done all dis's morning".

The treatment of slaves in the United States varied widely depending on conditions, times, and places. The power relationships of slavery corrupted many whites who had authority over slaves, with children showing their own cruelty. Masters and overseers resorted to physical punishments to impose their wills. Slaves were punished by whipping, shackling, hanging, beating, burning, mutilation, branding and imprisonment. Punishment was most often meted out in response to disobedience or perceived infractions, but sometimes abuse was carried out to re-assert the dominance of the master or overseer of the slave.[181] Treatment was usually harsher on large plantations, which were often managed by overseers and owned by absentee slaveholders.

William Wells Brown, who escaped to freedom, reported that on one plantation, slave men were required to pick 80 pounds (36 kg) of cotton per day, while women were required to pick 70 pounds (32 kg) per day; if any slave failed in their quota, they were subject to whip lashes for each pound they were short. The whipping post stood next to the cotton scales.[182] A New York man who attended a slave auction in the mid-19th century reported that at least three-quarters of the male slaves he saw at sale had scars on their backs from whipping.[183] By contrast, small slave-owning families had closer relationships between the owners and slaves; this sometimes resulted in a more humane environment but was not a given.[181]

More than one million slaves were sold from the Upper South, which had a surplus of labour, and taken to the Deep South in a forced migration, splitting up many families. New communities of African American culture were developed in the Deep South, and the total slave population in the South eventually reached 4 million before liberation.[184][185] In the 19th century, proponents of slavery often defended the institution as a "necessary evil". White people of that time feared that emancipation of black slaves would have more harmful social and economic consequences than the continuation of slavery. The French writer and traveler Alexis de Tocqueville, in Democracy in America (1835), expressed opposition to slavery while observing its effects on American society. He felt that a multiracial society without slavery was untenable, as he believed that prejudice against black people increased as they were granted more rights. Others, like James Henry Hammond argued that slavery was a "positive good" stating: "Such a class you must have, or you would not have that other class which leads progress, civilization, and refinement."

The Southern state governments wanted to keep a balance between the number of slave and free states to maintain a political balance of power in Congress. The new territories acquired from Britain, France, and Mexico were the subject of major political compromises. By 1850, the newly rich cotton-growing South was threatening to secede from the Union, and tensions continued to rise. Many white Southern Christians, including church ministers, attempted to justify their support for slavery as modified by Christian paternalism.[186] The largest denominations, the Baptist, Methodist, and Presbyterian churches, split over the slavery issue into regional organizations of the North and South.

Flogging a slave fastened to the ground, illustration in an 1853 anti-slavery pamphlet

When Abraham Lincoln won the 1860 election on a platform of halting the expansion of slavery, according to the 1860 U.S. census, roughly 400,000 individuals, representing 8% of all U.S. families, owned nearly 4,000,000 slaves.[187] One-third of Southern families owned slaves.[188] The South was heavily invested in slavery. As such, upon Lincoln's election, seven states broke away to form the Confederate States of America. The first six states to secede held the greatest number of slaves in the South. Shortly after, over the issue of slavery, the United States erupted into an all-out Civil War, with slavery legally ceasing as an institution following the war in December 1865.

In 1865, the United States ratified the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which banned slavery and involuntary servitude "except as punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted," providing a legal basis for forced labor to continue in the country. This led to the system of convict leasing, which affected primarily African Americans. The Prison Policy Initiative, an American criminal justice think tank, cites the 2020 US prison population as 2.3 million, and nearly all able-bodied inmates work in some fashion. In Texas, Georgia, Alabama and Arkansas, prisoners are not paid at all for their work. In other states, prisoners are paid between $0.12 and $1.15 per hour. Federal Prison Industries paid inmates an average of $0.90 per hour in 2017. Inmates who refuse to work may be indefinitely remanded into solitary confinement or have family visitation revoked. From 2010 to 2015 and again in 2016 and in 2018, some prisoners in the US refused to work, protesting for better pay, better conditions, and for the end of forced labor. Strike leaders were punished with indefinite solitary confinement. Forced prison labor occurs in both government-run prisons and private prisons. CoreCivic and GEO Group constitute half the market share of private prisons, and they made a combined revenue of $3.5 billion in 2015. The value of all labor by inmates in the United States is estimated to be in the billions. In California, 2,500 incarcerated workers fought wildfires for only $1 per hour through the CDCR's Conservation Camp Program, which saves the state as much as $100 million a year.[189]

Asia-Pacific

[edit]

East Asia

[edit]
A contract from the Tang dynasty recording the purchase of a 15-year-old slave for six bolts of plain silk and five coins

Slavery existed in ancient China as early as the Shang dynasty.[190] Slavery was employed largely by governments as a means of maintaining a public labour force.[191][192] Until the Han dynasty, slaves were sometimes discriminated against but their legal status was guaranteed. As can be seen from the some historical records as "Duansheng, Marquis of Shouxiang, had his territory confiscated because he killed a female slave" (Han dynasty records in DongGuan), "Wang Mang's son Wang Huo murdered a slave, Wang Mang severely criticized him and forced him to commit suicide" (Book of Han: Biography of Wang Mang), Murder against slaves was as taboo as murder against free people, and perpetrators were always severely punished. Han dynasty can be said to be very distinctive compared to other countries of the same period(In most cases, lords were free to kill their slaves) in terms of slaves human rights.

After the Southern and Northern Dynasties, Due to years of poor harvests, the influx of foreign tribes, and the resulting wars, The number of slaves exploded. They became a class and were called "jianmin [zh] (Chinese: 贱民)", The word literally means "inferior person". As stated in The commentary of Tang Code: "Slaves and inferior people are legally equivalent to livestock products", They always had a low social status, and even if they were deliberately murdered, the perpetrators received only a year in prison, and were punished even when they reported the crimes of their lords.[193] However, in the Later period of the dynasty, perhaps because the increase in the number of slaves slowed down again, the penalties for crimes against them became harsh again. For example, the famous contemporary female poet Yu Xuanji, she was publicly executed for murdering her own slave.

Many Han Chinese were enslaved in the process of the Mongol invasion of China proper.[194] According to Japanese historians Sugiyama Masaaki (杉山正明) and Funada Yoshiyuki (舩田善之), Mongolian slaves were owned by Han Chinese during the Yuan dynasty.[195][196] Slavery has taken various forms throughout China's history. It was reportedly abolished as a legally recognized institution, including in a 1909 law[197][198] fully enacted in 1910,[199] although the practice continued until at least 1949.[194] Tang Chinese soldiers and pirates enslaved Koreans, Turks, Persians, Indonesians, and people from Inner Mongolia, central Asia, and northern India.[200][201] The greatest source of slaves came from southern tribes, including Thais and aboriginals from the southern provinces of Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, and Guizhou. Malays, Khmers, Indians, and "black skinned" peoples (who were either Austronesian Negritos of Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands, or Africans, or both) were also purchased as slaves in the Tang dynasty.[202]

In the 17th century Qing dynasty, there was a hereditarily servile people called Booi Aha (Manchu: booi niyalma; Chinese transliteration: 包衣阿哈), which is a Manchu word literally translated as "household person" and sometimes rendered as "nucai." The Manchu was establishing close personal and paternalist relationship between masters and their slaves, as Nurhachi said, "The Master should love the slaves and eat the same food as him".[203] However, booi aha "did not correspond exactly to the Chinese category of "bond-servant slave" (Chinese:奴僕); instead, it was a relationship of personal dependency on a master which in theory guaranteed close personal relationships and equal treatment, even though many western scholars would directly translate "booi" as "bond-servant" (some of the "booi" even had their own servant).[194] Chinese Muslim (Tungans) Sufis who were charged with practicing xiejiao (heterodox religion), were punished by exile to Xinjiang and being sold as a slave to other Muslims, such as the Sufi begs.[204] Han Chinese who committed crimes such as those dealing with opium became slaves to the begs, this practice was administered by Qing law.[205] Most Chinese in Altishahr were exile slaves to Turkestani Begs.[206] While free Chinese merchants generally did not engage in relationships with East Turkestani women, some of the Chinese slaves belonging to begs, along with Green Standard soldiers, Bannermen, and Manchus, engaged in affairs with the East Turkestani women that were serious in nature.[207]

Kisaeng, women from outcast or slave families who were trained to provide entertainment, conversation, and sexual services to men of the upper class

Slavery in Korea existed since before the Three Kingdoms of Korea period, in the first century BCE.[208] Slavery has been described as "very important in medieval Korea, probably more important than in any other East Asian country, but by the 16th century, population growth was making [it] unnecessary".[209] Slavery went into decline around the 10th century but came back in the late Goryeo period when Korea also experienced multiple slave rebellions.[208] In the Joseon period of Korea, members of the slave class were known as nobi. The nobi were socially indistinct from freemen (i.e., the middle and common classes) other than the ruling yangban class, and some possessed property rights, and legal and civil rights. Hence, some scholars argue that it is inappropriate to call them "slaves",[210] while some scholars describe them as serfs.[211][212] The nobi population could fluctuate up to about one-third of the total, but on average the nobi made up about 10% of the total population.[208] In 1801, the majority of government nobi were emancipated,[213] and by 1858, the nobi population stood at about 1.5 percent of the Korean population.[214] During the Joseon period, the nobi population could fluctuate up to about one-third of the population, but on average the nobi made up about 10% of the total population.[208] The nobi system declined beginning in the 18th century.[215] Since the outset of the Joseon dynasty and especially beginning in the 17th century, there was harsh criticism among prominent thinkers in Korea about the nobi system. Even within the Joseon government, there were indications of a shift in attitude toward the nobi.[216] King Yeongjo implemented a policy of gradual emancipation in 1775,[209] and he and his successor King Jeongjo made many proposals and developments that lessened the burden on nobi, which led to the emancipation of the vast majority of government nobi in 1801.[216] In addition, population growth,[209] numerous escaped slaves,[208] growing commercialization of agriculture, and the rise of the independent small farmer class contributed to the decline in the number of nobi to about 1.5% of the total population by 1858.[214] The hereditary nobi system was officially abolished around 1886–87,[208][214] and the rest of the nobi system was abolished with the Gabo Reform of 1894.[208][217] However, slavery did not completely disappear in Korea until 1930, during Imperial Japanese rule. During the Imperial Japanese occupation of Korea around World War II, some Koreans were used in forced labour by the Imperial Japanese, in conditions which have been compared to slavery.[208][218] These included women forced into sexual slavery by the Imperial Japanese Army before and during World War II, known as "comfort women".[208][218]

After the Portuguese first made contact with Japan in 1543, slave trade developed in which Portuguese purchased Japanese as slaves in Japan and sold them to various locations overseas, including Portugal, throughout the 16th and 17th centuries.[219][220] Many documents mention the slave trade along with protests against the enslavement of Japanese. Japanese slaves are believed to be the first of their nation to end up in Europe, and the Portuguese purchased numbers of Japanese slave girls to bring to Portugal for sexual purposes, as noted by the Church[221] in 1555. Japanese slave women were even sold as concubines to Asian lascar and African crew members, along with their European counterparts serving on Portuguese ships trading in Japan, mentioned by Luis Cerqueira, a Portuguese Jesuit, in a 1598 document.[222] Japanese slaves were brought by the Portuguese to Macau, where they were enslaved to Portuguese or became slaves to other slaves.[223][224] Some Korean slaves were bought by the Portuguese and brought back to Portugal from Japan, where they had been among the tens of thousands of Korean prisoners of war transported to Japan during the Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–98).[225][226] Historians pointed out that at the same time Hideyoshi expressed his indignation and outrage at the Portuguese trade in Japanese slaves, he was engaging in a mass slave trade of Korean prisoners of war in Japan.[227][228] Fillippo Sassetti saw some Chinese and Japanese slaves in Lisbon among the large slave community in 1578, although most of the slaves were black.[229][230][231][232][233]

The Portuguese also valued Oriental slaves more than the black Africans and the Moors for their rarity. Chinese slaves were more expensive than Moors and blacks and showed off the high status of the owner.[234] The Portuguese attributed qualities like intelligence and industriousness to Chinese, Japanese and Indian slaves.[235][231] King Sebastian of Portugal feared rampant slavery was having a negative effect on Catholic proselytization, so he commanded that it be banned in 1571.[236] Hideyoshi was so disgusted that his own Japanese people were being sold en masse into slavery on Kyushu, that he wrote a letter to Jesuit Vice-Provincial Gaspar Coelho on July 24, 1587, to demand the Portuguese, Siamese (Thai), and Cambodians stop purchasing and enslaving Japanese and return Japanese slaves who ended up as far as India.[237][238][239] Hideyoshi blamed the Portuguese and Jesuits for this slave trade and banned Christian proselytizing as a result.[240][self-published source][241] In 1595, a law was passed by Portugal banning the selling and buying of Chinese and Japanese slaves.[242]

South Asia

[edit]

Slavery in India was widespread by the 6th century BC, and perhaps even as far back as the Vedic period.[243] Slavery intensified during the Muslim domination of northern India after the 11th century.[244] Slavery existed in Portuguese India after the 16th century. The Dutch, too, largely dealt in Abyssian slaves, known in India as Habshis or Sheedes.[245] Arakan/Bengal, Malabar, and Coromandel remained the largest sources of forced labour until the 1660s.

Between 1626 and 1662, the Dutch exported on an average 150–400 slaves annually from the Arakan-Bengal coast. During the first 30 years of Batavia's existence, Indian and Arakanese slaves provided the main labour force of the Dutch East India Company, Asian headquarters. An increase in Coromandel slaves occurred during a famine following the revolt of the Nayaka Indian rulers of South India (Tanjavur, Senji, and Madurai) against Bijapur overlordship (1645) and the subsequent devastation of the Tanjavur countryside by the Bijapur army. Reportedly, more than 150,000 people were taken by the invading Deccani Muslim armies to Bijapur and Golconda. In 1646, 2,118 slaves were exported to Batavia, the overwhelming majority from southern Coromandel. Some slaves were also acquired further south at Tondi, Adirampatnam, and Kayalpatnam. Another increase in slaving took place between 1659 and 1661 from Tanjavur as a result of a series of successive Bijapuri raids. At Nagapatnam, Pulicat, and elsewhere, the company purchased 8,000–10,000 slaves, the bulk of whom were sent to Ceylon, while a small portion were exported to Batavia and Malacca. Finally, following a long drought in Madurai and southern Coromandel, in 1673, which intensified the prolonged Madurai-Maratha struggle over Tanjavur and punitive fiscal practices, thousands of people from Tanjavur, mostly children, were sold into slavery and exported by Asian traders from Nagapattinam to Aceh, Johor, and other slave markets.

