Hubbry Logo
ConfucianismConfucianismMain
Open search
Confucianism
Community hub
Confucianism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Confucianism
Confucianism
from Wikipedia

Confucianism
Chinese name
Chinese儒家
Literal meaningRu school of thought
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinRújiā
Bopomofoㄖㄨˊ ㄐㄧㄚ
Gwoyeu RomatzyhRujia
Wade–GilesJu2-chia1
Tongyong PinyinRú-jia
IPA[ɻǔ.tɕjá]
Wu
SuzhouneseZyú-ka
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationYùhgāa
Jyutpingjyu4 gaa1
IPA[jy˩ ka˥]
Southern Min
Tâi-lôJû-ka, Lû-ka
Middle Chinese
Middle ChineseNyu-kæ
Old Chinese
Baxter–Sagart (2014)*no kˤra
Alternative Chinese name
Chinese儒教
Literal meaningRu religious doctrine
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinRújiào
Bopomofoㄖㄨˊ ㄐㄧㄠˋ
Wade–GilesJu2-chiao4
Tongyong PinyinRú-jiào
IPA[ɻǔ.tɕjâʊ]
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationYùhgaau
Jyutpingjyu4 gaau3
IPA[jy˩.kaw˧]
Second alternative Chinese name
Traditional Chinese儒學
Simplified Chinese儒学
Literal meaningRu studies
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinRúxué
Bopomofoㄖㄨˊ ㄒㄩㄝˊ
Wade–GilesJu2-hsüeh2
Tongyong PinyinRú-syué
IPA[ɻǔ.ɕɥě]
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationYùhhohk
Jyutpingjyu4 hok6
IPA[jy˩.hɔk̚˨]
Vietnamese name
VietnameseNho giáo
Chữ Hán儒教
Literal meaningRu teachings
Korean name
Hangul유교
Hanja儒敎
Transcriptions
Revised RomanizationYugyo
Japanese name
Kanji儒教
Hiraganaじゅきょう
Katakanaジュキョウ
Transcriptions
RomanizationJukyō
Kunrei-shikiZyukyô
Temple of Confucius of Jiangyin, Wuxi, Jiangsu. This is a wenmiao (文庙), a temple where Confucius is worshipped as Wendi, "God of Culture" (文帝).
Gates of the wenmiao of Datong, Shanxi

Confucianism, also known as Ruism or Ru classicism,[1] is a system of thought and behavior originating in ancient China, and is variously described as a tradition, philosophy, religion, theory of government, or way of life.[2] Founded by Confucius in the Hundred Schools of Thought era (c. 500 BCE), Confucianism integrates philosophy, ethics, and social governance, with a core focus on virtue, social harmony, and familial responsibility.[3]

Confucianism emphasizes virtue through self-cultivation and communal effort.[4] Key virtues include ren (, "benevolence"), yi (; "righteousness"), li (; "propriety"), zhi (; "wisdom"), and xin (; "sincerity").[5] These values, deeply tied to the notion of tian (; "Heaven"), present a worldview where human relationships and social order are manifestations of sacred moral principles.[6][7][8] While Confucianism does not emphasize an omnipotent deity, it upholds tian as a transcendent moral order.[9][10][11]

Confucius regarded himself as a transmitter of cultural values from the preceding Xia, Shang, and Western Zhou dynasties.[12] Suppressed during the Legalist Qin dynasty (c. 200 BCE), Confucianism flourished under the Han dynasty (c. 130 BCE), displacing the proto-Taoist Huang–Lao tradition to become the dominant ideological framework, while blending with the pragmatic teachings of Legalism.[13] The Tang dynasty (c. 600 CE) witnessed a response to the rising influence of Buddhism and Taoism in the development of Neo-Confucianism, a reformulated philosophical system that became central to the imperial examination system and the scholar-official class of the Song dynasty (c. 1000 CE).

The abolition of the imperial examination system in 1905 marked the decline of state-endorsed Confucianism. In the early 20th century, Chinese reformers came to associate Confucianism with China's "Century of Humiliation", and instead embraced alternative ideologies such as Sun Yat-sen’s "Three Principles of the People" and later Maoism. Nevertheless, Confucianism endured as a cultural force, influencing East Asian economic and social structures into the modern era. Confucian work ethic was credited with the rise of the East Asian economy in the late twentieth century.[13]

Confucianism remains influential in China, Korea, Japan, Vietnam, and regions with significant Chinese diaspora.[14][15] A modern Confucian revival has gained momentum in academic and cultural circles, culminating in the establishment of a national Confucian Church in China in 2015, reflecting renewed interest in Confucian ideals as a foundation for social and moral values.[16][17]

American philosopher Herbert Fingarette describes Confucianism as a philosophical system which regards "the secular as sacred".[18]

Terminology

[edit]
Older versions of the grapheme ; ; 'scholar', 'refined one', 'Confucian', 'traditionalist': it is composed of ; rén; 'person' and ; ; 'to await', itself composed of ; ; 'rain', 'instruction' and ; ér; 'sky'. According to Kang Youwei, Hu Shih, and Yao Xinzhong, they were the official shaman-priests (wu) experts in rites and astronomy of the Shang, and later Zhou, dynasty.[19]

There is no term in Chinese which directly corresponds to "Confucianism". The closest catch-all term for Confucianism is the word (). Its literal meanings in modern Chinese include 'scholar', 'learned', or 'refined man'. In Old Chinese the word had a distinct set of meanings, including 'to tame', 'to mould', 'to educate', and 'to refine'.[20]: 190–197  Several different terms, some of which with modern origin, are used in different situations to express different facets of Confucianism, including:

The terms that use ru do not use the name "Confucius" at all, but instead focus on the ideal of the Confucian man. The use of the term "Confucianism" has been avoided by some modern scholars, who favor "Ruism" and "Ruists" instead. Robert Eno argues that the term has been "burdened ... with the ambiguities and irrelevant traditional associations". Ruism, as he states, is more faithful to the original Chinese name for the school.[20]: 7 

The term "Traditionalist" has been suggested by David Schaberg to emphasize the connection to the past, its standards, and inherited forms, in which Confucius himself placed so much importance.[21] This translation of the word ru is followed by e.g. Yuri Pines.[22]

According to Zhou Youguang, ru originally referred to shamanic methods of holding rites and existed before Confucius's times, but with Confucius it came to mean devotion to propagating such teachings to bring civilisation to the people.

In the Western world, the character for water is often used as a symbol for Confucianism, which is not the case in modern China.[citation needed]

Five Classics and the Confucian vision

[edit]
Confucius in a fresco from a Western Han tomb in Dongping, Shandong

Traditionally, Confucius was thought to be the author or editor of the Five Classics which were the basic texts of Confucianism, all edited into their received versions around 500 years later by Imperial Librarian Liu Xin.[23]: 51  The scholar Yao Xinzhong allows that there are good reasons to believe that Confucian classics took shape in the hands of Confucius, but that "nothing can be taken for granted in the matter of the early versions of the classics". The sixth classic similar to the Classic of Poetry was the Classic of Music. It was lost during the Han dynasty. Music carried an invaluable tool to induce focus in performing rituals.[24] These were the internal (music) and external (rites) keys to harmonizing society.[25] Yao suggests that most modern scholars hold the "pragmatic" view that Confucius and his followers did not intend to create a system of classics, but nonetheless "contributed to their formation".[26]

Painting of Confucius donning traditional robes, by Wu Daozi, 8th century

The scholar Tu Weiming explains these classics as embodying "five visions" which underlie the development of Confucianism:

  • I Ching (Classic of Change or Book of Changes), generally held to be the earliest of the classics, shows a metaphysical vision which combines divinatory art with numerological technique and ethical insight; philosophy of change sees cosmos as interaction between the two energies yin and yang; universe always shows organismic unity and dynamism.
  • Classic of Poetry or Book of Songs is the earliest anthology of Chinese poems and songs, with the earliest strata antedating the Zhou conquest. It shows the poetic vision in the belief that poetry and music convey common human feelings and mutual responsiveness.
  • Book of Documents or Book of History is a compilation of speeches of major figures and records of events in ancient times, embodying the political vision and addressing the kingly way in terms of the ethical foundation for humane government. The documents show the sagacity, filial piety, and work ethic of mythical sage-emperors Yao, Shun, and Yu, who established a political culture which was based on responsibility and trust. Their virtue formed a covenant of social harmony which did not depend on punishment or coercion.
  • Book of Rites describes the social forms, administration, and ceremonial rites of the Zhou dynasty. This social vision defined society not as an adversarial system based on contractual relations but as a network of kinship groups bound by cultural identity and ritual practice, socially responsible for one another and the transmission of proper antique forms. The four functional occupations are cooperative (farmer, scholar, artisan, merchant).
  • Spring and Autumn Annals chronicles the period to which it gives its name, Spring and Autumn period (771–481 BC), from the perspective of Confucius's home state of Lu. These events emphasise the significance of collective memory for communal self-identification, for reanimating the old is the best way to attain the new.[27]

Doctrines

[edit]

Theory and theology

[edit]
Zhou dynasty oracular version of the grapheme for Tian, representing a man with a head informed by the north celestial pole[28]

Confucianism revolves around the pursuit of the unity of the individual self and tian ("heaven"), or the relationship between humanity and heaven.[29][30] The principle or way of Heaven (tian li or tian tao) is the order of the world and the source of divine authority.[30] Tian li or tian tao is monistic, meaning that it is singular and indivisible. Individuals may realise their humanity and become one with Heaven through the contemplation of such order.[30] This transformation of the self is extended to family and society to create a harmonious community.[30] Joël Thoraval studied Confucianism as a diffused civil religion in contemporary China, finding that it expresses itself in the widespread worship of five cosmological entities: Heaven and Earth (; ), the sovereign or the government (; jūn), ancestors (; qīn), and masters (; shī).[31]

According to the scholar Stephan Feuchtwang, in Chinese cosmology, which is not merely Confucian but shared by many Chinese religions, "the universe creates itself out of a primary chaos of material energy" (hundun and qi), and is organized through the polarity of yin and yang that characterises any thing and life. Creation is therefore a continuous ordering; it is not creation ex nihilo. "Yin and yang are the invisible and visible, the receptive and the active, the unshaped and the shaped; they characterise the yearly cycle (winter and summer), the landscape (shady and bright), the sexes (female and male), and even sociopolitical history (disorder and order). Confucianism is concerned with finding "middle ways" between yin and yang at every new configuration of the world."[32]

Confucianism conciliates both the inner and outer polarities of spiritual cultivation—that is to say self-cultivation and world redemption—in the ideal of "sageliness within and kingliness without".[30] Ren, translated as "humaneness" or the essence proper of a human being, is the character of compassionate mind; it is the virtue endowed by Heaven and at the same time the means by which a person may achieve oneness with Heaven by comprehending their origin in Heaven, and therefore divine essence. In his work The Book of Great Unity (大同書), late Qing dynasty reformer Kang Youwei considered ren as the means "to form one body with all things" and one can find ren "when the self and others are not separated... and when compassion is aroused".[5]

"Lord Heaven" and "Jade Emperor" were terms for a Confucianist supreme deity who was an anthropomorphized tian,[33] and some conceptions of it thought of the two names as synonymous.

Tian and the gods

[edit]
Like other symbols such as the sauwastika,[34] (wàn; 'all things') in Chinese, the Mesopotamian dingir or anu 𒀭𒀭,[35] and also the Chinese ; wu; 'shaman' (in Shang script represented by a graph resembling the cross potent ☩),[36] Tian refers to the northern celestial pole (北極; běijí), the pivot and the vault of the sky with its spinning constellations.[37] Here is an approximate representation of the tiānmén (天門; 'gate of heaven').[38] or tiānshū (天樞; 'pivot of heaven')[39] as the precessional north celestial pole, with α Ursae Minoris as the pole star, with the spinning Chariot constellations in the four phases of time. According to Reza Assasi's theories, the may not only be centred in the current precessional pole at α Ursae Minoris, but also very near to the north ecliptic pole if Draco (天龙; 天龍; Tiānlóng) is conceived as one of its two beams.[40][note 1]

Tian, a key concept in Chinese thought, refers to the God of Heaven, the northern culmen of the skies and its spinning stars,[37] earthly nature and its laws which come from Heaven, to 'Heaven and Earth' (that is, "all things"), and to the awe-inspiring forces beyond human control.[41] There are so many uses in Chinese thought that it is impossible to give a single English translation.[42]

Confucius used the term in a mystical way.[43] He wrote in the Analects (7.23) that tian gave him life, and that tian watched and judged (6.28; 9.12). In 9.5 Confucius says that a person may know the movements of tian, and this provides with the sense of having a special place in the universe. In 17.19 Confucius says that tian spoke to him, though not in words. The scholar Ronnie Littlejohn warns that tian was not to be interpreted as a personal god comparable to that of the Abrahamic faiths, in the sense of an otherworldly or transcendent creator.[44] Rather it is similar to what Taoists meant by Dao: "the way things are" or "the regularities of the world",[41] which Stephan Feuchtwang equates with the ancient Greek concept of physis, "nature" as the generation and regenerations of things and of the moral order.[45] Tian may also be compared to the Brahman of Hindu and Vedic traditions.[29] The scholar Promise Hsu, in the wake of Robert B. Louden, explained 17:19 ("What does Tian ever say? Yet there are four seasons going round and there are the hundred things coming into being. What does Tian say?") as implying that even though Tian is not a "speaking person", it constantly "does" through the rhythms of nature, and communicates "how human beings ought to live and act", at least to those who have learnt to carefully listen to it.[43]

Duanmu Ci, a disciple of Confucius, said that Tian had set the master on the path to become a wise man (9.6). In 7.23 Confucius says that he has no doubt left that Tian gave him life, and from it he had developed right virtue (de). In 8.19, he says that the lives of the sages are interwoven with Tian.[42]

Regarding personal gods (shen, energies who emanate from and reproduce Tian) enliving nature, in the Analects Confucius says that it is appropriate (yi) for people to worship (; jìng) them,[46] although only through proper rites (li), implying respect of positions and discretion.[46] Confucius himself was a ritual and sacrificial master.[47]

Answering to a disciple who asked whether it is better to sacrifice to the god of the stove or to the god of the family (a popular saying), in 3.13 Confucius says that in order to appropriately pray to gods, one should first know and respect Heaven. In 3.12, he explains that religious rituals produce meaningful experiences,[48] and one has to offer sacrifices in person, acting in presence, otherwise "it is the same as not having sacrificed at all". Rites and sacrifices to the gods have an ethical importance: they generate good life, because taking part in them leads to the overcoming of the self.[49] Analects 10.11 tells that Confucius always took a small part of his food and placed it on the sacrificial bowls as an offering to his ancestors.[47]

Some Confucian movements worship Confucius,[50] although not as a supreme being or anything else approaching the power of tian or the tao, and/or gods from Chinese folk religion. These movements are not a part of mainstream Confucianism, although the boundary between Chinese folk religion and Confucianism can be blurred.[citation needed]

Other movements, such as Mohism which was later absorbed by Taoism, developed a more theistic idea of Heaven.[51] Feuchtwang explains that the difference between Confucianism and Taoism primarily lies in the fact that the former focuses on the realisation of the starry order of Heaven in human society, while the latter on the contemplation of the Dao which spontaneously arises in nature.[45] However, Confucianism does venerate many aspects of nature[15] and also respects various tao,[52] as well as what Confucius saw as the main tao, the "[Way] of Heaven."[4]

The Way of Heaven involves "lifelong and sincere devotion to traditional cultural forms" and wu wei, "a state of spontaneous harmony between individual inclinations and the sacred Way".[4]

Kelly James Clark argued that Confucius himself saw Tian as an anthropomorphic god that Clark hypothetically refers to as "Heavenly Supreme Emperor", although most other scholars on Confucianism disagree with this view.[53]

Social morality and ethics

[edit]
Worship at the Great Temple of Lord Zhang Hui (张挥公大殿; Zhāng Huī gōng dàdiàn), the cathedral ancestral shrine of the Zhang lineage corporation, at their ancestral home in Qinghe, Hebei
Ancestral temple of the Zeng lineage and Houxian village cultural centre, Cangnan, Zhejiang

As explained by Stephan Feuchtwang, the order coming from Heaven preserves the world, and has to be followed by humanity finding a "middle way" between yin and yang forces in each new configuration of reality. Social harmony or morality is identified as patriarchy, which is expressed in the worship of ancestors and deified progenitors in the male line, at ancestral shrines.[45]

Confucian ethical codes are described as humanistic.[6] They may be practiced by all the members of a society. Confucian ethics is characterised by the promotion of virtues, encompassed by the Five Constants, elaborated by Confucian scholars out of the inherited tradition during the Han dynasty.[54] The Five Constants are:[54]

  • Ren (benevolence, humaneness)
  • Yi (righteousness, justice)
  • Li (propriety, rites)
  • Zhi (; zhì: wisdom, knowledge)
  • Xin (sincerity, faithfulness)

These are accompanied by the classical four virtues (四字; sìzì), one of which (Yi) is also included among the Five Constants:

There are many other traditionally Confucian values, such as 'honesty' (; chéng), 'bravery' (; yǒng), 'incorruptibility' (; lián), 'kindness', 'forgiveness' (; shù), a 'sense of right and wrong' (; chǐ), 'gentleness' (; wēn), 'kindheartenedness' (; liáng), 'respect' (; gōng), 'frugality' (; jiǎn), and ; ràng; 'modesty').

Ren

[edit]

Ren (仁 ) is the highest Confucian virtue meaning the good quality of a virtuous human when reaching for higher ideals or when being altruistic. According to Confucius, Ren encompasses benevolence, trustworthiness, courage, compassion, empathy, and reciprocity. It is considered the essence of the human being endowed by Heaven, and the means by which someone may act according to the principle of Heaven and become one with it.[5]

Ren is expressed through interpersonal relationships and can be cultivated through the observance of proper Li. Li, or ritual, guides people's behaviors in nurturing and expressing Ren. Li regulates the fundamental human relationships between parents and kids, spouses, siblings, friends, and set the foundation to a harmonious society. Yan Hui, Confucius's most outstanding student, once asked his master to describe the criteria of Ren. Confucius replied, "If contrary to ritual, do not look; if contrary to ritual, do not listen; if contrary to ritual, do not speak; if contrary to ritual, do not act." [55]

Ren is also a central principle in Confucian political theory: a ruler with the Mandate of Heaven is one of great virtue, who leads by moral example and prioritizes the well-being of the people.