In September 1687, 665 slaves were exported by the English from Fort St. George, Madras. And, in 1694–96, when warfare once more ravaged South India, a total of 3,859 slaves were imported from Coromandel by private individuals into Ceylon.[246][247][248][249] The volume of the total Dutch Indian Ocean slave trade has been estimated to be about 15–30% of the Atlantic slave trade, slightly smaller than the trans-Saharan slave trade, and one-and-a-half to three times the size of the Swahili and Red Sea coast and the Dutch West India Company slave trades.[250]

According to Sir Henry Bartle Frere (who sat on the Viceroy's Council), there were an estimated 8 or 9 million slaves in India in 1841. About 15% of the population of Malabar were slaves. Slavery was legally abolished in the possessions of the East India Company by the Indian Slavery Act, 1843.[85]

South East Asia

[edit]

The hill tribe people in Indochina were "hunted incessantly and carried off as slaves by the Siamese (Thai), the Anamites (Vietnamese), and the Cambodians".[251] A Siamese military campaign in Laos in 1876 was described by a British observer as having been "transformed into slave-hunting raids on a large scale".[251] The census, taken in 1879, showed that 6% of the population in the Malay sultanate of Perak were slaves.[137] Enslaved people made up about two-thirds of the population in part of North Borneo in the 1880s.[137]

Oceania

[edit]

Slaves (he mōkai) had a recognised social role in traditional Māori society in New Zealand.[252] Blackbirding occurred on islands in the Pacific Ocean and Australia, especially in the 19th century.[253]

Europe

[edit]

Ancient Greece and Rome

[edit]
Ishmaelites purchase Joseph, by Schnorr von Carolsfeld, 1860

Records of slavery in Ancient Greece begin with Mycenaean Greece. Classical Athens had the largest slave population, with as many as 80,000 in the 6th and 5th centuries BC.[254] As the Roman Republic expanded outward, entire populations were enslaved, across Europe and the Mediterranean. Slaves were used for labour, as well as for amusement (e.g., gladiators and sex slaves). This oppression by an elite minority eventually led to slave revolts (see Roman Servile Wars); the Third Servile War was led by Spartacus.

By the late Republican era, slavery had become an economic pillar of Roman wealth, as well as Roman society.[255] It is estimated that 25% or more of the population of Ancient Rome was enslaved, although the actual percentage is debated by scholars and varied from region to region.[256][257] Slaves represented 15–25% of Italy's population,[258] mostly war captives,[258] especially from Gaul[259] and Epirus. Estimates of the number of slaves in the Roman Empire suggest that the majority were scattered throughout the provinces outside of Italy.[258] Generally, slaves in Italy were indigenous Italians.[260] Foreigners (including both slaves and freedmen) born outside of Italy were estimated to have peaked at 5% of the total in the capital, where their number was largest. Those from outside of Europe were predominantly of Greek descent. Jewish slaves never fully assimilated into Roman society, remaining an identifiable minority. These slaves (especially the foreigners) had higher death rates and lower birth rates than natives and were sometimes subjected to mass expulsions.[261] The average recorded age at death for the slaves in Rome was seventeen and a half years (17.2 for males; 17.9 for females).[262]

Medieval and early modern Europe

[edit]
Adalbert of Prague pleads with Boleslaus II, Duke of Bohemia for the release of slaves.

Slavery in early medieval Europe was so common that the Catholic Church repeatedly prohibited it, or at least the export of Christian slaves to non-Christian lands, as for example at the Council of Koblenz (922), the Council of London (1102) (which aimed mainly at the sale of English slaves to Ireland)[263] and the Council of Armagh (1171). Serfdom, on the contrary, was widely accepted. In 1452, Pope Nicholas V issued the papal bull Dum Diversas, granting the kings of Spain and Portugal the right to reduce any "Saracens (Muslims), pagans and any other unbelievers" to perpetual slavery, legitimizing the slave trade as a result of war.[264] The approval of slavery under these conditions was reaffirmed and extended in his Romanus Pontifex bull of 1455. Large-scale trading in slaves was mainly confined to the South and East of early medieval Europe: the Byzantine Empire and the Muslim world were the destinations, while pagan Central and Eastern Europe (along with the Caucasus and Tartary) were important sources. Viking, Arab, Greek, and Radhanite Jewish merchants were all involved in the slave trade during the Early Middle Ages.[265][266][267] The trade in European slaves reached a peak in the 10th century following the Zanj Rebellion, which dampened the use of African slaves in the Arab world.[268][269]

In Britain, slavery continued to be practiced following the fall of Rome, while sections of Æthelstan's and Hywel the Good's laws dealt with slaves in medieval England and medieval Wales respectively.[270][271] The trade particularly picked up after the Viking invasions, with major markets at Chester[272] and Bristol[273] supplied by Danish, Mercian, and Welsh raiding of one another's borderlands. At the time of the Domesday Book, nearly 10% of the English population were slaves.[274] William the Conqueror introduced a law preventing the sale of slaves overseas.[275] According to historian John Gillingham, by 1200 slavery in the British Isles was non-existent.[276] Slavery had never been authorized by statute within England and Wales, and in 1772, in the case Somerset v Stewart, Lord Mansfield declared that it was also unsupported within England by the common law. The slave trade was abolished by the Slave Trade Act 1807, although slavery remained legal in possessions outside Europe until the passage of the Slavery Abolition Act 1833 and the Indian Slavery Act, 1843.[277] However, when England began to have colonies in the Americas, and particularly from the 1640s, African slaves began to make their appearance in England and remained a presence until the eighteenth century. In Scotland, slaves continued to be sold as chattels until late in the eighteenth century (on the second May 1722, an advertisement appeared in the Edinburgh Evening Courant, announcing that a stolen slave had been found, who would be sold to pay expenses, unless claimed within two weeks).[278] For nearly two hundred years in the history of coal mining in Scotland, miners were bonded to their "maisters" by a 1606 Act "Anent Coalyers and Salters". The Colliers and Salters (Scotland) Act 1775 stated that "many colliers and salters are in a state of slavery and bondage" and announced emancipation; those starting work after July 1, 1775, would not become slaves, while those already in a state of slavery could, after 7 or 10 years depending on their age, apply for a decree of the Sheriff's Court granting their freedom. Few could afford this, until a further law in 1799 established their freedom and made this slavery and bondage illegal.[278][279]

A British captain witnessing the miseries of slaves in Ottoman Algeria, 1815.

The Byzantine-Ottoman wars and the Ottoman wars in Europe brought large numbers of slaves into the Islamic world.[280] To staff its bureaucracy, the Ottoman Empire established a janissary system which seized hundreds of thousands of Christian boys through the devşirme system. They were well cared for but were legally slaves owned by the government and were not allowed to marry. They were never bought or sold. The empire gave them significant administrative and military roles. The system began about 1365; there were 135,000 janissaries in 1826, when the system ended.[281] After the Battle of Lepanto, 12,000 Christian galley slaves were recaptured and freed from the Ottoman fleet.[282] Eastern Europe suffered a series of Tatar invasions, the goal of which was to loot and capture slaves for selling them to Ottomans as jasyr.[136] Seventy-five Crimean Tatar raids were recorded into Poland–Lithuania between 1474 and 1569.[283]

Slavic and African slaves in Córdoba, illustration from Cantigas de Santa Maria, 13th Century

Medieval Spain and Portugal were the scene of almost constant Muslim invasion of the predominantly Christian area. Periodic raiding expeditions were sent from Al-Andalus to ravage the Iberian Christian kingdoms, bringing back booty and slaves. In a raid against Lisbon in 1189, for example, the Almohad caliph Yaqub al-Mansur took 3,000 female and child captives, while his governor of Córdoba, in a subsequent attack upon Silves, Portugal, in 1191, took 3,000 Christian slaves.[284] From the 11th to the 19th century, North African Barbary Pirates engaged in raids on European coastal towns to capture Christian slaves to sell at slave markets in places such as Algeria and Morocco.[285]

The maritime town of Lagos was the first slave market created in Portugal (one of the earliest colonizers of the Americas) for the sale of imported African slaves – the Mercado de Escravos, opened in 1444.[286][287] In 1441, the first slaves were brought to Portugal from northern Mauritania.[287] By 1552, black African slaves made up 10% of the population of Lisbon.[288][289] In the second half of the 16th century, the Crown gave up the monopoly on slave trade, and the focus of European trade in African slaves shifted from import to Europe to slave transports directly to tropical colonies in the Americas – especially Brazil.[287] In the 15th century one-third of the slaves were resold to the African market in exchange of gold.[290]

Until the late 18th century, the Crimean Khanate (a Muslim Tatar state) maintained a massive slave trade with the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East.[136] The slaves were captured in southern Russia, Poland-Lithuania, Moldavia, Wallachia, and Circassia by Tatar horsemen[291] and sold in the Crimean port of Kaffa.[292] About 2 million mostly Christian slaves were exported over the 16th and 17th centuries[293] until the Crimean Khanate was destroyed by the Russian Empire in 1783.[294]

Crimean Tatar raiders enslaved more than 1 million Eastern Europeans.[295]

In Kievan Rus and Muscovy, slaves were usually classified as kholops. According to David P. Forsythe, "In 1649 up to three-quarters of Muscovy's peasants, or 13 to 14 million people, were serfs whose material lives were barely distinguishable from slaves. Perhaps another 1.5 million were formally enslaved, with Russian slaves serving Russian masters."[296] Slavery remained a major institution in Russia until 1723, when Peter the Great converted the household slaves into house serfs. Russian agricultural slaves were formally converted into serfs earlier in 1679.[297] Slavery in Poland was forbidden in the 15th century; in Lithuania, slavery was formally abolished in 1588; they were replaced by the second serfdom.

In Scandinavia, thralldom was abolished in the mid-14th century.[298]

During the Age of Enlightenment, individuals, whether religious or not, held diverse and inconsistent beliefs about race and slavery and despite discussions on individual rights and freedoms; slavery was not abolished, but expanded significantly.[299] The secular enlightenment allowed for scientific racism to emerge as a basis for slavery.[300] It allowed for coexistence of conflicting views on the moral status of black enslavement and the inferior physical status of those people being enslaved, based on the science at the time.[301][302] The theory of polygenesis (multiple independent human origins) generally lead to support or symapathy with slavery and this was used by nonreligious individuals to counter religious theories of monogenesis (single origin to one couple).[303]

Nazi Germany

[edit]
Prisoners forced to work on the Buchenwald–Weimar rail line, 1943

During the Second World War, Nazi Germany effectively enslaved about 12 million people, both those considered undesirable and citizens of conquered countries, with the avowed intention of treating these Untermenschen (sub-humans) as a permanent slave-class of inferior beings who could be worked until they died, and who possessed neither the rights nor the legal status of members of the Aryan race.[304]

Besides Jews, the harshest deportation and forced labour policies were applied to the populations of Poland,[305] Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia. By the end of the war, half of Belarus' population had been killed or deported.[306][307]

Communist states

[edit]
Workers being forced to haul rocks up a hill in a Gulag

Between 1930 and 1960, the Soviet Union created a system of, according to Anne Applebaum and the "perspective of the Kremlin", slave labor camps called the Gulag (Russian: ГУЛаг, romanizedGULag).[308]

Prisoners in these camps were worked to death by a combination of extreme production quotas, physical and psychological brutality, hunger, lack of medical care, and the harsh environment. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who survived eight years of Gulag incarceration, provided firsthand testimony about the camps with the publication of The Gulag Archipelago, after which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature.[309][310] Fatality rate was as high as 80% during the first months in many camps. Hundreds of thousands of people, possibly millions, died as a direct result of forced labour under the Soviets.[311]

Golfo Alexopoulos suggests comparing labor in the Gulag with "other forms of slave labor" and notes its "violence of human exploitation" in Illness and Inhumanity in Stalin's Gulag:[312]

Stalin's Gulag was, in many ways, less a concentration camp than a forced labor camp and less a prison system than a system of slavery. The image of the slave appears often in Gulag memoir literature. As Varlam Shalamov wrote: "Hungry and exhausted, we leaned into a horse collar, raising blood blisters on our chests and pulling a stone-filled cart up the slanted mine floor. The collar was the same device used long ago by the ancient Egyptians." Thoughtful and rigorous historical comparisons of Soviet forced labor and other forms of slave labor would be worthy of scholarly attention, in my view. For as in the case of global slavery, the Gulag found legitimacy in an elaborate narrative of difference that involved the presumption of dangerousness and guilt. This ideology of difference and the violence of human exploitation have left lasting legacies in contemporary Russia.

Historian Anne Applebaum writes in the introduction of her book that the word GULAG has come to represent "the system of Soviet slave labor itself, in all its forms and varieties":[313]

The word "GULAG" is an acronym for Glavnoe Upravlenie Lagerei, or Main Camp Administration, the institution which ran the Soviet camps. But over time, the word has also come to signify the system of Soviet slave labor itself, in all its forms and varieties: labor camps, punishment camps, criminal and political camps, women's camps, children's camps, transit camps. Even more broadly, "Gulag" has come to mean the Soviet repressive system itself, the set of procedures that Alexander Solzhenitsyn once called "our meat grinder": the arrests, the interrogations, the transport in unheated cattle cars, the forced labor, the destruction of families, the years spent in exile, the early and unnecessary deaths.

Applebaum's introduction has been criticized by Gulag researcher Wilson Bell,[314] stating that her book "is, aside from the introduction, a well-done overview of the Gulag, but it did not offer an interpretative framework much beyond Solzhenitsyn's paradigms".[315]

Contemporary slavery

[edit]
Modern incidence of slavery, as a percentage of the population, by country (2024)

Even though slavery is now outlawed in every country, the number of slaves today is estimated as between 12 million and 29.8 million.[316][317][318] According to a broad definition of slavery, there were 27 million people in slavery in 1999, spread all over the world.[319] In 2005, the International Labour Organization provided an estimate of 12.3 million forced labourers.[320] Siddharth Kara has also provided an estimate of 28.4 million slaves at the end of 2006 divided into three categories: bonded labour/debt bondage (18.1 million), forced labour (7.6 million), and trafficked slaves (2.7 million).[75] Kara provides a dynamic model to calculate the number of slaves in the world each year, with an estimated 29.2 million at the end of 2009.