Rite and centring

[edit]
Confucian ritual ceremony held at Qufu Confucius temple in Shandong, China.
Korean Confucian rite in Jeju

Li (; ) is a word which finds its most extensive use in Confucian and post-Confucian Chinese philosophy. Li can be translated as 'rite' or ritual, when referring to its realization in the context of human social behavior it has also been translated as 'customs', 'measures' and 'rules', among other terms. Li also means religious rites which establish relations between humanity and the gods.

According to Stephan Feuchtwang, rites are conceived as "what makes the invisible visible", making possible for humans to cultivate the underlying order of nature. Correctly performed rituals move society in alignment with earthly and heavenly (astral) forces, establishing the harmony of the three realms—Heaven, Earth and humanity. This practice is defined as "centering" (; yāng or ; zhōng). Among all things of creation, humans themselves are "central" because they have the ability to cultivate and centre natural forces.[56]

Confucian rite held at Teachers' Day in Taiwan.

Li embodies the entire web of interaction between humanity, human objects, and nature. Confucius includes in his discussions of li such diverse topics as learning, tea drinking, titles, mourning, and governance. Xunzi cites "songs and laughter, weeping and lamentation ... rice and millet, fish and meat ... the wearing of ceremonial caps, embroidered robes, and patterned silks, or of fasting clothes and mourning clothes ... spacious rooms and secluded halls, soft mats, couches and benches" as vital parts of the fabric of li.

Confucius envisioned proper government being guided by the principles of li. Some Confucians proposed that all human beings may pursue perfection by learning and practising li. Overall, Confucians believe that governments should place more emphasis on li and rely much less on penal punishment when they govern.

Loyalty

[edit]

Loyalty (; zhōng) is particularly relevant for the social class to which most of Confucius's students belonged, because the most important way for an ambitious young scholar to become a prominent official was to enter a ruler's civil service.

Confucius himself did not propose that "might makes right", but rather that a superior should be obeyed because of his moral rectitude. In addition, loyalty does not mean subservience to authority. This is because reciprocity is demanded from the superior as well. As Confucius stated "a prince should employ his minister according to the rules of propriety; ministers should serve their prince with faithfulness (loyalty)."[57]

Similarly, Mencius also said that "when the prince regards his ministers as his hands and feet, his ministers regard their prince as their belly and heart; when he regards them as his dogs and horses, they regard him as another man; when he regards them as the ground or as grass, they regard him as a robber and an enemy."[58] Moreover, Mencius indicated that if the ruler is incompetent, he should be replaced. If the ruler is evil, then the people have the right to overthrow him.[59] A good Confucian is also expected to remonstrate with his superiors when necessary.[60] At the same time, a proper Confucian ruler should also accept his ministers' advice, as this will help him govern the realm better.

In later ages, however, emphasis was often placed more on the obligations of the ruled to the ruler, and less on the ruler's obligations to the ruled. Like filial piety, loyalty was often subverted by the autocratic regimes in China. Nonetheless, throughout the ages, many Confucians continued to fight against unrighteous superiors and rulers. Many of these Confucians suffered and sometimes died because of their conviction and action.[61] During the Ming-Qing era, prominent Confucians such as Wang Yangming promoted individuality and independent thinking as a counterweight to subservience to authority.[62] The famous thinker Huang Zongxi also strongly criticised the autocratic nature of the imperial system and wanted to keep imperial power in check.[63]

Many Confucians also realised that loyalty and filial piety have the potential of coming into conflict with one another. This may be true especially in times of social chaos, such as during the period of the Ming-Qing transition.[64]

Filial piety

[edit]
Fourteenth of The Twenty-four Filial Exemplars

In Confucian philosophy, "filial piety" (; xiào) is a virtue of respect for one's parents and ancestors, and of the hierarchies within society: father–son, elder–junior and male–female.[45] The Confucian classic Xiaojing ("Book of Piety"), thought to be written during the Qin or Han dynasties, has historically been the authoritative source on the Confucian tenet of xiao. The book, a conversation between Confucius and his disciple Zeng Shen, is about how to set up a good society using the principle of xiao.[65]

In more general terms, filial piety means to be good to one's parents; to take care of one's parents; to engage in good conduct not just towards parents but also outside the home so as to bring a good name to one's parents and ancestors; to perform the duties of one's job well so as to obtain the material means to support parents as well as carry out sacrifices to the ancestors; not be rebellious; show love, respect and support; the wife in filial piety must obey her husband absolutely and take care of the whole family wholeheartedly. display courtesy; ensure male heirs, uphold fraternity among brothers; wisely advise one's parents, including dissuading them from moral unrighteousness, for blindly following the parents' wishes is not considered to be xiao; display sorrow for their sickness and death; and carry out sacrifices after their death.

Filial piety is considered a key virtue in Chinese culture, and it is the main concern of a large number of stories. One of the most famous collections of such stories is "The Twenty-four Filial Exemplars". These stories depict how children exercised their filial piety in the past. While China has always had a diversity of religious beliefs, filial piety has been common to almost all of them; historian Hugh D.R. Baker calls respect for the family the only element common to almost all Chinese believers.[66]

Relationships

[edit]

Social harmony results in part from every individual knowing his or her place in the natural order, and playing his or her part well. Reciprocity or responsibility (renqing) extends beyond filial piety and involves the entire network of social relations, even the respect for rulers.[45] This is shown in the story where Duke Jing of Qi asks Confucius about government, by which he meant proper administration so as to bring social harmony:

齊景公問政於孔子。孔子對曰:君君,臣臣,父父,子子。
The duke Jing, of Qi, asked Confucius about government. Confucius replied, "There is government, when the prince is prince, and the minister is minister; when the father is father, and the son is son."

— Analects 12.11 (Legge translation).

Particular duties arise from one's particular situation in relation to others. The individual stands simultaneously in several different relationships with different people: as a junior in relation to parents and elders, and as a senior in relation to younger siblings, students, and others. While juniors are considered in Confucianism to owe their seniors reverence, seniors also have duties of benevolence and concern toward juniors. The same is true with the husband and wife relationship where the husband needs to show benevolence towards his wife and the wife needs to respect the husband in return. This theme of mutuality still exists in East Asian cultures even to this day.

The Five Bonds are: ruler to ruled, father to son, husband to wife, elder brother to younger brother, friend to friend. Specific duties were prescribed to each of the participants in these sets of relationships. Such duties are also extended to the dead, where the living stand as sons to their deceased family. The only relationship where respect for elders is not stressed was the friend to friend relationship, where mutual equal respect is emphasised instead. All these duties take the practical form of prescribed rituals, for instance wedding and death rituals.[45]

Junzi

[edit]

The junzi is a Chinese philosophical term often translated as "gentleman" or "superior person."[67] Junzi, which literally means "son of a lord", was redefined by Confucius in the Analects to describe a person of noble character and ethical virtue.[68]

In Confucianism, the sage or wise is the ideal personality; however, it is very hard to become one of them. Confucius created the model of junzi, which may be achieved by any individual through the discipline of one's minds and actions.[69] Song dynasty Confucian philosopher Zhu Xi defined junzi as second only to the sage. There are many characteristics of the junzi: he may live in poverty, he does more and speaks less, he is loyal, obedient and knowledgeable. The junzi disciplines himself. Ren is fundamental to become a junzi.[70]

As the potential leader of a nation, a son of the ruler is raised to have a superior ethical and moral position while gaining inner peace through his virtue. The junzi enforces his rule over his subjects by acting virtuously himself. It is thought that his pure virtue would lead others to follow his example. The ultimate goal is that the government behaves much like a family, the junzi being a beacon of filial piety. To Confucius, the junzi sustained the functions of government and social stratification through his ethical values. Despite its literal meaning, any righteous man willing to improve himself may become a junzi.

In contrast to the junzi, the xiaoren (小人; xiăorén ), small-minded or morally inferior people,[69] do not grasp the value of virtues and seeks only immediate gains. The petty person is egotistic and does not consider the consequences of his action in the overall scheme of things. Should the ruler be surrounded by xiaoren as opposed to junzi, his governance and his people will suffer due to their small-mindness. Examples of such xiaoren individuals may range from those who continually indulge in sensual and emotional pleasures all day to the politician who is interested merely in power and fame; neither sincerely aims for the long-term benefit of others.

Rectification of names

[edit]
Priest paying homage to Confucius's tablet, c. 1900

Confucius believed that social disorder often stemmed from failure to perceive, understand, and deal with reality. Fundamentally, then, social disorder may stem from the failure to call things by their proper names, and his solution to this was the "rectification of names" (正名; zhèngmíng). He gave an explanation of this concept to one of his disciples:

Zi-lu said, "The vassal of Wei has been waiting for you, in order with you to administer the government. What will you consider the first thing to be done?"
The Master replied, "What is necessary to rectify names."
"So! indeed!" said Zi-lu. "You are wide off the mark! Why must there be such rectification?"
The Master said, "How uncultivated you are, Yu! The superior man [Junzi] cannot care about the everything, just as he cannot go to check all himself!
        If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things.
        If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success.
        When affairs cannot be carried on to success, proprieties and music do not flourish.
        When proprieties and music do not flourish, punishments will not be properly awarded.
        When punishments are not properly awarded, the people do not know how to move hand or foot.
Therefore a superior man considers it necessary that the names he uses may be spoken appropriately, and also that what he speaks may be carried out appropriately. What the superior man requires is just that in his words there may be nothing incorrect."
(Analects XIII, 3, tr. Legge)

Xunzi chapter (22) "On the Rectification of Names" claims the ancient sage-kings chose names (; míng) that directly corresponded with actualities (; shí), but later generations confused terminology, coined new nomenclature, and thus could no longer distinguish right from wrong. Since social harmony is of utmost importance, without the proper rectification of names, society would essentially crumble and "undertakings [would] not [be] completed."[71]

History

[edit]

Metaphysical antecedents

[edit]
The dragon is one of the oldest symbols of Chinese religious culture. It symbolises the supreme godhead, Di or Tian, at the north ecliptic pole, around which it coils itself as the homonymous constellation. It is a symbol of the "protean" supreme power which has in itself both yin and yang.[72]
Birthplaces of notable Chinese philosophers of the Hundred Schools of Thought in Zhou dynasty. Confucians are marked by triangles in dark red.

According to He Guanghu, Confucianism may be identified as a continuation of the Shang-Zhou (c. 1600–256 BC) official religion, or the Chinese aboriginal religion which has lasted uninterrupted for three thousand years.[73] Both the dynasties worshipped a supreme "godhead", called Shangdi ('Highest Deity') or Di by the Shang and Tian ('Heaven') by the Zhou. Shangdi was conceived as the first ancestor of the Shang royal house,[74] an alternate name for him being the "Supreme Progenitor" (上甲; Shàngjiǎ).[75] Shang theology viewed the multiplicity of gods of nature and ancestors as parts of Di. Di manifests as the Wufang Shangdi with the winds (; fēng) as its cosmic will.[76] With the Zhou dynasty, which overthrew the Shang, the name for the supreme godhead became tian.[74] While the Shang identified Shangdi as their ancestor-god to assert their claim to power by divine right, the Zhou transformed this claim into a legitimacy based on moral power, the Mandate of Heaven. In Zhou theology, Tian had no singular earthly progeny, but bestowed divine favour on virtuous rulers. Zhou kings declared that their victory over the Shang was because they were virtuous and loved their people, while the Shang were tyrants and thus were deprived of power by Tian.[12]

John C. Didier and David Pankenier relate the shapes of both the ancient Chinese characters for Di and Tian to the patterns of stars in the northern skies, either drawn, in Didier's theory by connecting the constellations bracketing the north celestial pole as a square,[77] or in Pankenier's theory by connecting some of the stars which form the constellations of the Big Dipper and broader Ursa Major, and Ursa Minor (Little Dipper).[78] Cultures in other parts of the world have also conceived these stars or constellations as symbols of the origin of things, the supreme godhead, divinity and royal power.[79] The supreme godhead was also identified with the dragon, symbol of unlimited power (qi),[74] of the protean primordial power which embodies both yin and yang in unity, associated to the constellation Draco which winds around the north ecliptic pole,[72] and slithers between the Little and Big Dipper.

Zhou traditions wane

[edit]

By the 6th century BC, the power of Tian and the symbols that represented it on earth (architecture of cities, temples, altars and ritual vessels, and the Zhou system of rites) became "diffuse" and claimed by different potentates in the Zhou states to legitimise economic, political, and military ambitions. Communication with the divine no longer was an exclusive privilege of the Zhou royal house, but might be bought by anyone able to afford the elaborate ceremonies and the old and new rites required to access the authority of Tian.[80]

Besides the waning Zhou ritual system, what may be defined as 'wild' (; ) traditions, or traditions outside of the official system, developed as attempts to access the will of Tian. As central political authority crumbled in the wake of the collapse of the Western Zhou, the population lost faith in the official tradition, which was no longer perceived as an effective way to communicate with Heaven. The traditions of the 'Nine Fields' (九野) and of the Yijing flourished.[81] Chinese thinkers, faced with this challenge to legitimacy, diverged in a "Hundred Schools of Thought", each positing its own philosophical lens for understanding the processes of the world.

Confucius (551–479 BC) appeared in this period of political reconfiguration and spiritual questioning. He was educated in Shang–Zhou traditions, which he contributed to transmit and reformulate giving centrality to self-cultivation and agency of humans,[12] and the educational power of the self-established individual in assisting others to establish themselves (the 愛人; àirén; 'principle of loving others').[82] As the Zhou reign collapsed, traditional values were abandoned resulting in a period of perceived moral decline. Confucius saw an opportunity to reinforce values of compassion and tradition into society, with the intended goal of reconstructing what he believed to be a lost perfect moral order of high antiquity. Disillusioned with the culture, opposing scholars, and religious authorities of the time, he began to advance an ethical interpretation of traditional Zhou religion.[4] In his view, the power of Tian is pervasive, and responds positively to the sincere heart driven by humaneness and rightness, decency and altruism. Confucius conceived these qualities as the foundation needed to restore socio-political harmony. Like many contemporaries, Confucius saw ritual practices as efficacious ways to access Tian, but he thought that the crucial knot was the reverent inner state that participants enter prior to engaging in the ritual acts.[83] Confucius is said to have amended and recodified the classical books inherited from the Xia-Shang-Zhou dynasties, and to have composed the Spring and Autumn Annals.[84]

Confucianism rises

[edit]

Philosophers in the Warring States period, both focused on state-endorsed ritual and non-aligned to state ritual built upon Confucius's legacy, compiled in the Analects, and formulated the classical metaphysics that became the lash of Confucianism. In accordance with Confucius, they identified mental tranquility as the state of Tian, or 'the One' (; ), which in each individual is the Heaven-bestowed divine power to rule one's own life and the world. They also extended the theory, proposing the oneness of production and reabsorption into the cosmic source, and the possibility to understand and therefore reattain it through correct state of mind. This line of thought would have influenced all Chinese individual and collective-political mystical theories and practices thereafter.[85]

In the Han dynasty, Confucians beginning with Dong Zhongshu synthesised Warring States Confucianism with ideas of yin and yang, and wuxing, as well as folk superstition and the prior schools that led up to the School of Naturalists.[86]

In the 460s, Confucianism competed with Chinese Buddhism and "traditional Confucianism" was "a broad cosmology that was as much about personal ethics as about spiritual beliefs" and had roots that went back to Confucianist philosophers from over a thousand years before.[87]

Decline

[edit]

The Confucian examination system was abolished in Korea in 1894, in China in 1905, and in Vietnam in 1919. This meant that conformity to Confucian ideology was no longer a prerequisite for a career in the civil service or politics, allowing persons of other ideologies (notably Nationalism and Socialism) to attain leading positions in society.[88]

Organisation and liturgy

[edit]
A Temple of the God of Culture (文庙; wénmiào) in Liuzhou, Guangxi, where Confucius is worshiped as 'God of Culture' (文帝; wéndì)
Temple of the Filial Blessing (孝佑宫; Xiàoyòugōng), an ancestral temple of a lineage church, in Wenzhou, Zhejiang

Since the 2000s, there has been a growing identification of the Chinese intellectual class with Confucianism.[89] In 2003, the Confucian intellectual Kang Xiaoguang published a manifesto in which he made four suggestions: Confucian education should enter official education at any level, from elementary to high school; the state should establish Confucianism as the state religion by law; Confucian religion should enter the daily life of ordinary people through standardisation and development of doctrines, rituals, organisations, churches and activity sites; the Confucian religion should be spread through non-governmental organisations.[89] Another modern proponent of the institutionalisation of Confucianism in a state church is Jiang Qing.[90]

In 2005, the Center for the Study of Confucian Religion was established,[89] and guoxue started to be implemented in public schools on all levels. Being well received by the population, even Confucian preachers have appeared on television since 2006.[89] The most enthusiastic New Confucians proclaim the uniqueness and superiority of Confucian Chinese culture, and have generated some popular sentiment against Western cultural influences in China.[89]

The idea of a "Confucian church" as the state religion of China has roots in the thought of Kang Youwei, an exponent of the early New Confucian search for a regeneration of the social relevance of Confucianism, at a time when it was de-institutionalised with the collapse of the Qing dynasty and the Chinese empire.[91] Kang modeled his ideal "Confucian Church" after European national Christian churches, as a hierarchic and centralised institution, closely bound to the state, with local church branches, devoted to the worship and the spread of the teachings of Confucius.[91]

In contemporary China, the Confucian revival has developed into various interwoven directions: the proliferation of Confucian schools or academies,[90] the resurgence of Confucian rites,[90] and the birth of new forms of Confucian activity on the popular level, such as the Confucian communities (社區儒學; shèqū rúxué). Some scholars also consider the reconstruction of lineage churches and their ancestral temples, as well as cults and temples of natural and national gods within broader Chinese traditional religion, as part of the renewal of Confucianism.[92]

Other forms of revival are salvationist folk religious movements[93] groups with a specifically Confucian focus, or Confucian churches, for example the Yīdān xuétáng (一耽學堂) of Beijing,[94] the Mèngmǔtáng (孟母堂) of Shanghai,[95] Confucian Shenism (also known as the "phoenix churches"),[96] the Confucian Fellowship (儒教道壇; Rújiào Dàotán) in northern Fujian which has spread rapidly over the years after its foundation,[96] and ancestral temples of the Kong kin (the lineage of the descendants of Confucius himself) operating as Confucian-teaching churches.[95]

Also, the Hong Kong Confucian Academy, one of the direct heirs of Kang Youwei's Confucian Church, has expanded its activities to the mainland, with the construction of statues of Confucius, Confucian hospitals, restoration of temples and other activities.[97] In 2009, Zhou Beichen founded another institution which inherits the idea of Kang Youwei's Confucian Church, the Holy Hall of Confucius (孔聖堂; Kǒngshèngtáng) in Shenzhen, affiliated with the Federation of Confucian Culture of Qufu City.[98][99] It was the first of a nationwide movement of congregations and civil organisations that was unified in 2015 in the Holy Confucian Church. The first spiritual leader of the church is the scholar Jiang Qing, the founder and manager of the Yangming Confucian Abode (陽明精舍; Yángmíng jīngshě), a Confucian academy in Guiyang, Guizhou.