Tuareg society is traditionally hierarchical, ranging from nobles, through vassals, to dark-skinned slaves.[321]

According to a 2003 report by Human Rights Watch, an estimated 15 million children in debt bondage in India work in slavery-like conditions to pay off their family's debts.[322][323]

Slavoj Žižek asserts that new forms of contemporary slavery have been created in the post-Cold War era of global capitalism, including migrant workers deprived of basic civil rights on the Arabian Peninsula, the total control of workers in Asian sweatshops and the use of forced labor in the exploitation of natural resources in Central Africa.[324]

Distribution

[edit]

In June 2013, U.S. State Department released a report on slavery. It placed Russia, China, and Uzbekistan in the worst offenders category. Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria, and Zimbabwe were at the lowest level. The list also included Algeria, Libya, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait among a total of 21 countries.[325][326]

In Kuwait, there are more than 600,000 migrant domestic workers who are vulnerable to forced labor and legally tied to their employers, who often illegally take their passports.[327] In 2019, online slave markets on apps such as Instagram were uncovered.[328]

In the preparations for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, thousands of Nepalese, the largest group of labourers, faced slavery in the form of denial of wages, confiscation of documents, and inability to leave the workplace.[329] In 2016, the United Nations gave Qatar 12 months to end migrant worker slavery or face investigation.[330]

The Walk Free Foundation reported in 2018 that slavery in wealthy Western societies is much more prevalent than previously known, in particular the United States and Great Britain, which have 403,000 (one in 800) and 136,000 slaves respectively. Andrew Forrest, founder of the organization, said that "The United States is one of the most advanced countries in the world yet has more than 400,000 modern slaves working under forced labour conditions."[331] An estimated 40.3 million are enslaved globally, with North Korea having the most slaves at 2.6 million (one in 10). Of the estimated 40.3 million people in contemporary slavery, 71% are women and 29% are men. The report found of the 40.3 million in modern slavery, 15.4 million are in forced marriages and 24.9 million are in forced labor.[332] The foundation defines contemporary slavery as "situations of exploitation that a person cannot refuse or leave because of threats, violence, coercion, abuse of power, or deception."[333]

China

[edit]

In March 2020, the Chinese government was found to be using the Uyghur minority for forced labour, inside sweat shops. According to a report published then by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), no fewer than around 80,000 Uyghurs were forcibly removed from the region of Xinjiang and used for forced labour in at least twenty-seven corporate factories.[334] According to the Business and Human Rights resource center, corporations such as Abercrombie & Fitch, Adidas, Amazon, Apple, BMW, Fila, Gap, H&M, Inditex, Marks & Spencer, Nike, North Face, Puma, PVH, Samsung, and UNIQLO have each sourced products from these factories prior to the publication of the ASPI report.[335]

Libya

[edit]

During the Second Libyan Civil War, Libyans started capturing Sub-Saharan African migrants trying to get to Europe through Libya and selling them on slave markets or holding them hostage for ransom[336] Women are often raped, used as sex slaves, or sold to brothels.[337][338][339] Child migrants suffer from abuse and child rape in Libya.[340][341]

Mauritania

[edit]

Mauritania, was the last country to abolish slavery (in 1981), it is estimated that 20% of its population of 3 million people are enslaved as bonded labourers,[38][342][343] with black Haratin being slaves and Berbers and Arabs the owners.[344] Slavery in Mauritania was criminalized in August 2007.[38] However, although slavery, as a practice, was legally banned in 1981, it was not a crime to own a slave until 2007.[345] Although many slaves have escaped or have been freed since 2007, as of 2012, only one slave owner had been sentenced to serve time in prison.[346]

North Korea

[edit]

North Korea's human rights record is often considered to be the worst in the world and has been globally condemned, with the United Nations, the European Union and groups such as Human Rights Watch all critical of the country's record. Forms of torture, forced labour, and abuses are all widespread. Most international human rights organizations consider North Korea to have no contemporary parallel[347] with respect to violations of liberty.[348][349][350][351]

Taiwan

[edit]

Taiwan's migrant worker population—estimated in 2018 to be up to 660,000 in number—have reportedly faced slavery-like conditions involving sexual abuse in the domestic work sector[352] and forced labor in fishing sectors.[353][354] Taiwan is among a minority of places in the world that legally allows labor brokers to charge migrant workers for services which elsewhere are covered by employers as human resource costs.[355] A few Taiwanese universities have reportedly tricked students from Eswatini,[356] Uganda and Sri Lanka into forced labour at factories as payment for the university programs.[357] Some charity groups in 2007 also insisted that foreign women—mostly from China and Southeast Asia—were being forced into prostitution, although local police in Tainan disagreed and said they deliberately came to Taiwan "to sell sex".[358]

Yemen

[edit]

Despite being formally abolished in the 1960s, slavery in Yemen remains a significant issue exacerbated by ongoing conflict and socio-economic instability. An estimated 85,000 people remaining enslaved as of 2022. The Iran-backed Houthi militias have been accused of reinstating traditional slavery systems. Reports indicate that over 1,800 Yemenis have been forced into servitude by prominent Houthi leaders, with the Houthis dividing society into hierarchical classes of masters and slaves. [359][360] This modern slavery encompasses various forms, such as forced labor, sexual exploitation, human trafficking, and child recruitment. [361] Vulnerable populations include the Al Muhamashīn community, Ethiopian migrants, and children who are subjected to severe discrimination and exploitation. [361] [360] Despite legal prohibitions against slavery in Yemen, enforcement is weak due to political instability and ongoing civil war. [362] International organizations have documented these abuses, highlighting the need for stronger interventions to combat slavery and human trafficking in the region. [361]

Economics

[edit]

While American slaves in 1809 were sold for around $40,000 (in inflation adjusted dollars), a slave nowadays can be bought for just $90, making replacement more economical than providing long-term care.[363] Slavery is a multibillion-dollar industry with estimates of up to $35 billion generated annually.[364]

Trafficking

[edit]

Victims of human trafficking are typically recruited through deceit or trickery (such as a false job offer, false migration offer, or false marriage offer), sale by family members, recruitment by former slaves, or outright abduction. Victims are forced into a "debt slavery" situation by coercion, deception, fraud, intimidation, isolation, threat, physical force, debt bondage or even force-feeding with drugs to control their victims.[365] "Annually, according to U.S. government-sponsored research completed in 2006, approximately 800,000 people are trafficked across national borders, which does not include millions trafficked within their own countries. Approximately 80% of transnational victims are women and girls, and up to 50% are minors, reports the U.S. State Department in a 2008 study.[366]

While the majority of trafficking victims are women who are forced into prostitution (in which case the practice is called sex trafficking), victims also include men, women and children who are forced into manual labour.[367] Because of the illegal nature of human trafficking, its extent is unknown. A U.S. government report, published in 2005, estimates that about 700,000 people worldwide are trafficked across borders each year. This figure does not include those who are trafficked internally.[367] Another research effort revealed that roughly 1.5 million individuals are trafficked either internally or internationally each year, of which about 500,000 are sex trafficking victims.[75]

Abolitionism

[edit]
Isaac Crewdson (Beaconite) writerSamuel Jackman Prescod - Barbadian JournalistWilliam Morgan from BirminghamWilliam Forster - Quaker leaderGeorge Stacey - Quaker leaderWilliam Forster - Anti-Slavery ambassadorJohn Burnet -Abolitionist SpeakerWilliam Knibb -Missionary to JamaicaJoseph Ketley from GuyanaGeorge Thompson - UK & US abolitionistJ. Harfield Tredgold - British South African (secretary)Josiah Forster - Quaker leaderSamuel Gurney - the Banker's BankerSir John Eardley-WilmotDr Stephen Lushington - MP and JudgeSir Thomas Fowell BuxtonJames Gillespie Birney - AmericanJohn BeaumontGeorge Bradburn - Massachusetts politicianGeorge William Alexander - Banker and TreasurerBenjamin Godwin - Baptist activistVice Admiral MoorsonWilliam TaylorWilliam TaylorJohn MorrisonGK PrinceJosiah ConderJoseph SoulJames Dean (abolitionist)John Keep - Ohio fund raiserJoseph EatonJoseph Sturge - Organiser from BirminghamJames WhitehorneJoseph MarriageGeorge BennettRichard AllenStafford AllenWilliam Leatham, bankerWilliam BeaumontSir Edward Baines - JournalistSamuel LucasFrancis Augustus CoxAbraham BeaumontSamuel Fox, Nottingham grocerLouis Celeste LecesneJonathan BackhouseSamuel BowlyWilliam Dawes - Ohio fund raiserRobert Kaye Greville - BotanistJoseph Pease - reformer in India)W.T.BlairM.M. Isambert (sic)Mary Clarkson -Thomas Clarkson's daughter in lawWilliam TatumSaxe Bannister - PamphleteerRichard Davis Webb - IrishNathaniel Colver - Americannot knownJohn Cropper - Most generous LiverpudlianThomas ScalesWilliam JamesWilliam WilsonRev. Thomas SwanEdward Steane from CamberwellWilliam BrockEdward BaldwinJonathon MillerCapt. Charles Stuart from JamaicaSir John Jeremie - JudgeCharles Stovel - BaptistRichard Peek, ex-Sheriff of LondonJohn SturgeElon GalushaCyrus Pitt GrosvenorRev. Isaac BassHenry SterryPeter Clare -; sec. of Literary & Phil. Soc. ManchesterJ.H. JohnsonThomas PriceJoseph ReynoldsSamuel WheelerWilliam BoultbeeDaniel O'Connell - "The Liberator"William FairbankJohn WoodmarkWilliam Smeal from GlasgowJames Carlile - Irish Minister and educationalistRev. Dr. Thomas BinneyEdward Barrett - Freed slaveJohn Howard Hinton - Baptist ministerJohn Angell James - clergymanJoseph CooperDr. Richard Robert Madden - IrishThomas BulleyIsaac HodgsonEdward SmithSir John Bowring - diplomat and linguistJohn EllisC. Edwards Lester - American writerTapper Cadbury - Businessmannot knownThomas PinchesDavid Turnbull - Cuban linkEdward AdeyRichard BarrettJohn SteerHenry TuckettJames Mott - American on honeymoonRobert Forster (brother of William and Josiah)Richard RathboneJohn BirtWendell Phillips - AmericanJean-Baptiste Symphor Linstant de Pradine from HaitiHenry Stanton - AmericanProf William AdamMrs Elizabeth Tredgold - British South AfricanT.M. McDonnellMrs John BeaumontAnne Knight - FeministElizabeth Pease - SuffragistJacob Post - Religious writerAnne Isabella, Lady Byron - mathematician and estranged wifeAmelia Opie - Novelist and poetMrs Rawson - Sheffield campaignerThomas Clarkson's grandson Thomas ClarksonThomas MorganThomas Clarkson - main speakerGeorge Head Head - Banker from CarlisleWilliam AllenJohn ScobleHenry Beckford - emancipated slave and abolitionistUse your cursor to explore (or Click "i" to enlarge)
A painting of the 1840 World Anti-Slavery Convention at Exeter Hall in London[368]

Slavery has existed, in one form or another, throughout recorded human history – as have, in various periods, movements to free large or distinct groups of slaves.[citation needed]

In antiquity

[edit]

Emperor Ashoka, who ruled the Maurya Empire in the Indian subcontinent from 269 to 232 BCE, abolished the slave trade but not slavery.[369] The Qin dynasty, which ruled China from 221 to 206 BCE, abolished slavery and discouraged serfdom. However, many of its laws were overturned when the dynasty was overthrown.[370] Slavery was again abolished by Wang Mang in China in 17 CE but was reinstituted after his assassination.[371]

Americas

[edit]

The Spanish colonization of the Americas sparked a discussion about the right to enslave Native Americans. A prominent critic of slavery in the Spanish New World colonies was the Spanish missionary and bishop, Bartolomé de las Casas, who was the first to document the European maltreatment of and cruelty towards American natives.[372]

In the United States, all of the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804, with New Jersey being the last to act.[373] Abolitionist pressure produced a series of small steps towards emancipation. After the Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves went into effect on January 1, 1808, the importation of slaves into the United States was prohibited,[374] but not the internal slave trade, nor involvement in the international slave trade externally. Legal slavery persisted outside the northern states, but abolitionists took an active role in opposing slavery by supporting the Underground Railroad, and violent clashes between anti-slavery and pro-slavery Americans occurred, including in Bleeding Kansas, a series of political and armed disputes in 1854–1858 as to whether Kansas would join the United States as a slave or free state. By 1860, the total number of slaves reached almost four million, and the American Civil War, beginning in 1861, led to the end of slavery in the United States.[185] Slaves in areas controlled by the Confederacy were legally emancipated in 1863, when Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, and slavery was banned nationwide, except as punishment for a crime, in 1865, with the ratification of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Many of the freed slaves became sharecroppers and indentured servants. In this manner, some became tied to the very parcel of land into which they had been born a slave having little freedom or economic opportunity because of Jim Crow laws which perpetuated discrimination, limited education, promoted persecution without due process and resulted in continued poverty. Fear of reprisals such as unjust incarcerations and lynchings deterred upward mobility further.

Olaudah Equiano. His autobiography, published in 1789, helped in the creation of the Slave Trade Act 1807 which ended the African slave trade for Britain and its colonies.
Joseph Jenkins Roberts, born in Virginia, was the first president of Liberia, which was founded in 1822 for freed American slaves.

Europe

[edit]

France abolished slavery in 1794 during the Revolution,[375] but it was restored in 1802 under Napoleon.[376] It has been asserted that, before the Revolution, slavery was illegal in metropolitan France (as opposed to its colonies),[377] but this has been refuted.[378]

One of the most significant milestones in the campaign to abolish slavery throughout the world occurred in England in 1772, with British Judge Lord Mansfield, whose opinion in Somersett's Case was widely taken to have held that slavery was illegal in England. This judgement also laid down the principle that slavery contracted in other jurisdictions could not be enforced in England.[379] The last person to be deemed a slave in a British court was Bell (Belinda) who was transported to the Americas in 1772 as a "slave for life" by a Perth court.[380]

Sons of Africa was a late 18th-century British group that campaigned to end slavery. Its members were Africans in London, freed slaves who included Ottobah Cugoano, Olaudah Equiano and other leading members of London's black community. It was closely connected to the Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade, a non-denominational group founded in 1787, whose members included Thomas Clarkson. British Member of Parliament William Wilberforce led the anti-slavery movement in the United Kingdom, although the groundwork was an anti-slavery essay by Clarkson. Wilberforce was urged by his close friend, Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger, to make the issue his own and was also given support by reformed Evangelical John Newton. The Slave Trade Act was passed by the British Parliament on March 25, 1807, making the slave trade illegal throughout the British Empire,[381] Wilberforce also campaigned for abolition of slavery in the British Empire, which he lived to see in the Slavery Abolition Act 1833.

After the 1807 act abolishing the slave trade was passed, these campaigners switched to encouraging other countries to follow suit, notably France and the British colonies. Between 1808 and 1860, the British West Africa Squadron seized approximately 1,600 slave ships and freed 150,000 Africans who were aboard.[382] Action was also taken against African leaders who refused to agree to British treaties to outlaw the trade, for example against "the usurping King of Lagos", deposed in 1851. Anti-slavery treaties were signed with over 50 African rulers.[383]

Worldwide

[edit]

In 1839, the world's oldest international human rights organization, Anti-Slavery International, was formed in Britain by Joseph Sturge, which campaigned to outlaw slavery in other countries.[384] There were celebrations in 2007 to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the abolition of the slave trade in the United Kingdom through the work of the British Anti-Slavery Society.

In the 1860s, David Livingstone's reports of atrocities within the Arab slave trade in Africa stirred up the interest of the British public, reviving the flagging abolitionist movement. The Royal Navy throughout the 1870s attempted to suppress "this abominable Eastern trade", at Zanzibar in particular. In 1905, the French abolished indigenous slavery in most of French West Africa.[385]

On December 10, 1948, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which declared freedom from slavery is an internationally recognized human right. Article 4 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states:

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.[386]

In 2014, for the first time in history, major leaders of many religions, Buddhist, Hindu, Christian, Jewish, and Muslim met to sign a shared commitment against modern-day slavery; the declaration they signed calls for the elimination of slavery and human trafficking by 2020.[387] The signatories were: Pope Francis, Mātā Amṛtānandamayī, Bhikkhuni Thich Nu Chân Không (representing Zen Master Thích Nhất Hạnh), Datuk K Sri Dhammaratana, Chief High Priest of Malaysia, Rabbi Abraham Skorka, Rabbi David Rosen, Abbas Abdalla Abbas Soliman, Undersecretary of State of Al Azhar Alsharif (representing Mohamed Ahmed El-Tayeb, Grand Imam of Al-Azhar), Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Taqi al-Modarresi, Sheikh Naziyah Razzaq Jaafar, Special advisor of Grand Ayatollah (representing Grand Ayatollah Sheikh Basheer Hussain al Najafi), Sheikh Omar Abboud, Justin Welby, Archbishop of Canterbury, and Metropolitan Emmanuel of France (representing Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew.)[387]

Groups such as the American Anti-Slavery Group, Anti-Slavery International, Free the Slaves, the Anti-Slavery Society, and the Norwegian Anti-Slavery Society continue to campaign to eliminate slavery.[citation needed]

UNESCO has been working to break the silence surrounding the memory of slavery since 1994, through The Slave Route Project.[388]

Apologies

[edit]

On May 21, 2001, the National Assembly of France passed the Taubira law, recognizing slavery as a crime against humanity. Apologies on behalf of African nations, for their role in trading their countrymen into slavery, remain an open issue since slavery was practiced in Africa even before the first Europeans arrived and the Atlantic slave trade was performed with a high degree of involvement of several African societies. The black slave market was supplied by well-established slave trade networks controlled by local African societies and individuals.[389]

There is adequate evidence citing case after case of African control of segments of the trade. Several African nations such as the Calabar and other southern parts of Nigeria had economies depended solely on the trade. African peoples such as the Imbangala of Angola and the Nyamwezi of Tanzania would serve as middlemen or roving bands warring with other African nations to capture Africans for Europeans.[390]

Several historians have made important contributions to the global understanding of the African side of the Atlantic slave trade. By arguing that African merchants determined the assemblage of trade goods accepted in exchange for slaves, many historians argue for African agency and ultimately a shared responsibility for the slave trade.[391]

In 1999, President Mathieu Kérékou of Benin issued a national apology for the central role Africans played in the Atlantic slave trade.[121] Luc Gnacadja, minister of environment and housing for Benin, later said: "The slave trade is a shame, and we do repent for it."[392] Researchers estimate that 3 million slaves were exported out of the Slave Coast bordering the Bight of Benin.[392] President Jerry Rawlings of Ghana also apologized for his country's involvement in the slave trade.[121]

The issue of an apology is linked to reparations for slavery and is still being pursued by entities across the world. For example, the Jamaican Reparations Movement approved its declaration and action plan. In 2007, British Prime Minister Tony Blair made a formal apology for Great Britain's involvement in slavery.[393]

On February 25, 2007, the Commonwealth of Virginia resolved to 'profoundly regret' and apologize for its role in the institution of slavery. Unique and the first of its kind in the U.S., the apology was unanimously passed in both Houses as Virginia approached the 400th anniversary of the founding of Jamestown.[394]

On August 24, 2007, Mayor of London Ken Livingstone issued a public apology for London's role in Atlantic slave trade, which took place at an event commemorating the 200th anniversary of the British slave trade's abolition. In his speech, Livingstone described the slave trade as "the racial murder of not just those who were transported but generations of enslaved African men, women and children. To justify this murder and torture black people had to be declared inferior or not human... We live with the consequences today."[395] City officials in Liverpool, which was a large slave trading port, apologized in 1999.[396]

On July 30, 2008, the United States House of Representatives passed a resolution apologizing for American slavery and subsequent discriminatory laws.[397] In June 2009, the U.S. Senate passed a resolution apologizing to African-Americans for the "fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery". The news was welcomed by President Barack Obama, the nation's first president of African descent.[398] Some of President Obama's ancestors may have been slave owners.[399]

In 2010, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi apologized for Arab involvement in the slave trade, saying: "I regret the behavior of the Arabs... They brought African children to North Africa, they made them slaves, they sold them like animals, and they took them as slaves and traded them in a shameful way."[400]

Reparations

[edit]

There have been movements to achieve reparations for those formerly held as slaves or for their descendants. Claims for reparations for being held in slavery are handled as a civil law matter in almost every country. This is often decried as a serious problem, since former slaves' relatives lack of money means they often have limited access to a potentially expensive and futile legal process. Mandatory systems of fines and reparations paid to an as yet undetermined group of claimants from fines, paid by unspecified parties, and collected by authorities have been proposed by advocates to alleviate this "civil court problem." Since in almost all cases there are no living ex-slaves or living ex-slave owners these movements have gained little traction. In nearly all cases the judicial system has ruled that the statute of limitations on these possible claims has long since expired.

In June 2023, The Brattle Group presented a report at an event at the University of the West Indies in which reparations were estimated, for harms both during and after the period of transatlantic chattel slavery, at over 100 trillion dollars.[401][402]

Media

[edit]
Poster for Spartacus

Film has been the most influential medium in the presentation of the history of slavery to the general public around the world.[403] The American film industry has had a complex relationship with slavery and until recent decades often avoided the topic. Films such as The Birth of a Nation (1915)[404] and Gone with the Wind (1939) became controversial because they gave a favourable depiction. In 1940 The Santa Fe Trail gave a liberal but ambiguous interpretation of John Brown's attacks on slavery.[405]

The Civil Rights Movement in the 1950s made defiant slaves into heroes.[406] The question of slavery in American memory necessarily involves its depictions in feature films.[407]

Most Hollywood films used American settings, although Spartacus (1960), dealt with an actual revolt in the Roman Empire known as the Third Servile War. The revolt failed, and all the rebels were executed, but their spirit lived on according to the film.[408] Spartacus stays surprisingly close to the historical record.[409]

The Last Supper (La última cena in Spanish) was a 1976 film directed by Cuban Tomás Gutiérrez Alea about the teaching of Christianity to slaves in Cuba, and emphasizes the role of ritual and revolt. Burn! takes place on the imaginary Portuguese island of Queimada (where the locals speak Spanish) and it merges historical events that took place in Brazil, Cuba, Santo Domingo, Jamaica, and elsewhere.

Historians agree that films have largely shaped historical memories, but they debate issues of accuracy, plausibility, moralism, sensationalism, how facts are stretched in search of broader truths, and suitability for the classroom.[410][408] Berlin argues that critics complain if the treatment emphasizes historical brutality, or if it glosses over the harshness to highlight the emotional impact of slavery.[411]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Slavery is a socioeconomic institution in which individuals are treated as property, deprived of personal liberty, and compelled to provide unpaid labor or services to owners under coercion, often involving violence or the threat thereof, with the legal right to buy, sell, inherit, or punish the enslaved. This practice, rooted in the exercise of power over war captives, debtors, or conquered peoples, has manifested across diverse forms—from chattel systems denying all autonomy to debt bondage retaining nominal freedoms—but consistently entails the owner's absolute control over the slave's body, labor, and reproduction. Historically, slavery underpinned economies and societies in nearly every major civilization, from ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt through classical Greece and Rome—where slaves comprised 20-30% of urban populations and drove mining, agriculture, and domestic work—to medieval Islamic empires, sub-Saharan African kingdoms, Indian caste systems, and Ottoman domains. In Africa, internal enslavement of war prisoners and criminals predated external trades, with slaves integrated into households, farms, or as status symbols in societies like those of the Ashanti and Dahomey, often fueling exports to Arab and later European markets. In terms of the scale, empirical data reveal the transatlantic trade's shipment of about 12 million Africans to the Americas from 1500 to 1866, alongside roughly 6 million via trans-Saharan, Red Sea, and Indian Ocean routes to the Islamic world over centuries, highlighting slavery's global, multi-directional causality rather than confinement to any single region or ideology. These trades, sustained by African elites capturing and selling rivals alongside foreign demand, generated vast wealth but entrenched cycles of violence, depopulation, and underdevelopment in source areas. Abolition emerged unevenly from the late 18th century, propelled by Enlightenment critiques of absolutism, evangelical moralism, and industrial shifts reducing reliance on coerced labor, culminating in legal bans by Western powers—Britain in 1833, the U.S. in 1865—though enforcement lagged and modern variants like forced labor and trafficking persist, affecting an estimated 50 million people today amid uneven global progress. Controversies endure over slavery's legacies, including economic disparities traceable to trade intensities and debates on reparative justice, yet causal analysis underscores its roots in universal human incentives for domination and resource extraction, not unique cultural pathologies.

Definitions and Forms

Etymology and Terminology

The English word "slavery" first appeared in the 1550s, referring to severe toil or drudgery, with its meaning shifting by the 1570s to denote a state of complete servitude and subjection to another's power. This term derives from "slave," which entered English around 1290 from Old French esclave, itself from Medieval Latin sclavus meaning "Slav" or "slave." The association stems from the mass enslavement of Slavic peoples in Eastern Europe during the 9th and 10th centuries, captured as prisoners of war or through raids by Byzantine, Holy Roman, and Islamic forces, including those supplying the Abbasid Caliphate's armies. This derivation from sclavus, rooted in the Greek Σκλάβοι (Sklaboi), extended beyond English to displace older indigenous terms for slaves in many European languages (except Slavic ones), such as Latin servus or Old Norse þræll, due to the prominence of Slavic captives in medieval trade networks. Similarly, in Arabic, the term Saqaliba (صَقَالِبَة), derived from the same Greek root, originally denoted Slavic peoples but evolved by the 10th century to refer generally to slaves, particularly white or European ones, in Islamic contexts. Prior English terms for similar conditions included thrall, from Old Norse þræll, denoting a captive or bondservant, which faded as "slave" became dominant by the 16th century. Historically, "slavery" has denoted a system of chattel ownership where individuals are legally treated as movable property, subject to buying, selling, inheritance, or separation from family at the master's discretion, with no inherent rights to self-determination, mobility, or bodily integrity. This contrasts with serfdom, which emerged in medieval Europe as a hereditary status tying peasants to specific lands rather than personal ownership; serfs owed fixed labor or dues to lords but typically retained family units, limited property, and protections against arbitrary sale or abuse, deriving the term itself from Latin servus via Old French serf. Indentured servitude, common in early modern colonial contexts like 17th-century America, involved contractual temporary bondage for passage or debt repayment, with defined end dates and residual legal rights, unlike perpetual hereditary slavery. Debt bondage or peonage, seen in various premodern societies, bound individuals through unpayable obligations but often allowed nominal freedom upon repayment, distinguishing it from absolute ownership. In ancient contexts, terminology varied: Greek doulos implied total household dependence, often war captives; Roman servus encompassed chattel slaves with potential for manumission, though legally akin to "speaking tools." Islamic texts used abd or mamluk for slaves, frequently military captives convertible to freedmen; Arabic raqīq specified domestic chattel. These terms reflect causal realities of slavery's origins in conquest and economic extraction, where victors claimed captives as assets, a pattern evident from Mesopotamian codes like Hammurabi's (c. 1750 BCE) regulating slave sales to Vedic India's dasa for subjugated laborers. Modern legal definitions, such as the 1926 League of Nations Slavery Convention, codify it as "the status or condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised," emphasizing empirical markers like coerced labor and alienability over euphemistic variants like "forced labor."