Chinese folk religious temples and kinship ancestral shrines may, on peculiar occasions, choose Confucian liturgy (called ; or 正統 (zhèngtǒng; 'orthopraxy') led by Confucian ritual masters (禮生; lǐshēng) to worship the gods, instead of Taoist or popular ritual.[100] "Confucian businessmen" (儒商人; rúshāngrén, also "refined businessman") is a recently "rediscovered" concept defining people of the economic-entrepreneurial elite who recognise their social responsibility and therefore apply Confucian culture to their business.[101]

Confucianists historically tried to proselytize to others,[102] although this is rarely done in modern times. Given Confucianism's place of importance in historical Chinese governments, the argument has been made that Imperial China's wars were Confucianism's wars, but the connection between Confucianism and war is not so direct or simple.[103] Modern Confucianism is the descendant of movements that greatly changed how they practiced the teachings of Confucius and his disciples from previous orthodox teachings.[104]

Governance

[edit]
Statue of Liu Bei and Zhuge Liang, considered the ideal example of the loyalty, integrity and shared governance between a lord and minister in Chinese history[note 2]
Yushima Seidō in Bunkyō, Tokyo, Japan

子曰:為政以德,譬如北辰,居其所而眾星共之。
The Master said, "He who exercises government by means of his virtue may be compared to the north polar star, which keeps its place and all the stars turn towards it."

— Analects 2.1 (Legge translation).

A key Confucian concept is that in order to govern others one must first cultivate inner virtue to be a moral elite. When actual, the king's personal virtue (de) spreads beneficent influence throughout the kingdom. The authority of the ruler and the submission of its people are grounded on a spiritual-ethical foundation, rather than on coercive power.[105] Confucius' ideal of good government, is one led by a superior man (junzi), takes effective use of "culture and tradition", and relies less on law and punishment.[106]

When Confucius praised the sage-king Shun for his "non-action", the undertone is different from the Taoist wu wei that emphasizes a spontaneous reaction to allow the natural course of things. The Confucian non-action is conditioned by a solid moral base and compassion for the welfare of the people. The virtuous ruler's non-action is further supported by the officials he appoints—individuals of upright character and benevolence toward the common people.[107]

Mencius provided more concrete and specific measures in the making of a "good ruler". He advised that a good ruler must prioritize the people’s welfare by ensuring adequate food and shelter, implementing light taxation, and avoiding unnecessary warfare, as moral instructions can only follow after people's basic needs are satisfied.[108] He argued that rulers should govern by moral example—exhibiting sincerity, benevolence, and righteousness—so that subjects emulate virtuous conduct. [109]

The emperors of China were considered agents of Heaven, endowed with the Mandate of Heaven,[110] one of the most vital concepts in imperial-era political theory. According to the Confucian classics, the Mandate is not fated or absolute, it reacts to the wishes and interests of the people. While virtuous rulers keep the Mandate, wicked ruler would be abandoned by the Mandate.[111]

Confucianism, despite supporting the importance of obeying national authority, places this obedience under absolute moral principles that curbed the willful exercise of power, rather than being unconditional. Submission to authority was only taken within the context of the moral obligations that rulers had toward their subjects, in particular ren. Confucians—including the most pro-authoritarian scholars such as Xunzi—have always recognised the right of revolution against tyranny.[112]

Meritocracy

[edit]

子曰:有教無類。
The Master said: "In teaching, there should be no distinction of classes."

— Analects 15.39 (Legge translation).

Although Confucius claimed that he never invented anything but was only transmitting ancient knowledge (Analects 7.1), he did produce a number of new ideas. Many European and American admirers such as Voltaire and Herrlee G. Creel point to the revolutionary idea of replacing nobility of blood with nobility of virtue.[113] Junzi ('lord's son'), which originally signified the younger, non-inheriting, offspring of a noble, became, in Confucius's work, an epithet having much the same meaning and evolution as the English "gentleman".

A virtuous commoner who cultivates his qualities may be a "gentleman", while a shameless son of the king is only a "petty person". That Confucius admitted students of different classes as disciples is a clear demonstration that he fought against the feudal structures that defined pre-imperial Chinese society.[114][page needed]

Another new idea, that of meritocracy, led to the introduction of the imperial examination system in China. This system allowed anyone who passed an examination to become a government officer, a position which would bring wealth and honour to the whole family. The Chinese imperial examination system started in the Sui dynasty. Over the following centuries the system grew until finally almost anyone who wished to become an official had to prove his worth by passing a set of written government examinations.[115]

Confucian political meritocracy is not merely a historical phenomenon. The practice of meritocracy still exists across China and East Asia today, and a wide range of contemporary intellectuals—from Daniel Bell to Tongdong Bai, Joseph Chan, and Jiang Qing—defend political meritocracy as a viable alternative to liberal democracy.[116]

In Just Hierarchy, Daniel Bell and Wang Pei argue that hierarchies are inevitable.[117] Faced with ever-increasing complexity at scale, modern societies must build hierarchies to coordinate collective action and tackle long-term problems such as climate change. In this context, people need not—and should not—want to flatten hierarchies as much as possible. They ought to ask what makes political hierarchies just and use these criteria to decide the institutions that deserve preservation, those that require reform, and those that need radical transformation. They call this approach "progressive conservatism", a term that reflects the ambiguous place of the Confucian tradition within the Left-Right dichotomy.[117]: 8–21 

Bell and Wang propose two justifications for political hierarchies that do not depend on a "one person, one vote" system. First is raw efficiency, which may require centralized rule in the hands of the competent few. Second, and most important, is serving the interests of the people (and the common good more broadly).[117]: 66–93  In Against Political Equality, Tongdong Bai complements this account by using a proto-Rawlsian "political difference principle". Just as Rawls claims that economic inequality is justified so long as it benefits those at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder, so Bai argues that political inequality is justified so long as it benefits those materially worse off.[118]: 102–106 

Bell, Wang, and Bai all criticize liberal democracy to argue that government by the people may not be government for the people in any meaningful sense of the term. They argue that voters tend to act in irrational, tribal, short-termist ways; they are vulnerable to populism and struggle to account for the interests of future generations. In other words, at a minimum, democracy needs Confucian meritocratic checks.[118]: 32–47 

In The China Model, Bell argues that Confucian political meritocracy provides—and has provided—a blueprint for China's development.[119] For Bell, the ideal according to which China should reform itself (and has reformed itself) follows a simple structure: Aspiring rulers first pass hyper-selective examinations, then have to rule well at the local level to be promoted to positions as the provincial level, then have to excel at the provincial level to access positions at the national level, and so on.[119]: 151–179  This system aligns with what Harvard historian James Hankins calls "virtue politics", or the idea that institutions should be built to select the most competent and virtuous rulers—as opposed to institutions concerned first and foremost with limiting the power of rulers.[120]

While contemporary defenders of Confucian political meritocracy all accept this broad frame, they disagree with each other on three main questions: institutional design, the means by which meritocrats are promoted, and the compatibility of Confucian political meritocracy with liberalism.

Institutional design

[edit]

Bell and Wang favour a system in which officials at the local level are democratically elected and higher-level officials are promoted by peers.[117]: 66–93  As Bell puts it, he defends "democracy at the bottom, experimentation in the middle, and meritocracy at the top."[119]: 151–179  Bell and Wang argue that this combination conserves the main advantages of democracy—involving the people in public affairs at the local level, strengthening the legitimacy of the system, forcing some degree of direct accountability, etc.—while preserving the broader meritocratic character of the regime.

Jiang Qing, by contrast, imagines a tricameral government with one chamber selected by the people (the 庶民院; 'House of the Commoners'), one chamber composed of Confucian meritocrats selected via examination and gradual promotion (the 通儒院; 'House of Confucian Tradition'), and one body made up of descendants of Confucius himself (the 國體院; 'House of National Essence').[121] Jiang's aim is to construct a legitimacy that will go beyond what he sees as the atomistic, individualist, and utilitarian ethos of modern democracies and ground authority in something sacred and traditional. While Jiang's model is closer to an ideal theory than Bell's proposals, it represents a more traditionalist alternative.

Tongdong Bai presents an in-between solution by proposing a two-tiered bicameral system.[118]: 52–110  At the local level, as with Bell, Bai advocates Deweyan participatory democracy. At the national level, Bai proposes two chambers: one of meritocrats (selected by examination, by examination and promotion, from leaders in certain professional fields, etc.), and one of representatives elected by the people. While the lower house does not have any legislative power per se, it acts as a popular accountability mechanism by championing the people and putting pressure on the upper house. More generally, Bai argues that his model marries the best of meritocracy and democracy. Following Dewey's account of democracy as a way of life, he points to the participatory features of his local model: citizens still get to have a democratic lifestyle, participate in political affairs, and be educated as "democratic men". Similarly, the lower house allows citizens to be represented, have a voice in public affairs (albeit a weak one), and ensure accountability. Meanwhile, the meritocratic house preserves competence, statesmanship, and Confucian virtues.

Promotion system

[edit]

Defenders of Confucian political meritocracy generally champion a system in which rulers are selected on the basis of intellect, social skills, and virtue. Bell proposes a model wherein aspiring meritocrats take hyper-selective exams and prove themselves at the local levels of government before reaching the higher levels of government, where they hold more centralized power.[119]: 151–179  In his account, the exams select for intellect and other virtues—for instance, the ability to argue three different viewpoints on a contentious issue may indicate a certain degree of openness.[119]: 63–110  Tongdong Bai's approach incorporates different ways to select members of the meritocratic house, from exams to performance in various fields—business, science, administration, and so on. In every case, Confucian meritocrats draw on China's extensive history of meritocratic administration to outline the pros and cons of competing methods of selection.[118]: 67–97 

For those who, like Bell, defend a model in which performance at the local levels of government determines future promotion, an important question is how the system judges who "performs best". In other words, while examinations may ensure that early-career officials are competent and educated, how is it thereafter ensured that only those who rule well get promoted? The literature opposes those who prefer evaluation by peers to evaluation by superiors, with some thinkers including quasi-democratic selection mechanisms along the way. Bell and Wang favour a system in which officials at the local level are democratically elected and higher-level officials are promoted by peers.[117]: 84–106  Because they believe that promotion should depend upon peer evaluations only, Bell and Wang argue against transparency—i.e. the public should not know how officials are selected, since ordinary people are in no position to judge officials beyond the local level.[117]: 76–78  Others, like Jiang Qing, defend a model in which superiors decide who gets promoted; this method is in line with more traditionalist strands of Confucian political thought, which place a greater emphasis on strict hierarchies and epistemic paternalism—that is, the idea that older and more experienced people know more.[121]: 27–44 

Compatibility with liberalism and democracy, and critique of political meritocracy

[edit]

Another key question is whether Confucian political thought is compatible with liberalism. Tongdong Bai, for instance, argues that while Confucian political thought departs from the "one person, one vote" model, it can conserve many of the essential characteristics of liberalism, such as freedom of speech and individual rights.[118]: 97–110  In fact, both Daniel Bell and Tongdong Bai hold that Confucian political meritocracy can tackle challenges that liberalism wants to tackle, but cannot by itself. At the cultural level, for instance, Confucianism, its institutions, and its rituals offer bulwarks against atomization and individualism. At the political level, the non-democratic side of political meritocracy is—for Bell and Bai—more efficient at addressing long-term questions such as climate change, in part because the meritocrats do not have to worry about the whims of public opinion.[119]: 14–63 

Joseph Chan defends the compatibility of Confucianism with both liberalism and democracy. In his book Confucian Perfectionism, he argues that Confucians can embrace both democracy and liberalism on instrumental grounds; that is, while liberal democracy may not be valuable for its own sake, its institutions remain valuable—particularly when combined with a broadly Confucian culture—to serve Confucian ends and inculcate Confucian virtues.[122]

Other Confucians have criticized Confucian meritocrats like Bell for their rejection of democracy. For them, Confucianism does not have to be premised on the assumption that meritorious, virtuous political leadership is inherently incompatible with popular sovereignty, political equality and the right to political participation.[123] These thinkers accuse the meritocrats of overestimating the flaws of democracy, mistaking temporary flaws for permanent and inherent features, and underestimating the challenges that the construction of a true political meritocracy poses in practice—including those faced by contemporary China and Singapore.[124] Franz Mang claims that, when decoupled from democracy, meritocracy tends to deteriorate into an oppressive regime under putatively "meritorious" but actually "authoritarian" rulers; Mang accuses Bell's China model of being self-defeating, as—Mang claims—the CCP's authoritarian modes of engagement with the dissenting voices illustrate.[125] He Baogang and Mark Warren add that "meritocracy" should be understood as a concept describing a regime's character rather than its type, which is determined by distribution of political power—on their view, democratic institutions can be built which are meritocratic insofar as they favour competence.[126]

Roy Tseng, drawing on the New Confucians of the twentieth century, argues that Confucianism and liberal democracy can enter into a dialectical process, in which liberal rights and voting rights are rethought into resolutely modern, but nonetheless Confucian ways of life.[127] This synthesis, blending Confucians rituals and institutions with a broader liberal democratic frame, is distinct from both Western-style liberalism—which, for Tseng, suffers from excessive individualism and a lack of moral vision—and from traditional Confucianism—which, for Tseng, has historically suffered from rigid hierarchies and sclerotic elites. Against defenders of political meritocracy, Tseng claims that the fusion of Confucian and democratic institutions can conserve the best of both worlds, producing a more communal democracy which draws on a rich ethical tradition, addresses abuses of power, and combines popular accountability with a clear attention to the cultivation of virtue in elites.

Influence

[edit]

In 17th-century Europe

[edit]
Life and Works of Confucius, by Prospero Intorcetta, 1687

The works of Confucius were translated into European languages through the agency of Jesuit missionaries stationed in China.[note 3] Matteo Ricci was among the very earliest to report on the thoughts of Confucius, and father Prospero Intorcetta wrote about the life and works of Confucius in Latin in 1687.[128]

Translations of Confucian texts influenced European thinkers of the period,[129] particularly among the Deists and other philosophical groups of the Enlightenment who were interested by the integration of the system of morality of Confucius into Western civilization.[128][130]

Confucianism influenced the German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who was attracted to the philosophy because of its perceived similarity to his own. It is postulated that certain elements of Leibniz's philosophy, such as "simple substance" and "Pre-established harmony", were borrowed from his interactions with Confucianism.[129]

The French philosopher Voltaire, Leibniz's intellectual rival, was also influenced by Confucius, seeing the concept of Confucian rationalism as an alternative to Christian dogma.[131] He praised Confucian ethics and politics, portraying the sociopolitical hierarchy of China as a model for Europe:[131]

Confucius has no interest in falsehood; he did not pretend to be prophet; he claimed no inspiration; he taught no new religion; he used no delusions; flattered not the emperor under whom he lived ...

On Islamic thought

[edit]

From the late 17th century onwards a whole body of literature known as the Han Kitab developed amongst the Hui Muslims of China who infused Islamic thought with Confucianism. Especially the works of Liu Zhi such as Tianfang Dianli (天方典禮; Tiānfāng Diǎnlǐ) sought to harmonise Islam with not only Confucianism but also with Taoism and is considered to be one of the crowning achievements of the Chinese Islamic culture.[132]

In modern times

[edit]

Important military and political figures in modern Chinese history continued to be influenced by Confucianism, like the Muslim warlord Ma Fuxiang.[133] The New Life Movement in the early 20th century was also influenced by Confucianism.

Referred to variously as the Confucian hypothesis and as a debated component of the more all-encompassing Asian Development Model, there exists among political scientists and economists a theory that Confucianism plays a large latent role in the ostensibly non-Confucian cultures of modern-day East Asia, in the form of the rigorous work ethic it endowed those cultures with. These scholars have held that, if not for Confucianism's influence on these cultures, many of the people of the East Asia region would not have been able to modernise and industrialise as quickly as Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and even China have done.[citation needed]

For example, the impact of the Vietnam War on Vietnam was devastating, but over the last few decades Vietnam has been re-developing in a very fast pace. Most scholars attribute the origins of this idea to futurologist Herman Kahn's World Economic Development: 1979 and Beyond.[134]

Other studies, for example Cristobal Kay's Why East Asia Overtook Latin America: Agrarian Reform, Industrialization, and Development, have attributed the Asian growth to other factors, for example the character of agrarian reforms, "state-craft" (state capacity), and interaction between agriculture and industry.[135]

Historical and current Confucianists were and are often environmentalists[15] out of their respect for tian and the other aspects of nature and the "Principle" that comes from their unity and, more generally, harmony as a whole, which is "the basis for a sincere mind".[136]

On Chinese martial arts

[edit]

After Confucianism had become the official 'state religion' in China, its influence penetrated all walks of life and all streams of thought in Chinese society for the generations to come. This did not exclude martial arts culture. Though in his own day, Confucius had rejected the practice of Martial Arts (with the exception of Archery), he did serve under rulers who used military power extensively to achieve their goals. In later centuries, Confucianism heavily influenced many educated martial artists of great influence, such as Sun Lutang,[citation needed] especially from the 19th century onwards, when bare-handed martial arts in China became more widespread and had begun to more readily absorb philosophical influences from Confucianism, Buddhism and Daoism.