Core Characteristics of Slavery

Slavery fundamentally entails the exercise of ownership powers over a human person, treating them as chattel property subject to sale, transfer, or inheritance by the owner. This ownership manifests in the denial of personal autonomy, with the slave's labor, movement, and residence controlled without consent or compensation, often enforced through physical coercion or threat thereof. The 1926 Slavery Convention formalized this as "the status or condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised," encompassing rights to possess, use, and dispose of the individual as property. In practice, these characteristics result in the slave's dehumanization, where legal personhood is stripped, allowing owners to separate families, impose perpetual servitude, and administer punishments without recourse to law. Hereditary transmission of slave status—often matrilineal or patrilineal—perpetuated the condition across generations, distinguishing it from temporary bondage by embedding it as an inheritable trait rather than a contractual obligation. Empirical records from ancient Mesopotamia to 19th-century Americas document slaves as alienable assets in commerce, with markets facilitating their valuation based on age, health, and productivity, underscoring the commodification central to the institution. Unlike indentured servitude or serfdom, chattel slavery lacks temporal limits or residual rights; servants could negotiate terms, anticipate freedom after a fixed period (typically 4-7 years in colonial contexts), and retain some legal protections against abuse, whereas slaves held no such agency and faced absolute proprietorial control. Serfs, bound to land rather than persons, possessed usufruct rights and familial integrity, enabling limited self-ownership absent in slavery's full proprietorship. This distinction arises causally from slavery's reliance on capture or birth into bondage, sustaining economic viability through indefinite exploitation without the incentives of bounded service.

Types and Variations

Chattel slavery constitutes a form in which human beings are legally regarded as personal property, subject to absolute ownership, sale, inheritance, or disposal by their masters, with no inherent rights or capacity for self-manipulation of their status. This type prevailed in systems such as the transatlantic trade, where an estimated 12.5 million Africans were forcibly transported between 1526 and 1867, and in ancient Rome, where slaves comprised up to 35-40% of Italy's population by the late Republic. Hereditary transmission of slave status was common, reinforcing permanence through offspring born into bondage. Debt bondage, also known as bonded labor, arises when individuals pledge their labor or that of descendants to repay a loan, often under exploitative contracts that inflate the principal through interest or manipulated accounting, effectively trapping generations in servitude. This form differs from chattel slavery by nominally originating in voluntary agreement but persisting via economic coercion rather than outright ownership; the United Nations Supplementary Convention of 1956 classifies it as an institution similar to slavery due to its involuntary perpetuation. Globally, it affects millions today, particularly in South Asia's brick kilns and carpet industries, where workers forfeit wages to "repay" unending debts. Forced labor encompasses compulsory work extracted under threat of penalty—physical, economic, or otherwise—without voluntary consent, as codified in the International Labour Organization's Convention No. 29 (1930), which excludes only limited exceptions like military conscription or communal duties. It varies from state-imposed systems, such as Nazi Germany's use of 7.6 million foreign laborers during World War II, to private exploitation in mining or agriculture; unlike chattel slavery, it may not involve formal ownership but relies on violence or deception for enforcement. The ILO estimates 27.6 million people in forced labor worldwide as of 2021, excluding forced marriages. Additional variations include domestic slavery, where slaves perform household tasks with potentially closer master-slave proximity but persistent subjugation, as seen in Ottoman harems or ancient Greek oikos; military slavery, entailing enslaved individuals trained as soldiers, exemplified by the Mamluks in medieval Egypt who rose to rule despite initial captive origins; and sexual slavery, involving coerced sexual exploitation, often intertwined with trafficking, as in the Japanese "comfort women" system during World War II affecting up to 200,000 women. These forms overlap but are differentiated by primary function—productive (e.g., plantation field work), reproductive, or extractive (e.g., mining)—and acquisition method, such as war captivity, judicial punishment, or birth. Indentured servitude, a temporary contract-based labor often for passage costs, contrasts with lifelong slavery by including end dates and limited rights, though abuses blurred lines in colonial contexts like 17th-century Virginia.
TypeKey Distinguishing FeatureEnforcement Mechanism
ChattelLegal property status, hereditaryOwnership transfer via sale/inheritance
Debt BondageDebt repayment via laborEconomic entrapment, intergenerational
Forced LaborCompulsory work under penaltyThreats of violence or deprivation
MilitaryEnslaved combatantsTraining and armament for loyalty/control
Such classifications highlight slavery's adaptability to economic needs, from agrarian estates requiring mass field labor to urban households demanding skilled domestics, though all share core elements of coercion and dehumanization.

Universality Across Societies

Empirical Evidence of Global Prevalence

Slavery, defined as the permanent, violent domination of alien laborers involving natal alienation and social death, has been empirically documented across diverse pre-modern societies worldwide, as evidenced by comparative analyses spanning 66 historical cases from tribal groups to empires. While its scale varied with societal complexity—rarer in simple hunter-gatherer bands but pervasive in agrarian and state-level formations—archaeological records, legal codes, and textual accounts confirm its institutional presence from the earliest urban civilizations onward. In the ancient Near East, slavery emerged as a core labor mechanism by the third millennium BCE in Mesopotamia, where war captives and debt bonds supplied slaves for agriculture, temples, and households, as detailed in cuneiform tablets from Sumer and Babylon. Similarly, ancient Egypt employed chattel slaves, bonded laborers, and forced corvée workers, primarily from military conquests and Nubian raids, integral to monumental construction and mining from the Old Kingdom (c. 2686–2181 BCE). These systems predated and influenced subsequent Mediterranean practices, with slaveholding embedded in legal frameworks like Hammurabi's Code (c. 1750 BCE), which regulated slave sales and punishments.
CivilizationEstimated Slave Population ProportionKey Evidence
Classical Athens (5th–4th century BCE)20–50% of total populationDemographic analyses of citizen-slave ratios in mining, households, and warfare support; slaves numbered 80,000–100,000 in a polity of ~300,000.
Roman Empire (1st century CE)10–20% empire-wideImperial records and economic histories indicate millions enslaved, fueling latifundia estates and urban services amid a population of ~50–60 million.
Han China (206 BCE–220 CE)~1–5%Extrapolations from census fragments and legal texts show slaves from conquests and debt, totaling hundreds of thousands in a 60 million population, though not economy-dominant.
Beyond Eurasia, slavery prevailed in sub-Saharan Africa prior to European contact, where kinship-based societies integrated war captives as domestic laborers, agricultural producers, and trade commodities, as reconstructed from oral traditions and archaeological sites in the savanna and forest zones. In Mesoamerica, Aztec tlacotin slaves—acquired via debt, crime, or raids—comprised a non-hereditary underclass used in households, markets, and ritual sacrifice, with Mayan polities similarly employing captives in postclassic warfare economies (c. 900–1500 CE). In ancient India, Vedic texts (c. 1500–500 BCE) reference dasas as enslaved laborers from Aryan conquests, persisting in varied forms through Mauryan and Gupta eras despite observers like Megasthenes (c. 300 BCE) underestimating its extent due to cultural differences from Hellenistic chattel systems. Even among forager societies, empirical traces exist, particularly in resource-rich coastal environments like the Pacific Northwest, where raids yielded hereditary slaves for status display and labor, challenging assumptions of egalitarian uniformity. This cross-cultural pattern underscores slavery's adaptation to local ecologies and power structures, from debt bondage in stateless groups to mass importation in empires, with no major pre-modern society lacking analogous coercive labor domination.

Economic and Causal Rationales

Slavery's prevalence across societies stemmed from its utility in coercing labor for economic activities requiring intensive, low-skill inputs, such as large-scale agriculture, mining, and infrastructure projects, where free wage labor was scarce or unreliable due to limited capital, poor contract enforcement, or high risks of desertion. In transitioning from nomadic to sedentary agrarian economies around 10,000 BCE, societies faced surging labor demands for clearing land, irrigation systems, and crop cultivation, making coerced workers a practical means to generate surpluses beyond subsistence levels. Empirical records from Mesopotamian cuneiform tablets dating to the third millennium BCE document slaves performing such tasks, yielding economic outputs that supported urban centers and elites, while similar patterns appear in ancient Egyptian pyramid construction and Roman latifundia estates producing grain for export. Causally, slavery emerged as a direct outcome of recurrent human conflicts and economic vulnerabilities, with war captives forming the bulk of slaves in most historical contexts; victors enslaved rather than executed prisoners to extract value from their labor or ransom them, creating incentives for further raids and conquests. Roman expansion, for instance, supplied up to 35-40% of Italy's population as slaves by the late Republic, fueling economic growth through forced labor in mines and farms while discouraging free citizens from menial work. Debt bondage compounded this, as individuals in credit-based economies pledged their persons as collateral when unable to repay loans amid crop failures or trade disruptions—a mechanism evidenced in Hammurabi's Code (circa 1750 BCE), which regulated such enslavements to stabilize creditor claims without immediate execution. Criminal punishment and hereditary status further perpetuated the system, with offspring of slaves inheriting bondage to offset the non-productive early years of child labor, a pattern observed from ancient Assyria to medieval Islamic caliphates. These rationales intertwined causally with societal scale: denser populations and economic specialization amplified labor needs, while weak institutions for voluntary exchange favored coercion over markets, rendering slavery adaptive until innovations like mechanized agriculture or ideological shifts eroded its viability post-18th century. In Viking Scandinavia (8th-11th centuries CE), thralls from European raids comprised up to 30% of the population, underpinning a trade-and-plunder economy that transitioned to feudalism only after Christianization curtailed captive-taking. Though inefficient for skilled tasks due to motivational deficits—evidenced by lower productivity in slave-run textile mills versus free factories—slavery excelled in gang-labor settings like plantations, where oversight costs were low relative to outputs in staples like sugar or cotton. This persistence across disparate cultures, from Mesoamerican empires to sub-Saharan kingdoms, underscores slavery's roots not in unique ideologies but in universal pressures of scarcity, violence, and hierarchy.

Comparisons of Scale and Brutality

The scale of slavery varied significantly across historical societies, with the largest documented trades involving millions over centuries, driven by economic demands for labor, military forces, and domestic service. The transatlantic slave trade, operating primarily from the early 16th to mid-19th century, forcibly embarked approximately 12 million Africans, of whom about 10 million survived to disembark in the Americas, reflecting a middle passage mortality rate of roughly 15 percent due to disease, overcrowding, and violence aboard ships. In contrast, the Islamic slave trade across trans-Saharan and Indian Ocean routes, spanning from the 7th to early 20th century—a duration over three times longer—enslaved an estimated 10 to 17 million Africans, with sparser records complicating precise tallies but indicating sustained annual captures exceeding those of the transatlantic trade in its peak decades. Internal African slavery systems, predating and supplying these external trades, involved millions more through warfare and raids, though quantitative estimates remain elusive due to decentralized record-keeping; total exports from Africa across all routes approached 20 million by some reconstructions. Brutality in these systems stemmed from commodification of humans as property, but manifested differently based on transport conditions, end-use, and cultural norms. Transatlantic voyages inflicted mass suffering through chained confinements in holds leading to dysentery and starvation, with overall mortality from capture to sale estimated at 25-50 percent when including African coastal losses. The Arab trade's overland caravans across the Sahara imposed even higher transit fatalities—often 50 percent or more—exacerbated by thirst, exposure, and deliberate killings of weaker captives to conserve resources, while male slaves faced systematic castration, with survival rates below 10 percent for eunuchs destined for harems or administration. In ancient Rome, where slaves comprised 20-30 percent of Italy's population during the late Republic, brutality included gladiatorial combat, mine labor with life expectancies under a decade, and mass crucifixions post-revolt, though manumission offered some upward mobility absent in chattel systems like the Americas'. Asian and Ottoman variants, such as galley slavery or devshirme conscription, combined physical exhaustion with psychological coercion, but often integrated slaves into households or armies, contrasting the perpetual hereditary bondage typical of New World plantations.
Slave Trade/SystemEstimated Enslaved (Millions)Duration (Years)Average Transit Mortality (%)
Transatlantic12 (embarked)~35015 (middle passage)
Islamic (Arab)10-17~1,25050+ (overland/sea)
Roman Empire (stock)5-10 (peak Italy/empire)~500Variable (war capture low; mines high)
Internal AfricanUnquantified (millions)Prehistoric-19thHigh in raids/wars
These comparisons reveal no universal metric for "worst" brutality, as causal factors like distance, climate, and slave roles influenced outcomes; however, all prioritized owner utility over human welfare, with empirical data underscoring slavery's inherent violence regardless of scale. Estimates for non-Western trades suffer from archival gaps, potentially understating totals given reliance on European observer accounts or later extrapolations, while transatlantic figures benefit from ship logs.

Historical Development

Ancient Civilizations

In ancient Mesopotamia, slavery is attested from the Sumerian period around 2500 BCE, with cuneiform tablets recording slave sales, contracts, and debt bondage as primary mechanisms of enslavement. War captives formed an early source of slaves among Sumerians, Babylonians, and Assyrians, supplemented by self-sale for debt or abandonment, though royal edicts like the mīšarum periodically annulled debts to prevent widespread free-to-slave transitions. Slaves performed agricultural, domestic, and temple labor, with legal protections such as the right to marry and own limited property, as outlined in the Code of Hammurabi circa 1750 BCE, which prescribed punishments for excessive owner cruelty but upheld slaves' status as property transferable via inheritance or sale. Ancient Egyptian society featured chattel slavery alongside bonded and forced labor, with the term ḥm (slave or servant) applied to foreigners captured in campaigns against , , and from onward (circa 2686–2181 BCE). Unlike Mesopotamia's debt-driven slavery, Egyptian enslavement stemmed predominantly from warfare, with slaves integrated into households for domestic work or elite estates rather than large-scale state projects like pyramids, which relied more on labor from free peasants during floods. Evidence from inscriptions and papyri indicates slaves could achieve through service or purchase, and some rose to administrative roles, though inheritance of slave status persisted, as seen in records of laborers like Dedisobek, son of a slave . Treatment varied, with sources noting provisions for , , and care, but physical for flight or was common. In ancient Greece, slavery evolved into a cornerstone of city-state economies by the Archaic period (circa 800–480 BCE), with chattel slaves in Athens sourced from war, piracy, and Black Sea trade, comprising an estimated 20–30% of the population by the 5th century BCE. Athenian slaves, often Thracians or Scythians, labored in mines, households, and crafts, enabling citizen leisure for politics and philosophy; public slaves (dêmosioi) even served as police or clerks, reflecting institutional integration. Sparta's helot system, imposed on conquered Messenians after the 8th-century BCE wars, differed as hereditary serfdom tied to land rather than individual ownership, with helots outnumbering Spartan citizens 7:1 and compelled to farm while facing annual krypteia culls to suppress revolts. This duality—chattel in commercial Athens versus enserfed helots in militarized Sparta—arose from causal needs: trade-driven Athens favored portable property, while Sparta prioritized citizen soldiery unburdened by agriculture. The Roman Republic and Empire (509 BCE–476 CE) scaled slavery to unprecedented levels through conquests, with annual influxes of 10,000–20,000 war captives from the 3rd century BCE onward fueling expansion. In Italy during the late Republic (circa 100 BCE), slaves likely constituted 25–35% of the population, totaling 1–2 million in a free populace of 4–5 million, concentrated in latifundia estates, gladiatorial games, and urban households. Origins included defeated Gauls, Germans, and Africans, with self-sale rare compared to Greece; manumission was frequent, producing a freedman class integral to trade, as evidenced by 1 million liberti by the 1st century CE. Roman law, codified in the Digest of Justinian (533 CE), treated slaves as res mancipi (owned things) yet regulated treatment to prevent sabotage, with owners liable for murder but empowered to punish via chains or crucifixion for flight. Economic rationale centered on cheap, coerced labor displacing free workers, sustaining grain production and mining output essential to imperial growth.