Criticism

[edit]

Confucius and Confucianism were opposed or criticised from the start, including Laozi's philosophy and Mozi's critique, and Legalists such as Han Fei ridiculed the idea that virtue would lead people to be orderly. In modern times, waves of opposition and vilification showed that Confucianism, instead of taking credit for the glories of Chinese civilisation, now had to take blame for its failures. The Taiping Rebellion described Confucianism sages as well as gods in Taoism and Buddhism as devils.

Contradiction with modernist values

[edit]

In the New Culture Movement, Lu Xun criticised Confucianism for shaping Chinese people into the condition they had reached by the late Qing dynasty: his criticisms are expressed metaphorically in the work "Diary of a Madman", in which traditional Chinese Confucian society is portrayed as feudalistic, hypocritical, socially cannibalistic, despotic, fostering a "slave mentality" favouring despotism, lack of critical thinking and blind obedience and worship of authority, fuelling a form of "Confucian authoritarianism" which persists into the present day.[137] Leftists during the Cultural Revolution described Confucius as the representative of the slave-owning class.[138]

In South Korea, there has long been criticism. Some South Koreans believe Confucianism has not contributed to the modernisation of South Korea. For example, South Korean writer Kim Kyong-il wrote a book in 1998 entitled "Confucius Must Die For the Nation to Live" (공자가 죽어야 나라가 산다, gongjaga jug-eoya naraga sanda). Kim said that filial piety is one-sided and blind, and if it continues, social problems will continue as government keeps forcing Confucian filial obligations onto families.[139]

Women in Confucian thought

[edit]

Confucianism "largely defined the mainstream discourse on gender in China from the Han dynasty onward."[140] The gender roles prescribed in the Three Obediences and Four Virtues became a cornerstone of the family, and thus, societal stability. The Three Obediences and Four Virtues is one of the moral standards for feudal etiquette to bind women.[141] Starting from the Han period, Confucians began to teach that a virtuous woman was supposed to follow the males in her family: the father before her marriage, the husband after she marries, and her sons in widowhood. In the later dynasties, more emphasis was placed on the virtue of chastity. The Song dynasty Confucian Cheng Yi stated that: "To starve to death is a small matter, but to lose one's chastity is a great matter."[142] It was during the Song dynasty that the value of chastity was so severe, Confucian scholars criminalized the remarriage of widows.[141] Widows were revered and memorialised during the Ming and Qing periods. The principle of chaste widowhood was made an official institution during the Ming dynasty. This "cult of chastity" accordingly condemned many widows to poverty and loneliness by placing a social stigma on remarriage.[140] Though the repercussions for widows at times went beyond poverty and loneliness, as for some the preservation of chastity resulted in suicide. The ideal of a chaste widow became an extremely high honor and esteem, especially for a woman who chose to end her life after her husband's death. Many instances of such acts were recorded in, Biographies of Virtuous Women, "a collection of stories of women who distinguished themselves by committing suicide after their husband’s deaths to guard their chastity and purity". Though it can be contested whether all these instances can be deemed self-sacrificing for the virtue of chastity, as it became common practice for women to be forced to commit suicide after their husband's death. This resulted from the honor which chaste widowhood garnered, lending itself to the husband's family as well as his clan or village.[141]

For years, many modern scholars have regarded Confucianism as a sexist, patriarchal ideology that was historically damaging to Chinese women.[141][143]: 15–16  It has also been argued by some Chinese and Western writers that the rise of neo-Confucianism during the Song dynasty had led to a decline of status of women.[142]: 10–12  Some critics have also accused the prominent Song neo-Confucian scholar Zhu Xi for believing in the inferiority of women and that men and women need to be kept strictly separate,[144] while Sima Guang also believed that women should remain indoors and not deal with the matters of men in the outside world.[142]: 24–25 [145] Finally, scholars have discussed the attitudes toward women in Confucian texts such as Analects. In a much-discussed passage, women are grouped together with 'small people' (小人), meaning people of low status or low morals) and described as being difficult to cultivate or deal with.[146] Many traditional commentators and modern scholars have debated over the precise meaning of the passage, and whether Confucius referred to all women or just certain groups of women.[147][148]

Further analysis suggests, however, that women's place in Confucian society may be more complex.[140] During the Han dynasty period, the influential Confucian text Lessons for Women was written by Ban Zhao (45–114 CE) to instruct her daughters how to be proper Confucian wives and mothers, that is, to be silent, hard-working, and compliant. She stresses the complementarity and equal importance of the male and female roles according to yin-yang theory, but she clearly accepts the dominance of the male. However, she does present education and literary power as important for women. In later dynasties, a number of women took advantage of the Confucian acknowledgment of education to become independent in thought.[140]

Joseph A. Adler points out that "Neo-Confucian writings do not necessarily reflect either the prevailing social practices or the scholars' own attitudes and practices in regard to actual women."[140] Matthew Sommers has also indicated that the Qing dynasty government began to realise the utopian nature of enforcing the "cult of chastity" and began to allow practices such as widow remarrying to stand.[149] Moreover, some Confucian texts like Dong Zhongshu's Luxuriant Dew of the Spring and Autumn Annals have passages that suggest a more equal relationship between a husband and his wife.[150] More recently, some scholars have also begun to discuss the viability of constructing a "Confucian feminism".[143]: 4, 149–160 

Catholic controversy over Chinese rites

[edit]

Ever since Europeans first encountered Confucianism, the issue of how Confucianism should be classified has been subject to debate. In the 16th and the 17th centuries, the earliest European arrivals in China, the Christian Jesuits, considered Confucianism to be an ethical system, not a religion, and one that was compatible with Christianity.[151] The Jesuits, including Matteo Ricci, saw Chinese rituals as "civil rituals" that could co-exist alongside the spiritual rituals of Catholicism.[151]

By the early 18th century, this initial portrayal was rejected by the Dominicans and Franciscans, creating a dispute among Catholics in East Asia that was known as the "Rites Controversy".[152] The Dominicans and Franciscans argued that Chinese ancestral worship was a form of idolatry that was contradictory to the tenets of Christianity. This view was reinforced by Pope Benedict XIV, who ordered a ban on Chinese rituals,[152] though this ban was re-assessed and repealed in 1939 by Pope Pius XII, provided that such traditions harmonize with the true and authentic spirit of the liturgy.[153]

Some critics view Confucianism as definitely pantheistic and nontheistic, in that it is not based on the belief in the supernatural or in a personal god existing separate from the temporal plane.[7][154] Confucius' views about tian and about the divine providence ruling the world, can be found above (in this page) and in Analects 6:26, 7:22, and 9:12, for example. On spirituality, Confucius said to Chi Lu, one of his students: "You are not yet able to serve men, how can you serve spirits?"[155] Attributes such as ancestor worship, ritual, and sacrifice were advocated by Confucius as necessary for social harmony; these attributes may be traced to the traditional Chinese folk religion.

Scholars recognise that classification ultimately depends on how one defines religion. Using stricter definitions of religion, Confucianism has been described as a moral science or philosophy.[156][157] But using a broader definition, such as Frederick Streng's characterisation of religion as "a means of ultimate transformation",[158] Confucianism could be described as a "sociopolitical doctrine having religious qualities".[154] With the latter definition, Confucianism is religious, even if non-theistic, in the sense that it "performs some of the basic psycho-social functions of full-fledged religions".[154]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Nylan, Michael (1 October 2008). The Five "Confucian" Classics. Yale University Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-300-13033-1. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
  2. ^ Yao 2000, pp. 38–47
  3. ^ Fingarette (1972), pp. 1–2.
  4. ^ a b c d Ivanhoe, Philip J.; Van Norden, Bryan W. (2005). Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. p. 2. ISBN 0-87220-781-1. OCLC 60826646.
  5. ^ a b c Tay (2010), p. 102.
  6. ^ a b Juergensmeyer, Mark (2005). Juergensmeyer, Mark (ed.). Religion in Global Civil Society. Oxford University Press. p. 70. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188356.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-518835-6. ... humanist philosophies such as Confucianism, which do not share a belief in divine law and do not exalt faithfulness to a higher law as a manifestation of divine will.
  7. ^ a b Adler (2014), p. 12.
  8. ^ Littlejohn (2010), pp. 34–36.
  9. ^ "Confucianism". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
  10. ^ "Confucianism". National Geographic Society. 20 May 2022. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
  11. ^ Adler (2014), pp. 10, 12
    • Quote, p. 10: "Confucianism is basically non-theistic. While tiān has some characteristics that overlap the category of deity, it is primarily an impersonal absolute, like dao and Brahman. "Deity" (theos, deus), on the other hand connotes something personal (he or she, not it)."
    • Quote, p. 12: "Confucianism deconstructs the sacred-profane dichotomy; it asserts that sacredness is to be found in, not behind or beyond, the ordinary activities of human life—and especially in human relationships. Human relationships are sacred in Confucianism because they are the expression of our moral nature (; xìng), which has a transcendent anchorage in Heaven (; tiān). Herbert Fingarette captured this essential feature of Confucianism in the title of his 1972 book, Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. To assume a dualistic relationship between sacred and profane and to use this as a criterion of religion is to beg the question of whether Confucianism can count as a religious tradition."
  12. ^ a b c Fung (2008), p. 163.
  13. ^ a b Lin, Justin Yifu (2012). Demystifying the Chinese Economy. Cambridge University Press. p. 107. ISBN 978-0-521-19180-7.
  14. ^ Kaplan, Robert D. (6 February 2015). "Asia's Rise Is Rooted in Confucian Values". The Wall Street Journal.
  15. ^ a b c Tucker, Mary Evelyn (1998). "Confucianism and Ecology: Potential and Limits". The Forum on Religion and Ecology at Yale. Yale University. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  16. ^
    • Benjamin Elman; John Duncan; Herman Ooms, eds. (2002). Rethinking Confucianism: Past and Present in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series. Los Angeles: UCLA Asia Pacific Center. ISBN 1883191076.[page needed]
    • Yu Yingshi (1996). Xiandai Ruxue Lun 現代儒學論 [Discourses on Modern Confucianism] (in Chinese). River Edge: Global Publishing. ISBN 9789813204232.
  17. ^ Billioud & Thoraval (2015), passim.
  18. ^ Fingarette (1972).
  19. ^ Yao (2000), p. 19.
  20. ^ a b Eno, Robert (1990). The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery (1st ed.). State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-0191-0.
  21. ^ Schaberg, David (1997). "Remonstrance in Eastern Zhou History". Early China. 22. Cambridge University Press: 130–179 at 138. doi:10.1017/S0362502800003266. JSTOR 23354245. S2CID 163038164.
  22. ^ Pines, Yuri (2005–2006). "Biases and Their Sources: Qin History in the "Shiji"". Oriens Extremus. 45. Harrassowitz Verlag: 10–34 at 30. JSTOR 24047638.
  23. ^ Nylan, Michael (2007). ""Empire" in the Classical Era in China (304 BC–AD 316)". Oriens Extremus. 46. Harrassowitz Verlag: 48–83. JSTOR 24047664.
  24. ^ Waring, Luke (2022). "Who said there was a Classic of Music?". Early China. 45. Cambridge University Press: 467–514. doi:10.1017/eac.2022.3.
  25. ^ Garrison, James (August 2012). "The Social Value of Ritual and Music in Classical Chinese Thought". Teorema. 31 (3): 209–222. JSTOR 43046966.
  26. ^ Yao (2000), pp. 52–54.
  27. ^ Tu Weiming (1990). "Confucian Tradition in Chinese History". In Ropp, Paul S.; Barrett, Timothy Hugh (eds.). The Heritage of China: Contemporary Perspectives on Chinese Civilization. University of California Press. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-520-06441-6.
  28. ^ Didier (2009), passim and p. 3, Vol. III, for the graphic interpretation of the character.
  29. ^ a b Adler (2014), p. 10.
  30. ^ a b c d e Tay (2010), p. 100.
  31. ^ Thoraval, Joël (2016). "Heaven, Earth, Sovereign, Ancestors, Masters: Some Remarks on the Politico-Religious in China Today". Occasional Papers. No. 5. Paris: Centre for Studies on China, Korea and Japan. Archived from the original on 16 January 2018.
  32. ^ Feuchtwang (2016), pp. 146–150.
  33. ^ Oxtoby, Willard Gurdon, ed. (2002). World Religions: Eastern Traditions (2nd ed.). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press. pp. 326, 393, 401. ISBN 0-19-541521-3. OCLC 46661540.
  34. ^ Didier (2009), p. 256, Vol. III.
  35. ^ Mair, Victor H. (2011). "Religious Formations and Intercultural Contacts in Early China". In Krech, Volkhard; Steinicke, Marion (eds.). Dynamics in the History of Religions between Asia and Europe: Encounters, Notions, and Comparative Perspectives. Leiden: Brill. pp. 85–110. doi:10.1163/9789004225350_005. ISBN 978-90-04-22535-0. pp. 97–98, note 26.
  36. ^ Didier (2009), p. 257, Vol. I.
  37. ^ a b Didier (2009), passim.
  38. ^ Reiter, Florian C. (2007). Purposes, Means and Convictions in Daoism: A Berlin Symposium. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 190. ISBN 978-3-447-05513-0.
  39. ^ Milburn, Olivia (2016). The Spring and Autumn Annals of Master Yan. Sinica Leidensia, vol. 128. Brill. p. 343, n. 17. doi:10.1163/9789004309661. ISBN 978-90-04-30966-1.
  40. ^ Assasi, Reza (2013). "Swastika: The Forgotten Constellation Representing the Chariot of Mithras". In Šprajc, Ivan; Pehani, Peter (eds.). Ancient Cosmologies and Modern Prophets: Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the European Society for Astronomy in Culture. Anthropological Notebooks (Supplement). Vol. XIX, no. 2. ISSN 1408-032X.
  41. ^ a b Hagen, Kurtis. "Confucian Key Terms – Tian 天". State University of New York at Plattsburgh. Archived from the original on 3 December 2014.
  42. ^ a b Littlejohn (2010), p. 35.
  43. ^ a b Hsu (2014).
  44. ^ Littlejohn (2010), pp. 35–36.
  45. ^ a b c d e f Feuchtwang (2016), p. 146.
  46. ^ a b Littlejohn (2010), p. 36.
  47. ^ a b Littlejohn (2010), p. 37.
  48. ^ Littlejohn (2010), pp. 36–37.
  49. ^ Shen & Shun (2007), pp. 278–279.
  50. ^ Chuarsa, Ira (14 November 2017). "The Invention of Indonesian Confucianism". Program Studi Agama dan Lintas Budaya Center for Religious and Cross-cultural Studies Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Gadjah Mada University. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
  51. ^ Dubs, Homer (1960). "Theism and Naturalism in Ancient Chinese Philosophy". Philosophy East and West. 9 (3–4). University of Hawaii Press: 163–172. doi:10.2307/1397096. JSTOR 1397096.
  52. ^ Stefon, Matt (2012). "Dao". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
    Wong, Pak-Hang (1 March 2012). "Dao, Harmony and Personhood: Towards a Confucian Ethics of Technology" (PDF). Philosophy & Technology. 25 (1): 68–71, 76–78, 80–81. doi:10.1007/s13347-011-0021-z. ISSN 2210-5441. S2CID 256085508 – via SpringerLink.
  53. ^ Jonathan Fuqua; Robert C. Koons, eds. (2023). "Searching for the Ineffable: Classical Theism and Eastern Thought about God". Classical Theism: New Essays on the Metaphysics of God. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-83688-2. OCLC 1353836889.
  54. ^ a b Runes, Dagobert D., ed. (1983). Dictionary of Philosophy. Philosophical Library. p. 338. ISBN 978-0-8022-2388-3.
  55. ^ Gardner 2014, p. 28.
  56. ^ Feuchtwang (2016), p. 150.
  57. ^ "Ba Yi". The Analects – via Chinese Text Project.
  58. ^ "Li Lou II". Mengzi – via Chinese Text Project.
  59. ^ "Liang Hui Wang xia" 梁惠王下. 孟子 (in Chinese and English) – via 中國哲學書電子化計劃 (ctext.org).
  60. ^ "Xian Wen" 憲問. 論語 (in Chinese and English) – via 中國哲學書電子化計劃 (ctext.org).
  61. ^ Example: Hai Rui in the Ming dynasty, Yuan Chang (official) in the Qing, and so forth.
  62. ^ Wang Yangming, Instructions for Practical Living and Other Neo-Confucian Writings by Wang Yang-Ming, Wing-tsit Chan tran. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1963), 159.
  63. ^ William Theodore De Bary, Waiting for the Dawn: A Plan for the Prince (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 91–110.
  64. ^ See the discussion in 何冠彪 He Guanbiao, 生與死 : 明季士大夫的抉擇 (Taipei: Lianjing Chuban Shiye Gongsi, 1997).
  65. ^ Wonsuk Chang; Leah Kalmanson (2010). Confucianism in Context: Classic Philosophy and Contemporary Issues, East Asia and Beyond. SUNY Press. p. 68. ISBN 978-1-4384-3191-8.
  66. ^ Baker, Hugh D.R. Chinese Family and Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979. p. 98
  67. ^ Sometimes "exemplary person." Roger T. Ames and Henry Rosemont, Jr., The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. Paul Goldin translates it "noble man" in an attempt to capture both its early political and later moral meaning. Cf. "Confucian Key Terms: Junzi Archived 20 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine."
  68. ^ Woo 2019, p. 291.
  69. ^ a b Woo 2019, p. 295.
  70. ^ Yang Tianshi (杨天石) (2005). "君子 – 儒学的理想人格" (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 18 April 2015.
  71. ^ Taylor, Rodney L.; Choy, Howard Y.F. (2004). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Confucianism. New York: Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 48–50. ISBN 978-0-8239-4079-0..
  72. ^ a b Pankenier (2013), p. 55.
  73. ^ Chen (2012), p. 105, note 45.
  74. ^ a b c Libbrecht (2007), p. 43.
  75. ^ Didier (2009), pp. 227–228, Vol. II.
  76. ^ Didier (2009), pp. 143–144, Vol. II.
  77. ^ Didier (2009), p. 103, Vol. II.
  78. ^ Pankenier (2013), pp. 138–148, "Chapter 4: Bringing Heaven Down to Earth".
  79. ^ Didier (2009), passim Vol. I.
  80. ^ Didier (2009), pp. xxxvi–xxxvii, Vol. I.
  81. ^ Didier (2009), pp. xxxvii–xxxviii, Vol. I.
  82. ^ Zhou (2012), p. 2.
  83. ^ Didier (2009), Vol. III, pp. 96–99.
  84. ^ Zhou (2012), p. 1.
  85. ^ Didier (2009), pp. xxxviii–xxxix, Vol. I.
  86. ^ Willard Gurdon Oxtoby, ed. (2002). World Religions: Eastern Traditions (2nd ed.). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press. pp. 169–170. ISBN 0-19-541521-3. OCLC 46661540.
  87. ^ Frankopan, Peter (March 2017). The Silk Roads: A New History of the World (First Vintage Books ed.). New York: Vintage Books. p. 32. ISBN 978-1-101-94633-6.
  88. ^ Liu, Haifeng (October 2007) [2006]. "Influence of China's imperial examinations on Japan, Korea and Vietnam". Frontiers of History in China. 2 (4). Translated by Yang Chunyan: 493–512. doi:10.1007/s11462-007-0025-5. Originally published in Xueshu Yuekan 学术月刊 [Academic Monthly] 2006 (12): 136–142.
  89. ^ a b c d e Yang, Fenggang (July 2007). "Cultural Dynamics in China: Today and in 2020" (PDF). Asia Policy (4): 48. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 September 2014.
  90. ^ a b c Chen (2012), p. 175.
  91. ^ a b Chen (2012), p. 174.
  92. ^ Fan & Chen (2015a), p. 7.
  93. ^ Billioud (2010), pp. 203–214.
  94. ^ Billioud (2010), p. 219.
  95. ^ a b Fan & Chen (2015), p. 29.
  96. ^ a b Fan & Chen (2015), p. 34.
  97. ^ Billioud & Thoraval (2015), p. 148.
  98. ^ Payette (2014).
  99. ^ Billioud & Thoraval (2015), pp. 152–156.
  100. ^ Clart (2003), pp. 3–5.
  101. ^ Billioud (2010), p. 204.
  102. ^ Bohan, Elise; Dinwiddie, Robert; Challoner, Jack; Stuart, Colin; Harvey, Derek; Wragg-Sykes, Rebecca; Chrisp, Peter; Hubbard, Ben; Parker, Phillip (February 2016). Big History. Foreword by David Christian (1st American ed.). New York: DK. p. 275. ISBN 978-1-4654-5443-0. OCLC 940282526.
  103. ^ Yao Fuchun (1 May 2011). "War and Confucianism". Asian Philosophy. 21 (2). Taylor & Francis: 213–226. doi:10.1080/09552367.2011.563996. ISSN 0955-2367. S2CID 145534064.
  104. ^ Harari, Yuval Noah (2015). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Translated by Harari, Yuval Noah; Purcell, John; Watzman, Haim. London: Penguin Random House UK. p. 391. ISBN 978-0-09-959008-8. OCLC 910498369.
  105. ^ Gardner 2014, pp. 33–34.
  106. ^ Gardner 2014, pp. 37–38.
  107. ^ Gardner 2014, pp. 39–40.
  108. ^ Gardner 2014, pp. 54–55.
  109. ^ Gardner 2014, p. 56.
  110. ^ "Tianming". Encyclopedia Britannica. 2008. Retrieved 28 April 2023.
  111. ^ Gardner 2014, pp. 44–46.
  112. ^ Wood, Alan Thomas (1995). Limits to Autocracy: From Sung Neo-Confucianism to a Doctrine of Political Rights. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 149–154. ISBN 0-8248-1703-6.
  113. ^ Creel, Herlee G. (1960). Confucius and the Chinese Way. New York: Harper & Brothers. ISBN 0-06-130063-2. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  114. ^ Chin, Annping (2008). Confucius: a Life of Thought and Politics. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-15118-3.
  115. ^ Bai, Tongdong (2012). China: The Political Philosophy of the Middle Kingdom. Zed Books. pp. 60–82. ISBN 978-1-78032-075-5.
  116. ^ Kim, Sungmoon (2020). "The challenge of Confucian political meritocracy: A critical introduction". Philosophy & Social Criticism. 46 (9): 1005–1016. doi:10.1177/0191453720948380. S2CID 225056920.
  117. ^ a b c d e f Daniel A. Bell; Wang Pei (2020). Just Hierarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  118. ^ a b c d e Bai, Tongdong (2019). Against Political Equality: The Confucian Case. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  119. ^ a b c d e f Daniel A. Bell (2016). The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 63–110, 151–179.
  120. ^ Hankins, James (2019). Virtue Politics: Soulcraft and Statecraft in Renaissance Italy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0-674-23755-1.
  121. ^ a b Jiang Qing (2013). A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China's Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691154602.
  122. ^ Joseph Chan, Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy For Modern Times (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013).
  123. ^ Kim, Sungmoon (2014). Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-04903-1.
  124. ^ Tan, Sor-hoon (2003). Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 0-7914-5889-X.
  125. ^ Mang, Franz (2020). "Political meritocracy and its betrayal" (PDF). Philosophy & Social Criticism. 46 (9): 1113–1126. doi:10.1177/0191453720948386. S2CID 225056766.
  126. ^ He Baogang; Warren, Mark (2020). "Can meritocracy replace democracy? A conceptual framework". Philosophy & Social Criticism. 46 (9): 1093–1112. doi:10.1177/0191453720948388. S2CID 225056621.
  127. ^ Tseng, Roy (2020). "Political meritocracy versus ethical democracy: The Confucian political ideal revisited". Philosophy & Social Criticism. 46 (9): 1033–1052. doi:10.1177/0191453720948398. S2CID 224941702.
  128. ^ a b "Windows into China," John Parker, p. 25, ISBN 0-89073-050-4
  129. ^ a b Mungello, David E. (1971). "Leibniz's Interpretation of Neo-Confucianism". Philosophy East and West. 21 (1). University of Hawaii Press: 3–22. doi:10.2307/1397760. JSTOR 1397760.
  130. ^ John M. Hobson (2004), The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation, Cambridge University Press, pp. 194–195, ISBN 0-521-54724-5
  131. ^ a b c Feng Lan (2005). Ezra Pound and Confucianism: Remaking Humanism In The Face of Modernity. University of Toronto Press. p. 190. ISBN 978-0-8020-8941-0.
  132. ^ Frankel, James (2009). "Uncontrived Concord: The Eclectic Sources and Syncretic Theories of Liu Zhi, a Chinese Muslim Scholar". Journal of Islamic Studies. 20 (1): 46–54. doi:10.1093/jis/etn062.
  133. ^ Stéphane A. Dudoignon; Hisao Komatsu; Yasushi Kosugi, eds. (2006). Intellectuals in the modern Islamic world: transmission, transformation, communication. London: Routledge. pp. 250, 375. ISBN 978-0-415-36835-3.
  134. ^ Hicks, George (1990), "Explaining the Success of the Four Little Dragons: A Survey", in Seiji Naya; Akira Takayama (eds.), Economic Development in East and Southeast Asia: Essays in Honor of Professor Shinichi Ichimura, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, and Honolulu: East-West Center, p. 25, ISBN 978-981-3035-63-8
    Hofstede, Geert; Harris Bond, Michael (1988). "The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth" (PDF). Organizational Dynamics. 16 (4): 124–5. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5. PMID 4640478. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 June 2013.
  135. ^ Kay, Cristóbal (2002). "Why East Asia overtook Latin America: Agrarian reform, industrialisation and development" (PDF). Third World Quarterly. 23 (6): 1073–1102. doi:10.1080/0143659022000036649. S2CID 154253600.
  136. ^ Wilson, Andrew, ed. (1995). World Scripture: A Comparative Anthology of Sacred Texts (1st paperback ed.). St. Paul: Paragon House Publishers. p. 19. ISBN 978-1-55778-723-1.
  137. ^ "The True Story of Lu Xun". ChinaFile. 23 November 2017 [1918]. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
  138. ^ "The evil life of Confucius". Reed University. 20 March 2005. Archived from the original on 21 January 2024. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  139. ^ 공자가 죽어야 나라가 산다고? – 시사저널. Sisapress.com. 23 September 1999. Retrieved 10 June 2012.
  140. ^ a b c d e Adler, Joseph A. (April 2005). "Daughter/Wife/Mother or Sage/Immortal/Bodhisattva? Women in the Teaching of Chinese Religions". ASIANetwork Exchange, vol. XIV, no. 2. Archived from the original on 20 March 2006. Retrieved 12 July 2010. (Pdf version archived January 30, 2024)
  141. ^ a b c d Gao Xiongya (2003). "Women Existing for Men: Confucianism and Social Injustice against Women in China". Race, Gender & Class. 10 (3): 114–125. ISSN 1082-8354. JSTOR 41675091.
  142. ^ a b c Patricia Buckley Ebrey (2002). Women and the Family in Chinese History. Routledge. pp. 10–12, 24–25. ISBN 978-0-415-28822-4.
  143. ^ a b Rosenlee, Li-Hsiang Lisa (2007). Confucianism and Women: A Philosophical Interpretation. State University of New York Press. pp. 4, 15–16, 149–160. ISBN 978-0-7914-6750-3.
  144. ^ Anders Hansson (1996). "The Chinese Status System". Chinese Outcasts: Discrimination and Emancipation in Late Imperial China. Brill. p. 46. doi:10.1163/9789004487963_005. ISBN 978-90-04-10596-6. S2CID 243925416.
  145. ^ Wang, Robin (2003). "Precepts for Family Life". Images of Women in Chinese Thought and Culture: Writings from the Pre-Qin Period to the Song Dynasty. Hackett Publishing. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-87220-651-9.
  146. ^ Lee Dian Rainey (2010). Confucius and Confucianism: The Essentials. John Wiley and Sons. p. 55. ISBN 978-1-4443-2360-3.
    Confucius. "Yang Huo no. 25" 陽貨. Analects 論語. Original text: 唯女子與小人爲難養也,近之則不孫,遠之則怨。
    Yuan Lijun (2005). Reconceiving Women's Equality in China: A Critical Examination of Models of Sex Equality. Lexington Books. pp. 5–6. ISBN 978-0-7391-1228-1.
  147. ^ Qiu Chong (邱崇) (December 2013). "Yi 'wei nü yu xiaoren wei nan yang ye'" 释 "唯女子与小人为难养也". Yuejiang Academic Journal. 6: 141–145. Archived from the original on 5 April 2018.
    The article points out the various disputes among traditional Confucian commentators on what the passage really means. It also summarizes the debate in contemporary academia regarding the phrase's meaning.
  148. ^ Liao Mingchun (廖名春) (2012). ""Wei nüzi yu xiaoren wei nan yang ye" liuzhu ji xinjie" “唯女子与小人为难养也”疏注及新解. Renwen Zazhi (人文雜志). No. 6. Retrieved 17 March 2023.
  149. ^ Sommers, Matthew (2000). Sex, Law and Society in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press. p. 319.
  150. ^ Dong Zhongshu (1988) [100s BC]. "Ji Yi" 基義. Chunqiu Fanlu 春秋繁露 (in Chinese) – via 中國哲學書電子化計劃.
  151. ^ a b Elman 2005, p. 112.
  152. ^ a b Gunn 2003, p. 108.
  153. ^ "Sacrosanctum concilium". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 17 March 2023.
  154. ^ a b c Yang 1961, p. 26.
  155. ^ Sinaiko 1998, p. 176.
  156. ^ "Centre for Confucian Science (Korea)". Archived from the original on 16 July 2009.
  157. ^ "Introduction to Confucianism". urantiabook.org.
  158. ^ Streng, Frederick, "Understanding Religious Life," 3rd ed. (1985), p. 2

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Confucianism is an ancient Chinese ethical and philosophical system attributed to the teachings of Confucius (551–479 BCE), a scholar who emphasized moral self-cultivation, social hierarchy, ritual propriety (li), and virtues such as benevolence (ren) and righteousness (yi) to achieve personal excellence and societal harmony. Confucius, born in the state of Lu during the Spring and Autumn period of the Zhou dynasty, traveled among feudal states offering counsel to rulers on governance through ethical leadership rather than coercion, compiling or editing key texts like the Five Classics (including the Book of Odes, Book of Documents, Book of Changes, Book of Rites, and Spring and Autumn Annals) that became foundational to later Confucian orthodoxy. His core ideas, preserved primarily in the Analects—a collection of sayings compiled by disciples—prioritize filial piety (xiao), loyalty, and reciprocal roles in family and state to foster order amid the era's political fragmentation. Though not originally a religion, Confucianism integrated with Chinese cosmology and ancestor veneration, evolving through Neo-Confucian syntheses in the Song dynasty (960–1279 CE) that incorporated metaphysical principles like li (principle) and qi (vital force) to counter Buddhism and Daoism, thereby reinforcing its role as state ideology from the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) onward. This institutionalization via civil service examinations based on Confucian classics enabled merit-based bureaucracy, contributing to imperial stability and administrative efficiency over two millennia. Confucianism's emphasis on education, hierarchy, and ethical governance extended its causal influence across East Asia, notably shaping Joseon Korea's bureaucratic elite, Japan's Tokugawa shogunate policies, and Vietnam's imperial exams, while empirical evidence links its cultural persistence to patterns of economic development and social cohesion in modern Sinosphere societies. Defining characteristics include a this-worldly focus on human agency over divine intervention, rejection of individualism in favor of relational ethics, and adaptability that allowed revival amid 20th-century challenges like Marxism, though critiques highlight its potential to entrench authoritarianism and gender roles absent egalitarian reforms.

Terminology and Foundational Texts

Etymology and Core Definitions

The English term "Confucianism" originated in the 16th and 17th centuries through Latinization by Jesuit missionaries, who rendered the Chinese honorific Kǒng Fūzǐ (孔夫子)—"Master Kong"—as Confucius, applying it to the broader tradition of his teachings and followers. This neologism reflected European efforts to categorize Chinese intellectual currents, though no equivalent unified label existed in classical Chinese texts, where adherents were simply termed (儒), denoting erudite scholars versed in ancient rituals, texts, and moral conduct. In modern Chinese, the tradition is designated Rújiā (儒家), literally "the scholarly school" or "lineage of the ," distinguishing it from other philosophical currents like Daoism or Legalism during the Warring States period (475–221 BCE). At its core, Confucianism constitutes an ethical, social, and political philosophy centered on the cultivation of personal virtue (, 德) to achieve societal order and harmony, rather than dogmatic theology or supernatural revelation. Its foundational tenets, drawn from sayings attributed to Confucius (551–479 BCE) and elaborated by disciples such as Mencius (c. 372–289 BCE), prioritize rén (仁, humaneness or benevolence) as the supreme virtue, manifesting through empathy, reciprocity, and fulfillment of relational duties. Complementary principles include (禮, ritual propriety and normative conduct), which structures human interactions to align with cosmic patterns, and (義, righteousness), guiding decisions toward moral rectitude over expediency. Unlike Abrahamic faiths, it posits no creator deity demanding worship; instead, tiān (天, Heaven) represents an impersonal moral order or natural mandate, responsive to human virtue yet not anthropomorphized. Confucianism's definitional scope extends beyond abstract to practical and , advocating rule by moral exemplars (jūnzǐ, 君子, "noble persons") who embody self-restraint and lead through influence rather than coercion. Historically, it evolved into a state orthodoxy under the (206 BCE–220 CE), integrating ritual practices like ancestor veneration and imperial sacrifices, which lent it quasi-religious dimensions without supplanting its humanistic focus. Scholarly interpretations vary, with some emphasizing its role as a civilizational ethic fostering and (xiào, 孝), while others highlight its adaptability, as seen in Neo-Confucian syntheses during the (960–1279 CE) that incorporated metaphysical elements from and Daoism. This framework underscores causal mechanisms of social stability: virtuous individuals beget harmonious families, which sustain ordered states, predicated on empirical observation of human relational dynamics rather than utopian ideals.

The Five Classics and Confucian Canon

The Five Classics, known as the Wujing (五經), comprise the foundational texts of the Confucian tradition, consisting of the Yijing (Book of Changes), Shujing (Book of Documents), Shijing (Book of Poetry), Liji (Book of Rites), and Chunqiu (Spring and Autumn Annals). These pre-Qin works, predating Confucius (551–479 BCE), were traditionally attributed to his editing and transmission, serving as repositories of ancient wisdom on cosmology, history, poetry, ritual, and moral governance. The Yijing, dating to the Western Zhou period (c. 1046–771 BCE), employs hexagrams for divination and philosophical inquiry into change and balance. The Shujing collects speeches and documents from the Xia, Shang, and early Zhou dynasties, emphasizing virtuous rule and historical precedent. The Shijing anthologizes 305 poems from 1000–600 BCE, illustrating social norms, emotions, and ethical ideals through verse. The Liji delineates rituals, social conduct, and ceremonial practices essential for harmony. The Chunqiu, a chronicle of Lu state events from 722–481 BCE, is interpreted through Confucian lenses for moral judgments on rulers and events. Originally part of a Six Classics set that included a lost Yuejing (Book of Music), the Five Classics were formalized as the imperial curriculum in 136 BCE under Emperor Wu of Han, who established academic chairs for their study to legitimize Confucian orthodoxy against competing schools like Legalism. This canonization integrated the texts into state ideology, influencing education, bureaucracy, and civil service examinations for over two millennia, with scholars required to master commentaries by figures like Zheng Xuan (127–200 CE). The broader Confucian canon, evolving into the Thirteen Classics by the Tang dynasty (618–907 CE), expanded the Five with additions like the Xiaojing (Classic of Filial Piety), Lunyu (Analects), and exegetical works, but retained the Wujing as its core for transmitting Zhou-era values of hierarchy, ritual propriety (li), and benevolence (ren). During the (960–1279 CE), Neo-Confucian reformers like (1130–1200 CE) prioritized over the expansive canon, yet the Five Classics persisted as scriptural authorities, underpinning interpretations of human nature and cosmic order. Their authority derived not from divine revelation but from empirical alignment with observed historical successes of sage-kings like Yao and Shun, as inferred from textual records, fostering a rationalist ethic over . Transmission faced disruptions, such as the Qin book burnings of 213 BCE, but oral traditions and rediscovered copies ensured survival, with Han-era reconstructions standardizing variants. In East Asian contexts, these texts shaped Korean and Japanese adaptations, as in the dynasty's (1392–1910) rigorous Wujing scholarship.