Medieval and Islamic World

In medieval Europe, chattel slavery diminished after the collapse of the Western Roman Empire around 476 CE, as economic structures shifted toward feudal serfdom, where laborers were bound to land rather than owned as property. However, slavery persisted in peripheral and Mediterranean regions, fueled by warfare, piracy, and raids; for instance, Viking expeditions captured thousands for sale in markets from the 8th to 11th centuries, while Slavic populations supplied slaves to Byzantine and Islamic traders, contributing to the English term "slave" derived from "Slav." In the Byzantine Empire, slavery remained an urban institution, with slaves sourced from war captives and trade networks across the Black Sea, though Christian doctrines introduced manumission incentives and legal protections, rendering conditions somewhat less severe than in antiquity without abolishing the practice. Slavery in the medieval Islamic world expanded with the 7th-century conquests under the Rashidun and Umayyad caliphates, drawing on pre-Islamic traditions but regulated by Quranic injunctions favoring manumission while permitting enslavement of non-Muslims via war or purchase. Slaves served diverse roles, including domestic labor, agricultural work in marshlands, concubines in harems, and elite military units; the trans-Saharan and Indian Ocean trades imported primarily East African Zanj for grueling plantation labor in Iraq and sugar production, with estimates indicating high transit mortality rates exceeding 50% due to desert marches and castrations for eunuchs. A pivotal event was the Zanj Rebellion from 869 to 883 CE in southern Iraq, where tens of thousands of East African slaves, exploited in draining salt marshes under Abbasid landowners, rose under Ali ibn Muhammad, establishing a proto-state, sacking Basra in 871, and challenging caliphal authority until suppressed by Al-Muwaffaq, highlighting the scale and volatility of coerced African labor in the Islamic economy. Military slavery evolved into the Mamluk system by the 9th century, where non-Muslim boys—initially Turkic steppe nomads, later Circassians—were purchased, converted, rigorously trained, and manumitted as loyal soldiers; these slave-warriors seized power in Egypt in 1250 CE, founding the Mamluk Sultanate that ruled until 1517, defeating Mongols at Ain Jalut in 1260 and repelling Crusaders. This institution exemplified how slavery in the Islamic world often enabled social mobility for select individuals, contrasting with more static domestic or agricultural bondage, though overall reliance on imported slaves sustained vast networks across North Africa, the Middle East, and into Central Asia. In southern Europe under Islamic rule, such as al-Andalus and Sicily from the 8th to 11th centuries, slavery mirrored broader patterns with captives from Christian-Muslim conflicts augmenting African imports for labor and concubinage, while Venice and Genoa facilitated Mediterranean trade linking European, Byzantine, and Islamic markets until the 15th century. Despite religious encouragements for freeing slaves, the system's economic imperatives—driven by demand for unskilled labor in expanding empires—ensured its endurance, with no widespread abolition until modern pressures.

Early Modern and Transatlantic Era

![Slave ship diagram showing the cramped conditions aboard a vessel transporting enslaved Africans across the Atlantic][float-right] The Early Modern period, spanning roughly the 16th to 18th centuries, saw European powers reintroduce large-scale chattel slavery through colonial expansion, building on earlier Portuguese coastal trades initiated in 1441. Portugal pioneered the transatlantic trade in the early 1500s, transporting enslaved Africans to Brazil and the Caribbean for labor in sugar plantations, followed by Spain in the Americas. By the 17th century, Britain, France, the Netherlands, and Denmark entered the trade, establishing triangular routes from Europe to Africa for goods, Africa to the Americas for captives, and back with plantation products like sugar, tobacco, and cotton. This system relied on African intermediaries who captured and sold war prisoners or raided villages, with Europeans purchasing along the coast rather than penetrating inland en masse. From 1501 to 1866, approximately 12.5 million Africans were forcibly embarked on transatlantic voyages, with about 10.7 million surviving to disembark in the Americas, according to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database compiling records of over 36,000 voyages. The trade's scale escalated over time: roughly 367,000 in the 16th century, 1.8 million in the 17th, 6 million in the 18th, and 1.8 million in the 19th before abolition efforts curtailed it. Portugal/Brazil dominated with 5.8 million embarked, followed by Britain (3.3 million), France (1.4 million), Spain/Uruguay (1.1 million), and the Netherlands (0.6 million). Mortality during the Middle Passage averaged 13-19%, driven by overcrowding—slaves chained in holds with minimal space, poor sanitation, inadequate food, and rampant diseases like dysentery and smallpox—resulting in nearly 2 million deaths at sea. Crews enforced discipline through whipping and confinement, with women and children particularly vulnerable to sexual violence. Enslaved Africans powered plantation economies in the Americas, where indigenous labor had proven insufficient due to disease and resistance, and European indentured servants were costly and temporary. In Brazil, the Caribbean, and later the southern United States, slaves cultivated cash crops; for instance, by 1700, Barbados's population was 80% enslaved, producing sugar that accounted for half of Britain's tropical imports. This labor system generated immense wealth: slave-produced commodities fueled European mercantilism, with profits reinvested in shipping, banking, and early industry, though direct causation to the Industrial Revolution remains debated, as slavery's role was significant but not sole in Britain's economic takeoff around 1760. In Europe itself, slavery was marginal post-medieval, limited to household servants in port cities like Lisbon or London, where a few thousand African slaves lived under legal ambiguities, but serfdom and wage labor predominated. The transatlantic trade's brutality and profitability entrenched racialized chattel slavery, distinguishing it from earlier forms by its hereditary, perpetual nature tied to African descent. ![A black family works a cotton plantation in Mississippi, illustrating labor conditions on American plantations][center]

19th-Century Abolition and Persistence

In the British Empire, abolitionist campaigns gained momentum through parliamentary efforts led by figures such as William Wilberforce, culminating in the Slave Trade Act of 1807, which banned British participation in the transatlantic slave trade effective January 1, 1808, though smuggling persisted. The Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 extended emancipation to slaves in most colonies, freeing an estimated 800,000 individuals by August 1, 1834, after a transitional "apprenticeship" period lasting until 1838 or 1840, during which former slaves were required to work for their owners without full wages; owners received £20 million in compensation, equivalent to roughly 5% of Britain's GDP at the time. These measures reflected a combination of evangelical moral pressure, economic shifts toward wage labor amid industrialization, and strategic naval enforcement that intercepted over 150,000 slaves from illegal vessels between 1807 and 1867. Across the Americas, abolition progressed unevenly, often tied to independence movements and civil conflict. Haiti, having achieved de facto abolition through revolution in 1804, influenced regional debates, while Chile enacted its first antislavery law in 1811, followed by gradual emancipation in Argentina (1813) and Mexico (1829). In the United States, the abolitionist press, exemplified by William Lloyd Garrison's The Liberator starting in 1831, amplified slave rebellions like Nat Turner's in Virginia (1831, resulting in 60 white deaths and over 200 slave executions) and fueled sectional tensions leading to the Civil War. President Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 1863, declared freedom for slaves in Confederate-held territories, affecting about 3.5 million people, but full legal abolition required the 13th Amendment, ratified December 6, 1865, after the war's estimated 620,000 military deaths. France abolished slavery in its colonies on April 27, 1848, under the Second Republic, liberating around 250,000 slaves without compensation to owners, while Brazil's Lei Áurea of May 13, 1888, ended slavery for 700,000 people, marking the last major Western Hemisphere abolition. Despite these legal triumphs, slavery persisted or evolved in non-Western regions due to weak enforcement, cultural entrenchment, and economic incentives. In the Ottoman Empire, the African slave trade continued robustly into the 1850s and beyond, with Zanzibar serving as a hub exporting up to 20,000 slaves annually to Ottoman markets despite an 1857 Anglo-Ottoman treaty nominally curbing the trade; domestic enslavement of Circassians and Africans supplied harems and households until gradual reforms in the 1880s-1890s under European pressure. Internal African trades intensified, as coastal export declines redirected captives inland for labor in plantations and armies; in West Africa, societies like the Sokoto Caliphate expanded enslavement through jihad, incorporating millions into domestic economies by mid-century. Even in abolished areas, illegal transatlantic shipments evaded patrols, delivering tens of thousands to Brazil and Cuba until the 1860s, while post-emancipation systems like sharecropping in the U.S. South replicated coercive labor for former slaves, binding over 80% of Black farmers in debt peonage by 1900. Abolition's uneven success highlighted causal factors: moral campaigns succeeded where economic alternatives existed and naval power enforced bans, but persisted where states lacked capacity or incentive to uproot entrenched hierarchies, as in Africa's decentralized polities or the Ottoman's fiscal reliance on slave taxes. By century's end, while Atlantic chattel slavery waned, global estimates suggest 10-20 million remained enslaved outside Europe and the Americas, underscoring abolition as a protracted, regionally contingent process rather than universal triumph.

Regional Contexts

Africa: Internal and Export Trades

Slavery was a longstanding institution in pre-colonial African societies, where captives from warfare, judicial punishments, or debt bondage were incorporated into kinship networks, agricultural labor, or military roles, often with varying degrees of integration compared to chattel systems elsewhere. In regions like the Sahel and West Africa, slaves constituted significant portions of populations in states such as the Songhai Empire (15th-16th centuries), where they supported rulers' economies through farming and herding, with estimates suggesting up to one-third of inhabitants in some polities were enslaved by the 19th century. Internal slave trading networks facilitated the movement of captives between African kingdoms, driven by demands for labor and prestige, predating external influences but intensifying with the rise of centralized states like the Ashanti Empire (late 17th-19th centuries), which relied on slave labor for gold mining and warfare. African polities actively participated in export trades, supplying captives to external markets through raids and wars incentivized by trade goods like firearms and textiles. In West Africa, kingdoms such as Dahomey (17th-19th centuries) conducted annual raids to procure slaves for export, amassing wealth that funded military expansion and state apparatus. Similarly, the Oyo Empire and Aro Confederacy in the 18th century controlled interior trade routes, exchanging war prisoners for European and Arab commodities, with African elites serving as primary suppliers rather than passive victims. The trans-Saharan slave trade, operational since the 8th century following camel domestication, transported an estimated 6-7 million Africans northward to North Africa and the Middle East by 1900, peaking between 800 and 1600 CE with annual caravans of thousands enduring high mortality from desert crossings. This route drew primarily from Sahelian regions, where Muslim merchants and Berber nomads purchased slaves from local rulers for use in households, armies, and plantations, with total exports from West Africa alone reaching about 6,500 annually in some periods before 1600. Complementing this, the East African trade via the Indian Ocean and Red Sea, active from the 7th century, exported 10-18 million over 1,200 years, concentrated in the 19th century under Omani control of Zanzibar, where Swahili ports shipped slaves to Arabia and Persia for domestic and agricultural roles. Overall, external slave exports from Africa totaled nearly 20 million between the 7th and 19th centuries, exacerbating internal conflicts as demand fueled intertribal warfare and depopulation in source regions.

Middle East and Arab Slave Trade

The Arab slave trade, originating with the expansion of Islamic caliphates in the 7th century, encompassed the systematic enslavement and transportation of individuals primarily from sub-Saharan Africa, but also from Europe and Asia, to serve in the Middle East, North Africa, and adjacent regions. This trade operated through multiple routes, including trans-Saharan caravans, Red Sea crossings, and Indian Ocean voyages via East African ports like Zanzibar, facilitating the movement of slaves for military, domestic, agricultural, and sexual purposes. Historians estimate that between 10 and 18 million Africans were enslaved and transported across these routes from approximately 650 to 1900 CE, with mortality rates during transit reaching up to 50% due to harsh desert marches, overcrowding on dhows, and disease. Slaves were sourced from raids and wars in sub-Saharan Africa, targeting regions south of the Sahara for "Zanj" laborers; from European captives via Barbary corsairs, known as Saqaliba; and from Central Asia and the Caucasus for elite military roles like Mamluks. Male slaves faced routine castration to produce eunuchs for palace service, a procedure with near-total mortality for full castration and aimed at preventing reproduction, while females were often destined for concubinage in harems. Agricultural slavery peaked under the Abbasid Caliphate, exemplified by the Zanj Rebellion of 869–883 CE, where East African slaves in southern Iraq rose against forced marsh drainage labor, destroying cities and nearly toppling the caliphate before suppression. In the Ottoman Empire, which inherited and expanded these practices, slaves served in janissary corps, households, and harems, with trade regulated but persistent until gradual reforms from the 1830s culminated in formal abolition by 1924. The trade's persistence into the 20th century is evident in Saudi Arabia's abolition in 1962, following international pressure, though clandestine practices lingered. Unlike chattel systems emphasizing reproduction for labor, Arab slavery's emasculation and sexual exploitation reduced generational continuity, contributing to demographic erasure in source populations.

Asia and Pacific

Slavery in Asia manifested in varied forms, often tied to warfare, debt, and household economies rather than large-scale plantation systems seen elsewhere. In ancient East Asia, chattel slaves were primarily war captives, criminals, or those born to slave mothers, serving elites in labor, sacrifice, or domestic roles. Systems persisted through dynastic changes, with slaves comprising a small but significant portion of society, estimated at 1-5% in some periods due to reliance on free peasant labor. In China, slavery dates to the Shang dynasty around 1600–1046 BCE, where captives from conquests were used for oracle bone divination sacrifices and labor. By the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE), legal codes distinguished slaves (nubi) from free persons, allowing owners to punish or kill them without repercussions, though manumission occurred via imperial decree or purchase. The practice waned under the Tang (618–907 CE) with corvée labor emphasis but revived in Song (960–1279 CE) amid economic expansion, involving eunuch slaves in imperial households. Qing dynasty (1644–1912) records show over 2 million slaves registered in some provinces by the 18th century, often from frontier raids or debt sales; formal abolition came in 1909–1910, though forced labor continued into the Republican era. Korea maintained the nobi system from the Three Kingdoms period (57 BCE–668 CE), where slaves—about 30% of the population by the 16th century—were hereditary, acquired via war, crime, or self-sale during famines. Nobi performed agricultural and domestic work, with limited rights to property or marriage outside their status; gradual reforms in the late Joseon dynasty (1392–1897) reduced numbers through land grants and abolition edicts by 1894, driven by economic shifts favoring wage labor. In Japan, early Yamato period (250–710 CE) slavery involved nuhi from tribal conflicts, used in construction and rituals; by the Heian era (794–1185), it evolved into indentured servitude, but Edo period (1603–1868) saw genin and hinin as de facto slaves in low-status roles, abolished in 1871 amid Meiji modernization. South Asia featured dasa slavery in Vedic texts (c. 1500–500 BCE), where debtors or captives served as laborers or concubines, distinct from the rigid varna system but overlapping with servile castes. Islamic conquests from the 8th century intensified enslavement; Mahmud of Ghazni's raids (1000–1027 CE) captured 500,000 Hindus for sale in Central Asian markets. Mughal emperors (1526–1857) employed slave soldiers (ghulams) and eunuchs, with estimates of millions in bondage by the 17th century, often from Deccan wars or African imports via Portuguese traders (1530–1740). British colonial policies shifted to indentured labor post-1833 abolition, exporting over 1.5 million Indians to plantations by 1920, under conditions akin to coerced migration. Southeast Asia's slavery, peaking in the 18th–19th centuries, emphasized household and debt bondage over racial chattel systems, with females predominant in domestic roles due to raid captures from animist hill tribes. Kingdoms like Ayutthaya (Thailand, 1351–1767) and Mataram (Java, 1586–1755) integrated slaves via war or tribute, numbering tens of thousands; Burmese chronicles record 100,000 slaves from 18th-century campaigns. European colonial demands fueled internal trades, with Dutch and British East India Companies purchasing slaves for spice plantations in the Maluku Islands (1600s–1800s), involving up to 10,000 annually at peak. Abolition lagged, with Thailand formally ending it in 1905 amid international pressure. In the Pacific, pre-colonial slavery was limited, often kinship-based captives in Melanesia for labor or sacrifice, but 19th-century blackbirding introduced coercive labor trades post-Atlantic abolition. From 1863–1907, Australian recruiters forcibly took 62,000 South Sea Islanders—mainly from Vanuatu and Solomon Islands—to Queensland sugar fields under three-year contracts, with mortality rates exceeding 10% from disease and abuse; conditions included withheld wages and family separations, prompting 1901 repatriation of survivors. Peruvian raids (1862–1864) kidnapped 4,000–7,000 Polynesians, including nearly half of Easter Island's population, for guano mines, where 90% perished from overwork and smallpox. Fiji's sugar industry imported 27,000 indentured laborers by 1911, blending Indian and Pacific coerced workers under British oversight.

Europe and the Americas

In medieval Europe, following the decline of Roman institutions, chattel slavery largely transitioned to serfdom as the primary form of unfree labor under feudalism. Serfs were legally bound to the land of their lords, required to provide labor and dues, but unlike chattel slaves, they could not be bought or sold individually apart from the estate, retained some familial rights, and were not considered personal property. This system predominated from roughly the 9th to 15th centuries, affecting millions across regions like England, France, and the Holy Roman Empire, where serf populations comprised 50-90% of rural inhabitants in peak areas. Chattel slavery persisted marginally in peripheral zones, such as the enslavement of pagans during the Baltic Crusades (12th-14th centuries), where captives were traded eastward to Muslim markets via routes like Prague, numbering in the tens of thousands annually at height. By the late Middle Ages, canon law under the Catholic Church increasingly discouraged enslaving fellow Christians, accelerating the shift, though domestic slavery lingered in Mediterranean ports through purchases from Islamic traders. From the 16th to early 19th centuries, North African Barbary corsairs conducted raids and seizures that enslaved an estimated 1 to 1.25 million Europeans, primarily from coastal regions of Italy, Spain, France, England, and the Netherlands. These "white slaves" endured forced labor in galleys, quarries, and households in Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli, with high mortality from overwork and disease; annual replenishment needs reached 8,500 captives in the 17th century alone to maintain populations. European powers responded with tribute payments, naval actions like the 1816 Bombardment of Algiers, and eventual colonization, effectively ending the trade by 1830. Domestically, European societies abolished slavery early—England via Somersett's Case in 1772, though without formal statute—shifting focus to colonial enterprises, where nations like Portugal, Britain, Spain, France, and the Netherlands orchestrated the transatlantic trade without widespread internal chattel systems post-1500. In the Americas, European colonizers introduced hereditary chattel slavery, primarily of Africans, to exploit labor for cash-crop plantations, marking a resurgence of large-scale bondage absent in Europe since antiquity. The Portuguese initiated systematic imports to Brazil in the 1530s for sugar production, eventually receiving about 4.8 million enslaved Africans by 1867, fueling an economy where slaves comprised up to 30% of the population by the 18th century. Spanish colonies in the Caribbean and mainland imported around 1.3 million for mining and haciendas, with brutal conditions in silver mines like Potosí (opened 1545) causing lifespans under 10 years for many. British North America saw the arrival of 20 Africans in Virginia in 1619, initially as indentured-like laborers, but by 1700 slavery hardened into lifelong, inheritable status; only 388,000-400,000 Africans landed there directly, yet natural increase grew the U.S. slave population to 4 million by 1860, concentrated in southern tobacco, rice, and cotton fields where gangs worked 16-hour days under overseers. Caribbean British and French islands absorbed 2.3 million and 1 million respectively, with sugar estates exhibiting extreme brutality—mortality rates exceeding 50% in first years, necessitating constant imports—dwarfing U.S. scale but sharing racial permanence codified in laws like Virginia's 1662 statute deeming children of enslaved mothers as slaves. The Dutch and others contributed smaller shares, with total transatlantic arrivals estimated at 10.7 million from 1526-1867, driven by profitability: a single slave ship voyage could yield 300% returns. Conditions varied—less lethal in North America due to seasoning and reproduction incentives—but universally featured physical punishments, family separations via sales, and denial of legal personhood, contrasting Europe's serfdom by treating humans as alienable commodities. Indigenous enslavement preceded Africans, with millions captured by Spaniards in the 16th century for encomienda systems, though epidemics and flight reduced their viability, prompting the African shift. Slavery's entrenchment tied to mercantilism, ending variably: British Caribbean emancipation in 1834, U.S. via 1865 amendment, Brazil last in 1888.

Contemporary Slavery

Every contemporary society legally bans traditional slavery, though gaps in specific criminalization and enforcement allow modern exploitation to continue in practice. The latest comprehensive global estimates, derived from a joint effort by the International Labour Organization (ILO), Walk Free Foundation, and International Organization for Migration (IOM), indicate that 50 million people lived in modern slavery on any given day in 2021, encompassing both forced labor and forced marriage. This figure breaks down to 28 million in forced labor—defined as work or services exacted under threat of penalty and for which individuals have not offered themselves voluntarily—and 22 million in forced marriage, where coercion prevents free consent. Within forced labor, 17.3 million were exploited in private sector activities such as agriculture, construction, and domestic work; 6.3 million faced commercial sexual exploitation; and 3.9 million endured state-imposed forced labor, often in prisons or through conscription. These estimates rely on nationally representative surveys from 68 countries, combined with administrative data and statistical modeling to extrapolate globally, though methodological limitations such as underreporting and varying definitions across jurisdictions introduce uncertainty. Compared to the prior global benchmark of 40.3 million in 2016, the 2021 figure reflects a 25% increase, or 10 million more people, signaling a genuine rise beyond improvements in data collection. Contributing factors include population growth, exacerbated vulnerabilities from the COVID-19 pandemic—which disrupted economies and increased debt bondage—and ongoing armed conflicts displacing millions into exploitable conditions. Children comprise a disproportionate share, with 3.3 million in forced labor (12% of the total) and 3.8 million girls under 18 in forced marriages, often in regions with weak legal protections against child betrothal. Women and girls account for 71% of the overall total, predominantly in forced marriage and sexual exploitation, underscoring gendered patterns rooted in cultural norms and economic disparities rather than equitable distribution.
CategoryEstimated Number (millions, 2021)
Forced Labor (Total)28
Private Sector17.3
Commercial Sexual Exploitation6.3
State-Imposed3.9
Forced Marriage22
Global Total50
Post-2021 trends suggest persistence or further escalation, with no updated global tally available as of 2025, though localized data from anti-trafficking organizations report heightened risks from climate-induced migration and supply chain opacity in industries like mining and textiles. The ILO notes that without intensified enforcement of international standards like the Palermo Protocol, prevalence could continue climbing, as economic pressures in developing regions sustain demand for cheap, coerced labor. Regional hotspots, particularly Asia-Pacific where over half of cases occur due to sheer population scale, amplify global figures, but undercounting in conflict zones like those in Africa and the Middle East likely masks higher actual numbers.

Forms: Forced Labor, Trafficking, and Marriage

Forced labor, defined by the International Labour Organization (ILO) as work or service exacted under threat of penalty without voluntary consent, affected an estimated 27.6 million people worldwide in 2021, representing the predominant form of modern slavery. Of these, 63% occurred in private-sector activities such as agriculture (where victims often toil in remote farms under armed guards), construction, domestic service, and manufacturing, while 23% involved commercial sexual exploitation and 14% state-imposed forced labor, including prison work programs in countries like China and North Korea. The number rose by 3.8 million from 2016 to 2021, driven by factors including conflict, migration disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, and weak labor enforcement in supply chains for goods like electronics and apparel exported globally. Human trafficking facilitates entry into forced labor and other exploitations, encompassing recruitment, transportation, or harboring of persons through force, fraud, or coercion for labor or sexual purposes, regardless of cross-border movement. In 2021, trafficking contributed to the 6.3 million cases of forced commercial sexual exploitation within the broader forced labor tally, with victims predominantly women and girls deceived by false job promises or sold into brothels in regions like Southeast Asia and Eastern Europe. Labor trafficking, distinct from but overlapping with sex trafficking, often manifests as debt bondage, where migrants from South Asia or Africa incur recruitment fees they repay through indefinite unpaid work on fishing vessels or in brick kilns, generating an estimated $236 billion in annual illegal profits for traffickers worldwide. Estimates derive from surveys and administrative data, though underreporting due to victim fear and jurisdictional gaps likely inflates uncertainty. Forced marriage, affecting 22 million people in 2021—primarily women and girls—entails unions without full, free consent, often enforced through familial pressure, abduction, or economic coercion, resulting in lifelong servitude akin to slavery. Over 37% of victims were children under 18 at marriage, with high prevalence in South Asia (e.g., India and Pakistan, where cultural norms and poverty drive exchanges of brides for dowries or labor) and sub-Saharan Africa, where it intersects with tribal customs and conflict-related displacements. Such arrangements frequently impose domestic labor, restricted movement, and sexual exploitation without recourse, and international law classifies them as trafficking when involving force or deception for labor or servitude. The figure increased by 6.6 million from 2016 to 2021, linked to economic instability and inadequate legal protections, though data relies on household surveys that may miss hidden rural cases.

Key Hotspots and Drivers

Asia and the Pacific region hosts the largest concentration of people in modern slavery, with approximately 30 million individuals affected as of 2021, driven by forced labor in industries such as manufacturing, agriculture, and construction. India alone accounts for an estimated 11 million victims, primarily in bonded labor and human trafficking, while China has around 5.8 million, often linked to state-imposed forced labor in sectors like cotton production and electronics. North Korea reports the highest prevalence rate globally at 104.6 victims per 1,000 people, totaling about 2.7 million, largely through government-orchestrated forced labor in mining, logging, and agriculture. Africa follows with roughly 7 million in modern slavery, concentrated in countries like Mauritania (prevalence of 32 per 1,000) and Eritrea (32 per 1,000), where hereditary slavery and state conscription persist despite legal prohibitions. The Middle East and North Africa region sees elevated rates in nations such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, fueled by the kafala sponsorship system enabling forced labor among migrant workers in construction and domestic service. In Europe and the Americas, absolute numbers are lower but include vulnerabilities in supply chains and sex trafficking; for instance, the United States has an estimated 1.1 million victims, often in agriculture and domestic work. Primary drivers include chronic poverty, which compels individuals into debt bondage and exploitative migration, as seen in rural areas of South Asia where families borrow against future labor. Armed conflict and political instability exacerbate risks by displacing populations and eroding protections, with conflicts in regions like the Sahel and Yemen increasing trafficking for labor and sexual exploitation. Weak rule of law and corruption enable impunity, as officials in countries like Nigeria and Pakistan collude with traffickers or overlook forced labor in informal economies. Global demand for low-cost goods in supply chains, coupled with discrimination against marginalized groups such as women, children, and ethnic minorities, further sustains these practices by prioritizing profit over enforcement.