Philosophical Foundations

Tian, Divinity, and Cosmology

In classical Confucianism, (天), rendered as "," denotes the highest cosmic principle, an impersonal moral force that orders the through ethical patterns rather than anthropomorphic intervention. This concept, rooted in Shang inscriptions from the 13th–11th centuries BCE where signified the sky or supreme ancestral power, was reframed by the (c. 1046–256 BCE) as a dynamic ethical mandate legitimizing rule. (551–479 BCE), while not systematizing cosmology, invoked as the origin of virtue and destiny, as in 7.23: "Heaven is the author of the virtue that is in me." The Mandate of Heaven (Tianming), articulated by Zhou kings to justify overthrowing the Shang circa 1046 BCE, holds that legitimate sovereignty derives from Tian's approval, contingent on virtuous governance; tyranny manifests in omens like floods or uprisings signaling revoked mandate. Confucius echoed this by urging awe of Tianming, stating in Analects 16.8 that the gentleman fears "the Mandate of Heaven, great men, and the words of the sages." Such views position Tian as a naturalistic moral economy, responsive to human conduct yet beyond personal supplication, contrasting with theistic traditions. Confucius maintained distance from explicit divinity, prioritizing human ethics over supernatural speculation. In Analects 6.22, he counseled: "Respect the ghosts and spirits, but keep them at a distance; this may be called wisdom." Questioned on serving spirits (Analects 11.12), he replied: "You are not yet able to serve people—how could you be able to serve ghosts and spirits?" This pragmatic ritualism acknowledges ancestral and natural spirits for social cohesion—e.g., sacrifices "as if present" (Analects 3.12)—without affirming their independent agency or afterlife rewards, reflecting empirical caution amid Zhou-era . Early Confucian cosmology centers as the unifying pattern of change, evident in 17.19: "Does Heaven speak? Yet the four seasons run their course and all things are produced." This implies a self-regulating cosmos where human virtue aligns with natural rhythms, later elaborated through yin-yang polarity—dynamic opposites generating harmony—and the five phases (wuxing: wood, fire, earth, metal, water), depicting cyclical production (e.g., wood fuels fire) and conquest (e.g., water extinguishes fire) underlying moral and political stability. Though not emphasized by , these correlative schemes, drawn from Zhou ritual texts, underpin the triad of Heaven-Earth-Humanity, ensuring ethical order mirrors cosmic flux.

Human Nature, Moral Cultivation, and the Junzi

In Confucian thought, (xing) refers to the innate dispositions of individuals, which addressed sparingly but implied as initially similar across people, diverging primarily through and environment rather than fixed moral qualities. In the Analects (17.2), states that "by nature people are similar; they diverge through practice," suggesting a baseline potential for that requires external shaping rather than an inherently good or evil essence. This view avoids deterministic claims, emphasizing malleability through education and over innate moral polarity. The concept evolved through later Confucians, with Mencius (c. 372–289 BCE) positing that human nature is fundamentally good, rooted in innate "sprouts" (duan) of virtues such as benevolence (ren), righteousness (yi), propriety (li), and wisdom (zhi), which can be nurtured like seeds into full moral character. He illustrated this with examples like spontaneous compassion in witnessing a child's peril, arguing that moral failings arise from external obstructions like poverty or poor governance, not inherent flaws. In contrast, Xunzi (c. 310–235 BCE) contended that human nature is inherently "evil" or self-indulgent, driven by unchecked desires for profit, sensory pleasure, and dominance, which lead to conflict without intervention; goodness emerges solely from deliberate, artificial cultivation via rituals, laws, and education to transform raw impulses. These opposing positions—Mencius's optimism in innate potential versus Xunzi's realism about egoistic drives—framed subsequent debates, though both agreed on the necessity of active self-improvement over passive reliance on nature. Moral cultivation (xiushen) constitutes the core process for realizing ethical potential, portrayed in the Analects as a lifelong discipline involving study of classics, self-reflection, emulation of exemplars, and habitual practice of virtues to align personal conduct with cosmic and social order. Confucius advocated daily introspection—"examine yourself three times each day" (Analects 1.4)—combined with learning from antiquity and adapting rituals to foster inner transformation, warning that mere knowledge without action yields no virtue. This cultivation extends from familial duties, such as filial piety (xiao), which builds broader benevolence, to public roles, where rulers model restraint to inspire subjects (Analects 1.6). Xunzi elaborated this as rigorous habituation, likening it to straightening bent wood through repeated pressure, while Mencius stressed nurturing innate tendencies through righteous environments and reflective extension of empathy. Empirical emphasis lies on observable outcomes: cultivated individuals exhibit harmony in relationships and governance, verifiable through historical exemplars like sage-kings Yao and Shun. The junzi (exemplary person or noble one) embodies the fruition of moral cultivation, defined not by noble birth but by consistent virtue, self-mastery, and appropriate action amid changing circumstances, serving as a moral paragon who harmonizes personal integrity with social roles. Key traits include benevolence tempered with courage, reverence for propriety, diligence in learning, and magnanimity that prioritizes righteousness over personal gain, as Confucius described: the junzi "is at ease without arrogance, firm without harshness" (Analects 15.3). Unlike the xiaoren (petty person), who pursues expediency and fragments society, the junzi cultivates wholeness through rituals that curb desires and foster wisdom, ultimately aligning with tian (Heaven) by governing self and state with impartial equity. Attainment demands persistent effort, with Confucius noting even he progressed gradually from broad learning to focused application (Analects 15.28), underscoring that junzi status reflects achieved character, not bestowed status.

Ethical and Social Principles

Ren, Li, and the Cardinal Virtues

Ren (仁), translated as benevolence or humaneness, constitutes the foundational virtue in Confucian thought, embodying the ideal of altruistic concern for others rooted in self-mastery and moral empathy. In the Analects, Confucius equates ren with overcoming selfish impulses to align with propriety, as articulated in Book 12, where it is described as "restraining yourself and turning to the rites—this is ren." This virtue originates from innate human potential, predating Confucius but elevated by him as the essence of the junzi (exemplary person), who cultivates it through deliberate practice rather than mere instinct. Empirical analyses of early texts indicate ren's evolution from denoting aristocratic vigor to a universal ethical imperative, emphasizing relational harmony over abstract individualism. Li (禮), denoting ritual propriety or normative conduct, encompasses the structured practices, ceremonies, and social decorum that externalize inner virtues like ren, fostering communal order and distinguishing civilized s from mere animals. Confucius viewed li not as rigid formalism but as dynamic expressions of moral intent, warning against empty ritual devoid of sincerity, as in Analects 3.17: "If I am not enlightened in benevolence, how can I observe the rites?" Li integrates cosmic, ancestral, and interpersonal dimensions, with precedents in court rites serving as models for ethical governance and daily interactions. Scholarly reconstructions from pre-Qin sources confirm li's role in channeling human into socially productive forms, preventing chaos by prescribing roles and responses in hierarchical contexts. The interdependence of ren and li forms the ethical core, wherein ren supplies the substantive goodwill that animates li's forms; without ren, li devolves into superficiality, while unguided ren lacks direction for societal efficacy. Confucius prioritized their synthesis for personal rectification and political stability, as evidenced in dialogues where disciples seek ren through li observance. Extending this framework, the cardinal virtues—commonly ren (benevolence), yi (righteousness or justice, prioritizing moral duty over personal gain), li (propriety), and zhi (wisdom or discerning judgment)—represent interconnected excellences cultivated via reflection and habit. Primary texts like the highlight these as hallmarks of the junzi, with yi demanding resolute adherence to ethical principles amid temptation, and zhi enabling accurate moral perception. Some later Confucian compilations, drawing on Mencius, expand to five constant virtues by including xin (trustworthiness or fidelity), underscoring reliability in commitments as essential for relational bonds. These virtues derive from textual analysis of Confucius's teachings, not dogmatic imposition, with variations reflecting interpretive debates in Warring States commentaries rather than uniform doctrine.

The Five Relationships and Social Hierarchy

The Confucian doctrine of the wulun (five relationships) delineates the fundamental interpersonal bonds that structure society, emphasizing hierarchical roles and reciprocal obligations to foster harmony and moral order. These relationships, rooted in classical texts, prescribe duties wherein superiors exercise benevolence and inferiors respond with loyalty or deference, reflecting a causal view that proper role fulfillment prevents disorder akin to the (475–221 BCE). While not enumerated as a set in ' Analects, the framework emerges in ' teachings (c. 372–289 BCE), who derived it from earlier traditions like the , positing it as the foundation of benevolence (ren) and righteousness (yi). The five relationships are:
RelationshipSuperior's DutyInferior's Duty
Ruler and subjectBenevolence and righteous governanceLoyalty and dutiful service
Father and sonKindness and moral instruction and obedience
Husband and wife and Submission and inner management of household
Elder brother and younger brotherRespect and fraternal careDeference and emulation
Friend and friendTrust and mutual supportEquality in fidelity (non-hierarchical)
This schema, formalized in texts like the (Book of Rites, compiled c. 3rd century BCE–1st century CE), underscores inequality in four bonds to mirror natural distinctions in age, gender, and status, with the friend-friend relation as the sole horizontal tie promoting trust without dominance. The father-son relationship, through its emphasis on filial piety, promotes obedience to parents and extends to respect for teachers, who are analogized to parental figures, thereby establishing strong parental and teacher authority in East Asian societies including China, Korea, and Japan. argued these bonds, when observed, extend familial affection to the state, enabling stable rule without coercion. Social hierarchy in Confucianism derives from these relationships, positing a vertical order where each individual's position—determined by birth, merit, or role—imposes specific virtues and rituals (li) to regulate conduct and avert conflict. Superiors bear greater responsibility for welfare, as in the ruler's duty to emulate the sage-kings Yao and Shun (c. 23rd century BCE per tradition), while inferiors' compliance ensures reciprocity, not blind submission. This structure, evidenced in imperial exams from the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) onward, prioritized hierarchy over egalitarianism, viewing it as causally necessary for collective prosperity, as unchecked equality led to the feudal fragmentation pre-Qin. Critics in later traditions, like Legalists, contested its efficacy without punitive enforcement, but Confucian texts maintain it cultivates self-restraining junzi (exemplary persons).

Rectification of Names and Political Order

The doctrine of rectification of names, known as zhengming (正名), originates in Confucius's teachings as recorded in the Analects. In Analects 13.3, when queried on the essentials of governance, Confucius states that the first priority is to "rectify names," asserting that if names are not correct, "language is not in accordance with the truth of things." He elaborates that misalignment between names and reality disrupts practical affairs, undermines ritual propriety (li) and music, leads to misapplied punishments, erodes public trust, and results in societal chaos where "the people do not know where to set hand or foot." This principle posits that linguistic accuracy—particularly in designating social roles such as ruler, minister, father, and son—ensures behavioral conformity to inherent duties, thereby stabilizing hierarchy and order. In political application, zhengming demands that officeholders embody the substantive qualities their titles imply; a ruler who fails to rule virtuously forfeits legitimacy, as "the right name is given to the right thing" only when actions match designations. Confucius links this to effective administration, where rectified nomenclature enables clear instruction of the populace and prevents the arbitrary exercise of power that invites rebellion or decay. Scholarly analyses emphasize its causal role in Confucian statecraft: without rectification, ethical virtues like benevolence (ren) cannot propagate, as distorted roles foster deceit and factionalism rather than coordinated loyalty. For instance, if a "" neglects filial duties or a "minister" pursues personal gain over counsel, the five relationships—ruler-subject, father-son, husband-wife, elder-younger brother, and friend-friend—collapse, mirroring the Warring States' turmoil Confucius observed circa 500 BCE. This rectification extends beyond semantics to enforce causal accountability in governance, where nominal corrections precede institutional reforms; Confucius advised that once names align with , "things will of themselves advance." Later interpreters, such as Xunzi (circa 310–235 BCE), systematized zhengming as a tool for truth-aiming in policy, requiring rulers to classify phenomena accurately to avoid erroneous laws or edicts. Empirically, imperial applied this in bureaucratic oversight, where mismatched titles signaled corruption, as seen in (206 BCE–220 CE) edicts demanding officials match conduct to rank to avert dynastic decline. Critics from Legalist traditions, like (circa 280–233 BCE), dismissed it as idealistic, arguing coercive mechanisms better ensured order, yet Confucian persistence underscores its perceived efficacy in sustaining merit-based hierarchies over brute force.

Historical Development

Pre-Confucian Antecedents and Zhou Dynasty Roots

The ritual and religious practices of the Shang Dynasty (c. 1600–1046 BCE) provided foundational elements for subsequent Chinese traditions, including those central to Confucianism. Shang rulers conducted extensive divinations using oracle bones, inscribing questions on turtle shells or ox scapulae, heating them to produce cracks interpreted as responses from ancestors or high deities like Shangdi. These practices emphasized hierarchical communication with supernatural forces and reinforced social order through sacrificial rites to ancestors, establishing patterns of propriety and familial veneration that Confucius would later systematize. The (1046–256 BCE) built upon and transformed these antecedents following its conquest of the Shang at the circa 1046 BCE. Zhou propagandists introduced the (Tianming), asserting that ()—an impersonal cosmic force—granted rulership to morally exemplary leaders while withdrawing it from the tyrannical, as evidenced by natural disasters or social upheaval signaling divine disfavor. This doctrine, first articulated in texts like the Shujing (), shifted legitimacy from hereditary divine descent to ethical performance, laying groundwork for Confucian emphasis on virtuous governance over mere ritual form. Zhou adopted a feudal system, wherein the king enfeoffed kin and allies as lords over hereditary territories, creating a decentralized of reciprocal obligations mirroring extended family dynamics. This (feudal enfeoffment) arrangement, spanning from the Western Zhou capital at , promoted stability through bonds of loyalty, tribute, and military service, while the —regent for King Cheng—codified rituals (li) and administrative principles emphasizing liberality in rewards, moderation in policy, and shame as a social regulator. Such innovations prefigured Confucian ideals of hierarchical harmony and moral , with Zhou rituals serving not merely as ceremonies but as mechanisms for ethical order. Early Zhou texts, including odes and documents preserved in the Shijing and Shujing, documented virtues like and righteous rule, which Confucius revered as exemplars of ancient wisdom. By transmitting and refining these Zhou legacies, positioned his teachings as a restoration of , adapting pre-Confucian ritualism into a comprehensive ethical framework responsive to the dynasty's later fragmentation.

Confucius, Early Disciples, and Warring States Period

, whose personal name was Kong Qiu, was born in 551 BCE in , in the state of Lu (present-day Shandong Province, ), during the of the . Orphaned of his father at age three, he was raised in poverty by his mother and pursued self-education in the classics, rituals, and music, eventually serving minor administrative roles in Lu, including managing granaries and livestock by age 50. Disillusioned by political intrigue and the execution of a righteous minister in 500 BCE, he resigned from office and traveled for 14 years across states like , , Chen, and Cai, seeking rulers who would implement his vision of moral governance based on and propriety, though he found little success. Returning to Lu around 484 BCE, he devoted his later years to teaching until his death in 479 BCE at age 72. Confucius taught an estimated 3,000 students, with 72 or 77 considered direct disciples who mastered the rites, according to later compilations like the Shiji by , though these numbers reflect idealized traditions rather than precise records. Prominent early disciples included (Yan Yuan), his most favored pupil for moral insight but who died young in poverty at age 32, embodying ren (humaneness); Zilu (Zhong Yu), a bold warrior-disciple known for impetuous and roles; (Duanmu Ci), a skilled and merchant who advanced Confucian ideas through interstate missions; and Ran Qiu (Ran Yong), who facilitated Confucius's return to Lu and exemplified administrative competence. These disciples preserved his oral teachings in the (Lunyu), a concise collection of dialogues and aphorisms compiled posthumously, emphasizing , , and to restore social harmony amid feudal decline. Following Confucius's death, the Warring States period (c. 475–221 BCE) saw intensified interstate conflict among seven major powers, eroding Zhou ritual authority and fostering the Hundred Schools of Thought, where Confucianism competed with Mohism, Daoism, and Legalism for influence. Second-generation Confucians like Mencius (Mengzi, c. 372–289 BCE) systematized teachings, asserting innate human goodness (xing shan) that requires nurture and justifying tyrannicide if rulers failed benevolent rule, while itinerantly advising states like Qi and Liang. Xunzi (Xun Kuang, c. 310–235 BCE), active in Qi's Jixia Academy, diverged by viewing human nature as inherently self-interested and requiring strict li (ritual norms) and education for moral transformation, influencing Legalist policies under the Qin dynasty despite his ritual emphasis. These adaptations sustained Confucianism amid realpolitik, with disciples' commentaries on classics like the Odes and Documents laying groundwork for its later imperial orthodoxy, though it remained marginal until the Han era.