Abolition Efforts and Responses

Historical Abolitionism

Historical abolitionism emerged primarily in the late 17th and 18th centuries among Protestant religious groups, particularly Quakers, who viewed slavery as incompatible with Christian principles of equality before God. In 1688, German Quakers in Pennsylvania issued the first formal protest against slavery in the American colonies, condemning the practice as unrighteous. By the mid-18th century, Quaker meetings in Britain and America began disciplining members who owned slaves, and by 1776, the majority of the Quaker church explicitly opposed slavery, marking an organized religious stance against the institution. These efforts were rooted in theological convictions rather than secular Enlightenment rationalism alone, though the latter provided rhetorical support for individual rights; Quaker activism laid groundwork for broader campaigns by emphasizing moral testimony and non-violent persuasion. In Britain, the movement gained political traction through evangelical leaders like William Wilberforce, who, converted in 1785, spearheaded parliamentary efforts starting in 1787 to end the slave trade. After nearly two decades of debates and defeats—fueled by economic interests in plantations and naval reliance on trade routes—Parliament passed the Slave Trade Act on March 25, 1807, prohibiting British subjects from participating in the Atlantic slave trade, with penalties including fines and imprisonment. This act reflected a confluence of moral arguments, evidence from eyewitness accounts like Olaudah Equiano's 1789 narrative, and shifting economics as industrialization favored wage labor over slave plantations. Britain's subsequent naval patrols suppressed the trade internationally, intercepting over 1,600 slave ships and freeing approximately 150,000 Africans by 1860, though enforcement relied on superior sea power rather than universal moral consensus. The push extended to abolishing slavery itself, culminating in Britain's Slavery Abolition Act of 1833, effective August 1, 1834, which emancipated over 800,000 slaves across the empire in exchange for £20 million in compensation to owners—about 40% of the national budget—while imposing a seven-year apprenticeship period that critics argued prolonged exploitation. In the United States, abolitionism intensified post-1807 with the founding of the American Anti-Slavery Society in 1833 by William Lloyd Garrison and others, advocating immediate emancipation amid growing sectional tensions. The U.S. ended slavery via the 13th Amendment, ratified December 6, 1865, following the Civil War, which killed over 620,000 and was driven by slavery's expansion into territories as much as humanitarianism. France decreed abolition in 1794 during the Revolution but reinstated it in 1802 under Napoleon; final emancipation came April 27, 1848, freeing 250,000 in colonies like Martinique. Elsewhere, abolition lagged: Denmark banned the trade in 1803, effective 1807; Mexico in 1829; and the Ottoman Empire restricted trade from 1830 via Anglo-Ottoman treaties but permitted domestic slavery until 1908, with formal trade abolition in 1857 under European pressure, reflecting weaker internal moral drivers and persistent economic utility in harems and households. Slave rebellions, such as Haiti's 1791-1804 revolution leading to independence, accelerated some abolitions by demonstrating the system's instability, but success often required external military or economic leverage, underscoring that abolition stemmed from ideological, fiscal, and coercive factors rather than inevitable progress.

Modern International Frameworks

The Slavery Convention of 1926, adopted by the League of Nations on September 25, 1926, and administered by the United Nations following World War II, defined slavery as the status or condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised, and committed signatories to prevent and suppress the slave trade while progressively bringing about its complete abolition. This convention was amended by a 1953 protocol to align administrative provisions with UN structures, entering into force on July 7, 1955, and remains a cornerstone for international anti-slavery efforts, with 99 states parties as of recent records. Building on this, the Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery, adopted by the UN General Assembly on May 7, 1956, expanded coverage to debt bondage, serfdom, forced marriage, and child delivery for exploitation, obligating states to enact domestic legislation criminalizing these practices and to submit reports on implementation. Ratified by 123 states, it emphasized international cooperation in repatriation and rescue of victims, though enforcement relies on voluntary compliance and periodic UN reviews rather than binding adjudication. Parallel to UN efforts, the International Labour Organization's Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), adopted on June 28, 1930, prohibits all forms of forced or compulsory labor exacted under menace of penalty, defining it as work or service not voluntarily offered, with exceptions only for compulsory military service, judicial sanctions, or emergencies like disasters. Ratified by 179 of 187 ILO members, it addresses slavery-like conditions in labor contexts, complemented by the Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105), which bans forced labor as punishment for political views, economic discrimination, or labor discipline, ratified by 170 states. These ILO instruments integrate monitoring through the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, which examines state reports and identifies persistent violations, such as state-imposed labor in certain regimes. In response to evolving forms of exploitation, the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children—supplementing the UN Convention against —was adopted on , , and entered into force on , , defining trafficking as , transportation, or harboring of persons by , , or for exploitation, including forced labor or slavery-like practices. With 182 parties, it mandates of trafficking, victim , and international on controls and , though varies, with challenges in proving amid weak judicial capacities in high-prevalence regions. These frameworks collectively form a non-hierarchical regime, enforced through reporting, technical assistance, and occasional UN special rapporteurs, yet empirical data indicate gaps, as global forced labor affects an estimated 27.6 million people despite widespread ratification.

Apologies, Reparations, and Critiques

In 2008, the United States House of Representatives passed H.Res. 194, a non-binding resolution apologizing for the enslavement of African Americans and the enforcement of Jim Crow segregation laws, acknowledging these practices as incompatible with the nation's founding principles of equality. The Senate followed with a similar concurrent resolution in 2009, expressing regret for the "fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity" of slavery and Jim Crow without admitting legal liability or committing to reparations. Such apologies have been symbolic, focusing on historical acknowledgment rather than material redress, as evidenced by the absence of compensatory measures in these resolutions. European nations have issued comparable statements. In 2023, King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands delivered a formal apology for the country's historical involvement in the transatlantic slave trade, marking the 150th anniversary of its abolition in the Dutch colonies and expressing personal regret while urging societal reflection on ongoing inequalities. Earlier, in 2022, the Dutch government acknowledged its "deep regret" for profiting from slavery, establishing a €200 million fund for affected communities in former colonies but stopping short of direct reparations to individuals. These gestures contrast with limited African state apologies; for instance, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni expressed regret in 1998 for intra-African roles in capturing slaves for European traders during a visit by U.S. President Bill Clinton. Reparations proposals seek compensatory payments or policies for descendants of enslaved , often framed as redress for unpaid labor and intergenerational . In the U.S., H.R. 40, first introduced in 1989 and reintroduced periodically, calls for a federal commission to study slavery's impacts and recommend remedies, but it has not advanced to legislation despite hearings, such as the 2019 congressional session where advocates cited the $250 million value of cotton produced by enslaved labor in 1861 alone. California's 2023 reparations proposed payments up to $1.2 million per eligible Black resident and state apologies, leading to a formal apology signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in September 2024 for the state's role in slavery and segregation, though cash reparations remain unfunded amid fiscal constraints. Internationally, Caribbean nations via CARICOM have demanded reparations from European powers since 2013, estimating trillions in owed compensation for slavery's economic legacies, but no payments have materialized. Critiques of apologies and reparations emphasize their symbolic nature and practical flaws. Opponents argue that apologies, while commendable for historical candor, often serve political expediency without addressing causation, as modern inequalities stem more from post-abolition policies and individual choices than direct slavery links, per analyses questioning intergenerational liability. Reparations face objections on grounds of individual justice: no living perpetrators exist, and taxing non-descendant taxpayers— including recent immigrants—would impose collective guilt, violating principles that no person should be enslaved to another through coerced redistribution. Quantifying damages is deemed impossible, with slavery's value elusive amid confounding factors like global trade networks where African entities sold captives to Europeans, complicating unilateral Western blame. Polls indicate broad opposition, with 77% of Americans rejecting cash payments in 2023 surveys, citing impracticality and the fact that European abolition of the trade predated many non-Western practices. Sources advocating reparations, often from academia or advocacy groups, may overstate causality by downplaying comparative global slavery histories, reflecting institutional biases toward narratives of Western exceptional guilt.

Debates and Controversies

Myths of Western Exceptionalism

The notion of Western exceptionalism in slavery posits that the transatlantic slave trade and chattel slavery in the Americas were uniquely barbaric institutions, unprecedented in human history and disproportionately emphasized in historical narratives. This perspective often overlooks the widespread prevalence of slavery across non-Western societies, where it served as a foundational economic and social element for millennia. Empirical evidence indicates slavery existed in ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, India, and sub-Saharan Africa, with African kingdoms such as Dahomey and Ashanti relying heavily on slave labor and trade prior to European contact. In terms of scale, the transatlantic slave trade forcibly transported approximately 12 million Africans to the Americas between the 16th and 19th centuries, with mortality rates during the Middle Passage estimated at 10-20%. Comparatively, the Arab-Muslim slave trade, spanning from the 7th to the 20th century, enslaved an estimated 10-18 million Africans via trans-Saharan and Indian Ocean routes, often with higher death tolls due to prolonged overland marches and practices like mass castration of male captives, which reduced the surviving male population significantly. These figures demonstrate that while the transatlantic trade was intensive over a shorter period, other systems matched or exceeded it in total volume and duration, challenging claims of Western singularity. Brutality comparisons reveal similarities in across trades, including forced labor, sexual exploitation, and familial separation, but non-Western variants incorporated distinct such as the systematic in the trade, where up to 90% of male slaves died from the procedure or its aftermath. In African societies, slaves were often war captives integrated into households or sacrificed ritually, while Ottoman and Persian systems featured slavery and on a massive scale. Narratives emphasizing transatlantic , such as those in certain academic and media accounts, have been critiqued for selective focus, potentially influenced by ideological biases that downplay non-Western agency in and perpetuation. A key distinction lies in abolition: Western powers, driven by Enlightenment ideas and Christian humanitarianism, initiated global efforts to end slavery, with Britain banning the trade in 1807 and enforcing suppression via naval patrols that intercepted over 150,000 slaves by 1860. In contrast, slavery persisted legally in the Ottoman Empire until 1922, in Saudi Arabia until 1962, and in Mauritania until 1981, with vestiges enduring today. This Western-led eradication, despite internal hypocrisies, underscores a departure from universal historical norms rather than exceptional guilt.

Equivalence Between Historical and Modern Slavery

Modern slavery, as defined by organizations such as the (ILO), encompasses situations of forced labor, , , , and child soldiering, affecting an estimated 50 million people globally as of 2023, though these figures rely on expansive definitions that include temporary rather than perpetual . In contrast, historical chattel slavery, particularly in the transatlantic from to , involved the permanent, hereditary of approximately 12.5 million Africans as legal , with no inherent right to or familial . This distinction in legal status— versus coerced persons—undermines claims of direct equivalence, as modern victims retain nominal and recourse to law, albeit often unenforced in practice. Permanence and heritability further differentiate the systems: transatlantic slaves' status passed to descendants indefinitely, embedded in plantation economies where 90% of U.S. slaves in 1860 were born into bondage, reinforced by racial ideologies absent in most pre-modern slaveries. Modern forms, by comparison, rarely transmit across generations; debt bondage in South Asia, for instance, affects 11 million but typically ends with repayment or escape, comprising 55% of global modern slavery cases per ILO data. While both inflict severe physical and psychological harm—evidenced by mortality rates exceeding 15% during Middle Passage voyages versus ongoing violence in trafficking rings—the absence of formalized inheritance in contemporary cases reflects clandestine operations driven by profit rather than institutionalized lineage. Advocacy groups like Walk Free Foundation promote equivalence to galvanize action, arguing modern slavery's scale (larger in absolute numbers, though <1% of world population versus 18% in ancient Rome) mirrors historical brutality in outcome if not form. Scholarly critiques, however, contend this rhetoric dilutes the specificity of chattel systems, where state laws codified ownership (e.g., U.S. Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850), whereas modern exploitation thrives illegally amid global abolition since the 1926 Slavery Convention. Equating them overlooks how historical slavery fueled empire-building economies, with Britain's 18th-century slave trade profits comprising up to 5% of GDP, while today's hotspots like North Korean labor camps or Qatari migrant worker schemes operate marginally, evading rather than defining national structures. Causal realism highlights divergent drivers: historical slavery arose from mercantilist demands for lifelong labor in New World agriculture, yielding durable commodities like sugar and cotton, whereas modern variants stem from poverty, weak governance, and migration pressures, often temporary and adaptable to enforcement (e.g., sex trafficking rings dismantled by raids in 70% of documented U.S. cases from 2018-2022). This fluidity—absent in chattel regimes where recapture was legally mandated—suggests modern coercion, while egregious, lacks the systemic entrenchment that perpetuated historical bondage for centuries, rendering blanket equivalences empirically overstated despite shared elements of violence and dehumanization.

Cultural and Ideological Justifications

Throughout history, slavery has been justified in diverse cultures through appeals to natural hierarchies, divine sanction, and social utility, often rationalizing the subjugation of war captives, debtors, or perceived inferiors as essential to societal order. In ancient Greece, Aristotle articulated a theory of "natural slavery" in his Politics, arguing that certain individuals, characterized by a lack of rational deliberative capacity, exist by nature to serve as instruments for those with superior intellect, benefiting both master and slave through the latter's guidance toward virtue. This view posited slavery not as conventional but inherent to human diversity, influencing later defenses in Roman and Western thought. Roman ideology normalized slavery as a byproduct of conquest and empire-building, with enslaved persons—primarily prisoners of war—viewed as rightful spoils under jus belli, integrated into the economy without ethical qualms, as evidenced by Cicero's acceptance of slaves as property essential to household and state functioning. Slaves comprised up to 30-40% of Italy's population by the late Republic, justified by their role in sustaining urban luxury and agriculture, though manumission offered pathways to citizenship, reflecting a pragmatic rather than rigidly racial system. Religious texts provided ideological buttresses across Abrahamic traditions. The Hebrew Bible, in passages like Exodus 21:2-11 and Leviticus 25:44-46, regulated slavery by distinguishing Hebrew indentured servants (freed after six years) from perpetual foreign slaves acquired from surrounding nations, framing it as permissible property ownership under Mosaic law without explicit moral condemnation. Later interpreters, such as 19th-century American proponents, invoked the "Curse of Ham" (Genesis 9:25) to racialize sub-Saharan Africans as divinely ordained servants, despite the text's original context concerning Canaanite subjugation unrelated to skin color or perpetual bondage. In Islam, the Quran (e.g., Surah 4:92, 24:33) and Hadith permitted slavery primarily from lawful war captives (sabaya), portraying it as a merciful alternative to execution or a means to gradual manumission (muktabah), with owners obligated to humane treatment but retaining rights to ownership and concubinage, embedding it within a divine social order that persisted in Ottoman and Arab contexts until the 20th century. In pre-colonial Africa, tribal societies justified slavery through kinship expansion and warfare norms, where captives from raids—estimated at millions internally before European contact—were absorbed as kinless dependents (pawns or war bonds), serving economic needs in agriculture and trade without racial exclusivity, as seen in empires like Dahomey, where slaves funded royal power via tribute systems. Confucian thought in ancient China defended hierarchical servitude during the Western Zhou slave society (c. 1046-771 BCE), with Confucius viewing corvée-like bondage as aligned with ritual order (li), though emphasizing benevolence (ren) toward dependents to maintain harmony, facilitating a transition to feudalism where outright chattel slavery waned but debt bondage endured. These justifications, varying by context, consistently prioritized empirical utility—labor extraction post-conquest—and causal realities of power imbalances over egalitarian ideals, revealing slavery's ideological adaptability to rationalize dominance across civilizations.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.