Imperial Adoption and Evolution (Han to Tang)

![Confucius, fresco from a Western Han tomb of Dongping County, Shandong province, China][float-right] In the Western Han dynasty, Confucianism was elevated to the status of official state ideology under Emperor Wu (r. 141–87 BCE), influenced by the scholar Dong Zhongshu (179–104 BCE), who advocated for its synthesis with cosmological concepts such as yin-yang and the five phases to legitimize imperial rule. In 136 BCE, Emperor Wu issued an edict dismissing scholars of non-Confucian schools from court, effectively establishing ru (Confucian) learning as the orthodox doctrine for governance and moral instruction. This shift marked a departure from earlier Legalist and proto-Daoist influences, positioning Confucian texts as the core curriculum for official selection. To institutionalize this adoption, Emperor Wu established the Taixue (Imperial University) in 124 BCE, initially enrolling around 1,000 students to study the Five Classics under state-appointed doctors (boshi), laying the groundwork for merit-based recruitment into the bureaucracy via recommendation systems like xiaolian (filial and incorrupt) and early examinations on Confucian knowledge. During the Eastern Han (25–220 CE), Confucianism further entrenched as the ideological foundation, with emperors sponsoring temple sacrifices to Confucius and expanding classical scholarship, though practical administration retained Legalist elements. Post-Han fragmentation into the , Jin, and Northern-Southern dynasties saw a temporary eclipse by Daoist metaphysics () and incoming , yet Confucian rituals and hierarchies persisted in elite education and state legitimacy. The (581–618 CE) revived Confucian orthodoxy amid unification efforts, with Emperor Wen reforming the examination system in 581 CE to prioritize mastery of the Nine Classics, standardizing candidate evaluation for bureaucratic posts. This momentum carried into the (618–907 CE), where Emperor Taizong (r. 626–649 CE) actively promoted Confucian principles in governance during the prosperous Zhenguan era, emphasizing ruler virtue, meritocratic appointments, and classical learning while expanding the keju (examination) quotas to include broader Confucian texts beyond and policy essays. Tang statecraft integrated Confucian with Buddhist and Daoist elements in a syncretic framework, but retained ru classics as the ideological core for , fostering a class despite aristocratic influences. By the mid-Tang, annotations like those in the Five Classics Justice (compiled under Emperor Xuanzong in 732 CE) reflected interpretive evolution, adapting Han-era exegesis to contemporary needs while upholding ethical and ritual primacy.

Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism and Institutionalization

emerged during the (960–1279) as a revitalization of Confucian thought, incorporating metaphysical elements from and Daoism while reasserting Confucian primacy over cosmology, human nature, and moral cultivation. Early proponents, including (1017–1073), who outlined a cosmological emphasizing the transition from the supreme ultimate (taiji) to yin-yang and the five phases, and Zhang Zai (1020–1077), who posited as the fundamental substance forming all things with an ethical imperative of "forming one body with heaven and earth," laid groundwork for a rationalist metaphysics. The Cheng brothers, Cheng Hao (1032–1085) and Cheng Yi (1033–1107), advanced techniques of reverential attention (jing) and investigation of things (gewu) to realize (li), critiquing Buddhist quietism and emphasizing active engagement in moral order. Zhu Xi (1130–1200) synthesized these into the Cheng-Zhu school, dominant in Southern Song (1127–1279), by distinguishing li as transcendent pattern from qi as material force, arguing that moral knowledge arises through exhaustive inquiry into principles in external things and the self. His commentaries on Analects, Mencius, Great Learning, and Doctrine of the Mean—reframed them as a coherent curriculum for , prioritizing rational investigation over intuitive insight. Though facing imperial bans in 1195 and 1197 for alleged , Zhu's framework gained traction post his death, influencing academies (shuyuan) that proliferated beyond state schools, fostering independent scholarship. In the (1368–1644), solidified as state orthodoxy, with Emperor Hongwu mandating Zhu Xi's interpretations in examinations from 1370, requiring candidates to master alongside the Five Classics. This shift elevated scholarly officials trained in Cheng-Zhu , embedding hierarchical ethics and merit-based bureaucracy into governance, while suppressing rival interpretations. Academies expanded, numbering over 1,000 by the late Ming, serving as centers for debate and moral training outside imperial oversight. Wang Yangming (1472–1529) challenged Cheng-Zhu emphasis on external investigation with the Lu-Wang school, asserting that principle resides innately in the mind-heart (xin), advocating innate knowledge (liangzhi) and the unity of knowledge and action—true understanding manifests in immediate ethical response. Influential among Ming officials and commoners, his teachings spurred heterodox movements but were marginalized in exams favoring Zhu's orthodoxy. By the (1644–1912), Cheng-Zhu remained exam standard until 1905, institutionalizing Neo-Confucian metaphysics as ideological foundation for imperial rule, though evidential scholarship (kaozheng) later critiqued its speculative elements.

Decline in Qing, Republican Suppression, and Maoist Era

During the late (1644–1912), Confucianism faced erosion as the dynasty grappled with Western imperialism and internal stagnation, culminating in the abolition of the imperial civil service examination system on September 2, 1905, by decree of the , which dismantled the cornerstone of Confucian and state orthodoxy that had selected officials based on mastery of the Confucian classics for over a millennium. This reform, intended to modernize education amid defeats in the (1839–1842 and 1856–1860) and the Sino-Japanese War (1894–1895), shifted emphasis toward Western sciences and military training, thereby severing the institutional link between Confucian scholarship and bureaucratic power, though ritual veneration of Confucius persisted in temples until the dynasty's fall in 1912. In the Republican era (1912–1949), intellectual movements explicitly targeted Confucianism as a barrier to national renewal, with the (1915–1921), led by figures such as and Hu Shi, denouncing it in publications like as feudal superstition responsible for China's "" and advocating "Mr. Science" and "Mr. Democracy" as antidotes. The May Fourth Incident of May 4, 1919, amplified this critique, associating Confucian hierarchy and rituals with and , prompting the Republican Ministry of Education in 1928 to abolish mandatory Confucian worship in schools and remove classical texts from curricula, replacing them with vernacular literature and modern subjects. While some warlords and conservatives maintained Confucian academies, the Nationalist government's 1934 attempt to revive elements via the under emphasized moral hygiene over doctrinal depth, reflecting a diluted rather than robust endorsement, as urban elites increasingly viewed traditional rites as incompatible with industrialization and republican ideals. Under Mao Zedong's rule (1949–1976), Confucianism underwent systematic suppression as part of broader anti-feudal campaigns, with the framing it as ideological residue justifying class exploitation and restorationist plots, evident in the destruction of over 6,600 Confucian temples during the (1966–1976) and the prohibition of ancestral rites under the 1950 , which outlawed and filial obligations conflicting with proletarian loyalty. The 1973–1974 "Criticize , Criticize " campaign, initiated by Mao after Lin's alleged 1971 coup attempt, equated Confucian benevolence (ren) with Lin's "feudal" authoritarianism, mobilizing mass criticism sessions that condemned as a defender of slave-owning aristocracy and extended attacks to Zhou Enlai's pragmatic policies, resulting in the desecration of Confucian sites like Temple and the exile or persecution of scholars. This era's policies, rooted in Mao's view of Confucianism as antithetical to , reduced public discourse on the tradition to near-zero, with private study persisting underground among rural elders but state surveillance enforcing ideological conformity.

Post-1978 Revival and Contemporary State Promotion

Following the economic reforms initiated by in , which marked the end of the Cultural Revolution's suppression of traditional , Confucianism experienced a gradual resurgence in . Scholarly interest revived amid the "culture fever," a period of intellectual reorientation seeking cultural anchors after Maoist , leading to renewed studies of Confucian and their application to modern . By the late 1970s and into the , elements of Confucian thought reemerged in , , and public discourse, with ordinary citizens engaging in practices like family rituals and moral . The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) increasingly endorsed this revival, integrating Confucian principles to foster social stability and . Numerous Confucian temples, damaged or neglected during the Mao era, underwent restoration starting in the reform period; for instance, the Confucius Temple in , originally built in 478 BCE and repeatedly rebuilt, received significant state-backed repairs to support and cultural preservation. Ancestral halls and wenmiao (temples of literature) across provinces like saw repurposing from political uses to devotional and communal functions post-1978, reflecting a shift toward economic and cultural utilization of tradition. This state-supported reconstruction aligned with broader efforts to reconstruct , positioning Confucianism as a civilizational heritage compatible with . Under Xi Jinping's leadership since 2012, the promotion of Confucianism has intensified as a tool for ideological consolidation and governance. Xi has invoked Confucian concepts such as "" (he) and "" (yi) to underpin policies like the "" of national rejuvenation, framing them as continuations of traditional ethics adapted to socialist core values. High-profile actions include Xi's 2013 visit to for sacrifices at the Confucius Temple and directives embedding Confucian education in schools to cultivate moral discipline and loyalty to the party-state. This "bureaucratized Confucianism" serves to legitimize CCP rule by associating it with historical imperial virtues, while subordinating the tradition to state control rather than independent religious revival. A key mechanism of global outreach has been the Confucius Institutes, non-profit entities funded by the Chinese government and established starting in to promote Mandarin language and cultural understanding. By the end of 2023, 496 institutes and 757 classrooms operated worldwide through partnerships with foreign institutions, peaking at over 500 centers by 2019 before facing closures abroad due to concerns over influence operations. Domestically, Confucian has expanded in guoxue (national studies) programs and community academies, emphasizing virtues like to counter perceived moral decay from rapid modernization. Critics, including some Western analysts, argue this promotion instrumentalizes Confucianism for and surveillance-aligned social engineering, such as through the echoing hierarchical duties, rather than fostering autonomous ethical inquiry. Despite such instrumentalization, empirical growth in participation—evidenced by rising temple attendance and adoptions—indicates genuine popular resonance amid economic uncertainties.

Practices and Institutions

Rituals, Liturgy, and Family Observances

In Confucianism, li (禮) encompasses the prescribed rituals, ceremonies, and norms of propriety that regulate human conduct to foster social harmony and moral order. These practices, detailed in classical texts such as the (Liji), extend from daily etiquette to elaborate ceremonial observances, emphasizing hierarchical relationships and communal stability. Family observances form the foundational layer of li, rooted in xiao (孝), the virtue of filial piety, which mandates children's respect, care, and obedience toward parents and elders during their lifetime, including deference to parental judgment and prioritization of family needs over personal desires. After death, xiao manifests through ancestor veneration, involving regular offerings at home altars, funeral rites, and mourning periods that reinforce lineage continuity and psychological reverence for forebears. Ancestor worship, the most enduring Confucian ritual, entails sacrificial offerings (jizu, 祭祖) to deceased kin, symbolizing communication with spirits believed to influence descendants' fortunes, conducted on altars in family homes or clan halls. These practices, predating Confucius but systematized in his teachings, include seasonal feasts, burning, and prostrations, with elaborate funerals featuring coffining, processions, and graded attire worn for up to three years by sons, as prescribed in the Liji. Key family milestones—birth announcements, capping ceremonies for boys at age 20 marking adulthood, weddings with ancestral bows, and capping for girls—integrate li to affirm roles within the patrilineal structure. Liturgical elements extend beyond the family to communal and state-sponsored rites, including sacrifices to in temples (wenmiao) and the "Three Sacrifices" (sanji, 三祭) honoring (tian), ancestors, and the sage himself, often performed biannually with feasts, music, and dances by officiants in robes. The Autumnal Sacrifice to , for instance, features pre-dawn offerings of meats, grains, and wines laid out precisely, followed by invocations seeking moral guidance, preserving li as a bridge between the living and exemplary figures. Such observances, while ritualistic, prioritize ethical intent over superstition, aligning with 's view of li as cultivating virtue through disciplined action.

Education, Examination Systems, and Scholar-Official Class

Confucianism regards education as the primary mechanism for moral self-cultivation and the formation of virtuous rulers and officials, with Confucius asserting in the Analects that study enables one to pursue an official career and that education should extend to all without discrimination based on social origin. This approach prioritized developing the junzi, an individual of ethical integrity capable of harmonious governance through mastery of ritual, propriety, and classical knowledge, rather than specialized technical skills. Imperial education systems revolved around Confucian academies and state-sponsored schools like the , established during the , where curricula emphasized rote memorization and interpretation of the Confucian to instill hierarchical values and administrative competence. Access was predominantly male, with female literacy rates around 10 percent compared to 40 percent for men, reflecting the system's focus on preparing scholars for bureaucratic roles over broad societal literacy. The keju imperial examination system operationalized Confucian education by merit-selecting officials, originating in prototypes in 605 CE, achieving formal structure in Tang, and standardizing into three tiers—prefectural, metropolitan, and palace exams—during from 960 CE, conducted every three years thereafter. Examinations tested proficiency in the and , poetry, historical analysis, and policy essays, evolving to the rigid eight-legged format in Ming-Qing eras to ensure orthodox Neo-Confucian adherence. Success quotas limited graduates, such as around 300-400 annually in later dynasties, linking scholarly achievement directly to state service. This mechanism produced the scholar-official (shenshi or gentry) class, transforming the ancient shi warrior-scholars into a non-hereditary elite of degree-holders (juren and jinshi) who staffed the bureaucracy, advised rulers, and upheld moral remonstrance per Confucian duty. Privileges included tax exemptions, corvée labor immunity, and protection from corporal punishment, enabling focus on governance, teaching, ritual conduct, tax collection, and dispute mediation at local levels. The system fostered limited social mobility for talented commoners but perpetuated inequality, as preparation demanded years of private tutoring often unaffordable without familial resources, sustaining a scholarly hierarchy until keju's 1905 abolition amid modernization pressures.

Governance and Political Theory

Confucian Statecraft and Ruler Responsibilities

In Confucian , the ruler's primary responsibility is to embody virtue as the foundation of effective , serving as a exemplar to inspire the people toward benevolence (ren) and propriety (li). Confucius emphasized that government by virtue surpasses coercive measures, stating in the Analects 2.3: "Guide them by edicts, regulate them by punishments, and the people will evade but lack shame; guide them by virtue, regulate them by ritual, and the people will have shame and reform." This approach posits that the ruler's personal cultivation of virtues like righteousness (yi) and wisdom (zhi) radiates outward, harmonizing society without the need for constant edicts, as "when the ruler is correct, his will is put into effect without the need for official orders." The concept of the (tianming) underpins the ruler's legitimacy, deriving from precedents but elaborated in Confucian thought to condition authority on virtuous rule and the people's welfare. A ruler retains divine sanction by honoring Heaven, ancestral spirits, and fulfilling duties to provide material security and moral guidance, but loses it through tyranny, corruption, or failure to alleviate suffering, justifying rebellion or dynastic change. extended this by asserting the people's inherent goodness and right to depose an inept sovereign, framing the ruler's role as paternal: ensuring through policies favoring over or warfare, minimizing taxation to prevent , and promoting to nurture talent. Statecraft thus demands the ruler appoint贤能 (xian), merit-based officials who advise candidly and reprove errors, fostering a bureaucracy aligned with ritual norms rather than familial . Responsibilities include suppressing vice through exemplary conduct, investing in for flood control and granaries against , and upholding the five relationships (ruler-subject, father-son, etc.) to maintain hierarchical order. Failure in these—such as excessive or moral laxity—invites heavenly disfavor, evidenced by omens like droughts or uprisings, as the ruler's directly correlates with cosmic and social stability. This system prioritizes long-term cultivation over short-term expediency, with the ruler's via study as a core duty to avert the that historically toppled regimes.

Meritocracy, Bureaucracy, and Anti-Egalitarian Hierarchy

Confucianism advocates meritocracy in governance through the selection of officials based on moral virtue (de) and practical ability (neng), rather than hereditary privilege or wealth. Confucius instructed that rulers should "raise up the straight and apply them to the crooked," prioritizing those who demonstrate ethical integrity and competence in administration. This principle aimed to ensure capable leadership capable of maintaining social order, as unqualified appointees based on kinship would lead to state decay. Mencius reinforced this by arguing that positions of authority should go to those who cultivate benevolence and righteousness, enabling effective rule over the people. The imperial examination system (keju) institutionalized Confucian meritocracy, beginning under the in 605 CE and reaching its zenith in the (960–1279 CE), where it expanded to include broader testing of classical knowledge and policy application. Candidates underwent rigorous multi-level exams focused on the Confucian canon, including the , , and Five Classics, with success granting entry into the class regardless of social origin in theory. By the (1368–1644 CE), the system was refined to emphasize Neo-Confucian orthodoxy, producing around 300–400 (advanced degree holders) triennially for high bureaucratic posts, though pass rates remained below 1% at the palace level, filtering for exceptional talent. This mechanism displaced aristocratic monopolies, fostering a professional that sustained imperial stability for over 1,300 years until its abolition in 1905. The Confucian bureaucracy formed a centralized administrative hierarchy staffed by these scholar-officials (shidaifu), who managed taxation, justice, and infrastructure across vast provinces while upholding ritual propriety (li) in decision-making. Numbering tens of thousands by the Song era, these officials operated under a nine-rank system, with promotions tied to performance evaluations (kaohe) every three years, blending merit with hierarchical oversight from the emperor. Their education in Confucian ethics instilled a duty to remonstrate against unjust policies, as seen in historical cases where officials risked demotion to critique imperial excess, thereby checking absolutism through moral suasion. This structure prioritized functional expertise over egalitarian rotation, enabling efficient governance in a pre-modern agrarian economy. Underlying this system is an anti-egalitarian view of as essential for cosmic and social harmony, rejecting blanket equality in favor of differentiated roles based on capacity, age, and . The five cardinal relationships (wulun)—ruler to subject (loyalty for benevolent rule), father to son ( for generational continuity), husband to wife (mutual respect within asymmetry), elder to younger ( for order), and (the sole reciprocal bond)—mandate unequal obligations where superiors guide and inferiors obey, preventing chaos from undifferentiated . and acknowledged natural variations in talents and moral endowments, with noting that while all share potential for , disparities in innate endowments justify stratified positions to maximize societal benefit. Empirical of Confucian states, spanning dynasties without the factional collapses common in egalitarian experiments, underscores the causal efficacy of such realism over abstract equality.

Compatibility with Modern Regimes and Critiques of Democracy

Confucianism has been adapted to underpin non-democratic regimes in contemporary , particularly in the and , where its emphasis on , , and social harmony aligns with or semi-authoritarian structures. In , since Xi Jinping's rise to power in 2012, the has actively promoted Confucian principles to bolster regime legitimacy, integrating them with socialist ideology to emphasize obedience to authority, familial duty, and collective stability over individual liberties or electoral competition. This revival includes state funding for Confucian temples, academies, and education programs, with Xi personally invoking Confucian concepts like "ren" (benevolence) and "li" (ritual propriety) in speeches to justify centralized rule and moral leadership by the Party elite. Such promotion serves to counter Western liberal influences, framing as culturally rooted in ancient wisdom rather than mere power consolidation. In , founding leader explicitly drew on Confucian ideals from the onward to construct a meritocratic, paternalistic system that prioritizes competent governance over populist democracy. Lee advocated "" rooted in Confucianism, including respect for authority, family-centric ethics, and anti-egalitarian hierarchy, which informed policies like rigorous exams and limited political pluralism under the People's Action Party's long-term dominance. This approach yielded sustained —Singapore's GDP rose from approximately $500 in 1965 to over $80,000 by 2023—attributed by proponents to Confucian-inspired and long-term planning, contrasting with the short-term electoral cycles of full democracies. Critics within Singaporean scholarship note, however, that this compatibility risks entrenching inequality, as favors inherited advantages despite formal equality of opportunity. Confucian political theory inherently critiques for undermining virtuous rule in favor of mass consent, positing that governance should rest with morally cultivated elites selected through rigorous examination and character assessment rather than . Traditional texts like the endorse rule by sage-kings who embody de (moral virtue), warning against "rule by the many" as prone to disorder, a view echoed in modern interpretations that enables unfit leaders via and factionalism. Philosopher , in his 2012 proposal for a "Confucian constitutional order," advocates a tricameral legislature—one chamber for meritocratic scholars via exams, one for cultural elites by lineage, and a limited popular house—to supplant one-person-one-vote, arguing it better ensures substantive justice over procedural equality. Similarly, contends that electoral 's flaws, such as pandering to short-term interests, necessitate "political " where leaders are chosen for ability and virtue, as in historical Chinese bureaucracies, rather than popularity. These critiques gain traction from empirical observations of democratic in diverse contexts, contrasted with the relative order in Confucian-influenced polities: Singapore's consistent rankings in indices (e.g., third in the 2023 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index) versus volatility in populous democracies like . Yet, Confucian adaptations face internal tensions, as historical imperial systems bred corruption despite meritocratic ideals, and modern implementations in have suppressed under the guise of , prompting debates on whether such compatibility truly advances human flourishing or merely sustains elite control. Proponents counter that democracy's egalitarian premise ignores natural inequalities in wisdom and capacity, favoring causal realism in selection over ideological fiat.

Influence and Legacy

Shaping East Asian Societies and Economies

Confucian emphasis on hierarchical relationships, encapsulated in the "three bonds" of over subject, over , and husband over wife, structured East Asian societies by prioritizing relational duties over individual autonomy, fostering social stability through defined roles and mutual obligations. This framework extended to family units, promoting extended households with multiple generations under one roof as the ideal, where reinforced intergenerational support and authority, as evidenced in historical Chinese practices persisting into modern demographics like South Korea's high elderly co-residence rates exceeding 30% in rural areas as of 2020. In education, Confucianism institutionalized merit-based advancement via imperial examinations from the (581–618 CE), selecting officials on scholarly competence rather than birth, which cultivated a class and widespread , with East Asian countries today maintaining top global rankings in scores—South at 519 in reading (2018)—attributable to cultural valorization of learning as a path to harmony and prosperity. Such systems embedded anti-egalitarian hierarchies, where competence justified authority, contrasting with Western and contributing to bureaucratic efficiency in imperial and modern states like . Economically, Confucian virtues of diligence, frugality, and perseverance underpinned the East Asian "," with post-World War II growth rates averaging 7-10% annually in , , , and from to 1990, linked by analysts to cultural traits like high savings rates—China's at 45% of GDP in —fostered by thrift as a rather than mere . Long-term orientation, scored highly in Hofstede's metrics for Confucian societies (e.g., at 87 vs. global 45), encouraged investment in and over short-term consumption, correlating with sustained and export-led industrialization, as seen in 's GDP rising from $158 in to $33,000 by 2020. While causality debates persist, empirical regressions show Confucian heritage positively associated with growth in non-democratic contexts, attributing stability to hierarchical over individualistic volatility.

Transmission to Europe, Islam, and Global Thought

Jesuit missionaries introduced Confucian texts to in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, primarily through translations and reports from . , an Italian Jesuit who arrived in in 1582 and entered in 1583, mastered and Confucian classics, collaborating with scholars to translate works like into Latin as Confucius Sinarum Philosophus (published posthumously in 1687). This accommodationist approach portrayed Confucianism as a rational, ethical system compatible with , emphasizing its focus on cultivation over . These transmissions shaped European intellectual discourse during the Enlightenment. , informed by Jesuit accounts, analyzed Confucian rites in his Discourse on the Natural Theology of the Chinese (1716), arguing that ancient Chinese practices demonstrated innate moral knowledge akin to European reason, and advocated binary arithmetic inspired by the . , drawing from the 1687 Latin edition, praised in essays and his Philosophical Dictionary (1764) as an exemplar of deistic virtue and , contrasting it favorably with biblical narratives and influencing critiques of absolutism by highlighting merit-based . Such views, disseminated via Jesuit letters and publications like the Lettres édifiantes et curieuses (1702–1776), positioned Confucianism as a model of , though later skepticism arose over alleged Jesuit fabrications. Transmission to the Islamic world occurred indirectly and on a limited scale, primarily through historical trade routes and cultural exchanges rather than systematic dissemination. During the (13th–14th centuries), Confucian administrative practices influenced Persian and Central Asian bureaucracies under rule, as seen in the adoption of merit examinations in regions like Yuan-dynasty interactions with Muslim elites, but without deep philosophical integration. In , Hui Muslim communities syncretized Confucian and ritual with Islamic tenets from the onward (1368–1644), producing texts like Liu Zhi's Tian Fang Dian Li (1706), which harmonized Confucian with Quranic principles, yet this remained localized assimilation rather than export to core Islamic thought. Scholarly comparisons, such as those on shared emphases in family and social harmony, emerged in modern analyses but lack evidence of formative influence on major Muslim thinkers like or . In global thought, Confucian principles contributed to broader philosophical dialogues beyond Europe and Islam, particularly in 19th–20th century reform movements. Japanese Meiji reformers (1868–1912) blended with Western ideas, exporting hybrid models to Asia; cited Confucian hierarchy in his (1905) as a basis for republican meritocracy. In the West, 20th-century thinkers like drew on Confucian aesthetics for , while economists attributed East Asian growth post-1960s to cultural residues of diligence and hierarchy, as in the World Bank's 1993 East Asia Miracle report linking Confucian to GDP surges (e.g., South Korea's 8–10% annual growth 1960–1990). These transmissions underscore Confucianism's adaptability, though causal claims of direct economic impact remain debated against institutional factors.

Modern Applications in China, Singapore, and Beyond

In contemporary , the under has actively promoted Confucianism as a complement to socialist since 2013, integrating its emphasis on , moral , and social harmony into state governance to bolster national unity and combat corruption. This revival includes the construction of over 1,300 Confucius Temples by 2020 and the incorporation of Confucian principles into the "core socialist values" curriculum in schools, aiming to foster ethical behavior amid rapid modernization. However, this promotion is state-orchestrated, serving as a tool for ideological control rather than an organic cultural resurgence, with Confucian rhetoric deployed to justify centralized authority and suppress dissent. In , former explicitly drew on Confucian ethics from the onward to underpin the city-state's developmental model, emphasizing , merit-based hierarchy, and communal discipline as antidotes to Western and social decay. The government instituted a mandatory "Religious Knowledge" program in secondary schools from 1984 to 1990, which included Confucian studies to instill values like respect for authority and academic excellence among the ethnic Chinese majority, contributing to Singapore's high rankings in global education metrics such as scores. This approach aligned with Lee's advocacy for "," which prioritized group harmony and paternalistic governance over , correlating with Singapore's sustained averaging 7% annually from 1965 to 1990. Critics, however, argue that this selective Confucianism justified authoritarian measures, though empirical stability—evidenced by low crime rates and political continuity—suggests causal efficacy in maintaining order. Beyond China and Singapore, Confucian principles influence and society in other East Asian contexts, such as and , where they underpin rigorous education systems and familial hierarchies that have driven economic miracles. In , Confucian veneration of scholarship persists in the hyper-competitive tutoring industry, with over 75% of students attending private cram schools by 2015, fostering high tertiary enrollment rates exceeding 70% and contributing to GDP per capita rising from $1,500 in 1970 to over $30,000 by 2020. similarly integrates Confucian rites into state ceremonies and education, emphasizing ren (benevolence) and li (ritual propriety) to sustain social cohesion amid . Globally, —advanced by thinkers like Tu Weiming—adapts classical tenets to modern challenges, advocating meritocratic over , though its political application remains limited outside . Institutes, established since 2004 to promote and culture, peaked at over 500 worldwide by 2019 but faced closures in the West due to concerns over , reducing U.S. sites from about 100 to under five by 2023. These efforts highlight Confucianism's adaptability for , yet their efficacy is tempered by perceptions of instrumentalization by .

Criticisms and Debates

Internal Philosophical Tensions and Historical Failures

One persistent internal tension in Confucian concerns the relationship between ren (benevolence or humaneness, emphasizing inner cultivation) and li (ritual propriety, focusing on external norms and social roles). Scholars have long debated whether ren is the foundational virtue from which li derives, rendering rituals mere expressions of authentic , or if li structures and enables ren, preventing benevolence from devolving into sentimentality without form. This ambiguity contributed to divergent interpretations, with some viewing overemphasis on li as fostering mechanical conformity devoid of genuine , while unchecked ren risked undermining hierarchical order. Another philosophical strain arises from conflicting views on human nature within the Confucian tradition. (c. 372–289 BCE) posited innate goodness in humans, requiring nurturing through to flourish, whereas Xunzi (c. 310–235 BCE) argued that human tendencies are inherently self-interested and disorderly, necessitating strict li to impose discipline and virtue. These positions created unresolved friction between optimistic moral perfectibility and pessimistic enforcement, complicating prescriptions for and personal . Additionally, the tradition's dual emphasis on conforming to ancestral rites and reforming through sage-like virtue generated ongoing debates about adaptation versus preservation, often paralyzing practical application. Historically, these tensions manifested in failures of implementation, beginning with himself (551–479 BCE), who, despite his teachings, could not restore moral order or gain lasting political influence during his 14-year wanderings across states, ultimately viewing his life's mission as a personal failure amid persistent warfare and ethical decay. In imperial , the Confucian examination system, formalized under the Sui (581–618 CE) and dominant by the (960–1279 CE), prioritized rote mastery of classics over empirical sciences or technical skills, fostering a scholar-official class ill-equipped for or economic innovation. This rigidity contributed to dynastic vulnerabilities, as seen in the Song's scholarly proliferation alongside atrophy, culminating in Mongol by 1279 CE, and the Ming's (1368–1644 CE) bureaucratic , which hampered adaptation to weaponry and enabled Manchu overthrow in 1644 CE. Max Weber's analysis (1915) highlighted how Confucianism's ethic of accommodation to the status quo—prioritizing harmonious adjustment over disruptive —impeded rational , as literati accommodated patrimonial rather than challenging it through systematic , contrasting with Europe's ascetic . The system's abolition in 1905 CE, following defeats in the (1839–1842 CE, 1856–1860 CE), underscored its role in China's technological lag, with exams symbolizing a ossified unable to counter Western encroachment. These failures stemmed causally from philosophical unresolvedness translating into policy dogmatism, where ritualistic suppressed adaptive reforms needed for survival against external pressures.

Gender Roles, Patriarchy, and Family Structure

Confucian teachings established a hierarchical family order rooted in the wulun (five cardinal relationships), which positioned the husband as superior to the wife, analogous to the ruler over subjects and father over sons. This framework, derived from texts like the Analects and elaborated in later Confucian commentaries, assigned men primary responsibility for external affairs, governance, and ritual duties, while confining women to domestic spheres focused on household management and moral cultivation. The Analects (17.25) reflects this gendered view, stating that "women and small-minded men are difficult to deal with," implying women's perceived emotional volatility necessitated male oversight. Central to female conduct were the "three obediences" (san cong)—obedience to the before , to the during , and to the eldest upon widowhood—and the "four virtues" (si de), encompassing moral character (de), proper speech (yan), modest demeanor (rong), and diligent labor (gong). These principles, systematized in texts such as Ban Zhao's Nüjie (c. 106 CE), prescribed women's lifelong subordination to male kin, prioritizing harmony through ritualized deference over individual . Education for women, when provided, emphasized texts like the Analects for Women by Song Ruozhao (c. ), reinforcing domestic virtues and filial duties rather than scholarly or public pursuits. Family structure under Confucianism was patrilineal and patriarchal, with descent traced through males to sustain ancestor worship and xiao (filial piety), which mandated children's absolute respect for parents, especially fathers. Extended kin groups resided patrilocally, granting the patriarch control over resources, marriages, and inheritance, as seen in historical practices from the onward where sons inherited property and daughters married into other families. This system prioritized male heirs, often leading to practices like among elites to ensure progeny, while widows faced social pressure to remain chaste or remarry under male relatives' authority. Enforcement through imperial codes and clan rules, such as those in Korea (1392–1910), extended these norms, linking family stability to state order via the metaphor of the family as a microcosm of society. Critics, particularly from modern egalitarian perspectives, contend that Confucian patriarchy entrenched by denying women legal , property , and political voice, as evidenced by historical restrictions on female literacy and mobility in imperial and Korea. Such views, prevalent in academic analyses influenced by feminist frameworks, highlight how these roles perpetuated subjugation, including customs like foot-binding (peaking 10th–19th centuries) tied to ideals of female docility. However, Confucian proponents argue the hierarchy promoted causal stability by aligning roles with biological differences in strength and temperament, fostering intergenerational continuity that underpinned East Asian societal resilience, as reflected in the longevity of dynasties like the Han (202 BCE–220 CE) following Confucian adoption. Empirical patterns in Confucian-influenced regions, such as historically low rates of familial dissolution compared to contemporaneous , suggest these structures mitigated social fragmentation, though data scarcity limits direct causation claims.

Conflicts with Egalitarianism, Individualism, and Modernity

Confucianism's hierarchical framework, rooted in the Five Relationships (wulun), posits inherent inequalities among individuals based on familial, social, and political roles, directly conflicting with egalitarian principles that demand equal treatment irrespective of status, ability, or virtue. In these relationships—ruler and subject, father and son, husband and wife, elder brother and younger brother, and friend and friend—the superior party holds authority to guide and correct the inferior, fostering order through differentiation (fen) rather than uniformity. This structure views equal distribution of power as counterproductive without corresponding moral virtue, arguing that it invites chaos from unchecked self-interest rather than merited governance. Confucian texts like the Analects prioritize role-based obligations over abstract equality, rendering modern egalitarian reforms—such as universal suffrage or affirmative policies—antithetical to its emphasis on aptitude-based hierarchy, where political equality applies only among those of similar capacities. The tradition's relational ontology further clashes with individualism, defining the self not as an autonomous agent but as embedded in interdependent networks where personal fulfillment derives from fulfilling duties to kin, superiors, and society. Self-cultivation (xiushen) aims at harmonizing one's role within the collective, subordinating individual desires to familial piety (xiao) and social harmony (he), in opposition to Western notions of inalienable rights or self-expression unbound by context. This collectivist orientation critiques individualism as atomizing, eroding the reciprocal bonds essential for stable communities, as evidenced in Confucian resistance to prioritizing personal autonomy over group obligations. While some interpreters detect individualistic elements in moral self-improvement, the core philosophy subordinates the individual to relational ethics, viewing unchecked personal liberty as a source of disorder rather than progress. These tensions extend to modernity's valorization of , secular rationalism, and egalitarian progress, which Confucianism counters with reverence for (li), ancestral tradition, and gradual reform under virtuous authority. Modernity's drive for equality and individual rights often demands dismantling structures, yet Confucian thought sees such upheavals as destabilizing, favoring continuity and moral exemplars over egalitarian experimentation. Historical implementations, such as imperial China's exams, integrated merit within hierarchy but resisted democratic leveling, highlighting ongoing frictions with liberal modernity's rejection of ascribed roles. In practice, Confucian-influenced societies have navigated these conflicts by adapting traditions selectively, yet philosophical purists maintain that full embrace of modern undermines the order necessary for enduring stability.

Leftist Critiques and Empirical Rebuttals from Stability Data

Leftist critiques of Confucianism often portray its hierarchical principles as antithetical to egalitarian ideals, arguing that virtues such as , respect for authority, and merit-based stratification reinforce class divisions and suppress proletarian agency. Marxist theorists, including during China's from 1966 to 1976, condemned as a proponent of feudal restoration, with the "Criticize and " campaign equating his doctrines with opposition to and revolutionary equality. These perspectives, prevalent in leftist scholarship, contend that Confucian emphasis on social harmony masks exploitation, prioritizing stability over redistribution and individual liberation, thereby perpetuating elite control akin to bourgeois ideology. Empirical evidence from Confucian-influenced East Asian societies counters these claims by highlighting superior social and political stability metrics, where hierarchical norms correlate with reduced disorder rather than oppression-induced volatility. , deeply shaped by Confucian values imported via , maintained homicide rates averaging 0.3 per 100,000 population from 1952 to 1990, far below contemporaneous U.S. rates exceeding 5 per 100,000, with cultural factors like group harmony and shame-based credited for curbing impulsivity and violence. Similarly, Singapore's Confucian-inspired governance under yielded one of the world's lowest overall crime rates—1.3 violent crimes per 100,000 in 2022—amid rapid , contrasting with higher in egalitarian Western models prone to riots and polarization. Economic stability data further rebuts predictions of stagnation under hierarchy: Confucian Asia's "economic miracle" featured sustained growth, with averaging 8.2% annual GDP expansion from 1962 to 1989, and 8.7%, driven by disciplined work ethics and long-term planning without the fiscal crises or plaguing socialist experiments elsewhere. China's post-1978 reforms, blending Marxist rhetoric with Confucian , achieved average 9.5% GDP growth from 1978 to 2018 while keeping homicide rates below 0.6 per 100,000—lower than many liberal democracies—suggesting that harmony-oriented values foster resilience against inequality-fueled unrest. These outcomes persist despite leftist-leaning academic narratives that attribute stability to state rather than cultural , as cross-national indices like the Bank's political stability rankings place Confucian polities higher than peers with flatter social structures.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.